I haven't seen too many of these type of propaganda posts that are pro-Covid restrictions in a while, but this one is making the rounds lately as a "cut & paste" on FB -

Yes, this is why I've [mostly] stopped arguing with people about the masks. They truly think they are doing the right thing and there's a definite dopamine hit from feeling virtuous about wearing the mask to "help others". There is also the feeling of being in a special club of do-gooders while defying the "crazy" anti-maskers. Plus there is a significant fear level driving their behavior - most mainstream headlines are still full of CASES, CASES, CASES. Never mind that daily deaths and hospitalizations have gone down. You'll never hear that.
 
I copied the thread you posted, and tidied it up a bit.
Back about 300 or 400 pages, a lot of this IS posted, but for posterity's sake, I think the following is rather tidy:
Thanks! I appreciate seeing it all laid out neatly, with graphics and even highlighter on the relevant passages. Makes it easy for someone like me whose eyes glaze over while trying to follow this medical stuff. I was wondering if anyone here is "specializing" in studying this aspect and if they think this is legit. I myself don't have any way to evaluate it at the moment.
 
This is an informative video by Ivor Cummins (fatemperor on Twitter):

He describes the particular curve pattern that the virus deaths follow, called a Gompertz curve, that is evident in all northern countries. Southern countries follow a different curve, which he shows later in the video.

I took a screen shot of one of his charts, below. It appears that lockdown and mask wearing has little to no impact on the curve.
Ivor Cummins 2020-09-08 Daily Confirmed Covid Deaths.jpg
 
Holy Moly - Patrice Evra is dropping absolute bombs on here.

For context, this is a retired French football player who plied his talents in England for Manchester United. Since his retirement he has become a bit of an influencer and is all about the good vibes. He's basically a celebrity and his bread is heavily buttered by the mainstream system!

Listen to this


Here's him as a player back in the day


Wow! Just wow! What will they do to him? What can they do to him?

One post and he has reached 7 million people.
 
Last edited:
CLAIM: Pharma giant Gilead sent death threats to French doctor for telling the world that hydroxychloroquine cures COVID-19
“The medical doctor behind the threats was found and happens to be from a Nantes university hospital,” these same reports add. “It happened to be the person who received the most money from Gilead over the past six years.”
CLAIM: Gilead has dark history of “bioterrorism,” used Pentagon to bomb competitor’s factory
As Great Game India reports, “Gilead Science has a dark history of allegations of bioterrorism, including having Pentagon to bomb a competitors factory under the false pretext of association with Al-Qaeda.”
 
CDC confident that their contradictions will not change the narrative even when pointed out:
Now, even the CDC itself has admitted that wearing cloth masks of the type it recommends for COVID are not effective for small particles. On August 30, the CDC posted a warning on this point to Facebook related to smoke.

“Cloth masks that are used to slow the spread of COVID-19 offer little protection against wildfire smoke,” the CDC said. “They do not catch small particles found in wildfire smoke that can harm your health.”

Writing for RedState, Scott Hounsell makes several good points about this CDC admission:

“Remember that ‘science’ that they always like to throw in the face of conservatives?” Hounsel writes. “Let’s take a quick look at this info through the lens of actual science. They just told us that smoke particulates are too small to be stopped by a cloth mask. While N95 masks will protect up to 95% of particles, down to .1 microns in size. A quick Google search will tell us that smoke particles and debris are usually .4 to .7 microns in size. According to the CDC, cloth masks are not effective in stopping materials that size.”

Hounsel continues:

Another quick Google search will tell us that the Wuhan Virus is .12 microns in size, about a quarter in size of the smoke and fire debris particulate. Even if we factor for the “respiratory droplets” that are allegedly to blame for the spread of coronavirus, those droplets are as small as .5 microns, or as small or smaller than smoke and fire debris particulate. These factors and figures aren’t hidden in some CDC vault that only their scientists are capable of accessing. Yet another quick Google search will show these figures within seconds.

The CDC cannot, on one hand, demand we wear masks because of the prevention of the spread of a disease (or droplets containing the disease) and then tell us that those same masks are ineffective in stopping particles that are bigger than the disease we are trying to prevent.

In the end, people who wish to wear masks of whatever type should feel free to do so. But mandates as favored by Democrat and RINO politicians are inappropriate and ineffective, as the CDC is now more or less admitting.

Because gaslighting works.
 
Scientists Discover Antibody That ‘Neutralizes’ Virus That Causes COVID-19: Report

University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine scientists have found “the smallest biological molecule” that “completely and specifically neutralizes” SARS-CoV-2, the virus that causes COVID-19.

The antibody is 10 times smaller than a full-sized antibody and has been used to create the drug Ab8, according to a report published by the researchers in the journal Cell on Monday. The researchers say the drug is a potential preventative treatment against SARS-CoV-2.
“Ab8 not only has potential as therapy for COVID-19, but it also could be used to keep people from getting SARS-CoV-2 infections,” said co-author John Mellors, chief of the Division of Infectious Diseases at Pitt and UPMC. “Antibodies of larger size have worked against other infectious diseases and have been well tolerated, giving us hope that it could be an effective treatment for patients with COVID-19 and for protection of those who have never had the infection and are not immune.”

The drug has been tested in mice and hamsters and has been shown to be “highly effective in preventing and treating” the SARS-CoV-2 infection, according to the report. Researchers also say the drug does not bind to human cells, which they say suggests there may not be adverse side effects in people.

Researchers are examining how the drug could be administered, saying it may be inhaled as an aerosol or delivered through a superficial injection.

Another team of researchers at the University of Texas Medical Branch Center for Biodefense and Emerging Diseases and Galveston National Laboratory tested Ab8 and found that the drug blocked the virus from entering cells. In trials, mice treated with Ab8 had 10-fold less of the amount of infectious virus compared to those untreated.

The development comes after the world’s largest clinical trial for a COVID-19 vaccine, being developed by drugmaker AstraZeneca, was put on hold.

“Our standard review process was triggered and we voluntarily paused vaccination to allow review of safety data by an independent committee,” the company said in a statement last week. “This is a routine action which has to happen whenever there is a potentially unexplained illness in one of the trials, while it is investigated, ensuring we maintain the integrity of the trials.”

“In large trials, illnesses will happen by chance but must be independently reviewed to check this carefully,” the statement said. “We are working to expedite the review of the single event to minimize any potential impact on the trial timeline. We are committed to the safety of our participants and the highest standards of conduct in our trials.”

The trial vaccine, jointly developed by pharmaceutical company AstraZeneca and scientists at the University of Oxford, was at the leading edge of an effort to develop a vaccine before the end of the year to fight the SARS-CoV-2 virus.

Health news site STAT said the vaccine’s Phase 3 trial was put on hold after a “suspected serious adverse reaction” to the drug in one participant in Britain. “While the vaccine developers haven’t revealed the details of the potential adverse reaction, the company has downplayed fears, highlighting that trial suspension is a standard process, and can be triggered by a single medical event,” STAT notes. The individual in question is expected to recover, the site reported.

And the race is on! The Big Money is literally on the Vaccine.
 
It's on Sott - a big move in the right direction:
U.S. Federal Judge Strikes Down Pennsylvania’s COVID Mandates as Unconstitutional

A federal judge ruled on Monday that Pennsylvania Gov. Tom Wolf’s and Secretary of Health Rachel Levine’s coronavirus orders, which shut down the state, closed businesses and limited gatherings, were unconstitutional.

U.S. District Judge William Stickman IV agreed with the plaintiffs claim that Wolf’s business shutdown and stay-at-home orders violated certain constitutional rights.

The plaintiffs include Butler, Fayette, Greene and Washington counties, four Republican lawmakers and several small businesses in those counties.

Stickman said in his opinion that COVID-19 orders from Wolf and Pennsylvania Secretary of Health Rachel Levine violated and continue to violate the First Amendment right to freedom of assembly and the due process and equal protection clauses of the 14th Amendment.

Stickman wrote that he believes Wolf and state Secretary of Health Rachel Levine:
“undertook their actions in a well-intentioned effort to protect Pennsylvania from the virus. However, good intentions toward a laudable end are not alone enough to uphold governmental action against a constitutional challenge.”
Stickman also wrote that the government engaged in a dangerous strategy where rights were taken away.
“In an emergency, even a vigilant public may let down its guard over its constitutional liberties only to find that liberties, once relinquished, are hard to recoup and the restrictions … may persist long after immediate danger has passed.”
Link to Sott article:

Hopefully, these rulings bode well for the case against Ohio's governor. Believe I read, though, that the PA ruling doesn't effect mask mandate and some other CV-19 measures. Ohio's suit is going for the whole ball of wax - Jon Rappoport reports [emphasis mine]:
Major Case Filed Against Governor And The State of Ohio For Restricting Freedom Without Legitimate Justification

By Jon Rappoport

Ohio attorney, Thomas Renz, on behalf of plaintiffs, has filed a case against the state of Ohio and Governor Mike DeWine. Renz is asking for a jury trial.

(Press release posted here; plaintiff’s document submitted to the court posted here)

This case, in the current climate, should provoke intense interest from the public, and from every lawyer within hailing distance.

Here is the impressive opening salvo in the court filing:
In recent months, entire states have been imprisoned without due process and with the clear threat to impose such lockdowns again, interstate travel has been severely restricted, privacy rights have been devastated, numerous business takings without compensation, and many regulations being implemented without statutory process requirements under the guise of a health emergency that is roughly as dangerous as a seasonal influenza outbreak. The plaintiffs in this case have all been injured in various capacities by these unconstitutional actions, and without action by the Court, will be left without redress. More terrifying, without action by the Court, the Court will be setting future precedent that will allow states to withhold fundamental Constitutional rights, in violation of US Supreme Court precedent, circumventing the various levels of scrutiny applied to such rights, and justify such actions under public health emergency orders without subjecting those orders to any real review—just trust the bureaucrats because they are the experts.
Here is the most important point:
We humbly ask the Court in this case to…Recognize that the political process and operative orders are invalid if based on false or misleading information… and recognize the criticality that all future emergency orders be based and maintained on clear, honest facts—particularly when such orders are infringing on Constitutional rights.
In other words, a declared State of Emergency cannot stand on the mere basis of arbitrary edict.

Facts matter. Actual science matters. Reasons why an Emergency is declared matter.

People can’t be locked down and restrained from earning a living and having contact with other humans simply because a state authority decides to issue such orders.

If this case goes to trial, the door will open to the presentation of fact and science.

Attorney Renz, for the plaintiffs, is well aware of this, and his filing is studded with bold and accurate claims of fact:
According to recent data from the Ohio COVID-19 Dashboard, we can see that the ‘spike’ in cases is actually just a spike in testing. The State went from a few thousand tests per day to 25,000 tests plus per day. The positivity rate for COVID-19 has remained fairly steady but there have been more tests.
When the Emergency was declared we heard a daily drumbeat about the danger and deaths related to COVID-19. Now that the case fatality rate has been shown to be roughly the same as the yearly flu…those [death] numbers are simply not scary to the public. As a result, the State sees no impact from talking about fatalities and has instead begun testing more so they could tell us there are more cases.
The PCR tests are generally viewed as the means of determining if a patient has COVID-19. The problem is that the inventor of the PCR test, who won a Nobel Prize in chemistry for the invention, specifically stated that the test was not well-suited to and never designed to diagnose disease. Much has been made about this in the press and elsewhere but the reason there are issues with PCR testing in relation to COVID is that PCR testing cannot detect how much of a virus exists in a person. Exposure of the existence of incomplete traces of a virus do not mean a person is infected with a disease [,] which is part of the reason the PCR tests have an elevated rate of false positives.
…there is not even a true standard for testing…Instead we have numerous tests from numerous vendors that may or may not have a similar standard for what it means to ‘have’ COVID-19. The CDC, governor, and ODH [Ohio Department of Health] know this so they have allowed for the diagnosis of cases based on as meaningless criteria as a cough in a community in which COVID supposedly exists.
Plow through this quote and then receive the translation below:
Another document also came to light that is critical in demonstrating the egregiously misleading nature of the public COVID-19 data. On the final paragraph of page 39 of a document published by the FDA regarding instructions for a COVID-19 test is the following quote: ‘Since no quantified virus isolates of the 2019-nCoV are currently available, assays designed for detection of the 2019-nCoV RNA were tested with characterized stocks of in vitro transcribed full length RNA (N gene; GenBank accession: MN908947.2) of known titer (RNA copies/μL) spiked into a diluent consisting of a suspension of human A549 cells and viral transport medium (VTM) to mimic clinical specimen’.
In plain English this means that there are no available pure 2019-nCOVvirus isolates to test against so instead an educated best guess is being used. The question this leads us to is how accurate can a test be for a virus that has not been defined…? If our freedoms are to be abridged under an emergency declaration related to a disease, should it not be a requirement that the disease at least be defined?

As you can see, this case is being argued not only on Constitutional grounds, but on major and deep issues of science. The plaintiffs are not accepting “the Word from the experts.”

There is no reason why they, or anyone, should surrender and accept.

In Ohio, a bright light is shining in the darkness.

Damn straight! :thup:

Looks like neighboring state Kentucky is also contending with lawsuits:

Ky. high court sets schedule for suit against Beshear’s executive orders

And Gov. DeWine's newest health director quit after just one day:
Ohio ‘health director’ hired, quit without exchanging a word in writing with state

Dr. Joan Duwve accepted, and then rejected, the job as director of the Ohio Department of Health without exchanging written correspondence with the office of Gov. Mike DeWine or the health agency.
[...]

The Ohio native, South Carolina’s public health director since April, informed DeWine she was withdrawing as Ohio health director within hours of the governor announcing her appointment Thursday.

Duwve subsequently said she quit before officially starting because she was concerned about harassment of Dr. Amy Acton, who quit as Ohio health director amid sometimes-armed protests that targeted her home in Bexley out of objection to her public health orders. “My family is off limits,” Duwve said.

The records provided by the governor’s office show Duwve neither accepted nor withdrew from the Ohio job in writing.

More pushback:
Interim health chief sued over school mask mandate

More than two dozen parents have sued Ohio’s interim health director over the state’s mask mandate for children in schools.

A complaint, filed last week in Putnam County Common Pleas Court, argues a state-imposed mask requirement infringes on parents’ religious beliefs and ability to rear their children as they wish. Attorneys for the parents, which include a Cincinnati-area mom, also say mask mandates have become a political issue, and forcing children to wear masks is forcing them to make a political statement.

“Plaintiffs dissent from this view, yet are being compelled to participate, and have their children participate in the state’s symbolic endorsement of panic over process,” the complaint reads.

Ohio Department of Health Interim Director Lance Himes signed an order requiring face coverings in educational settings serving children in kindergarten through 12th grade on Aug. 13. The order contained several exemptions, including one for students with a disability, mental health condition or medical condition. Another exemption allows students to forgo face coverings if they conflict with “an established sincerely held religious requirement.”

One of the parents, Jennifer Miller of Leipsic in Putnam County, attempted to use that exemption but was denied. The district said Miller’s objection was not based on an “established” requirement, according to the complaint.

Lee Strang, a plaintiff and constitutional law professor at the University of Toledo, said that’s not the standard.

“We have the school board acting like a church court — your (belief) is OK and yours isn’t good enough,” Strang told the Cincinnati Enquirer.

Strang decided to join the lawsuit because he thinks his son, a first-grader, and other children will be harmed by wearing masks all day. Strang said young children won’t be able to keep masks clean and he’s concerned about emotional and psychological effects of wearing masks all day. For example, phonics are typically taught by modeling the teacher making sounds.

Attorneys also argue a mask mandate violates students’ privacy — the order “erodes or destroys” their personality, identity and public projection of self and conceals their identities to others.

The lawsuit is the latest challenge to Gov. Mike DeWine’s efforts to slow the spread of the novel coronavirus. The state health department and DeWine were sued over rules for restaurants, amusement parks, gyms, arcade games and concerts.

A Warren County judge allowed several sports events to move forward in early August, despite a state order banning competitions between two teams. In several cases, the judge ruled against the state just before the businesses were allowed to reopen. Others are still pending.

The lawsuits generally challenge the director’s authority to issue orders to prevent the spread of contagious or infectious diseases, granted under a century-old law. They also allege the orders have violated various constitutional rights.

Another mask mandate lawsuit was filed last month by two parents in Muskingum County. The school district and local health commissioner have asked the court to dismiss the case.

Read the complaint here.

Meanwhile, Buckeye/Big Ten football continues to be an issue:
Wait continues, and clues emerge, as Big Ten debates whether to play football this fall

On Aug. 19, embattled Big Ten commissioner Kevin Warren said the conference’s decision eight days earlier not to play fall sports would not be revisited.

Whatever decision the Big Ten makes, that declaration proved untrue. The conference has spent the past few days discussing whether to return.

A decision could be at hand. The Milwaukee Journal Sentinel reported that sources said a proposal has been approved for the league to play its 2020 season this fall.

The Journal Sentinel reported that the latest proposal submitted to the Big Ten’s Council of Presidents and Chancellors featured an Oct. 17 kickoff. Each team would play eight games in a nine-week window, with the league title game tentatively set for Dec. 19.

That should allow a Big Ten representative to compete for a spot in the four-team College Football Playoff field. That field is scheduled to be revealed Dec. 20.

Earlier Tuesday University of Nebraska president Ted Carter was caught on a hot microphone Tuesday by an Omaha television station saying, “We’re getting ready to announce the Huskers and Big Ten football tonight.”

On CSPAN3 during a virtual Senate hearing on the name, image and likeness issue, Tim Kaine (D-Va.) asked Wisconsin chancellor Rebecca Blank about the Big Ten’s decision not to play. She said it was based mostly on the challenges posed by COVID-19 testing and contact tracing as well as concerns about myocarditis.

“Until we have answers to that, we will keep our season postponed,” Blank said. “Once we have answers to that and to some of those issues and think that we have ways to deal with them effectively, we will try to plan a delayed season.”

Kaine then asked Blank about a possible change of heart by the Big Ten.

“I’m not going to speak to that,” Blank said. “You’re going to have to let the Big Ten make that announcement when and if such a decision is made. When such a decision happens, the first question should be, ‘What’s changed?’ Hopefully, we will have answers to exactly the issues that I just raised.”

Asked if any vote would be unanimous, she replied, “I can’t say what the vote is going to look like. Decisions within the Big Ten are largely majority-based decisions, but I’ll be honest, we almost always decide everything by consensus. We very rarely take votes.”

After eight Nebraska players filed a lawsuit against the Big Ten after its August decision, the conference said it did take a vote and it was 11-3 against playing. Ohio State, Nebraska and Iowa provided the dissenting votes.

Even after Warren’s statement on Aug. 19, opponents of the decision, including players, parents and some coaches, kept pushing for a reversal. Ohio State’s parents had a rally Aug. 23 in the rotunda at Ohio Stadium that drew about 200 fans. Buckeyes coach Ryan Day released a statement last Thursday criticizing the Big Ten’s lack of communication and arguing that a season starting in mid-October remained feasible.

Advances in COVID-19 testing also aided the cause. The Pac-12, which also voted Aug. 11 not to play this fall, reached a deal with a rapid-response COVID testing company to provide tests. Ohio State team physician Dr. James Borchers made a presentation to the task force’s steering committee about safety, presumably including the risk of myocarditis, that was reportedly effective.

The college football season began in earnest last week with teams from two other Power Five conferences – the Big 12 and Atlantic Coast Conference – opening play. Teams from the Southeastern Conference begin playing next week.

Ohio State, which was ranked No. 2 behind Clemson in the major preseason polls, was not included in this week’s rankings.

Now the wait continues to see whether Ohio State and other Big Ten teams will have a chance to get back on the field.

And news regarding myocarditis:
Ohio State discovers new way to identify heart inflammation in athletes with COVID
Protocols recommend a clinical examination, an ultrasound, an electrocardiogram and a blood test to help diagnose myocarditis in athletes who contracted the coronavirus. The Ohio State study used all of methods as well as CMR imaging, which was found to be successful in spotting myocardial inflammation that was not picked up by the other methods.

A new Ohio State University study shows that a cardiac MRI can identify myocarditis, or inflammation of the heart muscle, in athletes.

The test could help determine when athletes diagnosed with COVID-19 can safely return to playing sports, the university said.

Researchers at Ohio State’s Wexner Medical Center examined 26 male and female college athletes from across the Midwest who tested positive for COVID-19, looking for signs of myocarditis, a rare disease that can cause heart failure and sudden cardiac death.

Existing protocols recommend a clinical examination, an ultrasound, an electrocardiogram and a blood test to help diagnose myocarditis in athletes before they are allowed to return to competitive play.
[...]

“We were able to differentiate those who had evidence of myocardial inflammation — and therefore myocarditis — from those who did not, and the MRI became the tool that did that with the highest sensitivity,” said Dr. Curt Daniels, co-author of the study, a cardiologist and professor at Ohio State Wexner Medical Center.

Myocarditis causes about 75 deaths per year in young athletes between the ages of 13 and 25, usually without warning, according to the Myocarditis Foundation. It is typically caused by a viral infection that occurs in young adults, and often affects males more than females.

Myocarditis has been seen in patients who have recovered from COVID-19. Twelve athletes studied by the Ohio State researchers reported mild symptoms of COVID-19 and the rest were asymptomatic.

Full story:
 
On a roll:
Dead Lives Matter
By Bill Sardi
September 15, 2020

The spread of the COVID-19 coronavirus is not a pandemic, it is the biggest crime in human history, since Cain killed Abel and reduced the human population by a quarter. And there is no world police force to stop this ongoing felony. At least not yet.

The intentional spread of a man-mutated coronavirus has a covert objective – – to involve the entire world in an exercise through panic and fear to “cultivate a sense of global community.” It is what the globalists call the Great Reset.

The usual suspects are behind it – – the U.N., the International Monetary Fund, the CIA, Mastercard, Microsoft, bankers, billionaire oligarchs and many billion-dollar corporations, who seek to rule the world economically via a global currency, using mind control and fear, and something called transhumanism where the human mind is melded with AI (automated intelligence). Corporations dare not enter this worldwide scheme or be frozen out.

Ruthlessness

The globalists will let nothing stand in the way of their objectives, to eradicate borders, erase history and culture, antiquate and replace religion via technology (immortality via AI), eliminate free enterprise, and destroy the economies of the world and individual livelihoods in order to coerce the world to beg for relief, for vaccines and a global currency, via a single world governance led by arrogant unelected elites whose godless technocratic, transhuman world view will be forced on 7.8 billion souls, or else you or your kids will be taken to quarantine camps.

So quickly the fear of God has been replaced by the instilled fear of COVID. What is so unexpected is the almost universal voluntary compliance with this out-in-the-open overthrow of modern society operating under the banner of equality. The masses have largely volunteered to comply.

Fooled by the equity card

Now the poorest people in the world will have an equity card that will give them use of a digital currency that is equal in value to all other world currencies.

Take a gander at the value of various world currencies: the

Indian rupee: worth 1.3-cents
Japanese yen – 9/10ths of a penny
Argentine peso 1.3-cents
Mexican peso 4.6-cents
Kuwaiti dinar $3.26;
Chinese renminbi 14.6-cents.

These currency values are determined on a floating rate by demand. Low demand = low value. If a buyer wants to purchase $100 US dollars of pencils from Mexico that would equal 2,133.4 pesos. The differences in these values are called exchange rates.

Currently the world uses the US dollar as the exchange rate for all foreign transactions, making the US dollar by practice the most in demand.

In the name of financial equality, the Constitution was trashed

With a global currency every currency would be equal. The value of the US dollar would decline in foreign trade. Imported goods would cost more. With the new global currency everybody will be playing with the same money value. Sounds great, doesn’t it?

Then international companies can do business without having to convert currencies into dollars and a guy in India can directly buy something made in Canada without having to do a wire transfer.

Robotics will be ushered in

As robotics takes over, a guaranteed income will likely follow, since that is the way to totally control the world. But then Gross Domestic Product is a measure of welfare, not productivity. People will learn not to work or just pretend to work. The AI-driven robots will do all the repetitive work cheaper than any human labor. Then the US doesn’t need to export its jobs to China any longer. But robots only make unemployment worse, not better.

Generational naivety

The generation of people who are most attracted to this scheme, particularly the poor who can only hope a lottery ticket will bring them out of poverty, never heard Sir Winston Churchill say this:

“The inherent vice of capitalism is the unequal sharing of its blessings; the inherent virtue of socialism is the equal sharing of misery.”

It was Ronald Reagan in 1967 who said at his inaugural address: “Freedom is a fragile thing and is never more than one generation away from extinction.”

Parents in America naively sent their high school graduates to universities that teach Marxist socialism. Bernie Sanders became their hero, their only hope. Young students can’t see they have been groomed.

Now there will be no hope of rising up out of poverty. You won’t be abjectly poor, your overseers will provide subsistence, but no freedom, no opportunity. You become a slave, never an entrepreneur. The US Constitution will soon be considered a relic.

When TV does the thinking for people

The world is so slow to catch on. That is because the conscience of the world, the script by which mankind operates, is being provided by the news media. It is the global news media that is filling in the blanks for the confused, the global news media that ridicules those who resist vaccination, that does the bidding for the banksters who are at the center of this confusion.

By social distancing, wearing masks, locking down indoors, the populations of the world will feel the “same connectedness,” so we are told.

People don’t know what to think of this. It is beyond their comprehension. They let the TV news reporters do the thinking for them. It’s about a virus, right? No!

Burning down the political opposition

No one can imagine the fires that were lit in rural Australia and California were targeted to burn down the political opposition and drive human populations into metropolises where their minds are more easily controlled.

Some say these fires were started by directed energy weapons. The complete devastation of the burned homes in these fires without burnt surroundings was unusual. Fires burned the California forest in swathes, like an aimed weapon. California is broke. Unlike countries that can print more money, states cannot. Fires force insurance companies to release funds to rebuild, raising employment and property values.

Turn the masses against each other

Turning humans against each other by exploiting racial divides keeps the masses from mounting a push-back against the real instigators of this crime – – the intelligentsia in Europe and the billionaire oligarchs that operate above the law and agencies within US government as well as NGOs (non-government orgs) like the UN that wants to bring down democracy and free enterprise, agencies that despise free market competition, a platform that ironically earned oligarchs billions.

When kickbacks become taxes

Then politicians say they will over-tax the mega-wealthy and no one will catch on that the billionaires now have a legal way to kickback to government via taxes and control legislatures. A kickback has now become a tax.

The elites want to solidify their dominance

The world will be run on their terms – – the bankers, oligarchs, NGOs.

The super wealthy families meet at Davos and the Bilderberg meeting so they can obtain advance information how to maintain their wealth and abolish any competitive threat to their dominance. They have learned to create the future rather than letting it happen.

The elites want to solidify their dominance

The world will be run on their terms – – the bankers, oligarchs, NGOs.

The super wealthy families meet at Davos and the Bilderberg meeting so they can obtain advance information how to maintain their wealth and abolish any competitive threat to their dominance. They have learned to create the future rather than letting it happen.

Now 90% of the wealth in the world is owned by a few. Now they want to create their own reality, and cull part of the world’s population in doing that, particularly the 80+year-olds who are such a drain in medical and retirement costs that life insurance companies actuaries want to eliminate. We must die on time. Forget longevity pills. They are not good for the life insurance business.

No middle class

The way to subdue the world is to impoverish it. There can be no middle class. Then offer the masses a little bit of security in the form of a guaranteed income, delivered by a digital currency that is individually transported in a currency card.

If all of this is so advantageous, why is it covertly being ushered in under the guise of an infectious disease pandemic?

The poor will clamor for change

It is so vast a crime that the many billions of poor souls (three-fourths of the human population on earth earn less than $10 a day, and another three-quarters of a billion who are illiterate), who rely on electronic information as their primary source of information, and can’t imagine it is all disinformation. It is obvious even the educated are easily deceived.

Slow takeover

In regard to a covert takeover of a country, in 1984 Ex-KGB agent Yir Bezmenov said:

“We change the perception of reality of every American, to such an extent that despite their abundance of information, no one is able to come to sensible conclusions in the interest of defending themselves, their family, their community or their country.”

Bezmenov went on to say there are four stages of a takeover: 1) demoralization, 2) destabilization, 3) crisis (where we are now) and finally 4) normalization, what the masses clamor for now.

“You will have nowhere to defect to,” said Bezmenov.

Are the globalists really filling in a vacuum by offering global governance?

The World Economic Forum (WEC), a so-called independent international organization established in 1971, laments there is no global governance. The WEC works in league with the World Health Organization – their dual logos can be seen on certain public health reports and both orgs have conducted combined press conferences. Corporations have joined hands with WEC and WHO to raise funds to vaccinate the world against COVID-19 coronavirus. This isn’t global governance, it is global tyranny.

This tripart group stirred up global panic – when there were only 4300 deaths from COVID-19 in March of 2020 they were claiming themselves as first global responders to this planetary health emergency.

The patients have taken over the asylum

These are the same non-governmental agencies (NGOs) that have brazenly offered advice how to cope with the stress of an alleged deadly virus for which there is no effective treatment or vaccine, or at least that is what they are telling the world. Sadly, their advice to lockdown is reported to have resulted in more suicides than deaths from the COVID-19 virus. Would you go to a psychiatrist whose advice produced a track record of death of his clients?

None dare call this murder

Have you heard of the calamity in Peru? No, you haven’t. That is a country that methodically carried out the World Health Organization’s toughest lockdown measures and it resulted in the world’s highest COVID-19 death toll.

Oh, the news media is covering for the WHO. Meanwhile neighboring Brazil with its relaxed policies towards the virus was widely criticized in the news press, but had a far lower death rate.

“For months on end, Peruvians were largely forbidden from leaving their homes,” says reporter Jordan Schachtel. Peru even enforced curfews. And as of the first week in September 2020, Schachtel says Peru is “doubling down on the madness.”

It is what you are not hearing that is so troublesome. And The New York Times dared to declare Peru a “success story.”

And you, Mr. and Mrs. Indecisive who now has occasion to read about all this planned mayhem. What don’t you understand about the obvious?

A hard lockdown is how frail elderly people in nursing homes already live day after day, deprived of the sunshine vitamin D that could save their lives. Johan Giesecke of the Karolinska Institute in Stockholm writes in THE LANCET:

“A hard lockdown does not protect old and frail people living in care homes, a population the lockdown was designed to protect. In fact, lockdowns only push severe cases into the future, it will not prevent them.”

Slow murder, like in the movie Arsenic and Old Lace, is difficult to prove. This is what is unfolding silently around the world, beyond what your eyes can see on television.

We knew it was inevitably going to happen, so we prepared for it. Ya, sure.

Globalists are behind the scenes promoters of the called pandemic and pose themselves as the cure for it as well.

Just by happenstance, they tell us, the WEC/Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation sponsored the scripted EVENT 201 pandemic exercise, held October 18, 2019, at the Johns Hopkins Center For Health Security (actually just front orgs for Gates and WEF) and a global pandemic suddenly and unexpectedly started in China with a laboratory enhanced (gain-of-function) coronavirus that started in North Carolina and due to restrictions, further research was delegated to a lab in Wuhan, China, so China would take the blame.

The world was told no one on the planet had immunity to this newly mutated virus that targets 80+ year-olds, the very population that costs governments the most money in medical and pension budgets.

Now we learn many people have pre-existing immunity against COVID-19 coronavirus. What a way to cull longevinarians and improve the profits of life insurance companies and take so many people off the Social Security and Medicare roles in one fell swoop.

It’s a man-made virus

Various virologists of renown (by name, Nobel Prize winner Luc Montagnier, Professor Nikolai Petrovsky of Australia who remarks how COVID-19 is so perfectly adapted to infect humans) say COVID-19 is man-made.

The virus may have even been pre-tested in some human environments prior to its initial outbreak in Wuhan. No, COVID-19 is not a bat virus, it is an evil batman virus. If COVID-19 mutated by chance, then why do so many lies surround it, like death numbers and infection stats?

Where did COVID-19 come from?

It takes some sleuthing work on the lines of Sherlock Holmes to figure out where COVID-19 came from.

A case of “mysterious pneumonia” in the U.S. in the summer of 2019 occurred in North Carolina was associated with a patient’s practice of vaping. A supercomputer in China suggested a high probability that this was “patient zero.”

A university in North Carolina was where gain-of-function experiments with coronaviruses were taking place. Despite denials, when US restrictions on such research was halted, a lab in China was commissioned and received funds to complete the work. This author is not the originator of this information. Others came to similar conclusions. Sure, we can trust China.

Who was US-patient zero?

COVID-19 coronavirus erupted in late November of 2019. “Patient zero” may have been in Toledo, Ohio as a March 2018 report in Clinical Respiratory Journal indicates. Five patients had been diagnosed at a hospital in Raleigh, North Carolina, at about the same time. That is near the aforementioned gain-of-function laboratory. In retrospect, a high number of patients listed a dry cough as their chief complaint to doctors in Los Angeles as early as December 2020.

Oh, there may be a Wuhan, China laboratory connection. A Hong Kong University-based virologist says COVID-19 has a unique fingerprint. She says it is man-made. But it didn’t first fly to America via Wuhan, China as reported. It was reportedly sent to Wuhan from a lab in North Carolina.

Intrigue between China and the US: vaping deaths preceded COVID-19

Independent reporter Nathan Rich adds to the intrigue with his chilling YouTube report linking a coronavirus research contract at Ft. Detrick, Maryland, which was shut down by the FDA at the same time vaping-related pneumonia cases were reported. Vaping lung disease and COVID-19-induced pneumonia are indistinguishable.

Was a coronavirus inadvertently or intentionally released in the US ahead of the COVID-19 outbreak in November-December 2019?

Was a contract initiated for a lab in China to conduct viral enhancement studies, to blame China for the outbreak? A worldwide military games event in Wuhan may have served to spread the virus from the US to China.

An outbreak of vaping-associated lung disease had been reported by public health authorities and in the news media. US health authorities denied these cases of pneumonia were COVID-19. Smoking elevates an enzyme receptor on lung cells (angiotensin-converting enzyme 2-receptor which is an adhesion site for the COVID-19 coronavirus.

If a biological terrorist wanted to get a pandemic going, the most logical way would be to directly seed the virus into the lungs of vapers.

Back in 2016 smoke-free vaping was preferred over nicotine-tobacco smoking to minimize lung/health risks. Three-quarters of all the e-cigarettes sold in the US emanate from one manufacturer. Was COVID-19 laced into vaping products?

Lung diseases from vaping began to be reported in 2019 and more than 450 illnesses linked to the use of these e-cigarettes were reported as of September 6, 2019. Electronic cigarettes had been introduced in the US in 2006-07 and were reported to be more effective than traditional smoking cessation practices in the BMC Public Health journal in 2011. So, something toxic was presumably added to vaping materials. The US Congress sought to ban vaping without asking why it was relatively safe for many years.

Evidence/ verdict

The dead bodies serve as evidence. There is more than suspicion that what we are seeing on television is a massacre, a slaughter of the most vulnerable in our society. When governors intentionally discharge hospitalized COVID-19-positive patients into nursing homes, what would you call this?

Like in the table game of CLUE, we are piecing together the evidence. Must I come to a sordid conclusion for you? The linked evidence presented in this report is yours to fact check and evaluate.

I’m dropping my gavel. By any definition, this is murder. The fingerprints are all over the planet. They perpetrators left their initials all over the planet: B.G, A.F., G.S. Sherlock Holmes wouldn’t even need his magnifying glass to find the same fingerprints of this international crime ring in every country in the world. How much more evidence do you need?

Ah, I understand. When Time Magazine and The New York Times tell you it’s M-U-R-D-E-R. Killing with intent.

How about a game of poker? We each put up $5000. Smallest bet is $100. If you believe the stuff you see on TV, you wouldn’t even guess I have a stacked deck.

When it’s your own grandmother in the nursing home, ideas change. But then they lock relatives out of the nursing homes so you can’t see what is going on. You are so grieved over the premature loss of your grandmother, you don’t know how to interrogate the perpetrators, who aren’t at the command and control of the whole sordid operation anyway.

“In the land of the blind, a one-eyed man is king.”

Don't know about directed energy weapons in this, but lots of good points made.
 
Two well known British musicians have made their views clearer recently.

Noel Gallagher (Oasis, High Flying Birds) was quoted in this Yahoo UK article.

He called the UK policy of wearing face coverings in shops but not pubs and restaurants "b*******", adding: "It's not a law. There's too many f****** liberties being taken away from us now."

The musician said: "I was going up to Manchester the other week and some guy's going 'can you put your mask on, on the train, because the transport police will get on and fine you £1,000. But you don't have to put it on if you're eating'."

"So I was saying, 'Oh right, this killer virus that's sweeping through the train is going to come and attack me but it's going to see me having a sandwich and go leave him, he's having his lunch?'" :lol:

Some tweets by Ian Brown (Stone Roses):





:headbanger:
 
Now AI is going to be used to control scientific research and release of papers. 😡


As the COVID-19 pandemic has swept the world, researchers have published hundreds of papers each week reporting their findings – many of which have not undergone a thorough peer review process to gauge their reliability.

In some cases, poorly validated research has massively influenced public policy, as when a French team reported COVID patients were cured by a combination of hydroxychloroquine and azithromycin. The claim was widely publicized, and soon U.S. patients were prescribed these drugs under an emergency use authorization. Further research involving larger numbers of patients has cast serious doubts on these claims, however.

With so much COVID-related information being released each week, how can researchers, clinicians and policymakers keep up?

In a commentary published this week in Nature Biotechnology, University of New Mexico scientist Tudor Oprea, MD, PhD, and his colleagues, many of whom work at artificial intelligence (AI) companies, make the case that AI and machine learning have the potential to help researchers separate the wheat from the chaff.

Oprea, professor of Medicine and Pharmaceutical Sciences and chief of the UNM Division of Translational Informatics, notes that the sense of urgency to develop a vaccine and devise effective treatments for the coronavirus has led many scientists to bypass the traditional peer review process by publishing “preprints” – preliminary versions of their work – online.

While that enables rapid dissemination of new findings, “The problem comes when claims about certain drugs that have not been experimentally validated appear in the preprint world,” Oprea says. Among other things, bad information may lead scientists and clinicians to waste time and money chasing blind leads.

AI and machine learning can harness massive computing power to check many of the claims that are being made in a research paper, the suggest the authors, a group of public and private-sector researchers from the U.S., Sweden, Denmark, Israel, France, the United Kingdom, Hong Kong, Italy and China led by Jeremy Levin, chair of the Biotechnology Innovation Organization, and Alex Zhavoronkov, CEO of InSilico Medicine.

“I think there is tremendous potential there,” Oprea says. “I think we are on the cusp of developing tools that will assist with the peer review process.”

Although the tools are not fully developed, “We’re getting really, really close to enabling automated systems to digest tons of publications and look for discrepancies,” he says. “I am not aware of any such system that is currently in place, but we’re suggesting with adequate funding this can become available.”

Text mining, in which a computer combs through millions of pages of text looking for specified patterns, has already been “tremendously helpful,” Oprea says. “We’re making progress in that.”

Since the COVID epidemic took hold, Oprea himself has used advanced computational methods to help identify existing drugs with potential antiviral activity, culled from a library of thousands of candidates.

“We’re not saying we have a cure for peer review deficiency, but we are saying that that a cure is within reach, and we can improve the way the system is currently implemented,” he says. “As soon as next year we may be able to process a lot of these data and serve as additional resources to support the peer review process.”
 
Back
Top Bottom