Here's a resume of unexplained things or interesting comments I harvest:
- Impossibility of the record of the co-pilot breath. The A320 cockpit if a lot too noisy. (http://www.canalplus.fr/c-divertissement/c-le-grand-journal/pid5411-le-grand-journal.html?vid=1238310)
- The BEA (French investigators) say the co-pilot actioned the button to select the altitude. This action do no sound. How can they conclude that? (http://www.canalplus.fr/c-divertissement/c-le-grand-journal/pid5411-le-grand-journal.html?vid=1238310)
- No alarm sound recorded in the cockpit while the process of asking for opening the door was used? This is a strident sound.
- The prosecutor was not inform of what the BEA known before the green light of the gov. The prosecutor himself complained about that.
- Explosion heard before the crash (I lost the source)
- Two voluntary actions: too much for an accident. Lock of the door, and decide the descent - it seems that there is a third one at the very end with a stabilization of the altitude too low to be embedded itself into the middle of the cliff, there is a round in the altimetry curve...
- Why no much talk about the jet fighter? Of what was saw, what was done?
- The Serre-Ponçon dam is the biggest water hold in Europe and is only at some kilometers of the crash. But a discussion conclude the plane would have done few damages.
- Germanwings didn't release flight parameters which was automatically recorded. (I don't know if they release it since)
- Speculation of a Italian fighter jet being in the same area: https://twitter.com/hashtag/MM7168
- Staff frightened by something and does not want to flight anymore
- No crater of the impact? (and what about the motors? put in small pieces too?)
- Impossibility of the record of the co-pilot breath. The A320 cockpit if a lot too noisy. (http://www.canalplus.fr/c-divertissement/c-le-grand-journal/pid5411-le-grand-journal.html?vid=1238310)
- The BEA (French investigators) say the co-pilot actioned the button to select the altitude. This action do no sound. How can they conclude that? (http://www.canalplus.fr/c-divertissement/c-le-grand-journal/pid5411-le-grand-journal.html?vid=1238310)
- No alarm sound recorded in the cockpit while the process of asking for opening the door was used? This is a strident sound.
- The prosecutor was not inform of what the BEA known before the green light of the gov. The prosecutor himself complained about that.
- Explosion heard before the crash (I lost the source)
- Two voluntary actions: too much for an accident. Lock of the door, and decide the descent - it seems that there is a third one at the very end with a stabilization of the altitude too low to be embedded itself into the middle of the cliff, there is a round in the altimetry curve...
- Why no much talk about the jet fighter? Of what was saw, what was done?
- The Serre-Ponçon dam is the biggest water hold in Europe and is only at some kilometers of the crash. But a discussion conclude the plane would have done few damages.
- Germanwings didn't release flight parameters which was automatically recorded. (I don't know if they release it since)
- Speculation of a Italian fighter jet being in the same area: https://twitter.com/hashtag/MM7168
- Staff frightened by something and does not want to flight anymore
- No crater of the impact? (and what about the motors? put in small pieces too?)