Donald Trump wins 2016 US presidential election

goyacobol said:
I agree Soros has tried to assume the visibility of a "fly". I was trying to get people to see his real "size" and realize he is definitely "in the room". Pointing that out doesn't work for everyone I guess. :/
<snip>

I think that probably "cosmic" events will be the final less subtle images that are needed. One vote yea and 3 nay I guess. Subtlety is not for many I suppose.

Why do you keep writing these paramoralistically suggestive remarks about how subtle you were being and that others didn't get it? There was nothing subtle about the image at all, it was just wrong.

Subtle: So slight as to be difficult to detect or describe; elusive: a subtle smile; hard to notice or see : not obvious; clever and indirect : not showing your real purpose.

"Subtle" in no way applies to your image.
 
All these debates about elephants and flies let me perplex... Soros is so known around the world by all "reinfo-spheres" that it appear as a tree that hide the forest. This is not Soros alone that is behind the Blockchain, the FED, the EU/BCE, NATO, the planned "financial reset", etc... Soros is a part of the puzzle, nothing more.
 
NormaRegula said:
Of course, not all people want the truth even if they started a political conversation to begin with. I've had to practice external consideration with more than a few family and friends because I know they want to believe in the negative and no amount of truth is going to change their minds. At least right now.

Interesting times we live in.

I've seen this coming with a lot of my acquaintances and family as well, but now I'm like "oh wow, we're here now.."

People have truly turned off thinking and turned on emotions way past capacity, and the overflow is rather disgusting.

When I read this out of the precious snowflakes article on Sott, https://www.sott.net/article/334128-Precious-snowflakes-Universities-offer-Play-Doh-therapy-dogs-coloring-books-safe-spaces-for-students-hurt-by-election

"I'm quite terrified, honestly," one student said in the video, according to The Washington Times. "It's saying that people are really given into fear-mongering. They are willing to put people down based on their identity just so that they would feel vindicated that they would be getting rid of 'Crooked Hillary.'"

My first thought was that this person just chose their culpability to the slaughter of millions, simply to defend their very fragile emotional state. And he or she just cannot see past that. It's really astounding to witness all this, and I guess on one point I can agree with what that student says. I'm terrified too. Terrified that we live in a world where these are the kind of people who are given the loudest voice :huh:

As usual though, this funny thing called time will tell
 
It looks like the deaths follow Killary even after she lost the elections

_http://www.thepoliticalinsider.com/election-woman-investigating-clinton-foundation-crimes-found-dead/

It has been reported on Reddit that Monica Petersen, working for the Human Trafficking Center, was in Haiti investigating possible human trafficking connections to the Clinton Foundation.


_https://steemit.com/news/@allyouneedtoknow/the-suicide-of-monica-petersen-did-she-get-to-close
 
loreta said:
goyacobol said:
SummerLite said:
goyacobol said:
Laura said:
goyacobol said:
I got the urge before seeing the image posts here to create one for George Soros this morning if anyone wants to use it. It is not the greatest, just short and to the point maybe. I don't usually just go for a more emotional effect but rely on a full article but I do see some usefulness in the impact of the imaging.

I like elephants and that is sort of demeaning to elephants.

I agree. It would be demeaning even to a snake with is closer to his nature probably. I was playing to the "elephant in the room" saying. And I like elephants too.

Did my allusion fail? My mind works in strange ways even to me and I have been accused of being too subtle sometimes. Any ideas for a better image to use?
.

I love elephants as well. I like your picture very much goyacobol and it conveys the message perfectly. I think you nailed it! You could also post more then one if you like.

Thanks, SummerLite. I think you got my line of thinking and why I chose the comparison. And I did look for a nice looking elephant to draw attention from the viewers. It's a big kind of aggressive looking one I think but beautiful too. I'll try to use more "deplorable" animals next time. :huh:

It is difficult to compare Soros to an animal. Soros is a devil, how can you compare devil to an animal? It is difficult. A scorpion? A hyena? Hyenas are what they are, but not devil as Soros. Elephants are beautiful, royal, good mammal. I don't like insects so I would be happy to compare Soros to an insect that is there but you don't see it.

I like the dragon on treasure photo, but I also think of him as a greedy Gollum character
serveimage
 
Gollum is too gentle compared to Soros. I was thinking more about a Orc:
 

Attachments

  • images (2).jpg
    images (2).jpg
    8.7 KB · Views: 231
Why do you attempt to make this little man (Soros) a kind of devil ? it is only a little old man with lot of money... he works for nations decomposition, in the way of the globalism (its own interests), okay... he is not alone. The comparison with gollum is by far the better one (this is true for all this bunch of little old mens with lot of money)... This kind of man is nothing without the army of stupid people that he pay or fund to do stupids things. Question is : Who makes these people stupids, and how ? (the medias, yes, this is a part of the answer)
 
I wonder if it would be better to send a message (less ambiguous) with this kind of cartoonish images.


dss72.jpg


images
 
sedenion said:
Why do you attempt to make this little man (Soros) a kind of devil ? it is only a little old man with lot of money... he works for nations decomposition, in the way of the globalism (its own interests), okay... he is not alone. The comparison with gollum is by far the better one (this is true for all this bunch of little old mens with lot of money)... This kind of man is nothing without the army of stupid people that he pay or fund to do stupids things. Question is : Who makes these people stupids, and how ? (the medias, yes, this is a part of the answer)

Yes, Soros is not at the top of the heap, by any means. Just one of the players.
 
Observing the way people are reacting to Trump's victory is another one of those good "litmus tests", to see how aware they are of things. It's pretty predictable, that most people I know condemn Trump without blinking, but in some cases I'm surprised that someone I thought to be pretty open minded is behaving almost aggressively.

One that surprised me the most is Eric Draitser from 'stop imperialism'. He is posting anti-Trump messages on FB, in a quite agressive tone. I previously considered him being one those "rising stars" among dissidents. But right now I'm not so sure he has enough awareness to see the whole naked truth. Or, he might be a "double agent", who knows. He might be just making a miscalculation, but his know-it-all attitude really bugs me.
 
Aragorn said:
Observing the way people are reacting to Trump's victory is another one of those good "litmus tests", to see how aware they are of things. It's pretty predictable, that most people I know condemn Trump without blinking, but in some cases I'm surprised that someone I thought to be pretty open minded is behaving almost aggressively.

One that surprised me the most is Eric Draitser from 'stop imperialism'. He is posting anti-Trump messages on FB, in a quite agressive tone. I previously considered him being one those "rising stars" among dissidents. But right now I'm not so sure he has enough awareness to see the whole naked truth. Or, he might be a "double agent", who knows. He might be just making a miscalculation, but his know-it-all attitude really bugs me.
Yes, I clicked unfollow on his feed a few hours ago.
 
Aragorn said:
Observing the way people are reacting to Trump's victory is another one of those good "litmus tests", to see how aware they are of things. It's pretty predictable, that most people I know condemn Trump without blinking, but in some cases I'm surprised that someone I thought to be pretty open minded is behaving almost aggressively.

One that surprised me the most is Eric Draitser from 'stop imperialism'. He is posting anti-Trump messages on FB, in a quite agressive tone. I previously considered him being one those "rising stars" among dissidents. But right now I'm not so sure he has enough awareness to see the whole naked truth. Or, he might be a "double agent", who knows. He might be just making a miscalculation, but his know-it-all attitude really bugs me.

I do see what is happening right now as 'necessary'. Paradigms are changing, and it is not easy for the average guy to see what is the proper road to take. Trump storming on to the scene with a persona that is easy to hate definitely confuses things. He may be what we need, but he sure doesn't' fit the description of what a saviour should look like in people's minds. (If we could order a saviour on Amazon, we would have him/her be intelligent, articulate, looking a certain way... well you get the picture, we 'anticipate' something much different that what Trump is.) Of course the system has a knack for making the good look absolutely despicable, and the psychopath as totally warm and fuzzy. If you can navigate through that, you can begin to see the proper road.
 
You are discovering how "leftists" (or "useful idiots") are functionning... (or: how the system makes their brains ready to fight all what is against the globalist agenda). You are discovering what we know in france since 15 years... It is funny, because in France, at the begining, we beleived that Trump was used like the "Front National" in france: The way to force people to vote "against the devil" (so, for the system's candidate), but, it appear that USA (unexperienced) missed something in the process :D
 
sedenion said:
Why do you attempt to make this little man (Soros) a kind of devil ? it is only a little old man with lot of money... he works for nations decomposition, in the way of the globalism (its own interests), okay... he is not alone. The comparison with gollum is by far the better one (this is true for all this bunch of little old mens with lot of money)... This kind of man is nothing without the army of stupid people that he pay or fund to do stupids things. Question is : Who makes these people stupids, and how ? (the medias, yes, this is a part of the answer)

We are all aware here that Soros is not at the top of the heap.

We have done a lot of research here on psychopathy and that it is almost certainly the primary cause of the mayhem which goes on here on Earth. There are a few different types of them and they have inordinate power and ability to control because they have wormed their way into the top positions in every facet of government, science, education, religion, etc. for a long, long time now.

We here also understand that ultimately the 'control' comes from a higher level of reality which can be best described as Fourth Density Service to Self individuals and groups. These entities have controlled and influenced humanity for a tremendously long time now.

They do this by influencing, and thereby controlling, those who are essentially aligned with their own 'negative polarity', and so, are much more easily directed to do their bidding.

Even though we most often discuss the 'physical world' events and their ramifications, we are aware of the above. At the present time, we are not on a 'level playing field', as most of humanity is not even aware that this is so and has no idea why things are the way they are.

If you have been reading the transcripts you may be cognizant that there is a "Wave" coming through our entire sector of space-time. We are told this occurs about every 309,000 years. We are apparently in the midst of this wave as we speak. The effect of this is to elevate much of humanity (those who are willing and ready apparently) to the next higher-level of reality called 4th Density.

At that point, things will most likely not be all peachy and rosy, but, at least, we will all be on a 'level playing field' and have the possibility to live as Service to Others beings.

Since we 3rd. Density humans are their 'food source' and they depend upon the negative energies they engineer with their instigation of wars, strife and other suffering, they are very opposed to this scenario and are doing their very best to attempt to disrupt the process in whatever way they can and probably they attempt to limit the number of people who successfully transition to the new reality.

So, even though Soros is not the ultimate force we have to contend with, we see him as an exemplar of those who are really in control. This is why we discuss him and others like him.

I hope this is clear and understandable.
 
Hello H2O said:
Aragorn said:
Observing the way people are reacting to Trump's victory is another one of those good "litmus tests", to see how aware they are of things. It's pretty predictable, that most people I know condemn Trump without blinking, but in some cases I'm surprised that someone I thought to be pretty open minded is behaving almost aggressively.

One that surprised me the most is Eric Draitser from 'stop imperialism'. He is posting anti-Trump messages on FB, in a quite agressive tone. I previously considered him being one those "rising stars" among dissidents. But right now I'm not so sure he has enough awareness to see the whole naked truth. Or, he might be a "double agent", who knows. He might be just making a miscalculation, but his know-it-all attitude really bugs me.

I do see what is happening right now as 'necessary'. Paradigms are changing, and it is not easy for the average guy to see what is the proper road to take. Trump storming on to the scene with a persona that is easy to hate definitely confuses things. He may be what we need, but he sure doesn't' fit the description of what a saviour should look like in people's minds. (If we could order a saviour on Amazon, we would have him/her be intelligent, articulate, looking a certain way... well you get the picture, we 'anticipate' something much different that what Trump is.) Of course the system has a knack for making the good look absolutely despicable, and the psychopath as totally warm and fuzzy. If you can navigate through that, you can begin to see the proper road.

That's a good point about what people expect and what reality is. Some folks are open to information and others are not. There's some collective madness out there and I'm filtering out some of those voices for my own sanity. There are some absolutely loonie posts streaming through my FB feed. Some of the people I've tried to get through to are receptive and open to discuss, others get nasty pretty quickly and they're not always who I'd expect. Still others seem to go back and forth unable to get a firm grasp on the situation or make sense of it, which is understandable I think. Interesting times.

EDIT: Typo
 
Back
Top Bottom