Group of Eight, Cashless Society and the Mark of the Beast

[Jonatain]

Here is an image extracted from a book of the Jehovah's witnesses. Just for the eyes.

The french writings say: "Babylon the great is sitting on a beast."

 

[Jonatain]

Another pic which i guess is related to the "confusion by corruption":

Well, i can scan some more if some are interested...

See you!

P.S: these pics have bigger resolutions than viewed there... so can you save them for a better insight.

 

[Pierre]

Another pic which i guess is related to the "confusion by corruption":

A quick translation of the pic's comment :

"Turning their back to the lamb, they give their power and their authority to the wild beast"

 

[RedFox]

Just wondering if anyone has seen the new barcleycard advert?? It has a card you wave near the scanner rather than insert into anything.
I only just found out about it due to the advert being on TV in the UK lots at the moment. Anyone notice it in the US?
I was just thinking that perhaps this is one step more towards just having the chip implanted (thus no need for the card).
Just a thought..

More info posted here http://www.cassiopaea.org/forum/index.php?topic=10529.0

 

[anart]

Actually, this is already used in the US.  My debit card works this way, for instance (I had no choice in the matter, it just showed up that way).  No need to swipe it, just wave it - however, not all stores have installed the units that read the signal, so it is still swiped a lot.  Most cards with this capability have a little 'electromagnetic wave' symbol on the front - like this -

.

 

[RedFox]

Interesting. From what I can tell its been used in parts of London for over a year now as well (I didn't know about it until half hour ago! lol)
I'll be curiouse to know how much its being pushed in general. Another though, if everywhere hasn't got it, presumably that just means its easier to centralise (and thus control the populous) if only certain (large chain) stores have these? hm

 

[PopHistorian]

Gimpy wrote:

Well, what jumps out at me is this: once the tatoos (Lizzie takover etc) are making the rounds, it'll be near to time for the comet fragments to start hitting soon after, and if one is able to survive that event, then the transition to 4th density happens....at which time knowing the difference between STS and STO will determine which way one goes.

"Knowing the difference" won't determine which way you go. This can't be right, because there are those firmly committed to STS who know the difference. They've made a choice. There are those who choose to work toward STO but are still STS. So it seems to me this is about choice beyond just "knowing the difference."

Kesdjan wrote:

1) Economic Collapse (a report on SOTT.net has this as early as summer 2009)
2) Global Fascism/martial law
3) Comets
4) Wave

I don't think it's clear about the order of 2 and 3. For instance, comet havoc could speed the changes, or war might be started to speed the changes and disguise cometary impacts. Wait and see.

It's a little unclear to me what C's mean by "changes will follow turmoil." Changes doesn't necessarily mean the transition to fourth density because of a couple of things, I think. They've mentioned several times that consortium plans will fail. We will "will feel the effect of the Lizard beings desperate push for total control no matter" what, but the C's also said that:
- a staged ET invasion would flop (941119)
- suggested that further major manipulations of the populace would fail due to PTB madness and desperation (020928)
- "There will be a big miscalculation made. It will reveal the "Man behind the curtain." (030118) And the ever mysterious, "help is drawing near" (030118).
- Somewhere I believe they said if they got to the point of overt tyranny, it wouldn't last long -- anyone know the quote?

These seem to suggest that there may be a period of positive "changes" prior to 4th density transition, right? None of it actually means that the consortium won't succeed in achieving an overt tyranny. Also, it may be related to this that:

- the Lizzies will fail to increase their numbers and power even with the advantage they have of working in a "completely still state of space time" (941022).

Things could be even more interesting than conventional imaginings of cashless society, martial law, and war if we consider the material about the return of the Nephalim (as in Session 950924), and the STS underground army (as in Session 960831).

Regarding the transition to 4th density, though the "sides" may be on equal footing, the C's said in Session 970222,

We told you that "HAARP" was being designated for capturing and modulating electromagnetic fields for the purpose of total control of brainwave patterns in order to establish a system of complete "order on the surface of the planet" in either 3rd or 4th density.

How such technology is to be resisted in 4D is unknown.

 

[PepperFritz]

"Knowing the difference" won't determine which way you go. This can't be right, because there are those firmly committed to STS who know the difference. They've made a choice. There are those who choose to work toward STO but are still STS. So it seems to me this is about choice beyond just "knowing the difference."

Yes, and I don't think it's a choice made "in the moment" either; one needs to have been substantially "choosing" in that direction over time -- i.e. raising one's FRV -- before the "event" itself. Correct me if I have it wrong, but I think of the transition to 4th-density STO as being a process -- not just a one-time decision -- a process of raising one's FRV until it reaches the "critical mass" required....

 

[Pierre]

Yes, and I don't think it's a choice made "in the moment" either; one needs to have been substantially "choosing" in that direction over time -- i.e. raising one's FRV -- before the "event" itself. Correct me if I have it wrong, but I think of the transition to 4th-density STO as being a process -- not just a one-time decision -- a process of raising one's FRV until it reaches the "critical mass" required....

Yes and we shall be judged by our fruits.

If I correctly remember one transcript (that I don't manage to find back) mentioned that in order to graduate to 4D STO, a STO candidate should have performed more that 50% STO deeds.

On the other side, to reach 4D STS, one individual should perform 95% STS deeds.

1) Economic Collapse (a report on SOTT.net has this as early as summer 2009)
2) Global Fascism/martial law
3) Comets
4) Wave

We might add a drop of glacial rebound to this rather spicy soup.

 

[PepperFritz]

If I correctly remember one transcript (that I don't manage to find back) mentioned that in order to graduate to 4D STO, a STO candidate should have performed more that 50% STO deeds. On the other side, to reach 4D STS, one individual should perform 95% STS deeds.

I don't believe that appears in the Cassiopaea transcripts. I think you are recalling the following exchange from the Ra material:

QUESTION: The book Oahspe says that if an entity is over 51% service to others and less than 50% service to self, then the entity is harvestable for the positive 4th dimensional level.

RA: This is correct. The negative path is quite difficult for attaining harvestability and requires great dedication. To be harvestable in the negative orientation requires at least 95% service to self.

I also don't think it's accurate to speak in terms of "STO deeds" and "STS deeds", as "deeds" are not in themselves STO or STS in nature; it is only the INTENT and ORIENTATION of the person performing the deed that can be so defined. Two people can perform the same act with entirely different intents.

 

[Adaryn]

If I correctly remember one transcript (that I don't manage to find back) mentioned that in order to graduate to 4D STO, a STO candidate should have performed more that 50% STO deeds. On the other side, to reach 4D STS, one individual should perform 95% STS deeds.

I also don't think it's accurate to speak in terms of "STO deeds" and "STS deeds", as "deeds" are not in themselves STO or STS in nature; it is only the INTENT and ORIENTATION of the person performing the deed that can be so defined. Two people can perform the same act with entirely different intents.

Yes, I think the important element is not the 'deeds' which can appear STO (or STS) from the outside, but the Frequency Resonance Vibration of a person. A FRV leaning towards STO, which then leads to truly STO acts.

 

[Pierre]

I don't believe that appears in the Cassiopaea transcripts. I think you are recalling the following exchange from the Ra material:

QUESTION: The book Oahspe says that if an entity is over 51% service to others and less than 50% service to self, then the entity is harvestable for the positive 4th dimensional level.

RA: This is correct. The negative path is quite difficult for attaining harvestability and requires great dedication. To be harvestable in the negative orientation requires at least 95% service to self.

Thank you for finding this excerpt. I could have searched the Cs transcripts for a long time since it comes from the Ra Material.

I also don't think it's accurate to speak in terms of "STO deeds" and "STS deeds", as "deeds" are not in themselves STO or STS in nature; it is only the INTENT and ORIENTATION of the person performing the deed that can be so defined. Two people can perform the same act with entirely different intents.

It makes sense.

I guess two persons can have the same intent and make two different decisions also.

Does it mean that both are important, the intent and the deed, the mean and the end ? Would the FRV encompass the whole process (intent and fruit, mean and end) ?

 

[PepperFritz]

I guess two persons can have the same intent and make two different decisions also. Does it mean that both are important, the intent and the deed, the mean and the end ? Would the FRV encompass the whole process (intent and fruit, mean and end) ?

Well, as the saying goes, "the road to hell is paved with good intentions". So the first question would be is the person's intent truly STO-oriented, or is it actually STS behaviour in disguise (e.g. is this a person who "helps" others in order to feel good about himself, to feel holier-than-thou, or to feed a need to direct and control others lives?). Once it is been established that there is a genuine intent to "help" one who has "asked", the next part of the equation is KNOWLEDGE and DISCERNMENT. The one desiring to "help" must know the difference between "asking" and "demanding" and/or "manipulating". He must also be able to discern what kind of "help" (the "means") will best serve the needs and overall spiritual development of the asker, in order to arrive at an "end" that is best for all concerned.

I would venture to say that the two components -- STO intent and the "best" means/end -- would tend to go hand-in-hand on an equal ratio basis. The higher someone's FRV and the purer his intent in STO terms, the more he will by his very nature seek out the kind of Knowledge and Discernment required to carry out that intent (the "means"), and bring about the best possible "end". Conversely, when someone's FRV is relatively low and his intent of "mixed" orientation, the more likely he is to "contaminate" and/or "confuse" his desire to "help" with his own issues and to fail to give the matter the degree of "reflection" required to result in the "best" outcome; in other words, he is not likely to use the best "means" nor arrive at the best "end".

So I guess I'm saying one cannot separate out the FRV and STO-intent from the "means" and the "end". Someone of high FRV and pure STO intent is not likely to use a deeply flawed means that leads to an equally flawed end. And, conversely, someone of a low FRV and either STS or "mixed" intent is not likely to use the best "means" to arrive at the best "end".

Which is not to say that an entity of "pure" STO intent would be incapable of "error". I recall that in the "Ra" transcripts, the Ra entity acknowledged having made an error in judgement when it provided certain information/technology to the Atlanteans, which was subsequently mis-used....

 

[Pierre]

I would venture to say that the two components -- STO intent and the "best" means/end -- would tend to go hand-in-hand on an equal ratio basis. The higher someone's FRV and the purer his intent in STO terms, the more he will by his very nature seek out the kind of Knowledge and Discernment required to carry out that intent (the "means"), and bring about the best possible "end". which was subsequently mis-used....

This can resonate with Castaneda's concept of impeccability where body, mind and spirit are acting together in harmony. I guess when impeccability is there, the intents, the thoughts, the words, the deeds, the means and the ends become consistent/united with each others.

By the way impeccability doesn't seem to solely apply to STO side. In the case of STS candidates, being more than 95% STS oriented, I guess there is a strong drive affecting intent, thoughts, words and deeds in order to reach such a high percentage.

 

[Buddy]

I was guided back to this thread by a post from thevenusian here:
http://www.cassiopaea.org/forum/index.php?topic=12928.msg93610#msg93610

I didn't realize I had missed so many additional replys on this thread. Thanks to all the contributors!

My question is about the best attitude to take regarding any further 'marking' requirements by the PTB on or in our personal self.
If I've understood the session and all the responses so far, my impression is that the important thing is to stay aware, watch, know what the state of the laws and mandates are at any given time, but don't resist in terms of trying to fight off anything. Instead, leave everything open to the last possible moment and if no way out (for physical chipping for example) presents itself, stay with the flow of the Work, let the PTB take from you what they can, but stay focussed on your service to others.

Two quotes illustrate the underlying dynamics that I'm talking about (all emphasis mine):

With regard to what an we do as the mayhem unfolds around us, we can also learn a lot by studying Gurdjieff and his actions during WWII. He continued to hold his meetings in Paris with all the chaos going on around them including the presence of German troops, resistance fighters, food rationing etc. Gurdjieff's classes were totally focused on "the work" and no mention of the war was made.
[...]

[quote author=A writer named David, speaking about Jesus]
I DID NOT know the meaning of His discourses or His parables until He was no longer among us. Nay, I did not understand until His words took living forms before my eyes and fashioned themselves into bodies that walk in the procession of my own day.
Let me tell you this: On a night as I sat in my house pondering, and remembering His words and His deeds that I might inscribe them in a book, three thieves entered my house. And though I knew they came to rob me of my goods, I was too mindful of what I was doing to meet them with the sword, or even to say, "What do you here?"
But I continued writing my remembrances of the Master.
And when the thieves had gone then I remembered His saying, "He who would take your cloak, let him take your other cloak also."
And I understood.
As I sat recording His words no man could have stopped me even were he to have carried away all my possessions.
For though I would guard my possessions and also my person, I know [where] there lies the greater treasure.[/quote]
Source:_http://leb.net/~mira/works/jesus/david.html

Does this approach pretty much sum up a balanced view?