Imminent Alien Disclosure?

Dark Journalist is sometimes interesting, but strikes me as way too paranoid for his own good.

I think I know what you mean here. He tends to think the whistleblowers like Grusch are part of the disinformation of the gatekeepers to control the narrative. He also tends to kind of go off the rails, or so it seems to me, about Atlantis. I mean, unless he has a solid channel source, I don't see how you can know much of anything about that subject. Maybe he does, but if so he doesn't mention it.
 
I think I know what you mean here. He tends to think the whistleblowers like Grusch are part of the disinformation of the gatekeepers to control the narrative.
Considering what we know, that does not seem unlikely.

He also tends to kind of go off the rails, or so it seems to me, about Atlantis. I mean, unless he has a solid channel source, I don't see how you can know much of anything about that subject. Maybe he does, but if so he doesn't mention it.
He does mention his sources on Atlantis. It is mostly Cayce and Rudolph Steiner, as well as uncovering little-known aspects of Atlantis research in Central America and the Caribbean in the 19th and 20th centuries. He does seem to think that Atlantis was basically centered in the Caribbean, which I think is questionable.
 
Considering what we know, that does not seem unlikely.
I think it's just the opposite. Considering what we know, everything Grusch and Elizondo have stated about what they know meshes nicely what "what we know," i.e. what we have determined is most likely to be true. I'll change my mind if and when they change their narrative, but until that happens, that's where I stand on the issue.

If you want a better idea of who is gatekeeping, I've got a few names for you: Mick West, Steven Greenstreet, Sean Kirkpatrick, Sue Gough, Mike Turner...
 
Considering what we know, everything Grusch and Elizondo have stated about what they know meshes nicely what "what we know," i.e. what we have determined is most likely to be true.
We know that this is one of the most highly classified topics at some of the most powerful and malicious organizations. Grusch and Elizondo were allowed to reveal certain information at this time and the question is why. I don't think that the answer to that is anything positive for humanity, just like the Dark Jounalist is suspecting.

The most likely reason is indeed that they want to use the UFO threat narrative to grant themselves emergency powers, similar to the Enabling Act in Nazi Germany.

An eventual 'official' revelation that we are not alone may have some positive consequences, but I think the STS controllers determined that they can steer the narrative in the desired direction.
 
We know that this is one of the most highly classified topics at some of the most powerful and malicious organizations. Grusch and Elizondo were allowed to reveal certain information at this time and the question is why. I don't think that the answer to that is anything positive for humanity, just like the Dark Jounalist is suspecting.
Since the late 1940s there have always been insiders who want disclosure of a sort, and there have always been leaks. Since 2017 those people have been networking. Many of them are or were fairly highly placed in the executive branch. Grusch and Elizondo were "allowed" to reveal certain information because they have the support of one or more factions, and they are smart, i.e. they know how the system works and how to work the system.
The most likely reason is indeed that they want to use the UFO threat narrative to grant themselves emergency powers, similar to the Enabling Act in Nazi Germany.

An eventual 'official' revelation that we are not alone may have some positive consequences, but I think the STS controllers determined that they can steer the narrative in the desired direction.
No doubt there are factions that want to control the narrative no matter what, and they will attempt to do so. That has no bearing on Elizondo or Grusch's motivations or sincerity.
 
Since the late 1940s there have always been insiders who want disclosure of a sort, and there have always been leaks. Since 2017 those people have been networking. Many of them are or were fairly highly placed in the executive branch. Grusch and Elizondo were "allowed" to reveal certain information because they have the support of one or more factions, and they are smart, i.e. they know how the system works and how to work the system.
I think it is a way too optimistic view that the supposed pro-disclosure faction within the PTB wants to do it for non-ulterior motives. What Grusch and Elizondo were allowed to disclose seems to have been carefully selected to fit a certain narrative and outcome, which I expect to be malicious in nature. Just like pretty much everything else coming from the various competing power factions within the PTB.

The "disclosure faction" is probably simply the one that wants to use the UFO threat card to get more power, while the "non-disclosure faction" thinks that continued secrecy is preferable.

That has no bearing on Elizondo or Grusch's motivations or sincerity.
Whether or not the two are sincere and are just being used for this operation is not really that important, in my opinion. What matters are the possible reasons for this limited disclosure by the PTB or some faction within it.
 
I think it is a way too optimistic view that the supposed pro-disclosure faction within the PTB wants to do it for non-ulterior motives.
Factions, plural. It is a way too simplistic view to think that everyone associated with UAP programs is a douchebag.
What Grusch and Elizondo were allowed to disclose seems to have been carefully selected to fit a certain narrative and outcome, which I expect to be malicious in nature.
Which narrative do you think it fits, and which narratives do you think it doesn't fit?
 
Session Date: April 27th 2024

(L) Okay. She is saying, basically, there's going to be disclosure in 2026 of some kind. Is she close to the mark with that?

A: Close.

Q: (L) So, there's going to be some ramping up of some kind of disclosure-type information in another year or so?

A: Yes

Q: (Possibility of Being) Will it be a real disclosure or distraction?

A: Distraction. Real disclosure would lead to mass rejection.


Q: (L) In other words, if they really told who they were and what they were here for, people would freak!
 
In an earlier post, I quoted something the C's said about the veteran ufologist Dr Jacques Vallee:

Q: (L) Uri Geller sent an e-mail to the mail list recommending that people visit Brother Blue's web site for info on the Aviary. Then he says that he has personally known and been involved with these 'birds.' Anyway, there is this whole deal going on with Vallee being caught in a lie on the mail list. Are they trying to assassinate him or is he really a bad guy?

A: Vallee is not sticking to the "program."

Laura wanted to know what program the C's were referring to. I had the benefit of watching an Ancient Aliens episode devoted to Vallee last week and it made me think more about the C's reference to the "program". Vallee was certainly an insider for a while who like Hal Puthoff worked for the CIA sponsored Stanford Research Institute (SRI). This would bring him into contact with many of the people I mentioned in my previous email on this subject. Quoting from Vallee's Wikipedia entry:

Via professional association with SRI and independent friendships with Harold E. Puthoff and Central Intelligence Agency analyst Kit Green (who obtained a temporary security clearance for him in 1974), Vallée was intermittently consulted on classified remote viewing research (including the Stargate Project) throughout the 1970s and 1980s. During the early SRI experiments (led by Puthoff and Russell Targ in conjunction with Green as CIA contract monitor), he became acquainted with Uri Geller, Edgar Mitchell, Charles Musès, Andrija Puharich, Jack Sarfatti, Arthur M. Young, Edwin C. May, Pat Price and Ingo Swann.

Coming back to the "program", Vallee was unusual among his fellow ufologists of the period in that he recognised the high strangeness (as did journalist John Keel) of the UFO experience rather than just looking at it as a nuts and bolts phenomenon when explaining the Extraterrestrial Hypothesis (ETH). As Wikipedia states:

However, by 1969, Vallée's conclusions had changed, and he publicly stated that the ETH was too narrow and ignored too much data. Vallée began exploring the commonalities between UFOs, cults, religious movements, demons, angels, ghosts, cryptid sightings, and psychic phenomena. His speculation about these potential links was first detailed in his third UFO book, Passport to Magonia: From Folklore to Flying Saucers.

As an alternative to the extraterrestrial visitation hypothesis, Vallée has suggested a multidimensional visitation hypothesis. This hypothesis represents an extension of the ETH where the alleged extraterrestrials could be potentially from anywhere. The entities could be multidimensional beyond space-time; thus they could coexist with humans, yet remain undetected.

Vallée's opposition to the popular ETH was not well received by prominent U.S. ufologists, hence he was viewed as something of an outcast. Indeed, Vallée refers to himself as a "heretic among heretics".


This stance immediately put him at odds with those who viewed the matter purely as a physical phenomenon. If the PTB wanted to preserve the subject as a purely physical phenomenon in order to disguise the hyperdimensional nature of the UAP's and EBE's, then Vallee was definitely departing from the programme. However, this departure from the main stream UAP narrative occurred long before the C's made their comment. So perhaps the "program" could mean something else.

One thing we do know is that the PTB and their various agents, including those in the military and intelligence agencies (especially in the USA), have striven to keep real data and information on the subject under wraps. When the C's made their comment, this was still very much the official position and what limited disclosure there has been up to now has come in recent years. So, how could Vallee have departed from the program? The answer may lie in the fact that Vallee is not just an astrophysicist but also a computer systems analyst, having obtained a Phd in industrial engineering and computer science from Northwestern University in 1967. Indeed, whilst at Northwestern he began to conduct early artificial intelligence research. He would later serve on the National Advisory Committee of the University of Michigan College of Engineering and authored four books on high technology, including Computer Message Systems, Electronic Meetings, The Network Revolution, and The Heart of the Internet.

So, could the C's reference to "program" be a cryptic reference to Vallee's interest in computer science as a means to conduct a deeper analysis of the UAP phenomenon? The answer could be a tentative yes, since the Ancient Aliens episode showed how Vallee used his computer skills to help establish a computer data program, which comprised as many UAP reports and investigations worldwide as he and his collaborators could lay their hands on. This allowed them to build a massive data bank, which could be interrogated in a sophisticated manner so as to try and gain answers to the phenomenon. Indeed, in the Ancient Aliens show, he spoke of enlisting modern artificial intelligence to advance this work. And it would seem that Robert Bigelow, who owned Skinwalker Ranch and the Wilson Ranch in Utah, played a part in the ongoing development of this program. Again, quoting from Vallee's Wikipedia entry:


More recently, he has been associated with Robert Bigelow as a consultant to the National Institute for Discovery Science and a member of the scientific advisory board of Bigelow Aerospace.

After years of ideological arguments based on anecdotal data the field of UAP research appears ready to emerge into a more mature phase of reliable study,” Vallée wrote in the paper’s abstract. Citing the mounting scientific interest in UAP around the world, based in part on documents conveying an official military interest in these phenomena, the scientist argued that the path forward would require the analysis of hard data, paired with intelligently informed theoretical studies.

“Without pre-judging the origin and nature of the phenomena, a range of opportunities arise for investigation,” Vallée wrote, warning that “such projects need to generate new hypotheses and test them in a rigorous way against the accumulated reports of thousands of observers
.”


So, where has this program reached today? Apparently, it has morphed into the Capella Project:
UAP: A Strategy for Research by Jacques Vallee – 2014 GEIPAN

“In the United States the National Institute for Discovery Science (“NIDS”) and the Bigelow Aerospace Corporation have initiated a series of special catalogues to safeguard their own reports from public sources and from their staff. The author was tasked with the development of a data warehouse consisting of 11 separate data bases to support this research. The project is known as “Capella”.
1730858624833.png
The “Capella” Data Warehouse concept

The overall data structure for Capella has been published in both French and English on the author’s website (www.jacquesvallee.com) under the title: “A System of Classification and Reliability Indicators for the Analysis of the Behaviour of Unidentified Aerial Phenomena.” The data warehouse uses a 6-layer system to describe the behaviour of the phenomenon. It is detailed in reference 10 below, which is also available on the website.

The low signal-to-noise ratio in ufology presents a special challenge, however, and it demands special technical responses by competent information scientists using the latest software tools.“
“The problem was that in 2014, despite the existence of several notable independent catalogs containing information on historical incidents, there was no single collection of reliable UAP reports—a centralized database, in other words—upon which such studies could rely. This had been part of what prompted Vallée to assemble such a database for NIDS, work that would later carry over as Bigelow’s efforts moved out of the private sector and into the official world as part of the Defense Intelligence Agency’s Advanced Aerospace Weapons Systems Application Program (AAWSAP).

“In the United States the National Institute for Discovery Science (“NIDS”) and the Bigelow Aerospace Corporation have initiated a series of special catalogues to safeguard their own reports from public sources and from their staff,” Vallée wrote in his 2014 paper, adding that he had been asked to develop a UAP data warehouse containing 11 individual databases.

“The project is known as ‘Capella,’” it stated.


“There is such a database. It is the one we built as part of the AATIP/BAASS project in Las Vegas,” Vallée told me. Comprising roughly 260,000 cases from countries around the world, the scientist said during our call that the Capella database had been one of the major focal points of the program.

“Contrary to what people believe, [Capella] is the largest part of the budget that was spent on the classified project,” Vallée said. This included paying for translations of incident reports from Russian, Spanish, Portuguese, and several other languages into English, and providing funding for teams that conducted additional research on-site.

“It was a large effort for two years, Vallée said, though he added that in reality, “probably close to fifty or sixty years of work went into the database.”“

See:

And https://www.geipan.fr/sites/default/files/15_VALLEE_full.pdf


There is one major drawback though and that is, quoting Valle, “The database is still classified, to my knowledge.” Whether this situation will change or not remains to be seen. If ever it is made public, it would comprise an absolute treasure trove of UAP reports.

The name "Capella" derives from that of the brightest star in the northern constellation of Auriga. Its name meaning "little goat" in Latin, Capella depicted the goat Amalthea that suckled Zeus in classical mythology. However, the constellation Auriga means the "Charioteer" in Latin, which seems appropriate in a UAP context given that UAP's have been viewed by some as the chariots of the gods.​
 

Trending content

Back
Top Bottom