It pays to read the fb fact checking articles. There was a fact check notice issued for the following claiming it was false:
Russia exposes Covid-19 with Scientific Data as a Hoax, says its a Fake Pandemic
Here is the fact check article linked in the notice and in part it says:
So basically the article supplied by the fact checkers is stating that the lockdowns and social distancing measures can be implemented for a benign nothing burger virus - it doesn't have to have the capacity to kill anyone.
The fact check article refers to a Merriam Webster dictionary entry that talks about the difference between an epidemic and a pandemic and doesn't address a viruses mortality rate anywhere in that comparison. There is an interesting part of the definition of pandemic mentioned though:
The bolded in the above begins to make some sense out of all the conflicting lockdown and social distancing enforcements and gives a clue to what is really under attack here. I'm looking at it from the perspective of a combination of the C's definition of love - knowledge is love is light and Michael Crichtons definition.
Weddings, funerals, visiting friends, neighbours and the elderly in nursing homes, going to church, being with sick friends or relatives in hospital, playing with your kids in the park, social gatherings for other family or cultural reasons, enjoying nature have been constrained under the threat of fine or forfeiture - or anything that unites people in a common or sensual love. Protesting BLM hasn't, the police actions haven't, the government hasn't or anything that unites people in a common conflict, or greed, power and control hasn't.
I get that the above might be somewhat black and white (no pun intended!) and pays little attention to nuances, the law of three and STO vs STS, it's just a foundation to show where thoughts were going as I read the fact check article and followed links in it.
So I've come to the conclusion that what is really under attack here is the capacity for, or the ability or drive to strive for and develop true love - and that's what STS doesn't have.
Russia exposes Covid-19 with Scientific Data as a Hoax, says its a Fake Pandemic
Here is the fact check article linked in the notice and in part it says:
The author's conclusion that the pandemic is fake is based on the premise that a certain proportion of the people who contract the disease must die in order for the pandemic to be real. But the definitions for pandemic and epidemic are not based on the level of mortality, rather they describe the extent of spread of a disease in relation to geography. Merriam-webster.com presents a comparison of the two words (here). On March 11, 2020, the World Health Organization declared COVID-19 a pandemic.
So basically the article supplied by the fact checkers is stating that the lockdowns and social distancing measures can be implemented for a benign nothing burger virus - it doesn't have to have the capacity to kill anyone.
The fact check article refers to a Merriam Webster dictionary entry that talks about the difference between an epidemic and a pandemic and doesn't address a viruses mortality rate anywhere in that comparison. There is an interesting part of the definition of pandemic mentioned though:
Origins of Epidemic and Pandemic
Epidemic, which may be traced to the Greek epidḗmios (“within the country, among the people, prevalent (of a disease)”), may carry broader meanings, such as “excessively prevalent,” “contagious,” or “characterized by very widespread growth or extent” (often used in a non-medical sense). Pandemic is less often encountered in a broad and non-medical sense, but does have additional senses, including “affecting the majority of people in a country or a number of countries”, “found in most parts of the world and in varied ecological conditions,” and “of or relating to common or sensual love” (in this last sense the word is usually capitalized). Pandemiccomes from the Greek pandēmos (“of all the people”), which itself is from pan- (“all, every”) and dēmos (“people”).
The bolded in the above begins to make some sense out of all the conflicting lockdown and social distancing enforcements and gives a clue to what is really under attack here. I'm looking at it from the perspective of a combination of the C's definition of love - knowledge is love is light and Michael Crichtons definition.
Weddings, funerals, visiting friends, neighbours and the elderly in nursing homes, going to church, being with sick friends or relatives in hospital, playing with your kids in the park, social gatherings for other family or cultural reasons, enjoying nature have been constrained under the threat of fine or forfeiture - or anything that unites people in a common or sensual love. Protesting BLM hasn't, the police actions haven't, the government hasn't or anything that unites people in a common conflict, or greed, power and control hasn't.
I get that the above might be somewhat black and white (no pun intended!) and pays little attention to nuances, the law of three and STO vs STS, it's just a foundation to show where thoughts were going as I read the fact check article and followed links in it.
So I've come to the conclusion that what is really under attack here is the capacity for, or the ability or drive to strive for and develop true love - and that's what STS doesn't have.