I was waiting for it, yet no, he did not. It would have been a good segue to have had Carlson (Hancock showed some maps) to weigh in on it, but there just seems to be not enough time available in the episodes to delved too deep.
The latest season of “Unsolved Mysteries” on Netflix had me wondering the same thing. There are two episodes about big UFO sightings that I’d never heard of before, an episode about a Native American team of police who investigated paranormal situations involving Bigfoot and what can only be described in our parlance as ‘window fallers’, and a woman and her daughter who had ghost and poltergeist type experiences in an apartment they moved into that were connected to a woman who once live in the apartment who was brutally murdered. The woman later had dreams which gave clues to the location of the body.
Netflix are being used as a ‘disclosure’ outlet, big time.
I’m not sure whether I’m understanding you correctly. I just watched the episode and he doesn’t say anything about survivors from the shores building the pyramid. He speaks of another place in Micronesia where they also built with those volcanic columns and wonders if they were built by the same people.
Maybe I didn’t pick up on the part you’re talking about?
I was also waiting for it, but maybe because the bays aren't in line with his timeframe for the younger dryas period event? not sure really.. I am just speculating.
I do think he jumped to expose his conclusions rather than show his research, and a lot of what he said was way above my head, but he also had short episodes to work with and I suppose the production team might've chosen to go with shocking/beautiful images than detailed explanations... but what I found valuable, was the central message of his program: A massive disaster took place a long time ago, which turned into the legends of the flood the world over, and it's cyclical, which means it will more than likely happen again.
Not being a scientist or historian myself, I thought that such a message was valuable.
And Netflix, well... maybe they are the disclosure avenue of choice these days, or the test ground for the popularity of certain ideas. Or someone is loosing control of what gets out there.. who knows.
Just caught this....I mean, I don't even know what to say.
Graham Hancock's Ancient Apocalypse Netflix series 'promotes racist conspiracy theories', claim archaeologists
Yes, @mkrnhr. I misunderstood. He says it in the final episode of the series. I had only watched the first episode which focused on the pyramid itself.
Here we go 
timesofmalta.com
Maltese archaeologists push back against Netflix show’s temple claims
Archaeologists dismiss 'pseudoscience' peddled in Ancient Apocalypse
timesofmalta.com
I wasn't clear, I wrote "Later" instead of writing "In a later episode". Sorry about that.
T
thisplacerocks
Guest
Radionics actually work well for farming. Check out what this farmer has to say Radionics on the Farm: Too Woo-Woo for You? - Nourishing Traditions
Lyndi
Jedi Master
Thank you thisplacerocks: for link to Radionics on the Farm! I have sketchy info on farm radionics but heard a Hugh Lovell lecture at Guelph Organic Conference about 25 years ago. I really liked his lecture but what I remember most is that he said if you are broadcasting radionics info for your land be sure to limit it to your land as your farming neighbours didn't sign up for this practice. That was a seed of a whole new realm of ideas, though at the time I wasn't in a position to practice what he said.
Found this thread while searching for 'pyramids'...
This Italian university chemist guy, with lots of interests in ancient history, ufology and all over, published some preliminary pdf with the reconstructed interior of the great pyramid
Having links with a radiofrequency researcher (can't spell the exact word for it), they utilized a satellite to scan the interior of the great pyramid of Giza.
He also theorized that the 'Pharaoh' utilized the pyramid to regenerate their bodies, in line with one of the C's answer about such device.
There's a recent youtube video interview and his website, and the link to download the pdf.
His conclusion is that the pyramid's internal chambers and shafts were running a machine filled with water. The internal corridors form a sort of diapason shape that produces frequencies for body regeneration. Unfortunately it's all in Italian by now, but you can watch the images on the pdf, pages 32 and on.
This Italian university chemist guy, with lots of interests in ancient history, ufology and all over, published some preliminary pdf with the reconstructed interior of the great pyramid
Having links with a radiofrequency researcher (can't spell the exact word for it), they utilized a satellite to scan the interior of the great pyramid of Giza.
He also theorized that the 'Pharaoh' utilized the pyramid to regenerate their bodies, in line with one of the C's answer about such device.
There's a recent youtube video interview and his website, and the link to download the pdf.
His conclusion is that the pyramid's internal chambers and shafts were running a machine filled with water. The internal corridors form a sort of diapason shape that produces frequencies for body regeneration. Unfortunately it's all in Italian by now, but you can watch the images on the pdf, pages 32 and on.
And yesterday from The Guardian:
Ancient Apocalypse is the most dangerous show on Netflix
The same story was carried a day later by an influential Danish paper, that like others parrot what comes from across the seas with a minimum of delay.
Experts: Wildly popular Netflix series is dangerous pseudoscience
And so on. The reviews try to limit the damage to the questioning being done in the series. This is as expected, and it is up to people who watch to study more on their own and overcome the limitations both by the series which can not discuss all points, and by the reviewers which has the conviction that what is taught in the school and by officialdom is all there is.
As I was writing, I found this quote:
Session 11 April 1998
April 11, 1998 Laura, Ark, Frank, Alice Q: Hello. A: Hello. Q: And who do we have with us this evening? A: Anamom. Q: And where do you transmit through? A: Cassiopaea. Q: I would like to ask about {Laura’s son} friend Chris. Is there anything you can tell about his condition...
cassiopaea.org
Like anyone else, Hancock may not be right all the time.
The existence of an advanced civilization in the past would be a hard blow to the idea of gradual evolution, and possibly also to the pride in the uniqueness of the current human civilization and its achievements conveyed in most schools.
So far I have only seen the first episode, and found it interesting, though I thought it could have been shortened. I am looking forward to watching the episode about the comet hits. Does Hancock leave it at speculations, or does he present the best arguments available?
Here we go
Maltese archaeologists push back against Netflix show’s temple claims
Archaeologists dismiss 'pseudoscience' peddled in Ancient Apocalypse
Yes. Laura digs into the rut issues on Malta from this session, with an extract that discusses Malta temples (or structures that were there and later further built upon):
From 14,019 years ago for the groves date (that was a pretty precise date given and not a range), and then the structures - saying the "survivors built those," which sounds pretty immediate (100 - 1,000 years after?), however how does one define in time survivors exactly?
The consensus from the link is:
Nice that they pushed it back a mere 700 years, so it's now 7,900 years ago, with the gap to possible ruts mentioned in the session 6,100 years and change further back.
Hancock looks to 11,000 years ago (this aligns with the business of the constellation Sirius, which he had explained), which also puts the survivors part 3,000 years off the 14,019 years.
Horseshoes are getting a bit closer to the mark. However, can understand archeologists who only have radio carbon dating to go on from teeth, and that is always the problem, organic matter. That is why the star charting was an interesting angle that gets repeated to other sites, and would need to discover much more on that. The Maltese professor-lady who seemed to be an expert was favorable to the star aliments of the temples in time.
