Interviews with Arkadiusz Jadczyk

I found this thread by searching for "Dzhanibekov effect" on this website after findind Arkadius'es blog entries about the "Dzhanibekov effect" on his website. I wonder why Arkadius never asked "the C's" about the Dzhanibekov effect and if it will play a role during earth changes?
 
I found this thread by searching for "Dzhanibekov effect" on this website after findind Arkadius'es blog entries about the "Dzhanibekov effect" on his website. I wonder why Arkadius never asked "the C's" about the Dzhanibekov effect and if it will play a role during earth changes?
Did he asked any questions about it since your post?
 
Interesting thoughts. Notice also that "quantization" is kind of inbuilt into calculus itself, i.e. integral calculus, which could be thought of as quantization with an infinitely high resolution.

But fascinatingly, some sort of quantization seems to be going on in real physical terms: the amount of energy that, say, an oscillator (think of a pendulum) can have is discrete, i.e. only multiples of Planck's constant. Amazingly, this means that if you push a child on a swing, you cannot arbitrarily choose the amount of energy, but there is a discrete "energy grid", or finite "resolution" of energy statuses! Of course, since Planck's constant is so small, we cannot really experience this except in dedicated quantum experiments. What does this mean though? I don't know.

Maybe there is something to the idea that true "analog" systems don't exist really? The Cs said something about an "energy grid" of consciousness:



As for time, as Ark alluded to, without time in our "clock" sense there could be no oscillations/frequencies/vibrations. Depending on wavelength, you need a certain amount of time to even speak of a vibrational cycle or frequency. And then there is information that is supposed to be a "mover and shaker". Maybe the concept of modulation has something to do with it? I.e. as in how we modulate a carrier wave in radio communication (such as FM or AM)? Are "unstable gravity waves" modulated waves and as such carry information? What does all that have to do with time?

Anyway, so many questions, so little answers and understanding, at least for me. But learning is fun!
Do you really need time to have an oscillation? Do you really need a propagation to have an oscillation? I don't think so, we're asking these kind of questions because we're thinking in 3D space-time (it'sour reference of visualisation) but don't forget, one you access 4D , you access the infinity all at once, you're out of the 3D linear space-time (galilean or einsteinien) and 5D there is no more space and time (antimatter for example).
 
I found this thread by searching for "Dzhanibekov effect" on this website after findind Arkadius'es blog entries about the "Dzhanibekov effect" on his website. I wonder why Arkadius never asked "the C's" about the Dzhanibekov effect and if it will play a role during earth changes?
Did you saw this post?
 
I just caught up with this thread and what wonderful videos of Ark that seemed to put in perspective knowing him more and sharing his incredible knowledge. Don’t know how I missed this one but so happy I found it. These interviews are incredible! WOW, made my day!
 
I found this thread by searching for "Dzhanibekov effect" on this website after findind Arkadius'es blog entries about the "Dzhanibekov effect" on his website. I wonder why Arkadius never asked "the C's" about the Dzhanibekov effect and if it will play a role during earth changes?
I bumped this , because on x ,@EthicalSkeptic posted his theory on Exothermic Core-Mantle Decoupling and Dzhanibekov Oscillation.

#climatechanges , #longcycles


Some simplified illustration by @nobulart:

 
I bumped this , because on x ,@EthicalSkeptic posted his theory on Exothermic Core-Mantle Decoupling and Dzhanibekov Oscillation.

Wow, @Philippe that is an interesting site.

I have to say the source of the site attributed to @EthicalSkeptic on X has an interesting glossary and database which may relate to some of the Cs clues that have been given to us. His Hidden in Plain Site reference is very interesting I think.

Maybe I do not understand his reference very well but he seems to be referring to erosion of the one pyramid to erosion by a deluge.

From Hidden in Plain Site
Then it hit me. The Tura limestone casing blocks had not been scavenged at all. Nor could this possibly have been from an earthquake, which selectively disturbed only Tura, but not Mokattam. The patterning and undercut nature of the stone depletion made that notion a ridiculous fairy tale (see Exhibits D and E above and to the right). The Tura limestone blocks had been dissolved, dissolved through both the ferocious kinetics, as well as carbonic acid chemistry – of ocean water. Just as in the case of the Leo Stela at Nimrud Dagwhile working in Turkey, or King Solomon’s Lost Mine of Ophir while working in Africa, the realization hit me inescapably, like a ton of bricks.

One may encounter the eyes of enigma for years, and suddenly, in a single glance, comprehend it utterly and completely—a penetrating affair that renders a thousand prior gazes entirely moot.

I was silent in the car on the way back to the hotel, my stomach hanging like lead under the weight of what I had just seen. My colleagues even inquired if I was well. I was not.
The Metrics and Evidence

Accordingly, I have outlined the measures and dynamics of this particular form of karst erosion, in Exhibits F, G, and H below. The grey area in Exhibits F and H, represents an ocean level which is 576 feet higher than our current day normal. This represents the height of ocean above current sea level which is required to create this fast-paced karst erosion visible on both the Khufu, and especially the Khafre, pyramids.

A 576 ft pause in this sea level is the origin of that light colored karst erosion band shown in the Exhibit E photo to the immediate right above – as well as in Exhibits F and G below. This erosion band was caused by a highly energized ocean, averaging a sea state of 6 to 8, over a significant period of time. I have sailed a ship in sea states 7 and 9 before. These were terrifying events, with waves taller than my bridge wing and ship.

Thereafter, the waters appear to have retracted almost as quickly as they encroached. This is a warning flag that we should heed and understand as mankind. Take your time in examining Exhibit F below, as it is packed with relevant deductive observation.
For some reason I thought the author would link the deluge with Atlantis but in this section he seems more interested in the cycles he says are depicted on the Nubian Egg and not Atlantis.

Exhibits L (Nile Sketch) and M (Faiyum Basin Sketch) – The Ethical Skeptic’s analysis of the Nubian Ostrich Egg – dated to 4500 – 5000 BCE. Just as we observed in Exhibit J above, the water levels in the Faiyum valley have retreatedover the last 7,000 – 11,600 years into a hypersaline lake called today, Lake Moeris (the deepest blue depression area in Exhibit M). This area is filled with karst erosion features, sea shells dated to 4600 to 5300 BCE, and ancient aquatic animal bones—including an extensive concentration of younger fossils to such a degree of preservation that even some stomach contents are intact.67
The reader may observe how well the Nubian Egg depiction fits the ancient topography, through clicking on this image, which shows how the Giza Pyramids would have presented an emerging marvel to local inhabitants as the sea level receded past the 220 ft elevation level around 3800 to 5000 BCE. One should note that the Nubian Egg depicts (Exhibit L – left side) the body of oceanic bay which existed to the immediate West of Giza in the linked image as well.

The top of the Nubian Egg, however, reveals not the fabled Atlantis, but something far more profound.
I find that the Cs references to a deluge, Atlantis, and Egypt's pyramids show the possible connections.

One of the first references to Noah and the deluge/flood was in the following session:

Session 30 September 1994:
Q: (L) Was the story of Noah's flood the story of the breaking up of Atlantis?

A: Yes. But symbolic.


Q: (L) How many people were on the planet at that time?

A: 6 billion.

Q: (L) Out of this six billion people, how many survived?

A: 119 million. (or 19 million)27

Q: (L) Was Noah's flood caused by the close passage of another celestial body?

A: Yes.

Q: (L) Which body was that?

A: Martek.

Q: (L) Do we know this body in our solar system now?

A: Yes.

Q: (L) What name?

A: Mars.

Q: (L) Was Martek an inhabited planet at that time?

A: No.

Other planets and celestial changes seem to be involved in the bigger picture with Venus being one of them.

Session 19 October 1994:
Q: (L) Was Venus born from the planet Jupiter?

A: No.

Q: (L) Did it appear in the sky from the area of Jupiter?

A: Yes.

Q: (L) Was the earth knocked into a new orbital position because of this activity?

A: Yes.

Q: Is an event of this type going to take place in the not-too-distant future?

A: Maybe.

Q: (L) Did an event of this type take place at the time of the flood of Noah?

A: Yes.

Q: (L) How many years ago did the
flood of Noah occur?

A: 12656. (10,662 B.C.)
It is interesting to note that when asked if a similar event to the one above might take place in the "not-too-distant future" answer was "Maybe".

The Cs say that it was the arrival of Venus that also caused the disturbance for Martek or Mars.

Session 19 October 1994:
Q: (L) Did Atlantis go down as a series of destructions?

A: Yes.

Q: (L) How many cataclysms?

A: Three.

Q: (L) Were these cataclysms all caused by the same source?

A: No.

Q: (L) And you said that the "flood of Noah" was the story of the final deluge and destruction of Atlantis?

A: Yes.

Q: (L) And that was caused by what?

A: Venus.


Q: (L) I thought you said it was caused by Martek?

A: Yes.

Q: (L) Well, how can it be caused by Venus if it was caused by Martek?

A: Venus also "caused" Martek.

Q: (L) You said that the earth, up to that time, was surrounded by a water vapor canopy, correct?

A: Yes.

Q: (L) And when Mars came by it overloaded the earth's atmosphere and it fell as a deluge, correct?

A: Close.

Q: (L) When did Venus enter the solar system?

A: 80000 years approximately.

Q: (L) How many close passes to the earth did Venus make?

A: Seven.

Q: (L) Was Venus involved with the planet Kantek which you said exploded due to psychic energies generated by its inhabitants?

A: No.

According to the Cs the "flood of Noah" is related to the history of trauma and confusion for the Guanches of the Canary Islands.

Session 19 July 1997:
Q: In a previous session you also said that the Guanches were confused by a trauma, which was why they did not have a clear story about their origins. So, I was thinking about it and wondering if they were actual Atlanteans, and that the Canary Islands were an intact part of Atlantis, and that the Guanches did not actually travel from anywhere... they were there all along. That the Canaries is an actual area of Atlantis that survived and that the Guanches survived with it.

A: Close.


Q: Is there some mystery or secret about how they got there?

A: In what context?

Q: I asked before, and you said 'guess,' and I guessed the flood of Noah, and you said 'close.' You said they were traumatized. I just wanted to know where they came from. They have a tradition that 60 of them arrived...

A: You are close enough to lay the foundations of your castle.

The Cs continued to talk about the origins of the pyramids in the following session:

Session 22 August 1998:
Q: (L) Now, on to the questions I have prepared: In a previous session you said that the pyramid was built 10,643 years ago. That would be 8,649 BC. Is that a correct figure, or was there any corruption?

A: Yes. Correct.

Q: Then you talked about the pyramid as a focuser of energy to do 'all things' or many things. Later we asked about Stonehenge and you said that Stonehenge was built 6,000 BC by Druids, an early Aryan group, as an energy director to do 'all things.' This seems to indicate that both structures had similar design functions. Is that correct?

A: No. Stonehenge is a vector of energy derived from Solar and Cosmic rays. Pyramids focus electromagnetic energy from the atmosphere ambiently. Stonehenge was built 8,000 BC, by the way.

Q: If it was built in 8,000 BC, and the Pyramids were built 8,649 BC, which is 10,643 years ago, more or less, that means that they were built at almost the same time, or at least within 600 years of each other. If they were built at almost the same time, were they built by the same, or similar, groups of people?

A: Atlantean descendants.

Q: Obviously the Great Pyramid is a marvel of engineering - and Stonehenge is as well - yet the two structures are so dissimilar. The Pyramid presents such a finished and sharp and elegant appearance, and Stonehenge might give a person - of course that is based on how it appears today - a more primitive presentation.

A: Was not originally.

Q: Did they work in conjunction with one another and were the two groups that built them in communication with one another?

A: No and yes.

Q: Was it two different groups? One, with the Stonehenge business, and one with the Pyramid business?

A: Offshoots of same group.

A: Were they antagonistic toward one another or were they friendly toward one another?

A: No, yes.

Q: If the flood of Noah, as you have said before, occurred 10,662 BC, that means that the Pyramid and Stonehenge were built more than 2,000 years after this event.

A: Yes.

Q: Did it take 2,000 years for them to develop or create the technology?

A: No.

Q: What were they doing in those 2,000 years?

A: Reassembling.

Q: In that 2,000 years of reassembling, do you mean reassembling as a group through reincarnative processes...

A: All. Built using sound wave technology.

Q: When you say that it was built using sound wave technology, were these sound waves produced by human voices or by instruments or mechanical devices of some sort?

A: Mostly latter.

Q: What kind of a device would this be? What would you call it?

A: Something like tuning fork.

Q: It would be something that could be struck and would produce a sound that could then be directed in some way?

A: A sound enhancing collector/focuser.

Q: Can we build such a thing?

A: Must be like a two-way antenna; solidly brass or bronze.

Q: Other than a solid piece of metal, were there any other internal parts such as a mechanism of some sort?

A: Silicon arterial wand.

Q: (A) Can we see somewhere a picture of this?

A: No pictures exist to where you have access.

Q: (L) Was the pyramid itself ever used as a sounding mechanism, the chambers?

A: Not exactly.

Q: How many chambers or cells are there in the Great Pyramid?

A: 19.

Q: So, there are some that have not been found yet. Now, according to this book, the 'Message of the Sphinx,' they are saying that the orientation of the pyramid complex which includes the Sphinx, designates or denotes a time, or replicates on the ground, of the pattern of Orion related to the constellation of Leo exactly 10,500 years ago. What is the significance of this date 10,500 years ago?

A: Complex, but what about Orion?!?

Q: What about Orion?

A: For you to surmise.

The most recent question about "the flood of Noah" is in the following session:

Session 9 March 2024:
(Ryan) You mentioned that Atlantis underwent 3 incarnations over a 100,000 year period (31/05/1997). If the "Flood of Noah" and Paranthan nuclear war were two of the three cataclysms, was the first cataclysm at the time of the Youngest Toba eruption after the destruction of Kantek?

A: Yes.
 
Going on the idea that time is an illusion to help us learn, what I see is that time separates relationships between things into a natural progression that allows us to recognize patterns. These patterns we call cause and effect. But the deeper you dig, the more it seems that phenomena are not causal, but mutual. For instance many people think of every electronic event starting as a voltage, which results in a current. But eventually you have a situation where in order to understand why a voltage is present, you must understand that there is already a current flowing. If you can only think of events as starting with a voltage then you will find it very difficult to understand this concept even though in practice voltage and current are symmetrical mathematically until you get into atomic and quantum phenomena (well I'm no physicist, I'm not sure about this).

So the idea of cause and effect is more like a stepping stone, the same way we may use analogies with pipes and water to understand electronics at the beginning. When you begin to see the limitations of the analogy you are ready to "graduate" to a higher viewpoint and awareness. Many things still follow the simple cause and effect relationship in practice, but you become aware of a lot more possibilities when you become aware of the space where the analogy breaks down. Well maybe at some point it really is cause and effect but in a completely different way - who can anticipate discovery?

What keeps us from reaching that point, we realize after the fact is not that reality is trying to confuse us, but that we are attached to a version of reality in our heads that we are growing out of. The attachment itself is the residue of 3rd density limitation which some mistake for reason because they think that reason is a feeling. But many things that are real, you may never experience as a feeling. Think of all the love you have received but never experienced as a feeling, or even realized until long afterward. Yet it is real. Maybe the rational mind can also receive love, when used wisely.
 
Back
Top Bottom