Health Protocol for Mandatory Coronavirus Vaccination

Who else spent thousands of dollars on supplements before they knew silicone dioxide damages the microbiome, retards cells of the gut lining (leading to leaky gut and all that follows) and causes impairment of the gut-brain axis affecting the hippocampus ?

grape seed extract to the rescue??


Silicon dioxide nanoparticles (SiO2-NPs) can be found in many products, such as composites, paints, ceramics, consumer products, and food additives. We recently demonstrated that via breastfeeding, SiO2-NPs transfer to the offspring's brain, interfering negatively with hippocampus development. In this work, we evaluated the protective effect of grape seed extract (GSE) against the adverse effects of SiO2-NPs. After delivery, animals were administered 25 mg/kg SiO2-NPs with/without GSE (300 mg/kg) for 20 days (from 2nd to 21st days post-delivery) by gavage. SiO2-NPs increased malondialdehyde concentration and decreased antioxidant activity in the offspring's hippocampi. The mean number of dark neurons (DNs) was significantly higher in the hippocampi of the SiO2-NPs group, whereas the mean number of DCX + cells was significantly lower than in the control group. The offspring in the SiO2-NPs groups had a weak cognitive performance in adulthood. Interestingly, these adverse effects of SiO2-NPs were alleviated in the GSE-treated groups. Therefore, GSE can attenuate the damaging effects of maternal exposure to SiO2-NPs during lactation.
 
Wow, I read your post, covid huh? We had it here a few weeks ago, I have been doing the protocol with all the supps for 3 months, cycling, having a few days off a week. I had increased the iodine because we were sick.
I found this, don’t know how or if it relates but if the immune system is busy burdened with other things may be the activation of mast cells and histamine are higher and can’t cope with iodine.
Yeah, the iodine thread was pre-COVID times and people's immune system took a big hit with the spike protein during th COVID era, whether vaccine shedding or what not. A lot of inflammatory histamine or mastocytosis-like reactions were developed and some people in poor countries were having zero mortality rate with severe COVID during the early COVID times just with anti-histaminics alone.

Selenium deficit will definitely create problems when using lugol, even of the autoimmune kind. I think that potassium iodide is safer.
 
Over the years I've seen quite a few articles, mentions and allusions to big pharma owning, or having shares or stakes in the supplement industry. Those reports often mention that these brands purposefully make supplements that don't really work well just to create an illusion of pharmaceutical solutions being much better than supplementation, thus discouraging people from using them to solve problems - while also making money in the process because supplements do sell well, even if they aren't perceived as an alternative to pharmaceuticals. And does it really hurt big pharma if people develop health issues as a result of taking supplements with harmful fillers? Or course not - sick people is how they make money, so all it does is create more customers.

Another way is using worse quality or unabsorbable forms of substances in supplements. B12 is one example. Poorly absorbed cyanocobalamin is used in well over 90% of B12 supplements found in health shops and supermarkets, I can only find other forms, such as methylcobalamin, or adenosylcobalamin online.

A few months ago I posted about issues with supplement quality, and as I was searching through my bookmarks today I bumped into a few articles about this topic that may be of interest.

A well-known supplement brand - Now Foods - has been regularly testing supplements from brands that sell their products on Amazon and in Walmart and discovered that the quantities of active ingredients are much lower than what's written on the bottle.

Here is a summary of the 2023 test of bromelain content of 25 brands that sell it on Amazon:

  • 15 out of 20 samples tested (75%) failed to meet label claims for potency. Only six out of 20 samples contained over 50% of labeled potency.
  • Shocking that 12 out of 20 brands contained less than even 10% of label claim! That means more than half of all tested Bromelain supplement samples contained less than one-tenth of label claims -- the most egregious testing results NOW has seen!
  • Three samples had ambiguous labeling that only claimed weight and no activity. Generally, Bromelain powder has an activity of 2,400 GDU per gram, but these brands made no potency claims. Two of these products' potencies were below the detection limit and were reported as < 10 GDU/g. The third brand, Cadane, only contained 34 GDU of Bromelain per capsule, which is extremely low potency.
  • Three brands were labeled as products made in India. These brands tested to only contain 10, 34 and 78 GDU potencies, respectively. Two were under 10% of label claim and the third made no potency claim.
  • Only four brands exceeded 100% potency with NOW as one at 121%.
  • NOW intentionally did not test known “natural” or practitioner brands. The reason being these other brands typically abide by Good Manufacturing Practices (GMPs) and we expect full potencies.
  • NOW has been testing products sold by lesser-known brands for six years and consistently finds most suspect products failing potency testing. We have shared this information widely, with the goal of addressing bad quality products in the marketplace. Unfortunately, testing shows the problem is getting worse.
  • NOW has been testing products exclusively found on Amazon, but we will begin adding unknown products found on Walmart.com in the future. We are finding that low potency products often spend the most dollars marketing on both Amazon and Walmart.com. Two of the top four “sponsored” or paid advertised brands from a search on Amazon in March 2023 included the violating brands below.

Now Foods name and shame the brands they tested here:

NOW uncovers quality issues for supplement brands sold on Amazon

This article has links to test results of more supplements from various brands, including ones many of us use, such as Alpha Lipoic Acid, Glutathione, Q10, or berberine:

NOW Tests on Astaxanthin Purchased on Amazon.com and Walmart.com

While this is likely a marketing move that aims to divert customers from the brand's competition and prove they are the real deal, they have in fact done the general public quite a favour. And come to think of it, I don't think they'd be "smearing" other brands like that if their own products weren't good in case someone subjects their supplements to the same scrutiny and calls them out on their hypocrisy.

Too bad they use nasty fillers though. Maybe not as much as other brands, but I have found stearic acid and silicon dioxide in their products. But if no clean versions are available, maybe Now Foods would be the lesser evil?

In case anyone is interested in the topic and would like to dive deeper, here are a few articles that dig into issues with supplement quality, lack or regulation or enforcement, and general issues with the supplements market:



 
In case anyone is interested in the topic and would like to dive deeper, here are a few articles that dig into issues with supplement quality, lack or regulation or enforcement, and general issues with the supplements market
I clicked on the berberine article. Pretty annoying that they don't tell you which brands are high potency:

The testing used high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC), the industry standard testing method, in order to assess product purity. And the results were bad:
  • Only three brands of the 33 tested contained berberine of at least 90% potency
  • Only seven brands had at least 80% potency
  • 18 brands had less than 40% potency
  • Shockingly, seven of the 33 brands tested had less than 1% potency
This means that if you closed your eyes and randomly selected a berberine product on Amazon, there’s a 1 in 5 chance that you’d get zero berberine. The situation really is that bad.
So, what are the 3 that have 90% potency? What are the 7 that have <1%? Unless I just missed it, they don't tell. Which makes me think they want to sell their brand. A bit shady if so.
 
So, what are the 3 that have 90% potency? What are the 7 that have <1%? Unless I just missed it, they don't tell. Which makes me think they want to sell their brand. A bit shady if so.

Oh it's a marketing tactic for sure, and a very clever one too, but they did share the brands that met the criteria. They marked them with a little triangle, have a look at the bit I circled in the screenshot, you'll see it next to the good brands on the list:

1730237379486.png
 
NOW has separate results for each of these supplements
Resveratrol Products
Berberine Products
Astaxanthin Supplements
Bromelain Supplements
Magnesium Glycinate
Quercetin and CoQ10 (2022)
Glutathione
Curcumin
Phosphatidyl Serine
Acetyl-l-Carnitine
Alpha Lipoic Acid
CoQ10 (2020) and SAMe

For bromelain, the 4 brands that tested 100%+ are
Horbaach
NOW
Nutricost
Superior Labs

I have some Nutricost supplements and did not think Nutricost is a lesser-known brand.

Nutricost tested 100%+ for
Resveratrol Products
Bromelain Supplements
Glutathione

Nutricost tested at 92% for
Quercetin
 
I have some Nutricost supplements and did not think Nutricost is a lesser-known brand.

In one of the articles I read about this topic when I first came across it (not sure if it’s one of the articles I shared or a different one) the author criticised Now Foods for going after smaller brands but not testing the big guys - and I can't help but wonder why. That’s still useful I guess. Many - if not most - people have health challenges caused by modern nutrition and lifestyles, and doctors aren’t doing much to help, so people turn to supplements that promise improvement. It really is a huge market, and as Now Foods have shown, it attracts producers who just want to make a quick buck out of people's suffering. And given the current economic situation and the ‘cost of living crisis’ the price tag is a big factor in the purchase decisions for many. Amazon has hundreds of products sold by producers I’ve never heard of and whose credibility is hard to verify - unless I want to trust Amazon reviews.

And funny enough, I first came across this topic in Amazon reviews. Someone wrote that the brand I was looking at was listed by Now Foods as a dodgy one - so I went ahead and googled the Now Foods study to find out what the reviewer was talking about.

So Now Foods has decided to go after the smaller guys and weed out the dodgy ones to push them off the market and stop ruining the reputation of supplements' effectiveness with products that don’t work. That’s useful, I’ll give them that.

But I can’t say I trust the big guys so much more, I would really love to see test results for their products too. The fact that the smaller guys often sell stuff that doesn’t do what it says on the tin doesn’t mean the big players are squeaky clean and their products are worth the frequently higher price. Most of them use pretty nasty fillers that have been proven to disrupt gut flora and cause a whole bunch of other issues. If they knowingly do that, I tend to trust them just about as far as I can throw them. And that’s not very far.

Another group of supplement producers that makes me suspicious is brands that sell products with no fillers at a similar price - or cheaper - than the ones with the nasties in them. Making supplements with fillers is actually significantly cheaper than making clean ones, so why would this not be reflected in the price? My guess is that either the producers of the ones with fillers add a huge margin while the makers of the clean but affordable ones don't, hence there's not much difference in price, or the makers of the affordable clean ones are cutting corners. And in the business world the most common way to cut them happens to be quality. Then there's also the possibility that the makers of the clean ones do cut corners on quality, maybe even make their products not as clean as stated - but still charge premium. Heck, it really is a jungle out there :nuts:
 
Then there's also the possibility that the makers of the clean ones do cut corners on quality, maybe even make their products not as clean as stated - but still charge premium. Heck, it really is a jungle out there

I've always been a little wary of Amazon concerning such products after watching a documentary on Netflix.

So I turned to online stores that specialize in selling supplements, such as iHerb or National Nutrition. But... I then asked myself, why would they be different from Amazon anyway? So I ended up reading tips from this forum, plus reading buyer's reviews and/or articles like the one you published, making Excel grids with price and concentration, etc.

It's a full-time job to weed out the good options from the junk. But at least, once it's done, all one needs to do is keep ordering the same stuff!

Adding to this, I had a conversation the other day with a friend: he has a friend who works in a pharmaceutical company. The conversation was that the company spends a lot of money to create new patentable molecules, and if they don't prove to work (fails the test from the FDA) and thus can't be marketed in the pharmaceutical branch, the company turns to selling it health supplements.
So the guy was outraged that the company would dare do that since the product doesn't work. His boss said: I have a family to feed, and if you want to keep your job, shut your mouth. We need to gain back on our investment.

I wish I was able to investigate this matter more in detail, because stories word-to-mouth always gets distorted or missing context/details. But in any case, it still sounds about right...

edit: the documentary I mentioned, I think it was "Toxic Beauty" or "Broken: Makeup Mayhem"
 
Last edited:
Having read the links that @Ant22 posted, i had a question that popped in my mind, about the orders many here made in China, with Serena. In fact, i just passed an big order recently and should receive a first package during the 10 coming days, then will make a second order (I prefer to do it in 2x).

My question was the following :

Did anyone here made some analyses of some complements received from this source, ie from Serena ?

I mean, yes, the comments about Serena are nice, she's usually fast to answer and the packages are usually well delivered (unless your local customs blocked it). But all know also that the best scammers will also be nice people who are quick to get back to you, thus i mean, it's not a valid argument, what would be valid is to have some here making random tests for some ordered substances and report back here the results.

To come back to the importance of this point, here's a short example that could represent many of us here :
You have some specific health problems and you searched a long time about, you participated on the forum to these researches, you've done your part and you know now, on the complements side, which one you need. which will help to solve your health issues. You order them and you start to take them, but what you take is not what it's supposed to be (with in mind the results of the tests the company "Now Foods" made on various brands). I mean, you did all well but you were fooled at the last step by a false product - what a bad story don't you think ?

So, i wondered how to solve this, or at least, how to minimize being fooled by bad products.
The ideal but impossible solution would that we all have a device in which you put a small dose of any substance you wish, and a voice (think about "Siri" from Apple) list you the results and answer to the question is what you have is well what is labelled on the pack/box/bottle. Maybe in the future such device will exist ... but let's come back to real possible solutions.

So, the best solution i thougt about was that for some here who order to Serena and who can afford it, will pay a test, to be made by a local labo, on the purity of such or such complement sent by Serena, then post the results here, or better in a dedicated new thread opened for the purpose. Aim to share this would also be to avoid to test one supplement which was already tested.

I'm willing to participate to this, by testing 1 or maybe 2 complements we'll receive (it's in fact a group order, for me and 2 of my colleagues). But what about testing the ivermectin we ordered, isnt there a risk that the labo reports to the authorities that i possess some iv !? same with melatonin, these are the 2 of the 14 complements we ordered which are "forbidden" (by the EU mafia)

Another side solution is to ask the question to the C's. As we are many to order to Serena, a rough question like "Can we generally trust the quality of the complements many of us order to Serena in China ?

That's all, any comment welcome about this sub-but-important-topic :-)
 
Last edited:
I clicked on the berberine article. Pretty annoying that they don't tell you which brands are high potency:


So, what are the 3 that have 90% potency? What are the 7 that have <1%? Unless I just missed it, they don't tell. Which makes me think they want to sell their brand. A bit shady if so.
Shady indeed, they have been adding more ingredients to their pills as years have passed by. I don’t buy their stuff anymore, unless it’s pure powder. Probably been bought out by big pharma.
 
Hello everyone.
Since a few days ago, I feel the need to ask a lot of things concerning diet and health, but I do not realize which is the most appropriate thread. I finally decided to ask these questions here, but if there is a more appropriate thread I thank the moderators for moving it there.

The case is the following:
With my wife a few years ago that we try to have a more appropriate diet for Work.
Despite the fact that we have very low economic possibilities, we have managed to change many things in our diet, with very noticeable positive results.
What we have not been able to achieve is to completely eliminate wheat flour. We are aware of the importance of doing that. I know that somehow we will get there. In fact, eating bread the way I used to, I don't feel like it anymore.
Buckwheat is very expensive for us.
The few times we have bought it, we couldn't manage to make tasty things at all :-D, but we will keep trying.

We don't eat dairy products, white sugar very rarely, vegetable oils none, only olive oil sometimes. We use animal fat. The meat we eat the most is pork. Before it was more beef than pork but now it is the other way around (everything from the supermarket 🤷‍♂️).
Also some fruits, vegetables, rice, potatoes, and other things I can't remember now.


As for liquids, for years we have had zero alcohol and no soft drinks. If we want something tasty, we do it with fruit. Basically we drink tap water and mate every day.

As for supplements and things like that, the case is as follows:
Both my wife and I use basically the same elements or substance, only that each one does it in a particular way, according to what we think is best for each one's body.

I will tell you about my routine and the changes or recent additions, which is exactly what I want to ask about.
My heartburn problems decreased enormously with the changes in my diet, and the improvement increased much more since I drink water with bicarbonate when I get up and before going to bed.

Some time ago, I think less than a year, I started with Magnesium, but also with Borax.
Even though I took them spaced one from the other, and only once a day each, after a few days I began to have great discomfort.
I felt terrible, as if I had eaten something bad.
I never knew what it was all about, because I got scared and stopped taking both substances.

I recently resumed taking Magnesium and it is not causing me any problems.
I intend to take the Borax again, and watch what happens with a little more courage.
I am also taking vitamin C. (one teaspoon of Ascorbic Acid in a glass of water) once a day.


Lately I am also taking a teaspoon of salt in half a glass of water when I wake up, and then I take the water with bicarbonate.
My first question is if that would be the correct order, or if I should take the water with baking soda first and then the water with salt. So far I have not had a problem, but I would like to make sure.

Another question is regarding the magnesium.
In the drugstore we get very cheap sachets with 35g of Magnesium Chloride, to mix in 1 liter of water. And from this we take a small glass of liquor per day. I mean those little glasses like drinking tequila.

The thing is that I took it once a day but at any time. And someone here, I don't remember who it was, commented that possibly the Magnesium was better absorbed if it was taken before going to bed.
So I started doing that, but again I was faced with the dilemma of whether to take it before or after the glass of water with baking soda that I also take before bedtime.

At the moment I am taking the Magnesium first and then getting that almost foul taste out of my mouth, with the glass of water with Bicarbonate, which in comparison is a delight.
Any advice you can give me would be greatly appreciated.



Regarding Ivermectin, we have been taking it once a month, but we have not been able to buy it for several months.
It is too expensive for us and, at home we are three people with my daughter.
Faced with this unavoidable reality, what occurred to me was to buy Wormwood.
I bought it as soon as the C's talked about the importance of eliminating parasites.
We have not used it yet, because we were able to buy Ivermectin.
But now we are not, and I think perhaps Wormwood might be a good option as an alternative, since that was what we were given as children for parasites.
If anyone here knows Wormwood and wants to share their opinion, it would be helpful.

I have a lot more questions, but I don't want to make this post too long. I will surely ask them soon.

Just in case this is something to consider, I will tell you that we are not vaccinated, none of the three of us.
I know that this does not exempt us from the problem, and that the protection protocol is necessary.
I only added the data for more information in the above context.

Thanks for reading, and for any advice or suggestions you can give me.
Best regards.

Translated with DeepL.com (free version)
 
Hello everyone.
Since a few days ago, I feel the need to ask a lot of things concerning diet and health, but I do not realize which is the most appropriate thread. I finally decided to ask these questions here, but if there is a more appropriate thread I thank the moderators for moving it there.

The case is the following:
With my wife a few years ago that we try to have a more appropriate diet for Work.
Despite the fact that we have very low economic possibilities, we have managed to change many things in our diet, with very noticeable positive results.
What we have not been able to achieve is to completely eliminate wheat flour. We are aware of the importance of doing that. I know that somehow we will get there. In fact, eating bread the way I used to, I don't feel like it anymore.
Buckwheat is very expensive for us.
The few times we have bought it, we couldn't manage to make tasty things at all :-D, but we will keep trying.

.........

I recently resumed taking Magnesium and it is not causing me any problems.
I intend to take the Borax again, and watch what happens with a little more courage.
I am also taking vitamin C. (one teaspoon of Ascorbic Acid in a glass of water) once a day.

.......

Lately I am also taking a teaspoon of salt in half a glass of water when I wake up, and then I take the water with bicarbonate.
My first question is if that would be the correct order, or if I should take the water with baking soda first and then the water with salt. So far I have not had a problem, but I would like to make sure.
........

Regarding Ivermectin, we have been taking it once a month, but we have not been able to buy it for several months.
It is too expensive for us and, at home we are three people with my daughter.
Faced with this unavoidable reality, what occurred to me was to buy Wormwood.
I bought it as soon as the C's talked about the importance of eliminating parasites.
We have not used it yet, because we were able to buy Ivermectin.
But now we are not, and I think perhaps Wormwood might be a good option as an alternative, since that was what we were given as children for parasites.
If anyone here knows Wormwood and wants to share their opinion, it would be helpful.
.......

Translated with DeepL.com (free version)
One thing I can comment on, I've been transcribing free weekly webinars with Dr. Dietrich Klinghardt, formerly of Germany now with clinics in the UK and in Seattle. I regard him highly. For parasite cleanse he suggests a mixture of Ascorbic acid combined with sea salt and since you are already using those things, this might be interesting to you and your wife.

Copied from information in his PDF on Lyme Disease: "1.5 gm salt per 10 lbs with 1-4 grams of Vit C, taken 3 times a day for 3 to 6 weeks with 2 week breaks in between each time."

This parasite cleanse is detailed in this pdf on Lyme Disease, it's on page 4 of the PDF under the title, "The Lyme ABC".

https://klinghardtinstitute.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/05/Lyme-Disease-Antibiotics-Klinghardt.pdf

I think it is a practical medicine for parasite defense so I've started the Ascorbic Acid/Salt parasite protocol and am at the 2 week break period. It may be responsible for me having a slightly better energy level along with other things I've learned from the webinars.

Note I'll be posting more most interesting webinar transcripts from Dr Klinghardt, a series on Electro Magnetic Radiation protocols and a history lesson that kind of blew my mind, in case you are interested in that as well. I'll post that transcript by tomorrow. The Dr Klinghardt topic here on the forum is this one:

Dr. Dietrich Klinghardt Healing & Diagnostics, ART, Research, Protocols

No cliff-hanger, not wanting to just leave the history lesson that blew my mind unreported so this was one thing (among others) he told us about. Top researchers back as early as 1950's examined different electrical wavelengths and concluded that certain specific ones were extremely noxious, highly so, to all life. By 1970, with that knowledge, the telecom industry chose exactly those most toxic wavelengths and they are what we live in today. I didn't know there were many other wave lengths that would do the job! But there are!
 
Back
Top Bottom