And now I want to speculate a bit for the end, because this is as far that the clues led me, and my very limited understanding of physics is a big obstacle at the moment. So I will just share what I think are the pieces of the puzzles (to a supposed formula?), that I got based on the clues in the words given by the Cs.
A: Need a better "handl" on it.
Need a better unit 'h' and unit 'L' on a formula related to alpha constant.
A: But there are always connections, both hither and yon. Tricky those Rosicrucians, tricky. And what of Piri Reis?
- connection between quantum physics/the wave function and yon/standard physics/also hidden physical units in the word
yon
- Piri stands for the equation P=I squared times R "The equation is
used to calculate the power, denoted by 'P', dissipated in an electrical circuit.
The power is directly proportional to the square of the current, 'I', and the resistance, 'R', in the circuit."
- And Reis perhaps for
the equation for electrical conductance Σ=1/R, where Σ (sigma) is conductance, which is reciprocal of resistance.
- My logic is as follows. 1) Reading it as R Σ 1 S(sigma) and 2) it is reciprocal to resistance (which is what P=I squared times R equation represents - 'Piri')
Tricky those Rosicrucians, tricky.
- Three keys?
Three letter 'k's perhaps.
- And 'Rosicrucians' (like I theorised in a post before), especially in the context of 'But there are always
connections, bother hither (Schrodinger's wave function) and
yon', could be interpreted as quantum reality (
waves)
So what to make of it? Here is what I've gathered and let's see if the puzzles pieces fit together.
Let's start with the word 'yon'. A word that didn't seem to fit as well as other clues thus far.
In electrical engineering, admittance is a measure of how easily a circuit or device will allow a current to flow. It is defined as the reciprocal of impedance, analogous to how conductance and resistance are defined. The SI unit of admittance is the siemens (symbol S); the older, synonymous unit is mho, and its symbol is ℧ (an upside-down uppercase omega Ω). Oliver Heaviside coined the term admittance in December 1887. Heaviside used Y to represent the magnitude of admittance, but it quickly became the conventional symbol for admittance itself through the publications of Charles Proteus Steinmetz. Heaviside probably chose Y simply because it is next to Z in the alphabet, the conventional symbol for impedance.
Admittance Y, measured in siemens, is defined as the inverse of impedance Z, measured in ohms: Y in physics = 1/Z
Whoa. Already a connection with 'PIRI REIS'. Admittance is analogous to conductance ((R Σ 1 S(sigma) part of 'Piri Reis')), and impedence is inverse of admittance and is analogous to resistance ((P=I squared times R) part of Piri Reis)).
Next let's look at the letter O in 'yon'.
What is the O symbol in physics?
The name of this symbol is omega. Omega is utilized as the symbol for ohms, which are the units of electrical resistance in physics and other sciences, lowercase omega is often used to represent angular frequency.
There are connections both hither and yon indeed!
Let's look at the letter N in 'yon'.
A newton (N) is the international unit of measure for force. One newton is equal to 1 kilogram meter per second squared. In plain English, 1 newton of force is the force required to accelerate an object with a mass of 1 kilogram 1 meter per second per second.
Hmm that is a unit of force in physics. And is also a unit in the gravitational constant.
In SI units, G has the value 6.67 × 10-11 Newtons kg-2 m2. The direction of the force is in a straight line between the two bodies and is attractive.
Interesting. But what to make of it?
Let's take a look at the formula for alpha (the fine structure constant), representing the ratio between the energy needed to overcome the
electrostatic repulsion between two electrons and the energy of a single photon of wavelength λ
. Image below is from
Fine-structure constant.
Note that
electrostatic repulsion is a force just like the gravitational constant G is,
both using Newtons (N) as a measuring units, with the difference of G being measured in Newton times meter squared / kilogram squared.
Coulomb's inverse-square law, or simply Coulomb's law, is an experimental law of physics that calculates the amount of force between two electrically charged particles at rest. This electric force is conventionally called the electrostatic force or Coulomb force. Although the law was known earlier, it was first published in 1785 by French physicist Charles-Augustin de Coulomb. Coulomb's law was essential to the development of the theory of electromagnetism and maybe even its starting point, as it allowed meaningful discussions of the amount of electric charge in a particle.
The law states that the magnitude, or absolute value, of the attractive or repulsive electrostatic force between two point charges is directly proportional to the product of the magnitudes of their charges and inversely proportional to the square of the distance between them. Coulomb discovered that bodies with like electrical charges repel:
It follows therefore from these three tests, that the repulsive force that the two balls – [that were] electrified with the same kind of electricity – exert on each other, follows the inverse proportion of the square of the distance.
Coulomb also showed that oppositely charged bodies attract according to an inverse-square law...
Being an inverse-square law, the law is similar to Isaac Newton's inverse-square law of universal gravitation, but gravitational forces always make things attract, while electrostatic forces make charges attract or repel. Also, gravitational forces are much weaker than electrostatic forces.
Where am I going with this?
What if the Cs are pointing us to an equivalent equation/relation of alpha in relation to standard laws of physics and in particular in relation to gravity. Maybe as the measure of ratio of two energies as in the example in the image above (ratio between the energy needed to overcome the electrostatic repulsion between two electrons and the energy of a single photon of wavelength λ
), and it might even be the connection between the 'hither and yon'/quantum physics and standard physics.
Think about it. Electrostatic repulsion between two electrons is akin to gravity in our world. It is a force, that in a sense is holding/gluing the electros to their orbits, the same way gravitational force is gluing/holding the objects in the universe in their orbits, and gluing us to Earth's surface.
But how to find the ratio?
C's said we need a better h and L on it. h is likely a planck constant and I asked Grok AI if there is equivalent for planck constant in the standard model of physics and long story short the answer is no.
In the image above -> ratio between the energy needed to overcome the electrostatic repulsion between two electrons and the energy of a single photon of wavelength λ, we see the ratio is between the energy needed to overcome the electrostatic repulsion (that is a force) and the energy of a single photon as represented by planck constant in the form of wavelength
λ or in the form of angular wavelength
y.
Cs hinted at a need for better 'h' and 'L'. L is a letter used in physics for angular momentum.
Angular momentum is the angular equivalent of linear momentum (p=mv) and is given by L=Iω, where I(kgm2) is the moment of inertia of an object about an axis and ω(rads−1) is its angular velocity about that axis. Angular momentum has the units kgm2s−1.
Angular frequency (ω), also known as radial or circular frequency, measures angular displacement per unit time. Its units are therefore degrees (or radians) per second. Hence, 1 Hz ≈ 6.28 rad/sec. Since 2π radians = 360°, 1 radian ≈ 57.3°.
Image below is from
Planck relation. We have letters y/λ and
ω(omega) and π (for n). The 'yon' connection. The 'better h and L' connection, because planck constant can be expressed in ratio of angular wavelength y, angular frequency ω(omega) and there is π involved (n).
Also note that 'k' represents the wave number. Remember 'tricky those Rosicrucians, tricky'. Maybe a hint towards three wave numbers. Or a hint towards three as in three 'cky'
c-speed of light, k-wave number, y-angular wavelength (note that all 3 appear in the image above).
Angular wavelength It is the inverse of angular wavenumber (k = 2π/λ). It is usually encountered in quantum mechanics, where it is used in combination with the reduced Planck constant (symbol ħ, h-bar) and the angular frequency (symbol ω = 2πf).
Are we looking for an equation that would represent a ratio between gravity and a standard model equivalent of angular wavelength in the form of a better 'h' and 'L', the one applicable for a standard model of physics? Energy represented by angular momentum and wavelength? If only we could find a way to put the necessary pieces in the equation to make it 'in the rest', ratio between certain units that will reveal alpha (if my theory is correct) and yield some cool treasures too according to Cs.
And how does resistance and conductance relate to this ('And what of Piri Reis?')
And 'to pique interest' - P i q u e in the rest? (alpha in between those units?)
Maybe I'm talking nonsense, and for sure my understanding of physics is very limited, but I can't shake the feeling that the clues given by the Cs are leading towards this direction, more or less. I just don't know how to connect it all into the framework of the physics formulas.
So I laid down the cards/clues I gathered, on the table of this forum and I hope someone else finds it interesting too.
Thank you for reading.
Just some additional info. Just in case. From
Photon.
