The theme of this article applies, as you know, two of the most hot, the most relevant phenomena — people get vaccination and chipping as key areas for further "development" of the global model of the world and as if the ways out of the pandemic.
The question itself is extremely sly. The current "world elites", obviously aware of the fact of increasing crisis processes in all spheres of modern Western super-monetary society, offered the world not a modernization of the economy or reform of social and political systems, not a discussion about the image of the future of the planet Earth, or even a solution to urgent environmental problems. They, as we can see, have narrowed the range of priorities of the world community to the utilitarian requirement of violent physical execution against 8 billion people and the creation of a system of total electronic oligarchic control over the behavior and consciousness of people as a necessary condition for the "effectiveness" of this execution.
The main mischief (to put it mildly) here is that the proposed means do not justify the declared goals (if the latter are considered to be overcoming economic crises and saving humanity-here and now-from a deadly virus); the applied means and the named goals, in fact, are in dissonance. After all, if, for example, to prevent total vaccination of the people, it's — at best — to protect mankind from only one modification of one of the viruses but does not warrant intrusion by tens and hundreds of other new (standing in this way, we will soon be pricked in vaccines being, completely devoid of immunity in relation to any new bacteria). Rather, on the contrary, it is vaccination that can become the main method of total infection of mankind with various man-made viruses in the interests of vaccine manufacturers and then managing the world through the manipulation of strains.
That is, the mandatory and "centralized vaccination" proposed to the world is a kind of self — sufficient program of action by one of the candidates for world usurpers, for whom the current coronavirus pandemic is just a "casus belli" as a favorite device of known "centers of power", used as a pretext for launching another global villainy. I will say more: we are actually talking about a startup designed to ensure the beginning of the descent of humanity into the" post-body age",
as the Russian thinker Alexander Zinoviev prophetically warned us about more than twenty years ago.[1] Into a state of post-corporeality, post-spirituality, post-humanity.
What is striking in this regard is the position of governments and politicians in most countries of the world, who have lost the will not only to live, but even to power itself.[2]
What is striking is the position of the elites of these countries, who immediately swore allegiance to some unknown forces and switched off their brains in favor of commands not even from the heads of their own States, but from certain mythical characters across the ocean posing as "world government".
What is striking is the position of the majority of journalists (who have turned off not only their reason, but also their conscience and professional intuition), who are now dispersing the wave of pandemics and supporting, for example, in Moscow, completely insane measures to "isolate" citizens and implement numerous projects to Rob them in every possible way.
What is striking is the position of the medical community, which, while valiantly repelling the attacks of the coronavirus, nevertheless proved absolutely incapable of self-organization in the face of turning the world health service into a servant of the interests of some frankly satanic forces that impose a new technology for killing humanity on aesculapians and forcing doctors to participate in a global genocide. So far, there is not a single professional movement uniting doctors in the world (even the Red cross has disappeared somewhere), which would set itself the task of developing a common and honest position on the coronavirus and the pandemic of greed spreading across the planet based on the pain and fears of people.
What is striking, finally, is the inability of the political opposition — right or left — to develop a positive alternative to the current authorities. So, for example, in Russia, in response to the prospect of forced vaccination of the population, the opposition finds nothing better than to stupidly agitate against it, as well as huddle in packs of future disruptors of gadgets associated with 5G technology.
It seems that the trigger of biological weapons was released into the anthroposphere at the very moment when a qualitative break occurred in humanity, related both to the loss of their will to freedom, and to the will stolen from them by freedom.
[3]
But how could it be that the rulers of the world's leading powers, including Merkel, Macron, Johnson and Putin, obediently saluted the medically illiterate and legally criminal recommendations of clerks from the who, the IMF, the fed and some other transnational structures? What exactly, what kind of poison is spilled in the air today, completely depriving the "national leaders" not only of their rational and national feelings, but also of their primary tribal survival instincts? What is it that paralyzes the political will of the heads of state and government, who formally have all the necessary powers for independent decision-making in the territories entrusted to them? What mechanisms and factors have turned the elite of Western countries into cattle, tightly tied to their feeders?
I believe that this poison is a total conceptual, value-based and everyday disorientation of people at all levels.
This disorientation of individuals occurs when a person is deprived of understanding of what is happening (this is precisely why the situation of global "worldview pluralism" is created); in turn, politicians, including heads of state, lose this understanding in a situation when they are convinced of the presence of some more powerful forces over them. When millennia-old semantic and value discourses, traditions and standards are broken, replaced by total hype, crafts and consumer tinsel.
[4] And this process, on the one hand, is a natural consequence of globalization (i.e. the loss of all sovereign free will — even those who consider themselves "master of the world"), on the other — a consequence of the counter process, manifested in the loss of their own will to freedom, consumer substitute touchy-feely.
Let me remind you in connection with this observation of the famous message of albert Camus. "It's all over," he wrote, assessing the prospect of suicide for a humanity incapable of metaphysical rebellion. "Man gives himself up to the prescribed history; seeing a terrible future ahead of him, he plunges into it."
[5]
In December of last year, the author of these lines published an article-a forecast for 2020 called
"Russia is waiting for the "triumph of will". But it won't be there», which was fully confirmed. The author of the forecast assumed that 2020 will be full of" surprises " that will require the leader of Russia to show will, but there will be no strong-willed decisions on his part. This is exactly what happened: in response to the threat of a "pandemic", as well as the subsequent collapse of the Russian economy and the crisis of the entire management system, the country's top officials showed us a set of procrastinations, half-hearted decisions, imitations, panicked statements and outright administrative insanity, not related to overcoming real problems. But the main thing is that not only the authorities, but the Russian elites as a whole were not able to even minimal reflection… Over the past two months, we have not heard a single voice either in the government of the Russian Federation or in the Federal Assembly (except for the voices of several "unfinished" officials of the Communist party of the Russian Federation), which would have sounded in favor of the country and its people. We have not seen a single decision aimed at preserving freedom of will in the country, and, on the other hand, not a single action that would confirm that the authorities have the will to freedom for everyone.
Everywhere we see not a conscious desire (will) for freedom, but the fate of impotence and the lawlessness of numbers and monetary signs.
I understand why, for example, the Central Bank and the Finance Ministry dutifully follow the instructions of the IMF, the Russian Ministry of health — guidelines of the who and the government of Moscow — the requirements to apply the Russian system of total control of citizens on the platform, developed by specialists of the CIA and the NSA. But what made you (high salary?) to adopt the laws "on digitalization of the population" and "on the unified register of information about the population of the Russian Federation"as a matter of urgency? It turns out that the continuous and thoughtless digitalization of the country based on American software is what Russia needs in the conditions of the coronavirus and the beginning of economic collapse?
What makes Herman Gref bend down forced employees of Sberbank in the direction of forcing them to" voluntary " vaccination? Afraid that someone will be late for the cemetery?
[6]
What makes the authors of the article in the "independent" newspaper "Gazeta" defend bill gates and attack the "anti-vaccination" allegedly interfering with the fight against coronavirus, ignoring such a well-known fact as the invention of COVID-19 in American laboratories, which was officially patented back in 2015?
[7]
What makes VTSIOM, in the midst of a pandemic, conduct a "formative" survey of Russians with a mix of questions about different vaccinations and thus obscuring the negative attitude to the upcoming vaccination associated with the coronavirus? And what makes many Russian media outlets propagandize the results of this sly survey as if the majority of Russian citizens are in favor of vaccination against CVID-19, ignoring the fact that the positive answers relate mainly to vaccinations against other diseases, and the vast majority of respondents support vaccination against coronavirus only if their PATRONYMIC vaccines are used?
[8]
What makes the government website Stop-coronavirus rely mainly on data from who and Johns Hopkins University to broadcast statistics on coronavirus?
[9] And what makes the owners of synergy University advertise and impose cheap propaganda books and "coaching" from Yuval Harari (a friend of bill gates and Mark Zuckerberg) on students in a situation when the entire thinking world, and especially the Russians, has for some time been experiencing heartburn at the mention of just the name of the head of Microsoft?
It is fair to say that there is no understanding of the situation and no positive will today everywhere, not just among the Russian elites. Individual attempts by some politicians (for example,
a speech in the Italian Parliament by a certain Sara Kunial with the demand to bring bill gates to criminal responsibility) have not yet led to anything and, apparently, will not lead. That is, there is a situation described one hundred and forty years ago by Friedrich Nietzsche in his famous novel "Thus spake Zarathustra", when the "last man" reigned on the planet Earth, which became the forerunner of the appearance of the" Superman", who turned out to be a banal moral freak. Today, as we can see, the" tables of values " are once again broken — just as they were on the eve of the First and Second World wars; therefore, the search for an answer to the question is on the way: who will take the position of "Superman"? Collective bill gates or some new and quite specific Fuhrer?
In recent decades, the entire world political process has revolved around the category of "freedom". Apologists of this value, as a rule, accepting and passing off as freedom the possibility of unpunished rudeness, confidently promoted to the masses (most often, in exchange for specific benefits from the powerful) the pipe of the pied Piper of Hamelin made in USA. This was a definite alternative to the Soviet thesis about freedom as a "conscious necessity". Meanwhile, both of these seemingly polar interpretations of" freedom " have replaced a serious and professional conversation about the true content of one of the most complex philosophical categories with its simplified and narrowly ideological interpretations.
The problem in the period of confrontation between the two systems (Western, capitalist, and Soviet, "socialist"), however, was not the absence of freedom as such in the USSR, nor even the fact that the Western understanding of "freedom" has always been and remains largely hypocritical.
The main problem then and now was and is a clear global trend towards minimizing free will in the world, and creative and Pro-human will at that.
What is the difference between "freedom" and "free will"?
Abstract freedom as "freedom in General" is nonsense; it can only exist in the imagination of individual individuals as some conceivable ideal in which the subject of thought ignores the sources, flows and precedents of unfreedom. In reality, real freedom is always concrete and implies the absence of undesirable dependencies of someone on something for something completely objective... for Example, the freedom to Express one's opinion is the independence (or minimal dependence) of the speaker of an opinion on various kinds of controllers, who are inherently not allowed to be usurpers of the right to assess what is happening.
"The only freedom available to my knowledge is the freedom of mind and action, "wrote albert Camus in man In revolt.
[10] Most Russians in the past two months have more than felt the lack of freedom of action, including the ban on movement in the space between housing and work — as a personal, and therefore a priori inviolable existential space of citizens, it is not clear on what legal and moral grounds privatized in March 2020 by a group of officials. So, free will is the real right and opportunity of each individual to create and perform actions according to his own mind. (In this case, I was merely repeating the words of the philosopher Benedict Spinoza, according to whom " every human being has the right to exist and act according to the way in which he was naturally predestined»
[11]). That is, "freedom" is a complex philosophical concept, in which one must clearly distinguish between numerous shades of humanitarian and value, since the will is different. In turn, free will should be distinguished from the will to freedom: the latter is a quality of the individual, and not objective rights and opportunities as a property of the environment.
For 400 years, the world has been striving to live up to Thomas Hobbes 'concept of" natural human rights " and, above all, the right to freedom of movement, as well as the right to work and to the results of one's labor. Periodically violating all these rights, most Western politicians, however, all these centuries at every historical crossroads increasingly rattled about the imperative of human rights and freedoms, turning this concept into a second Bible. But in the 21st century, in just one month (!), the theory and practice of "natural rights" has been fundamentally shamed — and, first of all, not anywhere, but in Russia, which has just embarked on the path of "democratic" transformations and declared itself a country "free" from totalitarianism.
Today in our country, in the Wake of almost complete social will is not very free (and therefore especially evil) officials aimed not at the development of the Fatherland, and only hold in their hands the power and resources, and in the Wake of the formation in Russia of a new caste of "chosen" that requires government political will in the interests of this caste, there is growing elites request to "nonissuance" (although today it would make more sense to get involved in Jean-Paul Sartre, albert Camus, Alexander Zinoviev, K.). As a result, the society has dramatically increased the degree of manipulation of terminology and confusion of concepts when, for example, the freedom for the nation and the people is replaced by "freedom of lawlessness" for himself and his group, the oligarchy in seeking to subjugate society, concludes an Alliance with the people,
[12] and instead of "triumph of the will" by the authorities, we are still seeing in her face only the triumph of ignorance and boorishness.
In this situation, the mythical " long Russia»
[13] generates monsters — people like "long will": in fact, boors and ignoramuses, convinced of their infallibility simply because they were (as a rule, undeservedly — due to the law of negative selection) in the zone of material comfort, legal impunity and transnational "legitimacy". These people never actually read the works of Friedrich Nietzsche, but heard something about it, well, West on the way "Superman" (due solely to Hollywood, not the works of German philosopher) worship, in essence, to themselves, or rather the reflection of "his honour" in the eyes of the servants. The measure of "superhuman" becomes their glossy image of "Superman", who only "can do everything" because he has billions of personal money (like bill gates, George Soros, etc.) or unlimited and, as a rule, usurped administrative capabilities — like famous mayors, governors or heads of "sovereign powers".
Among the new " supermen "there is no discussion of the difference between" I can "and" I can "or" I have the right "and"I know how." And certainly beyond the scope of discussion is the category of "understanding". The rights, goals, meanings, price, consequences and other aspects of seemingly "volitional" decisions regarding millions of destinies are not discussed. The motives for "taking", "keeping" and "not letting go" prevail (it is not clear who not to let go of; therefore, we will not let go of all those who are not loyal to the authorities) and a primitive idea of their own mission: "I can, so I must" and "if millions of people are silent, then I have the right." However, the very concepts of "I can" and "I have the right" are interpreted very poorly: I can and am competent, because, I repeat, I have material and administrative capabilities… It is obvious that in this case, the new "superhumans" who dream not of space flights and "liberation of labor", but of personal serfs, work well with certain grasping reflexes that are the basis for the presence of not even the will to power, but various animal urges to certain temptations. And what does free will have to do with it? And the will to be free has nothing to do with it.
Once (back in the middle of the 17th century), the British philosopher John Locke made a discovery, discovering that man originally belongs only to his labor force. Two hundred years later, the businessman Friedrich Engels gave a detailed definition of the "proletariat", and according to his colleague the lawyer Karl Marx, "the owner of labor power (the proletarian) and the owner of money meet in the market and enter into a transaction between themselves as equal commodity owners, differing only in what one buys, while the other sells...". Further, the naive Marx, who has never been in the shoes of a proletarian, writes stupidity - "... as legally equal persons", but we are not discussing this now.
[14] It is important to note that the author of capital and many of Its followers were mistaken in assuming, for example, that capitalism was about to be replaced by communism, in which the labor market would be abolished and labor would become free. They clearly underestimated the capitalist mode of production, which, apparently, if they disappear, it is not the result of a socialist revolution, but by its denial of ontology, reaching in the process of its development to its logical end, is associated with complete destruction of not only free market but a free person.
The Communist idea, in contrast to capitalism, assuming a maximum liberation of man (and not the fact that she prescribe criticism of "practical socialism" of the Soviet model) is even more relevant today than 200 years ago, because the labor of the common man — though he was far less to operate than earlier — in fact even less free than in Marx's time (though in the late Soviet Union, the degree of free labor was quite high — much higher than in modern high-tech Western countries). That is, the distance between the classical model of capitalism and communism in the last decades is increasing; social progress — in the language Nabiullina — the "negative dynamics of growth" and involves the passage of several rounds (cycles) in its evolution;
but removing layer by layer — like shavings on a carpenter's bench of history — not of degrees of slavery, because the modern West is developing in a capitalist model, and the degrees of freedom.
Thus, in the second half of the 20th century, the new monopoly and corporate capitalism deprived the proletariat and other poor social groups of their right to dispose of their labor force. The full control of corporations over the labor market and the ability to replace an employee with a machine or computer program has devalued the labor force, so that the modern proletarian sells corporations not so much his labor as his time and mental energy at a price set not by the market, but by the employer-monopoly. (Sometimes it comes to senility, as, for example, in Russia, where it is no longer so much working hands and the owner of these hands that are being sold, as jobs are being sold by the owner of these very places.)
Such a phenomenon of the 21st century as the growing "self-employment" of people breaks the classic relationship between an employer and an employee of wage labor and means the formation of new, non-classical relations between them, when there is almost no purchase and sale, but there is an administrative order( legalized violence) and a ruthless algorithm of the digital program, leveling legal systems. The order is set by the financier, or rather-the owner of the program, under whatever form it is submitted: "market relations", "state or corporate planning", "network self-organization", etc.
The global digital capitalism of our time (spring 2020) goes further — on a downward path and in the logic of consistent social degradation and political "optimization" of society. It does not just sell (in fact, simply monetize) jobs and exchanges people's physical and mental energy for granting them various kinds of statuses and partial restoration of pre — selected civil rights-it claims to have complete and uncontrolled disposal of labor, labor, energy, and even the body and consciousness of a person.
The global capitalist needs a man-name as, in essence, another resource of profit, no more. And if this resource can make the organs, embryos, health and life itself of the individual, insolent officials, Nouveau riche will do it, and the main role in this process is to play the technology associated with the VACCINATION of people — a sort of sophisticated penetration, forced, in essence, the penetration of the capitalist's personal space, his flesh and blood.
Forced human vaccination, managed by transnational capital — is not so much a medical act as a labeling process designed to secure the right of the vaccine owner to privatize human bodies. It is also a technology that leads humanity directly to a new global Auschwitz.
The rape of a man as personality is not just to deprive an individual of his transcendental labour rights, health protection and protection of personal space is taking his right to choose his own destiny in General, as well as opportunities to protect their genetics, consciousness, opinion, and in his own "I" and collective "We."
The individual " I " in this case naturally becomes an ordinal number, a figure, a purely quantitative quantity. About this way, thousands of years ago, slaveholders marked captives and other slaves with their personal brand, often arguing for some "humanitarian" reasons in the hypocritical rhetoric of "provide shelter, ""provide protection," and so on. In a similar way, slaveholders could maim their slaves at will — either as punishment or to prevent escape, resistance, or reproduction.
Does any of the deputies of the State Duma of the Russian Federation (who voted for the adoption of the Federal law " on digitalization of the population») about such a prospect? Do they understand that the true digitalization of humanity has been taking place for several thousand years and in a natural way — since humans invented numbers? What is being pushed today under the guise of introducing new digital technologies is nothing more than ordinary neo — fascism.
CHIPIZATION is the next and more advanced stage of establishing global slavery, associated with complete and possibly final
[15] deindividualization of a person. The implantation of a chip into an individual's body and the emergence of the possibility of influencing his emotions, intellectual abilities, psyche and physiology presuppose, in essence, the privatization of the human brain and its higher nervous activity. The irony of history is that fantasy's greatest writer about the transformation of dog into man is coming true right before our eyes and in the opposite option — turning people into the likeness of dogs and other animals.
The degree of slavery that promises us the implantation of programmable chips in the human body at the current stage of socio-cultural and political degradation of the anthroposphere (almost complete leveling of civil institutions and traditional values), was not even in the era of the so — called slave system-because then there was no technology and mechanisms for direct (electronic) control of the thoughts of human individuals.
How can humanity resist sinking into a new state of slavery?
This depends on the degree of will to freedom of those people who understand the true value of free will.
In what way can people's will to freedom be shown in the current situation? At least, in an effort to preserve at least that dose of free will that humanity had before the coronavirus pandemic began. The main direction of this resistance is to repel the plan imposed by globalists for total vaccination of the population, regulated from a single center, and then to go on the offensive against the current vicious system of organizing the world order, including the organization of the medical industry.
The main post-coronavirus problem of humanity — if we talk about public health-today is not the prospect of vaccination as such. The problem is that a centralized version of this operation is being imposed on us today: controlled and directed from some invisible center that cannot be trusted.
The main problem, therefore, is WHO conducts the vaccination, through which (WHERE and by WHOM produced, owned by WHOM, by WHOM and how tested and certified, etc.) vaccines and under WHOSE control. These are all the issues that Western and Pro-Western politicians, corrupt officials, medics involved in lobbying schemes and representatives of the corrupt media carefully avoid today, leading the discussion of these issues into the sphere of covidobesyism and digitrophilia.
Translating into the language of Russian realities, the formula for vaccination against coronavirus and possible next infections suggests that the Russian leadership has an open and clear position on the following points:
A) vaccination should be considered as a last resort for those infections that are not prevented or otherwise treated;
B)
vaccination cannot be forced , and people's refusal to be vaccinated cannot lead to the defeat of their civil rights; at the same time, if some unvaccinated individuals become a source of infection of other people, they must bear administrative or even criminal (if they are aware of the consequences of their actions) responsibility;
C) the vaccines and other socially important medicines used
in the national health system should only be of domestic production ; exceptions to this rule are possible, but they should be considered as state of emergency;
D) certification of vaccines and named
medicines should be absolutely transparent — with the right and possibility of alternative examination;
E) lobbying for foreign-made vaccines, obstructing alternative drug testing, and the presence of elements of corruption in the process of their certification and licensing should
be prosecuted;
F) the decision on how to apply a particular vaccine
should be in the nature of a law based on the above points and the moral imperatives of the state;
G) the state of the health system should be considered as
the most important problem of national security of the country , and the health system itself should be closely monitored by society and special services;
H) it is necessary to significantly increase budget expenditures for
clinical research and testing of socially significant and other medicines;
I) a serious revision of international law in the field of patenting drugs intended for the treatment of socially significant diseases is necessary; the profit of pharmaceutical companies at the expense of monopolistically high prices for certain vital drugs is unacceptable...
[16]
Accordingly, the production and distribution of all the world's vaccines should be absolutely transparent and regulated by international treaties, just as strategic offensive weapons are regulated by such treaties today.
It is necessary to understand that the issue we are discussing (the rights and opportunities of a person to dispose of their body and condition at their own discretion)
[17] becomes the most important existential question of our time.
However, the protection of personal space is still "flowers": the author of these lines touched on only one problem here, but hundreds of such fundamental problems have accumulated over the past half century. And save today need not only the personal "I", but many of the collective "We", victims of the usurpation of power, information, rights and financial resources of different oligarchic groups: political democracy, welfare state, education system, and other reproductive health, national security, judicial system, ethnic, religious and cultural identity of the people, the freedom of the media, classical culture, and so on. The world as a whole is turning into a single electronic concentration camp run by the ignorant and paranoid, to which all of the above (political democracy, social justice, civil rights and freedoms, natural intelligence, etc.) is categorically contraindicated.
A person's life is probably still more important than their rights and freedoms, although it is not correct to compare the latter with life as the most valuable thing that a person can have in principle. The rights and freedoms of the individual are more important than death threats because death and the threat of death, and it is well understood by those who at least once was on the verge of both.
The death rate from coronavirus, which we see today in Russia (0.8 % of the number of cases — as in any seasonal SARS) clearly does not correspond to the level of the threat fanned in the media, and in this sense, the current "pandemic", being the basis for mobilizing politicians, officials and the medical community, as well as restricting some freedoms of infected citizens,
cannot be the basis for violating the rights and freedoms of the healthy majority And even more so, when the degree and order of restrictions on civil rights and freedoms are determined not by the society itself and not by legal decisions of competent legislative bodies, but by certain officials who imagine themselves to be superhumans.
In fact, we are dealing with super-officials, whom most people do not consider "God-men" or even " technocrats "(as" modestly " the powerless and immoral characters who have found themselves in power call themselves), but demons who often confuse personal consumer passions with political will, and the possibility of using administrative or even police force with the right to infringe the rights and freedoms of others.
The new Russian "Atlanteans", as we know, were hatched EN masse from the eggs of the post-Soviet party, power or foreign trade nomenclature marked by the West. None of them are "self-made men" in the full sense of the phrase — all of them, at the moment of entering a new, "capitalist" system of relations, were subjected to appropriate initiation, as well as imprinting by a transnational oligarchy that has long lost its human dimension. Having entered the new system of relations in the "dashing" 90s, they remained in that time — in the era before the arrival of the"last man". When not only God and Christian ethics died, but also philosophy and other Humanities, the concept of natural rights, and even common sense.
In this sense, the people who make decisions in Russia today on behalf of the Russian state have a specific quasi — identity-posthumans — androids, completely deprived not only of conscience, but also of the will to freedom, since the very formation of this new social group took place in conditions that implied the rejection of society's will to freedom and society's freedom of will.
Footnotes:
[1] See Zinoviev A. A. Global human resource: selected works. - M: "Canon+", ROOI "Rehabilitation". 2019, 368 p.
[2] money has become the higher power is the spirit of the current time, resulting from a society of Hyper-consumption, where the desire for comfort and pleasure at some point eliminates the instinct of self-preservation. It is this phenomenon that we are seeing today.
[3] See Lepekhin V. A. Fourteen axioms about the" pandemic " of coronavirus and the circumstances associated with it. — 11.04.2020, email access:
#COVID-19. Владимир Лепехин: Четырнадцать аксиом о «пандемии» коронавируса и обстоятельствах, с ним связанных — Зиновьев.Инфо / Zinoviev.Info
[4] The simplest example is the widespread substitution of thousands of years of educational traditions based on the communication of people for the purpose of exchanging experience and knowledge, the so-called distance education, which excludes live communication, and therefore is, in essence, a profanation of education.
[5] Albert Camus. A rebellious man. Philosophy. Politics. Iskusstvo [art], Moscow, Politizdat publ., 1990, p. 53.
[6] See also "Sberbank offered its employees to test the vaccine against coronavirus." — 14.05.2020, See details on RBC:
Сбербанк предложил сотрудникам протестировать вакцину против коронавируса
[7] См.
«Выберу смерть»: чего боятся антипрививочники
[8] TASS, the state news Agency, was Most successful in its clumsy defense of bill gates and promotion of foreign vaccines, publishing an article titled "VTSIOM: more than half of Russians would like to get a coronavirus vaccination". First, for some reason, the authors omitted the keyword "voluntary" in the title, which completely changes the meaning of the article and fundamentally distorts the results of the survey. In addition, the same material could be submitted differently, for example: "The majority of Russians are against vaccination with foreign-made vaccines" or — "the Majority of Russians support the current vaccination against tuberculosis, measles, etc., while opposing coronavirus vaccines" or — "Only 12% of respondents prefer foreign-made vaccines". And the last three versions of the title would reflect the results of the VTSIOM poll much more adequately. (См.
ВЦИОМ: более половины россиян хотели бы сделать прививку от коронавируса
[9] См.
https://стопкоронавирус.рф
[10] Albert Camus. A rebellious man. Philosophy. Politics. Iskusstvo [art], Moscow, Politizdat publ., 1990, p. 54.
[11] I Quote from: Fedorova M. M. Classical political philosophy, Moscow: Vse Mir publishing House, 2001, p. 123.
[12] См.
. (This video on the channel of the Agency "Aurora" from January 05, 2020 tells about the conspiracy of the oligarchy and liberal okhlos against the popular majority).
[13]" Putin's Long Russia "is a speculative phrase thrown into Russian political usage in order to draw an analogy with the concept of"the American deep state".
[14] Karl Marx. Capital. Moscow: AST, 2019, p. 38.
[15] According to Alexander Zinoviev, the last human right will be his right to his own death. (See about this-Global human collar: selected works. - M: "Canon+", ROOI "Rehabilitation". 2019, p. 310).
[16] See Lepekhin V. A. The state of healthcare as a problem of national security in Russia. — Эл. доступ:
Состояние здравоохранения как проблема национальной безопасности России | Институт ЕАЭС
[17] A separate serious issue is the right of a parent to protect the life and health (body, mental state and intelligence) of their child.
www.sott.net
