Danger, Will Robinson! WaySeer Propaganda!

Wow. I don't know what's more painful, the video or the fact that so many people actually fall for it... :O

Has anyone tried getting in contact with the guy and asking his perspective on all this? Might be helpful, just to get his response beforehand, therefore killing 2 birds with one stone, so to speak. Might even lend itself to more material and insight to work with.

A counter video would be relatively quick and easy.
Take the original and perhaps freeze frame it when making a point, like it was suggested before- like a "pop-up video", since many people are familiar with it from VH1 and like that format.

Pop Up Video Example (for those unfamiliar): _http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ITt639SPxSQ&feature=related
 
Sounds good.

Most of the important points are covered and it`s easily understandable.

I don`t want to appear negative, but I was wondering how effective "adults" will be in countering this thing.

I`m not sure that we`re going to get through to a lot of the more troubled youth since what the "psycho" has said about them, and to them, is pretty much the way it is with the majority of them anyway and they will resonate strongly with it, in fact most of them might latch onto it as their "excuse" to continue acting as they do, because that's exactly what they want to believe.

For instance you stated this below:

"Remember, nothing is wrong with the idea of people agreeing to work together and form societies and governments. The problem stems from corruption within those societies and governments, and this corruption is almost entirely due to psychopaths ignoring the laws of decent behavior, laws which prevent this psychopath and those like him from torturing and tormenting you for their amusement."



These people relate so well to this "movement" because they do ignore laws/rules and act up on a regular basis!

This psycho guy would be their "hero" and they will want to believe him, to be like him..and see you, me or any older person as just part of the Establishment, and simply trying to kill the movement.

This is after all, a perfect excuse to act up, act out and do whatever they want.

I was thinking that someone appearing to be a younger person, of their own era, cool and hip.. would have a much better chance of getting through and countering the damage, someone seen as "dude ish" or whatever, as they think this guy is.

I don`t know, I was just wondering if using sort of the same tactic might work better, then appealing to the logic most them don`t have anyway, due of course to vaccinations, medications, fluoride, toxic food and recreational drug abuse and thats for starters..

I just don`t see any of them taking the time to clean all that up just to give the opposition equal time. See what I mean?
Maybe I`m just talking from too much foster care, I don`t know.
 
Woodsman said:
Does anybody have any further suggestions?

Well, just wondering about the time issue. If it is to be played, then paused for commentary, it could easily double the length, which is already at 9+ minutes. What is the max time allowed for youtube? A scrolling text would be a quick way to get it out without making it longer, nothing to stop a more detailed and narrated vid after that.

Also, it looks like there is some wayseers show planned:
_http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a4P8SmriQ9M
 
Meager1 said:
Sounds good.

Most of the important points are covered and it`s easily understandable.

I don`t want to appear negative, but I was wondering how effective "adults" will be in countering this thing.

I`m not sure that we`re going to get through to a lot of the more troubled youth since what the "psycho" has said about them, and to them, is pretty much the way it is with the majority of them anyway and they will resonate strongly with it, in fact most of them might latch onto it as their "excuse" to continue acting as they do, because that's exactly what they want to believe.

For instance you stated this below:

"Remember, nothing is wrong with the idea of people agreeing to work together and form societies and governments. The problem stems from corruption within those societies and governments, and this corruption is almost entirely due to psychopaths ignoring the laws of decent behavior, laws which prevent this psychopath and those like him from torturing and tormenting you for their amusement."



These people relate so well to this "movement" because they do ignore laws/rules and act up on a regular basis!

This psycho guy would be their "hero" and they will want to believe him, to be like him..and see you, me or any older person as just part of the Establishment, and simply trying to kill the movement.

This is after all, a perfect excuse to act up, act out and do whatever they want.

I was thinking that someone appearing to be a younger person, of their own era, cool and hip.. would have a much better chance of getting through and countering the damage, someone seen as "dude ish" or whatever, as they think this guy is.

I don`t know, I was just wondering if using sort of the same tactic might work better, then appealing to the logic most them don`t have anyway, due of course to vaccinations, medications, fluoride, toxic food and recreational drug abuse and thats for starters..

I just don`t see any of them taking the time to clean all that up just to give the opposition equal time. See what I mean?
Maybe I`m just talking from too much foster care, I don`t know.

I hear you and I've spent a good portion of my adult life considering the question of mass communication and the appropriate/ethical way to approach it. I tend to be a hard-liner; I hate being manipulated so I avoid manipulating in return, (though the sheer nature of communication in any mode can be deemed a kind of manipulative effort. It's a difficult issue to come to terms with.).

It's certainly possible to fake "Young and Hip"; the people who made this video did just that. But "Young and Hip" is also a fallacy. Young souls are more open, trying to work out what is real, what behavior sets should be adopted, and in that openness they've been sold on what they are supposed to be by big media. While big media and other forms of social control have made huge strides in owning the minds of young souls and shutting them off to alternate viewpoints, that doesn't mean those souls are truly closed off. I've definitely noted that a lot of the souls incarnating today seem really advanced. I think souls choosing to come into the world today are either really a bit foolish, or they are very brave and well-equipped to deal with the harrowing work ahead of them. The latter sort, I suspect, will be able to see through the false fronts and will appreciate a clear message which resonates with truth.

So I think it's best to simply present clearly so that most reading comprehension levels can connect; make it interesting for both children and adults, and do it in a manner which is aesthetically appealing, visuals and audio, to anybody who happens to be human. Just be clear and honest. It's the messages with ulterior motives that bother me, (which include most messages), from "Don't Smoke" and "Come to Jesus" to even arguably good messages like, "Reading is fun" and "Don't drink & drive", all are attempts to change people's behavior to suit what the message-giver would be more comfortable with. And people pick up on that on some level, so unless you are really slick at it, as with this video, you'll probably come across as false.

The key, I think, is this. . .

In my mind, I don't think we're here to 'save' people. And certainly not trick people into saving themselves. We're here, (IMO) to offer information and thereby choices. Personally, I think if a kid wants to run off and join the kind of circus being presented in this video, well, that's just another experience which is all part of God's awareness at this level, and is thereby valuable and necessary. I certainly wouldn't want to do it myself, but it's not my choice. What I'm interested in offering is information and the shooting down lies so that the choices people make are those which best match who they really are inside.

But, of course, there are other ways of approaching this kind of stuff. Mine isn't necessarily the best in all circumstances. Many spiritual teachers play all kinds of games on their students to achieve certain results. The Castaneda books were full of that kind of thing and it seemed to work well enough. So no answer is totally right.
 
I'm amazed I made it all the way through this. My head hurts. "Impulsivity is creativity." Uh-huh. This guy was all over the place. "If you don't revolt then you're programmed." He really liked images from Pink Floyd's "The Wall." That music though was really too much. And again, "We all are one." This guy just wants to make money and to be seen as a new age "guru."
 
mechanimated said:
Woodsman said:
Does anybody have any further suggestions?

Well, just wondering about the time issue. If it is to be played, then paused for commentary, it could easily double the length, which is already at 9+ minutes. What is the max time allowed for youtube? A scrolling text would be a quick way to get it out without making it longer, nothing to stop a more detailed and narrated vid after that.

Also, it looks like there is some wayseers show planned:
_http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a4P8SmriQ9M


The maximum length for a youtube video are 15min. However, some channels allow more and have no time limit, but I think that only goes for videos that don't infringe copyright issues.

There are different options how to approach the video. One would with pop-up videos as detached suggested, however I think that it would be too cluttered and not enough space when addressing his points as the the commentary that is being worked on here is also extensive.
Scrolling text may also work after each point he brings up. Narration is possible as well. I think regardless of scrolling, pop-up videos or narration (a combination of all three is possible as well), the length may exceed 15 min, but it could also be squeezed in (doesn't he repeat certain points?). You won't know until the response transcript is done and trying it out with various approaches.

Overall I think it's a very good and important thing to do since the video is gaining popularity like crazy. I already had some "discussion" about it on facebook. People are attracted to it like moths to a flame. Posting an article along with it would help as well, imo.
 
Spiral Out said:
The maximum length for a youtube video are 15min. However, some channels allow more and have no time limit, but I think that only goes for videos that don't infringe copyright issues.

There are different options how to approach the video. One would with pop-up videos as detached suggested, however I think that it would be too cluttered and not enough space when addressing his points as the the commentary that is being worked on here is also extensive.
Scrolling text may also work after each point he brings up. Narration is possible as well. I think regardless of scrolling, pop-up videos or narration (a combination of all three is possible as well), the length may exceed 15 min, but it could also be squeezed in (doesn't he repeat certain points?). You won't know until the response transcript is done and trying it out with various approaches.

Overall I think it's a very good and important thing to do since the video is gaining popularity like crazy. I already had some "discussion" about it on facebook. People are attracted to it like moths to a flame. Posting an article along with it would help as well, imo.

I see the format like this. . .

Play a portion of the original video, then freeze on the appropriate frame, dim it, and scroll up our text over top while our narrator reads. Then continue to the next part.

I also think a two-part video is probably the way to go. While this is not so good for people with short attentions spans, we might include a bit of dialogue at the end of part 1, "This video uses the very same techniques that schools and governments and religions use to trap people into following false signals. Now that you've begun to see the manipulation, continue in part 2 to learn more about the REAL way to break free!"

Or something along those lines. I would put a plug at the end of the second part for your video and perhaps some other useful sources of information. Definitely a link to a webpage where this can be discussed in more depth.

I also *definitely* think that we ought to use a narrator's voice. Is there any chance of enlisting the same narrator you used on the UFO video? I thought he was great!
 
Here's a contribution that I think is more in line with the group effort than the one I linked previously.

This post was originally formatted as a "Dialog with Garret" based on the video narrative which starts below. But I decided it was a bit too "wild", so I toned it down and re-wrote it a bit. The video narrative is the bolded part.


ATTENTION: All you rule-breakers, you misfits and troublemakers, all you free spirits and pioneers, all you visionaries and non-conformists:
That description could apply to ADDers, non-ADDers, sociopaths, Narcissists and possibly psychopaths. I’m not sure about psychopaths, since without empathy and with shallow emotions, could they be ‘motivated’ by this presentation? Seems more likely they would be behind the scenes, orchestrating the show.

So, who is being addressed, exactly?

Everything that the establishment has told you is wrong with you is actually what's right with you.
In light of all the possible addressees, how about some clarification here?

You see things others don’t.
How about an example so we can narrow down the field a bit?

You are hardwired to change the world.
And this statement is based on what?

Unlike nine out of ten people, your mind is irrepressible, and this threatens authority.
As a generality, I suppose that could be a contextually accurate statement for many, many people. Even some who are still inured in the system in different ways.

You were born to be a revolutionary.
“A revolutionary” in what way? Science, industry, academia, politics, something else?

You can’t stand rules because in your heart you know there’s a better way.
Which rules? There are all kinds of rules for just about everything imaginable – including grammar. And there is a BIG difference between some rules that are stupid, boring, pathological and counter-intuitive to creating and living a rational beneficial life - and those rules that are the only thing standing between some pathological people and the wholesale expression of their pathological urges to rape, rob, pillage, destroy, hurt, maim, kill, etc., etc., etc.

You have strengths dangerous to the establishment, and it wants them eliminated.
Well, I have certain strengths and “I” know what they are, but am I to assume the ones that are meant? And why must the referents be so vague? To keep the statements from being challenged? Which ‘strengths’ are targeted for elimination by this ‘establishment’?

So your whole life you’ve been told your strengths were weaknesses - Now I’m telling you otherwise.
Umm, if you are referring to the strengths that I think you might mean, and you know me the way you think you do, then you already know that I know that. So, naturally I wouldn’t need to be told that. Reality provides evidence via feedback and cognitive loops provide the means for perceiving it. So, it seems you might be addressing ‘wounded’ people who are deep in their ‘disorder’ perspective and your statement could be wrong or right, depending on their particular issue and situation.

Your impulsivity is a gift. Impulses are your key to the miraculous. Your distractibility is an artifact of your inspired creativity.
You’ve just used the three keywords of “AD/HD” as understood from the ‘disorder’ perspective and advanced by Russell Barkley. Am I to assume you’re not interested in ‘AD/HD’ folks with a healthier perspective? For instance, I’m not ‘impulsive’; I'm just ready and able to throw myself into 'the chase' on a moment's notice. And I'm not distractible; I'm constantly monitoring my environment; which is how I understood that you were coming while half a mile away and didn’t need to stay focused on you to maintain this awareness. Can we move this along?

Your mood swings reflect the natural pulse of life.
Well, maybe sometimes, but my sensitivity to stimuli also prompts my mood swings, mediated by my self-discipline of the moment. Since my inner and outer environment includes all kinds of toxins, including emotionally toxic people, the natural pulse of my life is not necessarily the healthiest at all times.

They give you unstoppable energy when you're high, deep soulful insight when you're low.
No, the mood swings don’t give me anything – they are effects rather than causes. The high energy levels are natural and exist in the absence of suppression/repression.

Been diagnosed with a "disorder"? That’s society’s latest way to deny its own illness by pointing the finger at you.
Well, to what ‘disorder’ do you refer? If you mean ‘AD/HD’, I agree that this diagnosis is done by using ‘normal’ as the yardstick and as ‘normal’ relates to the (so-called) Executive Functions Model which is a theory of human variability rather than proof of biological basis. Last time I checked, anyway.

Your addictive personality is just a symptom of your vast underused capacity for heroic, creative expression and spiritual connection.
I dunno. ‘Addictive personality’ in my case simply means that any ‘high’ I chase has to be done manually, time after time, because my brain is not wired for the easy, low-effort establishing of automatically maintained addictions. Not that it can't be done, of course. It just takes a lot more. Seems it’s more a symptom of not being able to easily turn off the perception of what’s really wrong in the world – for long, anyway.

Your utter lack of repression,
Who has ‘utter lack of repression’? According to Hervey Cleckley, Robert Hare and others, it’s the psychopath that has the property of ‘utter lack of repression’. The ‘AD/HD’ folks who see themselves from the ‘disorder’ perspective, are already repressed, obviously. Read that sentence again.

…your wide eyed idealism, your unmitigated open mind - didn’t anyone ever tell you? These are the traits shared by the greatest pioneers and visionaries, innovators, revolutionaries, procrastinators and drama queens, activists on the social scene, space cadets, mavericks, philosophers, derelicts, business suits flying fighter jets, football stars and sex addicts, celebrities with ADD, alcoholics who seek novelty, first responders, prophets and saints, mystics and change agents.
Well, you’ve just blended ADDers, psychopaths, sociopaths and other disturbed people into a single group, mixed desirable and undesirable traits together and came up with “a single personality type”. That’s bad alchemy. And potentially dangerous to some very good people in your “group” who have been hoodwinked, manipulated and abused enough in their lives.

CHORUS
We are all the same, you know
'cause we're all affected, by The Way
We are all the same, you know
'cause we're all attracted to the flame.
You know in your heart that there's a natural order, something more sovereign than any man-made rules or laws could ever express.


No. As I just pointed out, we’re all obviously not the same. Bad choice of metaphors: ‘attracted to the flame’. That’s about a moth’s spiraling path to death.

This natural order is called "The Way."
By whom? And which "The Way"?

According to a friend of mine (whose name I don't yet have permission to mention), back in the day, "The Way" referred to the inner secrets of the old Mystery religions, forerunners of Gnosticism and some forms of early Christianity. These groups of individuals worked to know themselves, to master their emotions, aspire to higher thought and Truth as the ultimate ideals; then came psychopath co-opting.

The Way is the eternal substrate of the cosmos. It guides the very current of time and space.
The ‘eternal substrate of the cosmos’ may guide the ‘current of time and space’. If that is the case, then that is what is real. “The Way” is a mere man-made effort to re-conceptualize the actual reality as if it were some prop in a scripted show. A redundant semantic identification. An esoteric sounding bridge to what follows…

The Way is known by some as The Will of God, Divine Providence, The Holy Spirit, the Implicate Order, the Tao, reverse entropy, life force, but for now we’ll simply call it 'The Way.'
Who is the ‘some’ who ‘knows’ this? None of those words are necessarily equivalent to your definition of ‘the way’ as eternal substrate of the cosmos. More unnecessary semantic identification to mix up all kinds of different referents as if one was making a pot of ‘refrigerator soup’.

The Way is reflected in you as the source of your inspiration, the source of your passions, your wisdom, your enthusiasm, your intuition, your spiritual fire...love. The Way takes the chaos out of the Universe and breathes life into it, giving it divine order. The Way, when expressed by the mind, is genius; perceived through the eyes, is beauty; felt through the senses, is grace. When allowed into the heart...is love.
Word salad blended together to feel good to the brain, taste good to the tongue, and leave the belly starved for solid nutrition.

Most people cannot sense The Way directly...
Most people cannot sense the ‘eternal substrate of the cosmos’ directly? So…?

…but then there are the Wayseers, the keepers of the flame.
Finally, a “noun” for that mixed group of people you defined above which likely includes psychological pathology. And what flame? The one I already mentioned that attracts the moth to its death, or did I miss something?

Wayseers have an unexplainable knack for just knowing The Way. They sense it in their very being. They can’t tell you why or how they arrived at the right answer. They just know it in their core.
You seem to be mixing 'just knowing the way' with situations of valid intuition or insight that come from a deep understanding of a particular something at a particular time after the preparatory work has been done.

They can’t show their work, so don’t ask.
Yes they can show it, by deductively expressing what they have intuitively sensed, in context with their observations and knowledge of how the world/universe works. They may often struggle for the right words to string together in the right manner to achieve the acceptable grammar of linear understanding; their logic may even seem fuzzy at times, but it just takes effort, and enough interest to maintain the necessary focus.

Their minds simply resonate with The Way. When The Way is present, so are they.
“When” the way is present? If the way is the eternal substrate of the cosmos, when would it not be present? Is that a faux paux?

While others are blind to it, and society begs you to ignore it, The Way stirs you inside.
If the others who are blind to ‘it’ are part of society, how is it these others beg me to ignore something that they, themselves, are blind to?

Neurological repression blocks most people’s awareness of The Way.
Neurological repression of one sort or other blocks most people’s awareness of many aspects and facts of reality. There is nothing new here.

Censoring all thoughts and impulses from the unconscious is their prefrontal cortex, the Gestapo of the brain. Nothing which violates its socialized programming even gets through.
Wait, which is it? The prefrontal cortex or the socialized programming that does the censoring? This idea of the PFC as the Gestapo of the brain is silly. The PFC is the latest addition to the brain, evolutionarily speaking, and is necessary for deductive work and contextualizing the irrational emotion originating in the more primitive limbic system, at the least.

You already know the limbic system because it’s represented by the reptile image in your own video. Without the PFC, one would not even be able to do the mathematics of engineering or to program computers, among other things.

The PFC was even instrumental in this video production due to the need for gathering the pictures, video, planning the script - which includes careful thought to what is and is not said, what power words to use, choosing the narrator, choosing the music and it's tone (whether major or minor keys to create and hook the desired mood), blending the music in, editing for a logical flow, etc. In short, making this entire video.

But your mind is different. Your mind has been cracked wide open to The Way; by some miraculous genetic trait, some psychotropic chemical or maybe even by the will of your own soul.
Cracked wide open? Like an egg or the earth during a massive earthquake, or by crack cocaine? So, the inference here is that no matter how it happens, it’s all good and beneficial and oh, so right?

Your brain’s reward pathways have been hijacked; dopamine employed to overthrow the fascist dictatorship of your prefrontal cortex.
Hmmm. From my own studies, it seems to me that dopamine is employed to stay calm in the face of predators, killers, incessant, unrelenting stress and the awareness of the fascist dictatorship of psychopaths and their worker bees. Where'd I go wrong, assuming it is me?

Now your brain is free of repression, your mind free of censorship, your awareness exposed to the turbulent seas of the unconscious - through this open doorway divine light shines into your consciousness, showing you The Way. This is what makes you a Wayseer.
Well, a person could theoretically be free of all addictions involving excessive dopamine, but they can still be ‘infected’ by narcissistic deep denial implanted by less-than-optimal childhood experiences that can also involve the compulsive re-enactment of trauma.

Following your logic, a person can be this wonderful ‘Wayseer’ and still unconsciously seek to visit their traumas onto others. Lloyd deMause and more mainstream psychologists have reams of research material to prove that.

Ninety percent of human civilization is populated with those whose brains are blocked to The Way.
Where does that percentage come from? I have read that 10 to 15% of the world’s population and 3 to 6% of school-age children are supposed to be on the “AD/HD” continuum. Are you referencing 90% of non-ADD people? If not, then where does this figure come from, exactly?

Their brains are hardwired to enforce the social programming indoctrinated since birth.
No, they’re not hardwired this way. This just becomes the default neurological set once the brain chemistry has balanced in ‘a state of siege’ that never ends.

Unlike you they cannot break out of this programming, because they have not yet experienced the necessary revolution of mind.
Anyone can experience a revolution of mind by questioning everything, breaking their robotic, mechanical addictions, following an esoteric path, or by more direct means that slowly and steadily lower the amount of stress and certain levels of certain neuro-chemicals the brain/body has become addicted to. That last is theoretical for most people at this time.

These programmed people take social institutions and rules very seriously. Society is full of games programmed to keep peoples’ minds occupied so they will not revolt. These games often cause sick fixations on peculiar protocols, power structures, taboos and domination - all subtle forms of human bondage. This distinct form of madness is not only tolerated by the masses but insisted upon. The programmed ones believe in rules so forcefully they become willing to destroy anyone who violates them.
When people cannot think for themselves because they have been taught and programmed with all the instructions they will ever need from their authorities, then yes, they will fight to preserve this status quo because unconsciously, the alternative is literally unthinkable - possibly resembling death.

Wayseers are the ones who call their bluff.
Neither Wayseers nor anyone else should take something out of a baby’s hand without replacing it with something else at the same time. I think a true Wayseer would recognize that efficiency which reduces stress and eases one’s work is a value.

Since Wayseer minds are free to reject social programming, Wayseers readily see social institutions for what they are - imaginary games.
So would anyone with an understanding of General Semantics and conscious projection.

Wayseers comfort the disturbed and disturb the comfortable. Helping those who are lost in these games and refuse to help themselves is a calling of many Wayseers.
That applies to anyone who displays genuine empathy and caring for others.

Since Wayseers are the ones who keep contact with the original source of reality, they are able to disrupt societal conventions and even governments to realign humanity with The Way.
How about an example from a historical perspective?

Wayseers are an ancient lineage - a kind of priesthood, carriers of the flame, ones "in the know." There must always be Wayseers to reform the dizzying psychotic spinning wheels of society, giant mindless hamster wheels obscuring the pure blue sky, keeping humanity shackled in a darkened cage. So Wayseers are called - to shed light on the madness of society, to continually resurrect the timeless transcendent Spirit of Truth.
“Wayseers” is something you made up. There have been mystics, prophets and others who have influenced the evolutionary course of history, but of those people whose collective traits fit your ‘Wayseer’ description there has also originated much destruction, pain and suffering; same as today.

As mentioned earlier, historically, there was a useful "Way" and there was the co-opted "Way". If, instead of lecturing, you are revealing some kind of secret or something, why would you want to shine a spotlight on it? Just how naïve do you think your audience is?

Wayseers reveal this divine truth by devoting themselves to the birth of some creative or disruptive act expressed through art or philosophy, innovations to shake up industry, revolutions for democracy, coups that topple hypocrisy, movements of solidarity, changes that leave a legacy, rebellions against policy, spirit infused technology, moments of clarity, things that challenge barbarity, watersheds of sincerity, momentous drives for charity.
So, here you ‘rap and rhyme’ to reveal that this imaginary group of people you call Wayseers are those people who are deliberately disruptive, overtly rebellious and destructive and those people who are also actually creative?

I disagree completely. It appears to me you are blending together highly entropic individuals with highly creative people and ‘nouning’ them as “Wayseers”. Righteously enough, a “Real Wayseer”, if such exists, would see this nonsense from a mile away and avoid it like a plague. But the gifted, yet self-effacing ‘disordered’ people will probably get suckered into another con again.

As a Wayseer by your definition, I reject the Way you describe in favor of a different Way. A Way that makes use of the prefrontal cortex to outflank and rewire the pathological influences of socialized programming and to help others do the same by understanding what has gone wrong, as well.

CHORUS
We are all the same, you know
'cause we're all affected, by The Way
We are all the same, you know
'cause we're all attracted to the flame.

This is your calling, Wayseer.
You’ve found your tribe.
Welcome home.


That sounds warm, fuzzy, and nice and cozy, but no thanks. This feels like it is knowingly addressed to those people who have suffered infant and childhood emotional abandonment. That situation leaves a hunger inside, for the caring, support and love never received when it was necessary to meet nature’s requirement for the formation of healthy brain circuitry in humans, ala Gabor Mate.

The only way your Wayseer conceptualization makes any sense to me, considering the disparity and inconsistency of the traits you describe, is as a "granfalloon". That’s your WaySeer!

Closing note:
As the founder of The Fourth Way, Gurdjieff believed everyone was a "dog" until they proved otherwise. Considering what is available and known and revealed in contemporary psychology and psychopathology, I think that's sound policy for life.
 
I just downloaded the first chapter of Garret John Loporto's book "Wayseers" for free here:

_http://www.wayseermanifesto.com/book/The-Wayseers-1st-chapter-v0-3-7-8.pdf
...or here...
_http://localchange.files.wordpress.com/2011/03/the-wayseers-1st-chapter-v0-3-7-8.pdf

It's pretty atrocious, but worth getting the insight if one is to do an efficient counter-video.
He seems to selectively distort science to make lofty (and dangerous) claims using vague examples.

In short, he tries to base all this on the assumption that:
"Wayseers usually share a common gene – a genetic polymorphism called the DRD4 exon III 7-repeat allele (DRD4 7R for short). This Wayseer gene causes the brain’s reward pathways to override the prefrontal cortex brain’s neurologically repression mechanism, which typically censors unconscious thoughts and impulses. This difference encourages risk-taking, novelty seeking, increased alpha/theta brainwave patterns, susceptibility to addictive behavior, ADD/ADHD and bipolar, propensity for genius level problem solving and creativity, and gives one access to that miraculous quality that makes great heroes, charismatic political leaders, rock stars, entrepreneurs, movie-moguls, rebel billionaires, inspired artists, mystics and pioneers.

Wayseers however are not limited only to those who have this DRD4 7R gene; because other gene combinations, decades of fervent prayer or meditation, psychotropic drugs or even medications like L- dopa (used to treat Parkinson’s disease) can cause one’s brain to reconstitute into a form that allows for Wayseer consciousness."

Something for the medical scientists here to consider. Sadly, he's also advocating that the mentally unstable, pathological, psychopathic, and impressionable use psychotropics to blast open their psychic space to the jungles of the supernatural world. Extremely irresponsible and repugnant advice...

He continues...
"Sigmund Freud’s most creative protégé, Otto Rank, spent his career studying the special case of Wayseer psychology – what he called the psychology of the creative type or “the Artist.” Rank’s waiting room was filled with Wayseers stuck in vicious cycles of conscious repression, unable to fully suppress their irrepressible minds enough to fit in and unable to allow themselves to freely express themselves enough to find happiness and peace. These Wayseers were at war within themselves and Rank called them “the neurotic”.

Rank later went on to develop a therapy for the neurotic Wayseer, which helps one shed their habits of conscious repression to become a heroic, creative, expressive Wayseer or “the Artist”. His work was brilliant and effective, but alas, it has been largely forgotten by history because his therapy only was applicable to about 10% of the general population – those whom are Wayseers."

This dated and questionable part of Otto Rank's work is generally described in the following:
"According to Rank, all emotional life is grounded in the present. In Will Therapy, published in German in 1929-31, Rank uses the term “here and now” for the first time in the psychotherapeutic literature: “Freud made the repression historical, that is, misplaced it into the childhood of the individual and then wanted to release it from there, while as a matter of fact the same tendency is working here and now” (Rank, 1929–31, p. 39). Instead of the word Verdrängung (repression), which laid stress on unconscious repression of the past, Rank preferred to use the word Verleugnung (denial), which focused instead on the emotional will to remain ill in the present: “The neurotic lives too much in the past [and] to that extent he actually does not live. He suffers … because he clings to [the past], wants to cling to it, in order to protect himself from experience [Erlebnis], the emotional surrender to the present” (Rank, 1929–31, p. 27)."
(source: _http://psychology.jrank.org/pages/528/Otto-Rank.html )

Curious to note that:

"The Freudians (the school from which Rank emerged) labeled Rank as mentally ill, and he was expelled from the American Psychoanalytic Association. To remain in the Association, those who had undergone analysis with Rank were forced to undergo analysis again with a Freudian practitioner.

[...]

Although Rank abhorred the Nazis, in 1939 the psychologist Erich Fromm labeled Rank's "will therapy" a Nazi-style philosophy (emphasizing ego, free-will, consciousness)."
(source: _http://psychology.jrank.org/pages/528/Otto-Rank.html )

It seems he's basing all this off a selective understanding of limited medical assumptions and a dated and limited psychological premise.


Later on in the book, he outlines that "Wayseer Qualities" include among other things, having a high sex drive, restless, hot tempered, impetuous, runs hot and cold (bipolar), fearless, ambitious, moody, addictive personality, charismatic, short attention span, sensation-seeking, impulsive, irrepressible, and energetic.

It's like he's waving a flag for all psychopaths and pathologically distorted & confused people to gather under!

He goes on to list the following as "Wayseers" (it's a part of the list):
Martin Luther King, Jr.
Thomas Jefferson
Abraham Lincoln
Louisa May Alcott
Napoleon
Joan of Arc
Benjamin Franklin
Thomas Edison
Amelia Earhart
Winston Churchill
John F. Kennedy
Mother Theresa
Bono
Tina Turner
Bill Clinton
Oprah Winfrey
Angelina Jolie
Richard Branson (founder of "Virgin")
Steve Jobs (founder of Apple & Pixar)
Conan O'Brien
Vincent van Gogh
Carl Jung


:jawdrop:


As an afterthought to maintain perspective, also considering the tangles of business and such as seen here before, there are some questions that might be worth reflecting upon.
Would he be able to sue for slander/ liable?
As deplorable as this all is, would it be worth putting a video out for it?
There are a great number of videos and authors perpetuating nonsense. What makes this guy so special?
Are there better, more noteworthy public icons to focus on?
 
Bud said:
Here's a contribution that I think is more in line with the group effort than the one I linked previously.

[...]

Ooh. That's quite good too.

Though, I do find the wording rather complex and difficult to follow at times. I think it's important to remember that the audience in question, (unless I'm reading things incorrectly), are largely junior high and high schoolers who are likely to feel threatened by university-level language.

Also, it has been understood in educational circles there are different learning styles, and that those children in one group often find themselves baffled by the style which applies perfectly to another group, and vice-versa.

I find, Bud, your writing style to pattern after what I vaguely term the 'engineer', which employs a tone and word-use which is quite different from where I come from, (I went through school strong in the visual arts and English, while the maths and sciences, once they moved beyond things I could see in my mind's eye, became hopelessly tangled.). While I suspect you would ring clear and true with many in the Slashdot crowd, for instance, I think they are just a subset of a much larger group which also includes the skate-board/instant messaging set who I strongly suspect won't be able to follow the language you are offering.

I've found in the past, that the way to sculpt a useful message which can be absorbed by the widest demographic possible is to describe complex ideas using simple language; the result is not going to be as rich in information, certainly, but it can cover the essential bases and nobody gets left out.

Still, I like much of what you've offered and have pasted below the passages I think are particularly strong and which might fit into an effective counter-message. . . (I did some experimental alterations to a few passages and have indicated which.)


~~~~~~~~~
You can’t stand rules because in your heart you know there’s a better way.

Which rules? There are all kinds of rules for just about everything imaginable – including grammar. And there is a BIG difference between some rules that are stupid, boring, pathological and counter-intuitive to creating and living a rational beneficial life - and those rules that are the only thing standing between some pathological people and the wholesale expression of their pathological urges to rape, rob, pillage, destroy, hurt, maim, kill, etc., etc., etc.

…your wide eyed idealism, your unmitigated open mind - didn’t anyone ever tell you? These are the traits shared by the greatest pioneers and visionaries, innovators, revolutionaries, procrastinators and drama queens, activists on the social scene, space cadets, mavericks, philosophers, derelicts, business suits flying fighter jets, football stars and sex addicts, celebrities with ADD, alcoholics who seek novelty, first responders, prophets and saints, mystics and change agents.

Well, you’ve just blended ADDers, psychopaths, sociopaths and other disturbed people into a single group, mixed desirable and undesirable traits together to come up with “a single type of personality”. That’s bad alchemy. And potentially dangerous to some very good people in your “group” who have been hoodwinked, manipulated and abused enough in their lives.


CHORUS
We are all the same, you know
'cause we're all affected, by The Way
We are all the same, you know
'cause we're all attracted to the flame.
You know in your heart that there's a natural order, something more sovereign than any man-made rules or laws could ever express.


No. As I just pointed out, we’re all obviously not the same. Bad choice of metaphors: ‘attracted to the flame’. That’s about a moth’s spiraling path to death.

This natural order is called "The Way."

By whom? And which "The Way"?

According to a friend of mine (whose name I don't yet have permission to mention), back in the day, "The Way" referred to the inner secrets of the old Mystery religions, forerunners of Gnosticism and some forms of early Christianity. These groups of individuals worked to know themselves, to master their emotions, aspire to higher thought and Truth as the ultimate ideals; then came psychopath co-opting.
Shortened and altered as follows. . .

By whom? And which "The Way"? Back in the day, "The Way" referred to the inner secrets of the old Mystery religions, forerunners of Gnosticism and some forms of early Christianity. These groups of individuals worked to know themselves, to master their emotions, aspire to higher thought and Truth as the ultimate ideals; then along came psychopathic leadership, twisting meanings to serve themselves.


Censoring all thoughts and impulses from the unconscious is their prefrontal cortex, the Gestapo of the brain. Nothing which violates its socialized programming even gets through.

[...] This idea of the PFC as the Gestapo of the brain is silly. The PFC is the latest addition to the brain, evolutionarily speaking, and is necessary for deductive work and contextualizing the irrational emotion originating in the more primitive limbic system.

[...]

The PFC was also instrumental in this video production due to the need for gathering the pictures, video, planning the script - which includes careful thought to what is and is not said, what power words to use, choosing the narrator, choosing the music and it's tone (whether major or minor keys to create and hook the desired mood), blending the music in, editing for a logical flow, etc. In short, making this entire video.

Wayseers comfort the disturbed and disturb the comfortable. Helping those who are lost in these games and refuse to help themselves is a calling of many Wayseers.

That applies to anyone who displays genuine empathy and caring for others.

Wayseers are an ancient lineage - a kind of priesthood, carriers of the flame, ones "in the know." There must always be Wayseers to reform the dizzying psychotic spinning wheels of society, giant mindless hamster wheels obscuring the pure blue sky, keeping humanity shackled in a darkened cage. So Wayseers are called - to shed light on the madness of society, to continually resurrect the timeless transcendent Spirit of Truth.

“Wayseers” is something you made up. There have been mystics, prophets and others who have influenced the evolutionary course of history, but of those people whose collective traits fit your ‘Wayseer’ description there has also originated much destruction, pain and suffering; same as today.

As mentioned earlier, historically, there was a useful "Way" and there was the co-opted "Way". If, instead of lecturing, you are revealing some kind of secret or something, why would you want to shine a spotlight on it? Just how naïve do you think your audience is?
Altered to. . .

“Wayseers” is something you made up. There have been mystics, prophets and others who have influenced the course of history, but among that number who fit your ‘Wayseer’ description have also been those responsible for genocides and mass suffering.


CHORUS
We are all the same, you know
'cause we're all affected, by The Way
We are all the same, you know
'cause we're all attracted to the flame.

This is your calling, Wayseer.
You’ve found your tribe.
Welcome home.


That sounds warm, fuzzy, and nice and cozy, but no thanks. This feels like it is knowingly addressed to those people who have suffered infant and childhood emotional abandonment. That situation leaves a hunger inside, for the caring, support and love of never received when it was necessary to meet nature’s requirement for the formation of healthy brain circuitry in humans, ala Gabor Mate.

The only way your Wayseer conceptualization makes any sense to me, considering the disparity and inconsistency of the traits you describe, is as a "granfalloon". That’s your WaySeer!

I think that's going to miss its mark. How about. . .

That sounds warm and fuzzy, but no thanks. This video feels like it was knowingly aimed at people who have suffered infant and childhood emotional abandonment, people left with a hunger inside, for caring, support and love. It seems that you are offering to fill that void, but you are doing it for your own selfish purposes.

The psychopath knows how to target the weak and hurting. That's what is happening here.


~~~~~~~~~~~~


I don't want to promote impulsive action, but I do think it's important to not get too bogged down on this project. These viral videos have a way of spreading their damage exponentially, so there IS a clock ticking.

If there are any significant concerns which need to be brought up, we'd better identify and deal with them soon.
 
It's like he's waving a flag for all psychopaths and pathologically distorted & confused people to gather under!




Exactly. And this is why he will certainly appear as a hero to the target population, especially the younger ones.
And to people with these problems he could very well seem like the "messiah".. Imagine an army of these folks being directed by the puppet master!

Talk about the horror of the situation, this one takes the cake.

There is a potential of this thing really taking off, considering the presentation and the high energy appeal, and is sure to attract the attention of every loose canon out there.

And though Woodsman explained the logic of the countering video very well, how many of these folks are going to be logical, or even be willing to listen to an opposing view if they have the problems he`s telling them are not problems?

Seems like he isn`t really targeting the fence sitters, but the actual down in the dirt hard, core trouble makers, for the most part.

I`m still hesitant to even post the link to it on my face book page, because I wouldn't`t want anyone sending it out to their friends, especially kids, without the warnings that have been put on it.
 
And though Woodsman explained the logic of the countering video very well, how many of these folks are going to be logical, or even be willing to listen to an opposing view if they have the problems he`s telling them are not problems?
Seems like he isn`t really targeting the fence sitters, but the actual down in the dirt hard, core trouble makers, for the most part.



Sorry posted to quickly "he" in the above was in reference to the video and not to Woodsmans commentary.



.
 
de-tached said:
I just downloaded the first chapter of Garret John Loporto's book "Wayseers" for free here:

_http://www.wayseermanifesto.com/book/The-Wayseers-1st-chapter-v0-3-7-8.pdf
...or here...
_http://localchange.files.wordpress.com/2011/03/the-wayseers-1st-chapter-v0-3-7-8.pdf

It's pretty atrocious, but worth getting the insight if one is to do an efficient counter-video.
He seems to selectively distort science to make lofty (and dangerous) claims using vague examples.

In short, he tries to base all this on the assumption that:
"Wayseers usually share a common gene – a genetic polymorphism called the DRD4 exon III 7-repeat allele (DRD4 7R for short). This Wayseer gene causes the brain’s reward pathways to override the prefrontal cortex brain’s neurologically repression mechanism, which typically censors unconscious thoughts and impulses. This difference encourages risk-taking, novelty seeking, increased alpha/theta brainwave patterns, susceptibility to addictive behavior, ADD/ADHD and bipolar, propensity for genius level problem solving and creativity, and gives one access to that miraculous quality that makes great heroes, charismatic political leaders, rock stars, entrepreneurs, movie-moguls, rebel billionaires, inspired artists, mystics and pioneers.

Wayseers however are not limited only to those who have this DRD4 7R gene; because other gene combinations, decades of fervent prayer or meditation, psychotropic drugs or even medications like L- dopa (used to treat Parkinson’s disease) can cause one’s brain to reconstitute into a form that allows for Wayseer consciousness."

This is a different interpretation of the effects of the rewarding and punishing parts of the brain. The recent science quoted by Laura in her new DC article quotes the study where it was shown that the rewarding and punishing parts of the brain can contribute to repressing factual information. It is the one where facts are presented about the subject's political leanings and the scientists observed that the brain's punishing areas lit up until a way was found to normalize the facts with respect their political leanings. Then the reward part of the brain lit up after the reinterpretation of facts was made.
 
Thrill-Seeking Gene Can Lead to More Sex Partners


John Coleman, a 22-year-old from Syracuse, N.Y., has been engaged for the last two years and cannot fathom having sex with anyone other than his girlfriend.

"I find cheating appalling," said Coleman. "There's got to be something going on in your head to cheat."

It turns out Coleman is right.

In what is being called a first of its kind study, researchers at Binghamton University, State University of New York (SUNY) have discovered that about half of all people have a gene that makes them more vulnerable to promiscuity and cheating.

Those with a certain variant of the dopamine receptor D4 polymorphism -- or DRD4 gene -- "were more likely to have a history of uncommitted sex, including one-night stands and acts of infidelity," according to lead investigator Justin Garcia.

DRD4 is the "thrill-seeking" gene, also responsible for alcohol and gambling addictions. The gene can influence the brain's chemistry and subsequently, an individual's behavior. {...}

The DRD4 Gene: Psychiatry's Repeat Offender

A new study—the first to focus on the 120/240 polymorphism—adds to the literature implicating the dopamine receptor in ADHD. Researchers at the University of California, Los Angeles, School of Medicine found an association between the 240-letter variant and ADHD in a population of families with two or more affected children. According to a statistical analysis of the transmission of DRD4 from parent to child, the 120/240 polymorphism may be a minor risk factor for ADHD. A paper describing the research appears in the current issue of Molecular Psychiatry. {...}


And here's where it starts getting a REAL TWIST:

DRD4 And Dopamine: Liberals Are Born Genetically Different, Says Study


Can there be a genetic difference between progressives and conservatives? Certainly we have had the discussion many times about studies, both sociological and biological, seeking to make the case that politics might be nature as well as nurture.

New research from U.C. San Diego and Harvard adds some fuel to the fire, stating in the Journal of Politics that a dopamine receptor gene called DRD4 may influence the sociological factors that determine a political mindset. The study's authors say this is the first research to identify a specific gene that predisposes people to certain political views. {...}

Dopamine is a neurotransmitter affecting brain processes that control movement, emotional response, and ability to experience pleasure and pain. Previous research has identified a connection between a variant of this gene and novelty-seeking behavior, and this behavior has previously been associated with personality traits related to being politically progressive.

They hypothesized that people with the novelty-seeking gene variant would be more interested in learning about their friends' points of view. As a consequence, people with this genetic predisposition who have a greater-than-average number of friends would be exposed to a wider variety of social norms and lifestyles, which might make them more progressive than average.

They reported that "it is the crucial interaction of two factors – the genetic predisposition and the environmental condition of having many friends in adolescence – that is associated with being more liberal." The research team also showed that this held true independent of ethnicity, culture, sex or age. {...}

It gets even more twisted. ADD behaviors that can mimic (or are) evidence of psychopathy are further associated with this gene and being Politically liberal:

Researchers Find the 'Liberal Gene'

The Eugene McCarthy Gene: Scientists Say DRD4 Drives Ideology


And now we get somewhere on understanding the limited scope of this study and how it has been generalized to entire populations:


Association of the dopamine receptor D4 (DRD4) gene with a refined phenotype of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD): a family-based approach


Previously in this journal, we reported an association of the dopamine D4 receptor gene (DRD4) and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). In a population-association (case-control) study of 39 children with a refined phenotype of ADHD and 39 ethnically matched controls, we observed an increased percentage of the 7 repeat allele (29% vs 12%) and the 7+ genotype (49% vs 21%) in the ADHD group compared to the control group. In a replication and an extension of our initial study, we recruited another sample of ADHD subjects and found percentages of the 7 repeat allele (28%) and the 7+ genotype (48%) consistent with our previous findings. We used a family-based approach to evaluate a predicted association of DRD4 and ADHD based on a test of allele transmission focused on the 7 repeat allele. We identified 52 families based on the diagnosis of the refined phenotype of ADHD in the proband and the availability of DNA from both biological parents as well as the proband. Haplotype relative risk (HRR) analysis was performed to test our a priori hypothesis and produced significant results (chi-square = 4.65, P < 0.035). this provides additional evidence that the drd4 gene is associated with a refined phenotype of adhd.

Notice "ethnically matched controls". Now, what does THAT mean?

Well, here it is:

DRD4, sex and Jews

I was pointed to this research (via David) that is just out about the correlation between variation on DRD4 and “sexual arousal.” From the press release:

Interestingly, some forms of variants in this gene were shown to have a depressing effect on sexual desire, arousal and function, while other common variant had the opposite effect – an increase in the sexual desire score. The latter is believed to be a relatively new mutation, and it is estimated that it appears in Homo sapiens “only” 50,000 years ago at the time of humankind’s great exodus from Africa. Approximately 30% of many populations carry the heightened arousal mutations, while around 60% carry the depressant mutation.


In short, it seems like a very sexual orientation is a derived trait, while the ancestral character tends to be more “repressed.” My first thought was that someone should forward this to Geoffrey Miller, his theories relating to sexual selection and cognitive evolution are predicated on weak pair-bonding and operational polyandry as males and females form temporary relationships which dissolve within 5 years after sexual novelty has expired (you need lots of reproductive skew to really ramp up sexual selection, and polygyny is the normal way to go about that).

In contrast, other theorists, like pervert-cum-anthropologist Desmond Morris, have posited the importance of pair bonding and monogamy in the natural history of our species. The relatively trivial sexual dimorphism among humans (around 10%) between the sexes in terms of overall size and canine ratio suggests a more monogamous past, while the sperm competition research implies a more “mixed” picture (one problem is that the words do not really map onto to the full distribution well).

The short of it is that monogamous species tend to be less “sexy” in many ways because they don’t need to be, whether that be in behavior, display or semen volume (much of this costs resources and so can detract from fitness). The spread of a sexy variant within the last 50,000 years is very interesting, because it is within the last 50,000 years that the cultural explosion has erupted that made us more than just “anatomically modern” humans, that is, behavorially modern.

Honestly, I would have guessed that the sexy variant was ancestral, but this data will surely result in new stories being told over the next few years if future research confirms and elaborates on it, because sex + evolution = mucho $$$ in terms of book sales.

The paper to published in Molecular Psychiatry is Polymorphisms in the dopamine D4 receptor gene (DRD4) contribute to individual differences in human sexual behavior: desire, arousal and sexual function. Click through and you will see why Jews are relevant, the study was done in Israel on university students, and found that particular DRD4 variants correlated with questionnaire responses. Is this generalizable to other populations?

{...}
 
de-tached said:
As an afterthought to maintain perspective, also considering the tangles of business and such as seen here before, there are some questions that might be worth reflecting upon.
Would he be able to sue for slander/ liable?
As deplorable as this all is, would it be worth putting a video out for it?
There are a great number of videos and authors perpetuating nonsense. What makes this guy so special?
Are there better, more noteworthy public icons to focus on?

good question.

when considering the time we might have left,
wouldn't it be better to focus on other topics for making new videos ? (cyclic cataclysms, psychopathy, secret history........etc. ?)
 
Back
Top Bottom