14 Dec 06
Q: (L) Along the lines of some of the things that I have been
working on recently, I'd like to ask if there's any more
information you can give to us about the hypnotic-opener-
strobe effect, and what it is preventing us from seeing. Is
this one of the things that keeps us from expanding into the
next density, in terms of awareness?
A: Not related to that. You see, the souls that are affected
by all these "cloaking" techniques are vibrating on a low
level anyway. The point is to block those who are blockable.
Q: (T) We're not blockable? (L) Is there anything we can do
to avoid this blocking? (T) We're not being blocked...
A: You are not blockable.
Q: (T) We are not being blocked. We're beyond the blocking.
A: If you were, would you be doing this?
Q: (T) That type of blocking technique doesn't work on us.
There may be other blocking techniques, but that particular
stuff doesn't work. We either see or don't see stuff,
because we are either meant or not meant to see it. We don't
see UFO's anymore, because we don't need to.
A: Not necessarily true.
Q: (L) OK, what is not necessarily true? Why don't we see
them any more?
A: Don't does not equal won't. If a Buick does not go by, you
don't see that, either! And if you are inside, doing the
laundry when Mr. Jones decides to take the old "Electra" for
a spin, you do not see him, or his precious car, do you?
Q: (L) I don't care, I've seen enough!
A: Oh, yes, you do care!!!
Q: (L) OK, yes, I care, but I've seen enough, I believe, I
believe!!!
A: It is not up to you whether you want to see them or not.
If they want you to see them, you will!
Q: (T) So, if they want us to see them, we'll see them! A:
Yes, and they will, and you will!
Q: (T) They will and we will... yes, but, there's a blocking
technique being used on people to lower the vibrational
frequency to prevent them from seeing them, right?
A: The blocking technique is for many things.
Q: (T) So that people do not understand what's going on
around them.
A: Yes.
Q: (L) What else?
A: That is it, in a nutshell. See and know and think or...
See, know and think that which is desired.
19 July 97
Q: As you know, there is a flood in Poland, and Ark has to go
back, there is so much that must be done, but the
government offices may be closed, the court session may be
delayed indefinitely, God knows what is going to happen.
What is the source of this dreadful disaster in Poland?
A: Sopophoric screen alterations of the magnetic belt
overlay.
Q: And what is causing these screen alterations of the
magnetic belt overlay?
A: Influences of Acquiim.
Q: What is Acquiim?
A: 4th density overseer.
Q: Does that mean sporofic screen alteration?
A: Soporific/phosphorous.
13 June 98
Q: Okay, one interesting thing that we just discovered was
that Hyakatuke and Hale Bopp both crossed the eye of
Medusa, the star Algol, on April 11th exactly one year
apart. What is the significance of this?
A: You must remember mosaic, matrix... When you are on the
verge of quantum changes or discovery, the realities begin
to reveal their perfectly squared nature to you.
Q: Is that the only thing you want to remark about the
crossing of the comets in front of the eye of Medusa?
A: Can you not picture all reality as a curving and bobbing
journey through a transparent, undulating matrix mosaic? [...]
Q: Yes, I remember. Okay, that takes care of several things.
You are talking about bloodlines becoming parasitically
infested and harassed at times of quantum leaps such as
now, when I was reading back over this, it seems that this
is a repeating cycle, this parasitic infestation; and then
reading the history of Gregory of Tours, and all of these
truly amazing things - lights in the sky, plagues,
repeated incidents of aerial phenomena... a 'light like a
serpent' in the sky... a bright light and 'snakes fell
from the clouds...' in 590, fiery globes traversed the
heavens and then an eclipse of the sun. These
astronomical phenomena were usually followed by inclement
weather which, in its turn, brought plague... is this the
kind of parasitical infestation, harassment and so forth
that we are talking about here?
A: Maybe, look for more clues.
Q: Well, do you have a specific point that you would like to
toss on me here so that I have an idea of what I am
looking for?
A: Undulating matrix/mosaic.
8 April 2000
Q: This is a good one. Brad has written a couple of times. He was reading the Flight 19
session and he said: "This indicates to me that perception can manifest into a reality
given proper conditions." Is his assumption going in the right direction? Can perception
manifest into reality given the proper conditions?
A: Essentially, but it is more complex, as it involves manifestations from other realities,
where the conditions do not parallel yours.
Q: Now he says: "If true, then an individual could manifest their reality if enough energy
or focus or will could be focused to produce a result." You just said that it involves
energies from other realities than our own. But, he goes on to say: "What I think is
implied here is that the dominant belief will be the most often produced result. However,
if ten people believe they see a UFO, but three others don't believe they see a UFO, then
what is the result in this case? Do the three non-believers end up seeing UFOs because
their perception that UFO's do not exist is overridden by the ten people who DO
believe?"
A: Trying to impose conditional conceptualizations re: 3rd density awareness.
Q: Well, the question still is, if ten people think they see a UFO, and three don't, DO the
three non-believers see a UFO?
A: Not valid due to rigidity of concept.
Q: Well, let me go on: "The prevailing or popular belief seems to override the less
popular belief if I read the text of your essay correctly. That would certainly explain why
disinformation and propaganda used by religious groups is so effective. I am not sure
about the proper way this works according to your essay. It seems to me that, in order for
an individual to buck the trend of a commonly held belief or thought, and for that person
to manifest their own reality, or produce a desired result, they would have to be very
strong willed, or have the ability to focus their will and intention so as to magnify its
power and produce a reality which differs from that which is the common perception.
It's all rather confusing. If ten people believe that Napoleon never died, but is still alive,
and two people believe he is dead, the dominant belief prevailing would have Napoleon
still alive. Perhaps you could go into some detail on this at a later time. If all is illusion,
as so many New Age teachings suggest, then there are no constraints as to what reality
can be."
A: No constraints? Then why the attempt to impose constraints?
Q: I think the one thing he missed in that session was the point that we were talking
specifically about the Flight 19 incident where you had already said that the EM field
generated by the aberrant activities of the Atlantean crystal, created an opening into what
you called the Thought Plane, and as long as it remained open, this condition prevailed.
But, under most circumstances, this is not the condition under which we live.
A: And even the EM crystal itself is transitory; in the space/time continuum it is of the
"Philadelphia Experiment" mode.
Q: The example of the Flight 19 situation was a description of an aberrant situation, even
though these aberrations can and do occur naturally or artificially, sometimes planned
and sometimes random. Is that correct?
A: Sort of.
Q: But, in talking about our consensual reality. Are the conditions, say, for example, on
our planet, a result of the consensus reality?
A: Ditto last response.
Q: Okay. Sort of. You say that we have these programs, and that there is this
undulating matrix force field around the planet that holds these effects, and the programs
in place, so to speak, but that some people CAN get out of the control and see what is
real, but most people cannot.
A: Yes, or do not.
Q: So, if a critical mass of people began to SEE things, or to escape from the
programming, would that effect a change for others in terms of the way they experience
the reality, or would the reality that they had been choosing to experience...
A: Such a "critical mass" does not occur until the consensus "chooses."
Q: So, the reality under which we live is essentially, even if held in place by
manipulations from higher densities, and some sort of matrix control system, is
CHOSEN?
A: Close.
Q: To get back to this idea about changing the reality: can an individual or group of
individuals change their personal reality so that they no longer have to or are required to
participate in the consensus reality?
A: It is possible.
Q: Is it, as our correspondent has said, because such people are very strong willed, or
have the ability to focus their will and intentions so as to magnify the power of the will,
to change the reality...
A: Constraints constrain.
Q: Yes. The Matrix page on the website discusses this. So, it amounts to the fact that if
a person is in THIS reality, for some reason they have CHOSEN it until they learn how to
UN-choose it. (A) The question is: how often can people do it? Yes, it is possible, but
can we know more?
A: Some truly rare types possess this talent flukishly, as it does not represent normal 3rd
density domain.
