Leo40 said:Considering the given, i.e. we are the 200, the difficulty is the fact that we are not physically in the
same location. Therefore may I suggest that forum members practise community creation in their locality.
One can practise discernment when dealing with "others". There is almost always a point of connection,
common interests in selfsufficiency, ecology, permaculture, CSA (community supported agriculture),
creation of food co-ops and in general promoting the idea of co-operation.
How do the forum members feel about creating a "skills exchange" in a closed forum; just a brief listing
of skills available to us. <snip>
How do we begin to disconnect from our dependence on the current pathological civilisation we live in, and to defend ourselves against it at the same time?
By creating local community and bypassing as much as possible the existing system.
How do we care for and defend this family in its current 'foetal' state, from the highly dangerous and toxic external conditions, to give it a chance to grow?
We are still a virtual family and I feel the forum is well defended.
All good ideas, but we must keep in mind that we may not have the forum forever. And that's not just a concern about the PTB acting nasty... the planet itself may go through things that will make our mass communication media inactive. So, as you say, creating local community is the way to go. But that needs some sort of guidance and structure on a local basis that can preserve the values and, at the same time, adjust to the local needs and growth.
Let me just say that we have an idea/plan that we will be unveiling very soon that we think will serve very well. It's actually something that is so obvious that it took a lot of concerted "attack" effort from "outside" to block it from our view (mine, in particular).
Joan said:<snip>
But then I got to thinking although we have knowledge of the past and can possibly learn from the past in creating a new reality, that maybe we are already in the process of creating a new reality. Maybe we just haven't got all the details together yet, let me try and explain.
I was thinking about Shamans and there role in the community, they were intermediaries between human and the world of spirit, they were capable of entering into supernatural realms to obtain answers to the problems of the community, they were bards/storytellers etc.. I also thought about the role in megalithic cultures, they were active participants in the culture, they had a partner had children (I think that this was a family lineage) that they lived in the world but at times were not part of it in a sense.
When looking at images of megaliths or dolmens there are some structures that have been identified as burial chambers, but I just can't get that idea because as far as I know there have been no human remains found (I could very well be wrong about that, I just don't really know for sure). I think they may possibly have been meditation chambers, so the shaman could communicate with a divine cosmic mind. I will post a link below to give examples of what I am talking about. <snip>
So back to why I think that we are already in the process of creating our own reality and what the role of shamanism is in the community/group. After lurking the forum and now becoming a participant and also since the EE programme has begun, (forming our own meditation chambers). I have noticed that there is an explosion of new information, it seems more intelligent, focused and creative <snip>
So my thought is that each member is in a way becoming there own shaman in an individual way through connecting with the divine within themselves, sharing there knowledge and experiences with the group, but also creating part of a larger whole organic body of consciousness that could also be called Shaman. Which in turn is creating a new reality. How we get to the physical reality of getting 200 people together and actually experience this reality as a workable and functional group, that are all on the same page so to speak needs great work on the individual personality OSIT, so that no one personality dominates the group, this in turn could form what I think would be the personality of the group, each one being separate but part of the whole group. <snip>
As an end note I am still pondering the question of psychopathy and how to deal with the issue.
I think you are going in the right direction. Obviously, the shamanic role is not open to everyone (they don't want it, aren't constituted for it), but I would think that there would be a higher percentage of those who are of the shamanic type here on this forum who would then become the intermediaries for their local communities at some point in the future. Sort of like this is a "college that teaches teachers". That then prepares them for their local roles at the point in time when the global connection may be lost (at least the technical connection, though by that time, we might get to the point where direct communication is possible without consideration of space/time).
As I just mentioned, we have a plan to give a bit more structure to the process AND provide protection to those who wish to pursue community/family building. This thread has given us a lot of ideas/material to work with and we'll unveil soon.
Buddy said:Thanks, Nomad. I appreciate your straightforward summary and questions.
I'm glad to consider the scenario in terms that WE ARE the 200, and that is, of course, assuming that I could be one of them.
I agree 100% with everything you have suggested. In fact, we already have the roles of Shaman and inner circle occupied, obviously, by Laura, Ark, the QFG. Who else would have more knowledge, DO-ability and RESPONSE-ability?
Just keep in mind that a single "shaman/inner circle" that exists in a virtual environment is kind of like putting all your eggs in one basket. As noted above, I think that local, community shamans will emerge from this forum and if they have a structure to work with initially, the process of community building on the local scale will be greatly facilitated. It can start in a virtual environment, but eventually will need to move to the local, real world.
Buddy said:Perhaps one of the general, yet main ideas is to build our own self-supporting economy (exchange system)? Somehow, I think it's more complicated than that, but I'm not sure.
Yes and no. As I said, we are working on a structure that can be utilized on the local level.
Just consider that what we must face in defending ourselves from pathology are the following:
Detoxing our bodies and environment in preparation for detoxing our minds/souls
-freedom of diet and medical choices
-exemption from vaccination
-exemption from military service
-freedom of movement
-exclusion of psychopathy
-method of "diagnosis" (after all, only psychiatrists are "allowed" to diagnose...)
-communal living
-raising/care of children
-council of "elders"
-nature of elders' authority
-forum for grievances (i.e. to settle disputes)
-legality of "family" status (can we create our own family status and get benefits that relatives have?)
-structure of society/family
-transmission of tradition/teaching
-restriction of false teaching via tiered initiations/titles based on level of Being (mandatory periods of learning)
Can anyone think of other areas that we need to consider and include in a framework?