School are turning kids into Antifa clone soldiers. Glad Trump is addressing it. But to little to late?
CNN’s Don Lemon said during an interview with actor Terry Crews on Monday that the Black Lives Matter movement was not about “all black lives matter” because the movement primarily focuses on police brutality.
There's lots of cognitive dissonance going on. A good share of it likely is intentional. Some may be the natural result of fractured minds that are trying to control the narrative. This is as good a time as any to work on critical thinking.Also, is anyone else getting the vibe that everything we've been experiencing since the beginning of March has had a diametric or mirror kind of flavor to it?
Learn the 4 Stage Hypnosis Protocol
The 4 Stage Hypnosis Protocol begins with Stage 1, to Absorb Attention. Absorbing attention is simply to capture the focus of your subject.hypnosistrainingacademy.com
I realized after posting the above that I should have investigated what it actually means to be a moderate just now in politics -- or, in this instance (concerning Conor Lamb), what it means to be a moderate Democrat. I sort of dropped the "moderate" idea in favor of looking at the degree to which Lamb supports initiatives that benefit middle-to-low income Americans, which has little to do with being "moderate."More on Parnell...
I've never had much faith in the military, largely because I've never had much faith in U.S. foreign policy. But here we find ourselves: looking to Republican military men like Parnell to stem the tide of authoritarianism on our soil.
These are indeed interesting times.
Parnell points out that "the Democratic party is no longer the party of the American middle class, or the American working class, no longer the party of unions... The Democratic party now, on every level, every candidate on stage embraces wholesale socialism. And Conor Lamb [Parnell's incumbent Democratic opponent in his upcoming race for Congress] is a part of that whether he likes it or not." Parnell also pointed out that although Lamb claims to be a moderate, he has always voted with Nancy Pelosi. That may be so (I'd need more information on that), however, according to Wikipedia, he voted against her as Speaker of the House.
Also from Wikipedia:
"In May 2020, President Trump endorsed Lamb's 2020 election opponent while falsely claiming that Lamb had voted for Pelosi as Speaker."
"On December 18, 2019, Lamb voted for both articles of impeachment against President Trump."
[end: Wiki quote]
Lamb seems to be quite a rival given he's ex-military, and his record as a prosecutor is not without merit.
Conor Lamb - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
According to Wiki, in 2017, in Pennsylvania's 18th Congressional District, Lamb unseated Republican State Representative, Rick Saccone, whom Trump vigorously supported. Rick Saccone, by the way, has an "interesting" background:
"He served as a United States Air Force officer, working in the Office of Special Investigation, counter intelligence. After resigning from the Air Force, Saccone was a civilian employee of the U.S. Army during the Iraq War, working in Iraq from 2004-05. While in Iraq, Saccone worked as an interrogation consultant at Abu Ghraib prison."
[end: Wiki quote]
So, as usual, politics is a messy business.
As to Lamb's claim to be a moderate (if that's even possible on the left now, as Parnell points out), while he supports the continuation of Obamacare (an increasingly expensive operation put in place for the sole benefit of insurance providers), he did oppose "the Republican 2017 tax reform bill, which Lamb described as a 'giveaway' to large corporations and a 'betrayal' of middle-class Americans." [Wiki]
Actually, If you take a look at Trump's famous tax reduction bill [highlighted above], you'll see that the benefits that middle-to-lower income Americans initially see in the bill evaporate by 2027:
"The Tax Policy Center (TPC) estimated that the bottom 80% of taxpayers (income under $149,400) would receive 35% of the benefit in 2018, 34% in 2025 and none of the benefit in 2027, with some groups incurring costs. TPC also estimated 72% of taxpayers would be adversely impacted in 2019 and beyond, if the tax cuts are paid for by spending cuts separate from the legislation, as most spending cuts would impact lower- to middle-income taxpayers and outweigh the benefits from the tax cuts."
All of which is to point out that, as usual with politics, nothing is as it seems. And while, as Parnell points out, "the Democratic party is no longer the party of the American middle class, or the American working class, no longer the party of unions..." may be true, voting Republican doesn't square things on that count either. It's simply that the agenda of the radical left is so extremely, seditiously corrupt that voting Republican is looking like the only way to stem the tide of complete authoritarianism. However, as per above, there is a price tag for middle-to-lower income Americans in making that choice, even if Trump's base is loath to admit that. For their loyalty, he should be petitioned accordingly.
(Perhaps Tucker Carlson should be put on the case. He seems to have Trump's ear.)
Upon more reflection, I've decided that BLM is, from what I've gathered it is not:
Did I miss anything???
- Black lives matter
- But not all black lives matter
- White lives especially don't matter
- No police
- Unless BLM is the police
- All statues are racist and bad, especially those of men or women whom in their time helped in a major way to defeat slavery and/or segregation
- Elk statues are the most racist and vile
- Statues of men who actually were slave traders and advocated for a world dominated by a strict and unforgiving hierarchy can remain because BLM isn't sure who they are anyway and are having a difficult time identifying the credentials
- Looting, shooting, and otherwise disorderly conduct are effective, especially when employed against already marginalized people of your own ethnic group
- You don't get to define what BLM stands for, BLM does, only they aren't quite sure themselves and if you ask different people you'll get different answers
Also, is anyone else getting the vibe that everything we've been experiencing since the beginning of March has had a diametric or mirror kind of flavor to it?
And if you look at my first list on BLM it's the same back and forth, polar opposites on everything. These are all examples of headlines I'm sure we've all seen, and it just makes me feel like I've read somewhere about hypnotizing or programming, one of the ways to do it is to rapidly introduce the brain to ideas that basically cancel each other out in meaning or whatever. Like it confuses you to a point of breaking where you can become more suggestible or something.
- Wear masks
- Don't wear masks
- Stay indoors
- Sunshine kills the virus
- The virus exists on every surface
- The virus can't survive on most surfaces
- We can contain it if we all vaccinate
- We can't contain it so we should all vaccinate
I can understand the presence of such headlines during a time like now where we are battling over information and truth, however, all of the things I listed were paraphrased headlines from sources like the CDC, or any of the mainstream outlets whom we can deduce to be playing for the STS side.
So when looking at it from that way it just seems suspicious to me the way it's being churned out in such oscillation.
Edit: if anyone wants to take that list and hyperlink it to examples, I'd love that. I'm sure I'll get around to it but I'm feeling kind of drained at the moment while I've been able to laugh and stay light-hearted at a lot of things, today just feels heavy