Failed Trump Assassination Attempt

[ApotheosisMMC.]

The first question to ask is: at what time was this photo taken? Police were on the roof soon after the shooting. We don't know if this was the original position of the weapon.

For what it's worth, the image is from a video that appeared on the same day of the incident, although in this other photo you can see how they are removing the weapon from the dead shooter's hands:

Here is another video from an aerial view of the roof:

 

[luc]

Well, just to throw it out there, another possibility is that they used some sort of advanced BlackTech, or even 4d tech, to take Trump out and blame the patsy. Not that there's any evidence for it, except that the whole thing doesn't make a lot of sense.

 

[Cosmos]

I guess if you use a patsy in the way we think here who isn’t using a silencer of some sorts then using a silencer as the incognito/secret sniper could bust the operation if cameras are rolling.

 

[Cosmos]

For what it's worth, the image is from a video that appeared on the same day of the incident, although in this other photo you can see how they are removing the weapon from the dead shooter's hands:
View attachment 98348
Here another video of the same scene:

Unfortunately it is hard to tell what he is doing there and if it is the gun that we are seeing or Crooks arm or something. But there definitely could be something to what you are suggesting.

 

[Goemon_]

Just throwing it out here for consideration since I thought about it on and off for a while:

What if there were shots that weren’t audible to the video equipments (cellphones, video cameras etc) at the scene? Wouldn’t a sniper use a silencer? I know that commonly used silencer still make a gun sound rather loud, but could a silencer being used by a sniper in a considerable distance from the scene be heard by the audio equipments there? And that question is only for commonly used silencers. What if the PTB have much more advanced and thus more quite silencers at their disposal these days that are a secret to the public?

From what I have heard, I am no specialist, the pop sound you hear is because of the velocity of the bullet passing the sound barrier. Silencer or not you would still hear the pop.

 

[nativeindigo]

I agree. I have been spending a lot of time on X these past few days and the things that people are saying about Trump are bloodthirsty, inhuman and cruel. There are all kinds of campaigns going on, though against these people and some of them who have openly stated their wish to see Trump dead have been reported to their employer (some of them have been fired). So, not everyone is taking this lying down!

I was recently looking at Nigel Farrage and his recent win. He was talking about the Trump shooting and was talking about the hate speech that seems to be running rampant. He mentioned that he usually does not draw attention to these incidents, but sometimes a spectator will put it online. He said that for every attack he gets, he always presses charges. He mentioned the hate speech he got after a video of an incident that happened at one of his talks, where a man threw a milkshake right into his face. Days after this a famous comedian called Jo Brand, had been quoted as saying, "it should've been battery acid". Now that was out of order to me. How could she dislike someone in a political arena so, much that she could wish such a cruel fate for him? I don't like Tony Blair particuarly, but I see him in the context of what his role is and that he is a puppet of puppets!

I was mentioning this exact thing earlier. Anyone who has a platform, and Jo brand has a large following, probably thinks she "cool" for saying this, but there may very well be someone out there listening, that thinks she is being serious......and perhaps she is! Scary stuff!

 

[nativeindigo]

For what it's worth, the image is from a video that appeared on the same day of the incident, although in this other photo you can see how they are removing the weapon from the dead shooter's hands:
View attachment 98348
Here is another video from an aerial view of the roof:

Thanks for posting these, very interesting. I already had the thought yesterday that perhaps there was a second shooter that was the real shooter and it has been mentioned about someone on the water tower! I think what will be revealed when this comes to fruition is going to be a massive turning point!

 

[Goemon_]

Here's the video that Cullen initially used to support his water-tower idea. Possible location for one or more of the wounded?

What to make of the last video from this post?

Here is another opinion that the sniper that was out to get Trump (not Crooks the Patsy) hid in the treeline.
But it is all so very convoluted.

The two wounded people being removed don't seems to be the same as in the Cullen video.

 

[ApotheosisMMC.]

Just throwing it out here for consideration since I thought about it on and off for a while:

What if there were shots that weren’t audible to the video equipments (cellphones, video cameras etc) at the scene? Wouldn’t a sniper use a silencer? I know that commonly used silencer still make a gun sound rather loud, but could a silencer being used by a sniper in a considerable distance from the scene be heard by the audio equipments there? And that question is only for commonly used silencers. What if the PTB have much more advanced and thus more quite silencers at their disposal these days that are a secret to the public?

What you propose is not difficult, in fact with what is in the known market good results are obtained.
In the first example, supersonic bullets are used and in the second even a very powerful Barret obtains good results (in the video they show it without and with a suppressor).

 

[ApotheosisMMC.]

From what I have heard, I am no specialist, the pop sound you hear is because of the velocity of the bullet passing the sound barrier. Silencer or not you would still hear the pop.

True, but there is an exception to that:

When firing a shot, a weapon makes three clearly identifiable sounds. The first would be the project when leaving the cannon mouth. The bang generated by the hot, very high-pressure gases, due to the difference in size between the barrel and the outside, causes a sonic explosion to occur, very similar to what happens when uncorking a bottle of champagne. This is the only sound that we can attenuate with a suppressor. The second is the sonic “boom” produced by shock waves when the project overcomes the sound barrier. This sound can be nullified by using subsonic ammunition. And the third would be that of the weapon's mechanisms: firing assembly, bolt, etc.

 

[Cosmos]

In hindsight after I have spend 3 hours or more as mentioned above on that specific video comparing and looking at various footage, maps and so on, I find that it might be a bit peculiar that I could find pretty good other footage/data and almost at every point I thought “right there might be the smoking gun!“ but then a camera moves or something else is happening like I can’t see a possible revealing reaction just in time. Always with the result of making the thing unclear/uncertain and not definitely pinpointable. And then I thought about all the other stuff I have seen so far and on this thread and the back and forth of theories and not quite being able to come to clear results. Maybe someone “up there“ is and/or has made everything deliberately uncertain so that we apes down here are not able to get behind it? Maybe all the confusion and wonders in this event are signs that we are currently trying to make sense of something “they up there“ handle live as we speak?

 

[Metrist]

Well, just to throw it out there, another possibility is that they used some sort of advanced BlackTech, or even 4d tech, to take Trump out and blame the patsy.

Why not? Look at how drones are working out in Russia and Ukraine.
It seems so obvious that the shooter was meant to be seen by many witnesses. So we are made to believe he was the source.

If you can make a small mechanical device that could look like anything, and perform as good as a sniper, that's the route to take.... But no one would claim utilizing such devices, so it would be secret.
And assassinations are becoming popular, so such a device is in par with the times.

 

[Meg]

Hi all,

I work as a security guard for a company that provides services to community health clinics. They have a few locations. At one of the locations something interesting occurred yesterday. A patient came into the clinic and yelled at everyone: "Donald Trump was shot so I'm going to shoot all of you!" Something along those lines. No one was hurt. I don't think she even had a gun. She's in a mental hospital right now. Interestingly enough, her name is Karen.

Maybe HAARP is activated or the STS faction is doing what they do to peoples thinking. I'm wondering if the Deep State/STS peeps are going to stage a false flag and blame MAGA?

 

[nativeindigo]

Hi all,

I work as a security guard for a company that provides services to community health clinics. They have a few locations. At one of the locations something interesting occurred yesterday. A patient came into the clinic and yelled at everyone: "Donald Trump was shot so I'm going to shoot all of you!" Something along those lines. No one was hurt. I don't think she even had a gun. She's in a mental hospital right now. Interestingly enough, her name is Karen.

Maybe HAARP is activated or the STS faction is doing what they do to peoples thinking. I'm wondering if the Deep State/STS peeps are going to stage a false flag and blame MAGA?

Lol, Karen was in the building! Regarding the HAARP stuff, they have so many weapons at their disposal in truth, it is a cat eof take your pick. We all have the nano tech inside us now so they could start tuning in to folks in various ways and placing the subliminal messaging in when they need someone to suddenly turn rogue. An ex CIA agent that had turned whistleblower had mentioned about the way they could target a certain individual with their DNA sequence, within a crowd and only he would drop dead, making it look like it was a natural death.......they could realistically do that with Mr T if they really wanted to....and that is just one out of many. So something still does not add up to me.

For a long time, as I mentioned in another post, I have had the known that Mr T has a job to do and is pivotal to the ascension process. I am sure in some other timelines, he was shot and killed and what ensues is not very nice. All the possibilities already exists according to Quantum theories.

 

[Fluffy]

Well, just to throw it out there, another possibility is that they used some sort of advanced BlackTech, or even 4d tech, to take Trump out and blame the patsy. Not that there's any evidence for it, except that the whole thing doesn't make a lot of sense.

Well, yeah!
Lots of things going around about divine intervention, the hand of ‘God (god?)’ at play, why not be open to the possibility that it was not so divine intervention?
Or even a bit of both? Im sure 4D sts think they’re pretty divine, I’ve never asked one of them though.
It’s harder to extrapolate on that idea but it’s a worthy contender for consideration. In my opinion.