Failed Trump Assassination Attempt

Who's telling the truth?
JEEP said:
Crabtree said that Secret Service resources were diverted away from Trump's rally to Jill Biden's Pittsburgh event at the same time.
Click to expand...

Secret Service Claims Reports That Resources Were Diverted From Trump Rally To Protect Jill Biden Are Wrong
The U.S. Secret Service disputed reports on Sunday that said the agency diverted resources away from protecting former President Donald Trump at his campaign rally to protect first lady Jill Biden, who was also in Pennsylvania at the time.

RealClearPolitics White House & National Political Correspondent Susan Crabtree reported on social media that sources told her resources were diverted away from Trump to protect the first lady.

Anthony Guglielmi, Chief of Communications for the Secret Service, responded to Crabtree’s post, which garnered millions of views on X, by saying that it was false.
“Susan, this is very wrong,” he claimed. “We did not divert resources from FPOTUS Trump & protection models don’t work that way. As far as ‘field office teams’ these are the candidate nominee operations teams that are added during election years for the heavy travel tempo.”
Click to expand...

Former Secret Service agent Dan Bongino told Fox News on Sunday night that his sources indicated to him that there were fewer Secret Service agents at the event than are normally present.

“I’m getting from a number of sources that people are feeding to me their information — obviously because they want to fix it, they’re concerned that I think you’re going to see a lot of whistleblowers — I’m hearing that were very few, I don’t want to give an exact number, but very few actual Secret Service [agents] at that site,” he said.

He added that some security personnel at Saturday’s rally were temporary officials from Homeland Security Investigations (HSI) who are not trained to carry out the same role as Secret Service agents.

“I’m also hearing that the counter sniper had a problem seeing over the elevation that’s why didn’t engage right away,” he said. “But that’s not the problem. The problem is, where the hell was the aerial visual support? Why was there no helicopter? Why was there no drone? Why was there no FLIR? Why was there no thermal? Forward looking infrared? How the hell is the crowd acting as the frickin counter surveillance?”

From the previously cited article, Guglielmi denied additional resources request was rebuffed:
https://twitter.com/x/status/1812451649387933912

If that were true, why wasn't the roof covered properly? Why wasn't the shooter picked up from an area that should have been a top priority to make sure was safe since it was a high vantage point? If they had everything, then we're talking about the Secret Service just completely missing or not reacting to obvious dangers, and that would raise even more questions.

Former Secret Service agent Dan Bongino called on Guglielmi to resign.
 
The plot really thickens . . .

Experts say three weapons fired at Trump rally
Audio forensics suggest that shots from at least three weapons were fired at ex-US President Donald Trump at a rally in Pennsylvania, CNN reports, citing experts.

According to Catalin Grigoras and Cole Whitecotton from the National Center for Media Forensics at the University of Colorado in Denver, "the first three shots were consistent with alleged weapon A, the next five were consistent with alleged weapon B, and the final 'acoustic impulse' was emitted by a possible weapon C," the media outlet notes.

Forensics expert Robert Maher, in turn, suggested that "the gunman was about 360 to 393 feet from the podium."

Webmaster addition: Some of those shots had to be the police and Secret Service shooting at the assassin. But it was just this kind of acoustic analysis that led the House Select Committee on Assassinations to conclude there were multiple shooters in Dealey Plaza when JFK was assassinated.​

Click to expand...
 
Given the sequence of events and for coverup reasons I think it is most likely that the first shot that hit Trump (and possibly the second and third) came from a very similar angle as the rooftop guy was positioned, thus probably within the same building as the rooftop guy, or somewhere near to that angle. Further it is likely that the rooftop guy got a signal “shoot now!“- possibly through an ear piece or remote triggered voice in his head through beam technology- after the first shot (or more likely after the third and the pause). So the water tower guy and possibly another sniper somewhere else were ordered to shoot only after the first shooter shot. If the water tower guy and possibly another shot at all is not clear.
 
The water tower was the first building i considered as it not only appeared to be the tallest. But could also give a better visual with more gravity assisting the bullet. Yet possibly more wind. It is also outside the perimeter.
However, i also thought it would be the main place i woukd suspect if i was security. So was most probably covered by them as a priority.
There could be a small parapet at the top to hide behind.
The attention was certainly on the building Crookes was on though. Diversion tactics as others have mentioned?

The vital lesson here for Trump and the Republicans is that at no time should Vance and Trump ever be together. Either out in public or on planes.
It is obvious they will go for both of them now.
Because if Trump is killed, Vance could well be a strong clone of Trump as his replacement. And with time and Presidential experience even surpass Trump in his manifestos.
Also he has had excellent forces training which I dont think Trump had.
If I were Trump i would also be looking for a 3rd person to prime and groom into the position! Should they both be killed covertly then at least they would have a reserve candidate to run in their place in a re-election. Plus someone the public also already feel familiar with and feel they can trust as the obvious runner.

If they can claw back all the wasted funds that is being sent to Ukraine and elsewhere, as well as Nato there is much good they can put these to.
So long as it all doesnt go to Israel!
But also making Nato countries fund Nato a lot more themselves may also see a reduction in how important these countries suddenly consider NATO :-)
Another wise move would be to finally get on the same page with the majority of countries regarding the UN security Council and the IPCC. To bring back the true unity and reduce the sickening bias of the US and the West in the voting procedures.
Given the opportunities and somehow better controlling the opposition plans, this pursuit of Unity could swing the pendulum eventually.
But meanwhile we could well be facing ressurection, martial laws, further division and desperate activities. Together with the calamities set to befall everywhere.
On a very remote positive, this new timeline that I feel we are on now, could possibly have reducex the severity of the apocalypse for the USA. Greatly depending on WHAT they DO next!
Just my 2 kurus ;-)
 
If the rooftop guy had any more or less normal type of ear piece in his ear it is likely that the first person that came to the shooter on the roof got rid of that evidence. Although I think it is more likely that they wouldn’t have taken that risk of using such obvious ear pieces, but rather projected a voice into his head via beam technology. Or the rooftop guy just got the orders “shoot directly after you hear the first and/or second/third shot“.
 
So now we have a man sent by God, protected by God, who will unite the whole country, who will save humanity. He's not an ET, but he's the 'saviour' everyone's waiting for.

Of course, he was very lucky, and miracles do happen.
Incompetence too, and now that the masks are coming off, we can see just how deeply flawed the Empire is at every level.

Looking at Trump's bodyguards, I found them to be quite young, a bit like zombies, a little lost, not reliable. And not enough bodyguards around him. As for the woman, I found her too short. Especially to protect a big man like Trump.

We are seeing ineptitude in the face. It's not pretty. The real tragedy is also this gentleman who died from a bullet to the head, and also the danger for the people who were at the rally, the danger they ran, the shock they experienced, the fear.
 
Cosmos said:
No, all pretty unlikely ideas IMO. I see little reason to be conspiracy minded about "who Tucker is" and "what he really believes and does".
Click to expand...
You know, Cosmos, you're probably right. I've thought about it and identified what bothers me about Tucker. At Fox he delivered very tightly written, focused, hard-hitting pieces. He no longer is using that persona. He is an excellent interviewer. But he seems to just talk off the top of his head at his speaking engagements and that hard-hitting focused edge is gone. He seems more just like a very intelligent motormouth I agree with talking at a back yard BBQ. But it seems like something is missing: the gravitas he projected at Fox. He now comes across to me, at times, as just more noise. I am hoping for a definitive 'take' that crystalizes and gives voice to what everyone is thinking as he used to do at Fox and I don't see him doing that. I was thinking the type and style of content he delivered at Fox was the real Tucker. He got fired for going too far over certain lines with that punchy style. But he seems to have mostly abandoned that and my reaction is disappointment because my expectations are too high given the ability and talent I know he has. Que sera..
 
Joe said:
Were all of them in radio contact with each other? Probably not. And that's the real lapse in security that Crooks (and his likely handlers) exploited.
Click to expand...

Just catching up in this thread, so forgive me if this has already been addressed. I worked in ems for 10 years and for events like this there's always an ambulance on ground on standby just in case. Each agency obviously has there own radio channel, but there should be a designated interagency channel for when SHTF so everyone can be made aware to facilitate cooperation for any type of response. Spotting a potential shooter on a rooftop is definitely something that should've been reported on this interagency channel.
 
BHelmet said:
Do we know that? Is the meeting done or still ongoing?
Click to expand...
Linear sequentiality does not apply in Quorum affairs, I think. Its enough if they vote / decide on something to definitely do in the future and when they actually do it in the future, I think, the effects of their actions ripple backward through time, already affecting us here in the present day!

Quorum balancing actions may share similar elements with the time-bracketing done by Orion STS, I think. Lizzies apparently still worry about their special version of "time"-"line": I call it 'Key Sequentiality'. Otherwise they wouldn't have meddled in the last 309K years, to make human affairs turn out how they like:
Laura said:
Q: (L) So they haven't been here for 300 thousand years?
A: They originally set up circumstances for their benefit 309 thousand years ago, however, they have been using the particular bracketed period of the 74 thousand year period alter things in all the various ways mentioned earlier.
Click to expand...

I reported here multiple times in the past, when I made a 100% sure decision in the morning that I will take a supplement in the afternoon, I usually started to feel the pills effects right away. While the supplement only arrived several hours later, in the afternoon = in the future, when I actually ingested it.
 
Despite everything, it's pretty remarkable to watch Trump arrive at the RNC. I mean, it's not often (if ever) you get to see, alive and well, a person who had just been slated for death by the most powerful forces on this planet.

There's a stark contrast between the all the red white and blue flags and pomp, and love of freedom and promotion of the awesomeness of American democracy, and the reality of what just happened.

I wonder how many people at that conference are aware of the reality behind the facade?

Also, notice the absence of any DEI hires among the security detail.

Also, notice in that front line with Trump there are only 5 other people, Trump's VP, the Republican speaker of the house, his wife, Byron Donalds - a Trump supporting congressman from Florida (who I assume was there for diversity reasons) - and....Tucker Carlson. Kind of sending a message. Even Trump's sons are in the 2nd row.

https://twitter.com/x/status/1813037049550938369
 
Last edited:
BHelmet said:
You know, Cosmos, you're probably right. I've thought about it and identified what bothers me about Tucker. At Fox he delivered very tightly written, focused, hard-hitting pieces. He no longer is using that persona. He is an excellent interviewer. But he seems to just talk off the top of his head at his speaking engagements and that hard-hitting focused edge is gone. He seems more just like a very intelligent motormouth I agree with talking at a back yard BBQ. But it seems like something is missing: the gravitas he projected at Fox. He now comes across to me, at times, as just more noise. I am hoping for a definitive 'take' that crystalizes and gives voice to what everyone is thinking as he used to do at Fox and I don't see him doing that. I was thinking the type and style of content he delivered at Fox was the real Tucker. He got fired for going too far over certain lines with that punchy style. But he seems to have mostly abandoned that and my reaction is disappointment because my expectations are too high given the ability and talent I know he has. Que sera..
Click to expand...

Yeah, generally speaking, Tuckers style of reporting has changed after he was fired and I also miss his hard hitting and deep investigative journalism he did on FOX. In some ways I found it better. I think he just was getting sick of doing the same thing he did on Fox and now actively just tries to talk to people in a relaxed long format podcast setting instead of doing deep investigative journalism. By doing so, he is now often just repeating the same points over and over again. Which can get boring. I can’t blame him for wanting to not do the dirty and/or hard journalism anymore in the way he did before. In fact it sounds like he has left that behind and is happy about it. On the other hand his new podcast style together with his speeches are also interesting and helpful in different ways. He also seems to be on a journey of self discovery/disillusion now and focusing more on that.
 
Joe said:
Despite everything, it's pretty remarkable to watch Trump arrive at the RNC. I mean, it's not often (if ever) you get to see, alive and well, a person who had just been slated for death by the most powerful forces on this planet.

There's a stark contrast between the all the red white and blue flags and pomp, and love of freedom and promotion of the awesomeness of American democracy, and the reality of what just happened.

I wonder how many people at that conference are aware of the reality behind the facade?

Also, notice the absence of any DEI hires among the security detail.

Also, notice in that front line with Trump there are only 5 other people, Trump's VP, the Republican speaker of the house, his wife, Byron Donalds - a Trump supporting congressman from Florida (who I assume was there for diversity reasons) - and....Tucker Carlson. Kind of sending a message. Even Trump's sons are in the 2nd row.

https://twitter.com/x/status/1813037049550938369
Click to expand...

Yes! I keep thinking about what Caesar and other ancients kept emphasizing to the point of making it a prime acknowledgment/consideration of their world view and actions; they called it: fortune.

They were keenly aware of it and took it very seriously. Probably rightfully so. Caesar for example told us how fortune can often strike in the most amazing and odds defying ways, changing almost certain outcomes in a short period of time completely via things like signs, wonders, sudden weather/earth changes and more. In all areas, including on the battlefield. I think what we have just witnessed is exactly that.

Maybe another word for it could be “devine intervention“ and/or “protection“ or something like that. Not necessarily having something to do with 4D interventions but “the universe“ somehow showing its hands via a channel, like somebody whose higher self is determined to follow a higher and/or deeper plan.

Edit: spelling
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.

Trending content

Back
Top Bottom