Csayeursost said:
A problem is internal considering when trying to "think" the prayer properly, intending and focusing on the words. Some little "I" worries whether or not I understand the issue correctly, fearing that something adverse is going to happen if I to do the prayer with a wrong understanding (for example, attributing the Cosmic Mind to something other than the creative side of the All, something "out there", for instance)
We know that, whether deliberately ponerized or not, words have a habit of morphing as they enter into the vernacular. If we had a previous 'understanding' of the word "divine", for instance, that meaning might not relate as powerfully to the Prayer of the Soul as it could.
Consider trading the semantic frame of reference for one that is predominately visual.
In
this post, I indicated a method that might help.
For instance, a person could take pencil and paper, divide a sheet of paper in half vertically and label one side "objective" and the other side "subjective". Then they could fill in the columns with their current understanding of a particular word, indicating all the referents they currently hold onto. The idea is to discover what understanding they have and how rigid that understanding is and whether the meaning can be changed.
After the word has been 'opened up' this way, it can more easily be 'overwritten' by a new understanding achieved through research and then practice. If someone uses all the resources available to connect some dots, they may reach a point where they are able to address Cosmic Mind visually, seeing 'Divine' Cosmic Mind as that Mind which possesses/originates/manifests/shines the light which we understand as objective knowledge and real Love.
Some references:
--------------------------------------------------------------
Some research of the word 'Divine' may lead us to discover that at one point, the Vedic duw becomes duwa, and then the modern diva. Diva becomes deva, the root of the word divine ("in" or "of" god). [also see
deva under Word Origin & History below]
_http://druid_csh.bravejournal.com/entry/22847
...to the earliest known root of the word "divine" -- "div" or "shining."
_http://www.ecotopia.org/about/JMI/ch02.html
The root of the word divine means “to shine”…
_http://www.peace.ca/breakthroughexperience.htm
Word Origin & History
divine (adj.)
c.1305 (implied in divinity), from O.Fr. devin, from L. divinus "of a god," from divus "a god," related to deus "god, deity," from PIE *deiwos, also the root of words for "sky" and "day." The god-sense is
originally "shining," but "whether as originally sun-god or as lightener" is not now clear. Weakened sense of "excellent" had evolved by c.1470. Divinity is from c.1300.
deva
"god, good spirit" in Hindu religion, from Skt. deva "a god,"
originally "a shining one," from *div- "to shine," thus cognate with Gk. dios "divine" and Zeus, and L. deus "god" (O.Latin deivos). Fem. form devi is used for "goddess," also (with capital D-) for the mother goddess in Hinduism. Hence, also, devadasi "temple dancing girl," lit. "female servant of a god," from dasi "slave girl." Also Devanagari, the formal alphabet of Skt. writings, perhaps originally "divine city script," from nagara "city."
_http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/deva
Some related Etymology:
_http://www.etymonline.com/index.php?search=divine&searchmode=none
[quote author=Laura]
I don't think he was even aware that his passionate declaration about learning and knowing and realizing were exactly what the Cassiopaeans said as quoted above and here:
"To love you must know. And
to know is to have light. And to have light is to love. And to have knowledge is to love."[/quote]
http://www.cassiopaea.org/cass/wave13j.htm
[quote author=Laura]
We learn from Michael Topper, in simplified form here:
...We well know the "law" of 3rd density: No two objects can occupy the same space at the same time. It should be obvious that this is a function of perception. ...Perception determines the outline of what's to stand as an "object." In 3rd density, objects are mutually exclusive and define one another by contrast - by their differences. ...Perception of UNITY ...is a function of higher density cognition. It requires the use of faculties that are presently "recessed" in our being, and only occasionally accessed.
When, through spiritual practice or discipline performed on this plane, we perceive the
"luminous wholeness" of "separate objects," we are experiencing a momentary coordination with energies belonging to other densities and drawn into our frame of reference.[/quote]
http://www.cassiopaea.org/cass/wave13f.htm