Getting a "Handl" on things?

I was watching this video that describes the concept of "action" in physics.


From wikipedia:


Video describes mind blowing concept of light (and everything) in the universe (not just at the quantum level) exploring all possible paths(possibilities) and choosing/manifesting in the one with the least action required. We end up seeing the path with least action. Then there was this part where Max Planck describes the moment he discovered/described what's known today as planck length, "the quantum of action". He wrote:


That's when I remembered this cryptic message from the C's: "Alfalfa fields in Rhineland yield as of yet undreamed of
treasures"
and I had a feeling it must be about physics, and also that its somehow related to planck length. So I looked into some clues starting with alfalfa quote and what I found aligned with the physics theory idea.

Alfalfa-lucerne-light (maybe also alfalfa-alpha-primary)
fields
in

Rhineland-land of the flow
yield-produce
as of yet undreamed of treasures-new undreamed of perspective in physics that would give treasures both spiritual and physical?
I wish I have understanding of quantum physics but I don't so I can just share what I think I connected.

Then while I was thinking about this part:


and how it might be connected to what I learned from the video about the path that light takes a.k.a. the path of least action, a tracks well worn perhaps, and how The searcher, the sepulcher, the one who carries the staff in constant search for greener pastures might be a description of that as of yet undreamed of reality of the universe/law of physics, I was also thinking about Need a better "handl" on it.
First I was looking for physicists named handl and on the similar lines, but then a different physics related idea came to my mind. Maybe it's not about handl as handl, maybe it's what's missing in a handle/handel, and that's E, the symbol for energy in physics. Then I tried to see if there is something in it and looked at "handl" again and what I saw was H and L, more physics constants? So I checked what H stands for in physics and google search gave the planck constant (discovered by the guy who said "a new undreamed of perspective") And google search for the L symbol in physics gave angular momentum.

So do we need a better E, H and L in physics? Or just better H and L? Seriously I wish I understand physics better! Somebody call Ark please 😅

Additional thoughts:

Based on the mentioned above concept of light taking the path/tracks of the least "action", while discarding all the other infinite possible options that 'it explores', I conclude the C's were also giving a clue here when Laura asks "Do you mean Rhineland as in Germany proper?" and C's reply "We do not mean Rhinelander, Wisconsin.... Or do we?!? Who is to tell?" Laura asks "Who?" And C's say: "The searcher, the sepulcher, the one who carries the staff in constant search for greener pastures."
Did C's mean it as a reference to the concept of least action and light exploring all the possibilities, like in this example Rhineland in Germany and Rhinelander, Wisconsin. But who is to tell? Maybe that new undreamed of concept in physics, that is near tracks well worn/the path of least action... "The searcher, the sepulcher, the one who carries the staff in constant search for greener pastures."
And it's interesting that the middle of the visible light spectrum is the green light spectrum. Is that a reflection of the green pastures of life created by "the searcher" constantly searching for greener pastures. Better versions of reality maybe?

Aditional speculation/contemplation: And maybe that 'who' is "Christ" as in "I am the Path, the Truth and Life". Contemplation gave me the idea that at the end of the theorised grand cycle "The Wave", The Searcher, the sepulcher, the one who carries the staff in constant search for greener pastures, collects the Life experiences of the grand total of conscious units and based on them creates a new reality in a new cycle. Those who live their lives by paying attention to objective reality left and right - walking/moving on the Path of Truth of the current reality of Life, that is I think being accelerated towards the end of the cycle so that only those who pay strict attention to the road/the Path/the Truth can stay on it and not hit the edge and crash or drive off the cliff, and reach the end of the road where the new reality is created based on their 'realities?'. While those who didn't participate by ignoring, shuting out or trying to overcome the reality, aren't included in the new one, they are filtered out through the filter of Life. Hmmm

I've done a lots of speculation and I wonder do you think I'm onto something here. Thank you for reading.
I am a little late, it is 2025 now, but thank you for the vid!
 
And now I want to speculate a bit for the end, because this is as far that the clues led me, and my very limited understanding of physics is a big obstacle at the moment. So I will just share what I think are the pieces of the puzzles (to a supposed formula?), that I got based on the clues in the words given by the Cs.

A: Need a better "handl" on it.
Need a better unit 'h' and unit 'L' on a formula related to alpha constant.

A: But there are always connections, both hither and yon. Tricky those Rosicrucians, tricky. And what of Piri Reis?
- connection between quantum physics/the wave function and yon/standard physics/also hidden physical units in the word yon

- Piri stands for the equation P=I squared times R "The equation is used to calculate the power, denoted by 'P', dissipated in an electrical circuit. The power is directly proportional to the square of the current, 'I', and the resistance, 'R', in the circuit."
- And Reis perhaps for the equation for electrical conductance Σ=1/R, where Σ (sigma) is conductance, which is reciprocal of resistance.
- My logic is as follows. 1) Reading it as R Σ 1 S(sigma) and 2) it is reciprocal to resistance (which is what P=I squared times R equation represents - 'Piri')
screenshot2022-06-2622129491025226692630..jpgimage.png

Tricky those Rosicrucians, tricky.
- Three keys? Three letter 'k's perhaps.
- And 'Rosicrucians' (like I theorised in a post before), especially in the context of 'But there are always connections, bother hither (Schrodinger's wave function) and yon', could be interpreted as quantum reality (waves)

So what to make of it? Here is what I've gathered and let's see if the puzzles pieces fit together.

Let's start with the word 'yon'. A word that didn't seem to fit as well as other clues thus far.

In electrical engineering, admittance is a measure of how easily a circuit or device will allow a current to flow. It is defined as the reciprocal of impedance, analogous to how conductance and resistance are defined. The SI unit of admittance is the siemens (symbol S); the older, synonymous unit is mho, and its symbol is ℧ (an upside-down uppercase omega Ω). Oliver Heaviside coined the term admittance in December 1887. Heaviside used Y to represent the magnitude of admittance, but it quickly became the conventional symbol for admittance itself through the publications of Charles Proteus Steinmetz. Heaviside probably chose Y simply because it is next to Z in the alphabet, the conventional symbol for impedance.
Admittance Y, measured in siemens, is defined as the inverse of impedance Z, measured in ohms: Y in physics = 1/Z

Whoa. Already a connection with 'PIRI REIS'. Admittance is analogous to conductance ((R Σ 1 S(sigma) part of 'Piri Reis')), and impedence is inverse of admittance and is analogous to resistance ((P=I squared times R) part of Piri Reis)).
Next let's look at the letter O in 'yon'.
What is the O symbol in physics?
The name of this symbol is omega. Omega is utilized as the symbol for ohms, which are the units of electrical resistance in physics and other sciences, lowercase omega is often used to represent angular frequency.

There are connections both hither and yon indeed!

Let's look at the letter N in 'yon'.
A newton (N) is the international unit of measure for force. One newton is equal to 1 kilogram meter per second squared. In plain English, 1 newton of force is the force required to accelerate an object with a mass of 1 kilogram 1 meter per second per second.
Hmm that is a unit of force in physics. And is also a unit in the gravitational constant.
In SI units, G has the value 6.67 × 10-11 Newtons kg-2 m2. The direction of the force is in a straight line between the two bodies and is attractive.

Interesting. But what to make of it?

Let's take a look at the formula for alpha (the fine structure constant), representing the ratio between the energy needed to overcome the electrostatic repulsion between two electrons and the energy of a single photon of wavelength λ. Image below is from Fine-structure constant.

WhatsApp Image 2025-03-15 at 23.38.59_efebdba2.jpg
Note that electrostatic repulsion is a force just like the gravitational constant G is, both using Newtons (N) as a measuring units, with the difference of G being measured in Newton times meter squared / kilogram squared.

Coulomb's inverse-square law, or simply Coulomb's law, is an experimental law of physics that calculates the amount of force between two electrically charged particles at rest. This electric force is conventionally called the electrostatic force or Coulomb force. Although the law was known earlier, it was first published in 1785 by French physicist Charles-Augustin de Coulomb. Coulomb's law was essential to the development of the theory of electromagnetism and maybe even its starting point, as it allowed meaningful discussions of the amount of electric charge in a particle.

The law states that the magnitude, or absolute value, of the attractive or repulsive electrostatic force between two point charges is directly proportional to the product of the magnitudes of their charges and inversely proportional to the square of the distance between them. Coulomb discovered that bodies with like electrical charges repel:

It follows therefore from these three tests, that the repulsive force that the two balls – [that were] electrified with the same kind of electricity – exert on each other, follows the inverse proportion of the square of the distance.

Coulomb also showed that oppositely charged bodies attract according to an inverse-square law...
Being an inverse-square law, the law is similar to Isaac Newton's inverse-square law of universal gravitation, but gravitational forces always make things attract, while electrostatic forces make charges attract or repel. Also, gravitational forces are much weaker than electrostatic forces.

Where am I going with this?
What if the Cs are pointing us to an equivalent equation/relation of alpha in relation to standard laws of physics and in particular in relation to gravity. Maybe as the measure of ratio of two energies as in the example in the image above (ratio between the energy needed to overcome the electrostatic repulsion between two electrons and the energy of a single photon of wavelength λ), and it might even be the connection between the 'hither and yon'/quantum physics and standard physics.

Think about it. Electrostatic repulsion between two electrons is akin to gravity in our world. It is a force, that in a sense is holding/gluing the electros to their orbits, the same way gravitational force is gluing/holding the objects in the universe in their orbits, and gluing us to Earth's surface.
But how to find the ratio?

C's said we need a better h and L on it. h is likely a planck constant and I asked Grok AI if there is equivalent for planck constant in the standard model of physics and long story short the answer is no.

In the image above -> ratio between the energy needed to overcome the electrostatic repulsion between two electrons and the energy of a single photon of wavelength λ, we see the ratio is between the energy needed to overcome the electrostatic repulsion (that is a force) and the energy of a single photon as represented by planck constant in the form of wavelength λ or in the form of angular wavelength y.

Cs hinted at a need for better 'h' and 'L'. L is a letter used in physics for angular momentum.
Angular momentum is the angular equivalent of linear momentum (p=mv) and is given by L=Iω, where I(kgm2) is the moment of inertia of an object about an axis and ω(rads−1) is its angular velocity about that axis. Angular momentum has the units kgm2s−1.
Angular frequency (ω), also known as radial or circular frequency, measures angular displacement per unit time. Its units are therefore degrees (or radians) per second. Hence, 1 Hz ≈ 6.28 rad/sec. Since 2π radians = 360°, 1 radian ≈ 57.3°.

Image below is from Planck relation. We have letters y/λ and ω(omega) and π (for n). The 'yon' connection. The 'better h and L' connection, because planck constant can be expressed in ratio of angular wavelength y, angular frequency ω(omega) and there is π involved (n).

WhatsApp Image 2025-03-16 at 00.15.28_2ce0cf56.jpg

Also note that 'k' represents the wave number. Remember 'tricky those Rosicrucians, tricky'. Maybe a hint towards three wave numbers. Or a hint towards three as in three 'cky' c-speed of light, k-wave number, y-angular wavelength (note that all 3 appear in the image above).

Angular wavelength It is the inverse of angular wavenumber (k = 2π/λ). It is usually encountered in quantum mechanics, where it is used in combination with the reduced Planck constant (symbol ħ, h-bar) and the angular frequency (symbol ω = 2πf).
Are we looking for an equation that would represent a ratio between gravity and a standard model equivalent of angular wavelength in the form of a better 'h' and 'L', the one applicable for a standard model of physics? Energy represented by angular momentum and wavelength? If only we could find a way to put the necessary pieces in the equation to make it 'in the rest', ratio between certain units that will reveal alpha (if my theory is correct) and yield some cool treasures too according to Cs.

And how does resistance and conductance relate to this ('And what of Piri Reis?')
And 'to pique interest' - P i q u e in the rest? (alpha in between those units?)

Maybe I'm talking nonsense, and for sure my understanding of physics is very limited, but I can't shake the feeling that the clues given by the Cs are leading towards this direction, more or less. I just don't know how to connect it all into the framework of the physics formulas.
So I laid down the cards/clues I gathered, on the table of this forum and I hope someone else finds it interesting too.

Thank you for reading.


Just some additional info. Just in case. From Photon.

WhatsApp Image 2025-03-13 at 23.34.20_235f6c24.jpgUntitled.png
 
Back
Top Bottom