The crew travelling around with the VAXXED bus in Queensland has been kicked out of the caravan park they were staying in at Caloundra because the management did not agree with their politics. The site supervisor withdrew his consent for the VAXXED crew to film him. That's his right, but they have issue with peeps who don't want to be vaccinated against their consent. 🤷‍♀️ Signs of things to come.

 
Trump stating about an agreement with Pfizer to produce and deliver first 100 million vaccines, as soon as its approval and then an additional 500 million dosages...
And a great cheer can be heard coming from the Pfizer board of directors room during a meeting taking place after the agreement was announced.

Then the discussion turned to what was needed for approval. All public safety measures were looked at and the discussion centered on how to bypass those measures that may delay the safety seal of approval.

The bottom line is they need to act fast in order to catch the brass ring.
 
Sean Hannity Takes Issue With Fox News Colleague Tucker Carlson’s Jeff Bezos Story On-Air, Then Apologizes On Twitter


Fox News host Tucker Carlson seemed buoyant as he ended his show on Tuesday. But then, as he was handing the reins to Sean Hannity, Hannity started speaking.

Carlson’s face did a quick dance as he began to realize that Hannity was criticizing his previous segment. Carlson’s mouth tightened. His eyes narrowed. He turned in Hannity’s direction, brows knitted, and his lips began to pucker as if to say, “What?”

Carlson had been talking about Amazon chief Jeff Bezos, who on Monday had the single-biggest one-day increase of wealth ever due to to Amazon’s positive Wall Street forecast.

“Jeff Bezos, just yesterday, made $13 billion,” Carlson said. “Now, 20 years ago if that had happened, if a captain of industry had made $13 billion in a single day, while the country got poorer, the Democratic Party would have had something to say about it. Not anymore because the people getting rich are members of the Democratic Party.”

The typically jovial interaction as the hosts transitioned from Tucker Carlson Tonight to Hannity took a turn, at least for Carlson, when Hannity seemed to argue against Carlson’s point.

“And now Sean Hannity takes over from New York,” Carlson said with a smile. “All right, Tucker,” Hannity responded. “People can make money. They provide goods and services people want, need and desire. That’s America. It’s called freedom, capitalism, and as long as it’s honest, right? People decide. All right, Tucker, great show.”

As Hannity deliverd the “great show” bromide, Carlson’s eyes darted to the right of the screen, as if looking for an exit.

[...]Hannity’s tweeted apology, which reads in part, “I apologize for any misunderstanding. … I support freedom and capitalism, not people taking advantage of a pandemic.” The latter is a reference to the money Bezos’s company is making are Americans are stuck at home.


Division in the ranks? Perhaps he's trying to distance himself from Tucker with the recent lawsuits. Maybe he senses Carlson is slated for destruction and doesn't want to be too close? Just speculation.
 
A minor update on the mandatory wearing of a face-covering in all shops that is due to commence in the UK this Friday. I spoke to a staff member in my local supermarket about it and asked what the situation was for people like me who have health issues such that this was not a good idea. He said that each customer would be asked to wear a face-covering when they enter the store but if I explain the situation then I should have no difficulties in not doing so. We'll see.

That is my current understanding also. There is a separate topic on this issue here with folks suggesting different strategies.

My current stance on this issue is to use a printed face covering exemption card or show one on my phone.

I have just listened to the UK businessman Simon Dolan (He recently lost a high court challenge against the UK government over the legality of the lockdown) on the Richie Allen Radio Show. He thinks that most supermarkets won't deny customers access if they say they have a 'disability' or 'reasonable excuse' or show such an exemption card, as I am intending to do. The only one who may ask for a medical certificate is Morrisons apparently. So I will boycott them for sure.

It is clear listening to Police Chiefs recently that this policy is effectively unenforceable anyway. There is a petition: Repeal the decision to implement compulsory face coverings in English shops.
 
Thought to share a post I made in a discussion with family members about opening Manitoba up for a truncated CFL season in Winnipeg.

From Facebook:
Mark Nelson so why the push to open up? Are they eager to sacrifice? Just saying! It looks to me that public safety is at the bottom of the list, no matter what people do. But if there is profit to be made, all considerations are off the table. I have always been aware of this with every statement made about Covid-19.

Of course, people do die from all sorts of things. Dad died because his organs quit working, likely a cytokine storm reaction from a vaccination. What else could cause a relatively healthy person to end up dead in 2-3 weeks? Not cancer. I have known others to pass away similarly over the past few years. Healthy to dead in a couple of weeks. Dieing from cancer is a long, painful drawn out thing. The current viral study says that viruses are part of our genetic makeup. Our immune system is designed to adapt to and use viruses as part of our evolution. Natural selection then kicks in. That is nature's way of species survivability. People who have built up natural immunity by exposure do survive, despite medical interventions.

Now we are looking at genetic editing vaccinations. What could go wrong? Think! We wouldn't need a new windows program every year. Our phones wouldn't be obsolete as soon as we buy them. Hell, we barely understand the role viruses play in our evolution. Talk about playing god, more like playing Russian Roulette.
 
She also says a kinda cryptic"not gonna go there" comments, regarding her looks, and the changes and difference of Melinda Gates features.
Pictures of the two of them together DO seem to show some rather strange morphing facial features, in my opinion.
I can see why there are so many rumors of "Clones" and/or that people are being replaced with Look alikes and actors.


View attachment 37733View attachment 37734


It is possible that the 4D STS replace the Key-Person to do evil things for them.
We never know how many are replaced, but we can see what’s happening right now, probably lots more than what we suspected.

May 4, 1996

A: Creates "environment" for unnoticed genetic modifications because of greatly heightened exchange of both physical and ethereal factors.

Q: (L) What do you mean by "replacement of key personnel?" Key personnel according to whose definition?

A: 4th density STS.

Q: (L) Are these key personnel human?

A: Yes.

Q: (L) When you say replacement, do you mean something as simple as someone dying, such as a head of state, and being replaced by another person who comes to power? That would be the simplest scenario that would fit this explanation.

A: Your scenario is not simple.

Q: (L) I mean simple in terms of the machinations...

A: Both.

Q: (L) Would it also be that key personnel could also be replaced as in duplication?

A: Yes. And removing to secret activity realm. Enough wars have taken place to effectively create entire new "underground race" of humans, both from direct capture followed by "reeducation," and spawning activity using these persons and others.
 
I think there is an assumption that those 'devastating effects' are not wanted by those behind the promotion of vaccines. What if they are wanted? And it's only the dupes who would think differently. "They would never do THAT" types. Of, course that type of thinking is ..... "a conspiracy"...

If everybody believes that vaccines are 'safe and effective' and they were 'encouraged' to take them, and those who refused were forced to, would they then be able to make a connection between being injected with an agent that causes an effect and that effect being deadly? They might, if they happened together, or immediately, but not if they occurred far apart.

This is what is troubling many people, even those who strongly support vaccines. It's known by a very positive sounding word as 'immune enhancement'. This is what sickened and killed animals in previous Coronavirus vaccine trials where it ethical to re-expose an animal to the agent they are vaccinated against. This is not the case for people. They are going straight to human trials, now, where the immediate effect of the vaccine may not be as deadly as when re-exposure happens, and it could happen at any time.

What people should be concerned about is the re-institution of slavery (for your own good, of course). People's bodies no longer belong to them, they belong to the State - or perhaps their employer. That's slavery. What these people say, goes. We now are being forced to do what they want.

Agreed but I suspect that the 'they would never do THAT' types shall require a pretty damn clear demonstration before they are shocked out of their illusions. Right at the start of the Covid-19 scam I said to a few people that it was nonsense and that they would use it as a ruse to take away all our liberties and return us to a state of serfdom. Some agreed and some said that I was essentially being paranoid and that they would never do that. Months later, where are we now?! Those same people have bought into the propaganda and are fully on board with all the self-isolation, social distancing, mask-wearing nonsense. Cognitive dissonance is a powerful tool for those who wish to manipulate the masses. When things get so bad that they are forced to view things as they actually are they are going to have a terrible time. It is no wonder the C's talk about 'soul smashing'. I feel for them but you know how it is with horses and water.

That is my current understanding also. There is a separate topic on this issue here with folks suggesting different strategies.



I have just listened to the UK businessman Simon Dolan (He recently lost a high court challenge against the UK government over the legality of the lockdown) on the Richie Allen Radio Show. He thinks that most supermarkets won't deny customers access if they say they have a 'disability' or 'reasonable excuse' or show such an exemption card, as I am intending to do. The only one who may ask for a medical certificate is Morrisons apparently. So I will boycott them for sure.

It is clear listening to Police Chiefs recently that this policy is effectively unenforceable anyway. There is a petition: Repeal the decision to implement compulsory face coverings in English shops.

I read on the BBC site earlier that those with respiratory difficulties are an allowed exception to mask-wearing from tomorrow in the UK so I should be okay. Also, from listening to the 'Lockdown Revolution' podcast yesterday they said that Lidl are not going to give people grief over it so I shall just go there if Tesco give me too much grief.
 
America's Most Powerful CEOs Band Together, Ask Every Business To Require Customer Face Masks
This isn’t simply the Business Roundtable weighing in. It’s the Business Roundtable throwing its weight around.

This has nothing to do with the efficacy of masks and everything to do with whether we’re going to allow corporate behemoths to set national policy on the matter.
So who's running this asylum anyhow?
 
DEADLY COVER UP: Fauci Approved Hydroxychloroquine 15 Years Ago to Cure Coronaviruses; “Nobody Needed to Die”
Dr. Anthony Fauci, whose “expert” advice to President Trump has resulted in the complete shutdown of the greatest economic engine in world history, has known since 2005 that chloroquine is an effective inhibitor of coronaviruses.

How did he know this? Because of research done by the National Institutes of Health, of which he is the director. In connection with the SARS outbreak – caused by a coronavirus dubbed SARS- CoV – the NIH researched chloroquine and concluded that it was effective at stopping the SARS coronavirus in its tracks. The COVID-19 bug is likewise a coronavirus, labeled SARS-CoV-2. While not exactly the same virus as SARS-CoV-1, it is genetically related to it, and shares 79% of its genome, as the name SARS-CoV-2 implies. They both use the same host cell receptor, which is what viruses use to gain entry to the cell and infect the victim.
 
Same adjuvant in swine flu vaccine that caused narcolepsy also being used in coronavirus vaccine
As for ASO3, this squalene-containing adjuvant, which also contains DL-?-tocopherol and polysorbate, was first used more than a decade ago in the swine flu vaccine to facilitate the rapid rollout of millions of new jabs. And before long, people who received the shot started to develop narcolepsy, sparking global concern about the vaccine’s safety.
 
Gov't Says Man Has Tested Positive for COVID, He Says He Has Never Been Tested

Here's a new way of keeping the alleged infection rate up.
Ballou’s problem is probably the same as yours, he wonders how he can trust the numbers coming out of the state if he’s being counted positive without actually taking a test. (Stories about inflated numbers of deaths being attributed to COVID-19 are becoming all too common.)
 
How a False Hydroxychloroquine Narrative Was Created, and More
Hydroxychloroquine has been used safely for 65 years in many millions of patients. And so the message was crafted that the drug is safe for its other uses, but dangerous when used for Covid-19. It doesn’t make sense, but it seems to have worked.

Were these acts carefully orchestrated? You decide.

Might these events have been planned to keep the pandemic going? To sell expensive drugs and vaccines to a captive population? Could these acts result in prolonged economic and social hardship, eventually transferring wealth from the middle class to the very rich? Are these events evidence of a conspiracy?
 
This from Global Research:
Forced Masking a “Coercive Practice Designed to Drive Up Vaccination Rates” Rules Hospital Arbitrator
By John C. A. Manley
Global Research July 22, 2020


Back in 2018, the Toronto Academic Health Science Network had a mandatory masking policy in place for nurses and health care workers, according to the Ontario Nursing Association. Staff were required “to wear an unfitted surgical mask for the entirety of their shift if they choose not to receive the influenza vaccine.”

An article on the Ontario Nursing Association (ONA) states:
“After reviewing extensive expert evidence submitted by both [sides], Arbitrator William Kaplan, in his September 6 decision, found that [the mask or vaccinate] policy is ‘illogical and makes no sense’ and ‘is the exact opposite of being reasonable.’ In reaching this conclusion, Arbitrator Kaplan rejected the hospital’s evidence.”
The arbitration report points out that there was an “admitted absence of direct evidence that mask wearing [healthcare workers] protected patients from influenza…” Thus one might ask: If a mask cannot even protect patients from influenza how is it of any use against a “super bad transmittable contagious awful virus” like COVID-19?

It went on to say that the arguments and evidence made for mask wearing “are insufficient, inadequate, and completely unpersuasive…. Evidence that masking as a source [of] control results in any material reduction in transmission was scant, anecdotal, and, in the overall, lacking.”

Even more telling is that the arbitration reported that forced masking is “a coercive practice designed to drive up vaccination rates” among staff. And, it seems, today, among citizens.

If you’re not for being violated with an improperly tested, rushed-to-market, money-making COVID-19 vaccine then please resist the mask wearing coercion with all your might.

From the last link in article:
Face Mask Opt-Out: Religious and medical exemptions to the corona masquerade party
The COVID-19(84) Red Pill Email Briefs | July 18, 2020 | John C. A. Manley

The masquerade party has begun in my Ontario county. The local health unit has a new policy (masquerading as a law) that asks business owners to crack down on all those people breathing willy-nilly in their stores and taxi cabs. Same goes for those snoring through sermons at churches, mosques, temples and synagogues. And I guess restaurants best switch to liquid meals and eat with a straw.

The policy’s list of exemptions, however, shows how one may easily opt-out of this mind control experiment (whereby people are asked to do something that has no significant benefit, while causing harm to the user and those around them.) Unless, of course, you like wearing a mask. Then, well, it’s your dream come true.

Otherwise, the policy is so lawless, counter to the human rights code and to constitutional freedoms, that all one might have to say is: “I am exempt from wearing a mask.”

In fact, you probably don’t even have to say that much. Though, I think it would be best if we said more.

A lot more.

Passive and quiet opposition to tyranny isn’t going to affect much change. Speak up while you still can. Masks may seem trivial, but they’ve already proven they are capable of demanding far worse in the spirit of voluntary servitude.

In my most recent article, I explain how to use face covering exemptions as a form of protest. The article links to a downloadable Notice of Exemptions that you can customize, print, use and distribute locally. You can read the article and download your own Notice of Exemption here.

John C. A. Manley created MuchAdoAboutCorona.ca to prevent the governments of the world from using an exaggerated pandemic as an excuse to violate our freedom, health, privacy, livelihood and humanity. John's COVID-19(84) Red Pill Email Briefs share excerpts from scientists, doctors, health care workers, investigative journalists and activists discussing issues around COVID-19 that are typically suppressed and censored. You can subscribe for free.

Manley's Notice of Exemption lists compelling reasons to receive exemption and might work in Ontario generally. But, will it work with doctors and hospitals? Their gatekeepers can just refuse service citing their own professional organization's guidelines along with CDC and WHO. Also, finding a doctor to provide an exemption is daunting as well.
 
D.C. Exempts Lawmakers, Government Employees From New Mask Order


Washington, D.C., mayor Muriel Bowser (D.) issued a universal masking order for her city Wednesday but exempted lawmakers, judges, and federal employees.

The order mandates the wearing of masks in all indoor and outdoor settings where social distancing cannot be observed. No other designated profession is exempt from wearing a mask, except when a piece of work equipment would preclude mask use. Consequences for ignoring the order include fines of up to $1,000.

The mayor’s office did not respond to a request for comment.

And the games continue 🙃
 
Back
Top Bottom