The below was what was withheld from posting 24 hours ago because of Laura's words regarding waiting for Sasha & Ljubica to reply. Since it is apparent that this has not happened, at least here, these were my thoughts last night.
[quote author=Herr Eisenheim]
I think the seeds for this intention were planted by something else. But at this point we have to hope that the reality of this grave situation has sank for both Sasha and Ljubica, that they have clear their mind and they will find strength to talk to the network sincerely and free of installed influences. [/quote]
Having gone back through many posts by Sasha and Ljubica, looking for changes or anomalies, what was noticed was that first, did not realize the extent of how Herr Eisenheim helped both overcome some obstacles with things such as Bandwidth and much more. This brings into context Herr Eisenhiem's great disappointment, amongst having personal connections, too; very understandable. Also though, Sasha especially has worked very hard at many things related to EE and both S & L have navigated their websites and efforts in a seemingly beneficial way that seems (at that time) to be in concert with this main forum; at least that is what was noticed.
Something however seems to have changed since holding open sessions back in June; although this is not substantiated. Expanding contacts and connections became apparent moving forward from that point. If one looks at these connections one might see something else or not. Considering both their work to that point, nothing indicates other than good effort to help others. There seemed to be no post focus on channeling, comets or spirit boards; except for the discussions that were verbal, osit. That been said, what happened?
[quote author=Mr. Scott]
Unless we know what actually happened, we cannot help.
The key is to know how things started, and how they progressed. Just because 1 person had the idea doesn't mean they will be immediately crucified. That's not the point at all.
The point is that if we don't know exactly what happened, we cannot see the finer energies and nuances of the situation that will allow us, collectively, to figure out what the heck is going on - and to take appropriate action to "fix" the situation.
Remember, if you are dealing with other-worldy energies or entities - or even a plain vanilla psychopath - you are SERIOUSLY SCREWED without the experience of the network.
And THAT is why we need details. [/quote]
And Mr. Scott says this well, imo, as does PoB below; essentially you're asked both again, to help yourselves, to help us help you.
[quote author=Possibility of Being]
"He that is without sin among you, let him first cast a stone."
There are many members here who've got their second, third, and fourth chance. As long as one wants to learn there is a place for them in this forum. It would be rather empty otherwise by now. We haven't turned the last page of this book yet, far from that. We're still at the introduction. Every and anything is still possible, OSIT.[/quote]
There is something pivotal here Sasha and Ljubica that you may not want to see, refuse to see or have even thought about; and it may not be what you think. This is why when it was said in various posts of your(s);
Sasha has a valid point - Work is possible only through proper networking. It looks like this is possible only on this forum and only in English language.
Also
We shouldn't get caught in "messiah/preacher role" with people and should keep in mind that they, as all of us, should put forward for themselves. We can only light them the path, they're the ones who have to take it.
Also, our community is in big part built around this forum and English is our language of communication here. Whoever doesn't want to make effort to learn at least some of it won't be able to properly network and, as you probably know, network is one of the key elements in the story.
- that there is reason to look at the chronology of thinking, contacts and actions. Your words above were all about networking. Cheery picking was not the intent of the above references, it was to understand thinking and the thinking at the time seems to be in alignment with the aims of the network; so again, what went wrong? With respect to the forum and networking, when webs develop in thinking or actions, it is the efforts of others to look a each strand, weigh and measure; this is what both of you know to be so.
Laura’s quotes from G are extremely important, so hope you both have the discernment to read them well and communicate in the ‘I’, in a detailed recapitulation that can help others look at the factors involved.