luc said:Navigator said:At first I thought, as the interview went viral (1.8m views at the moment), that a lynching mob was after the interviewer. I read a lot of the comments posted on Youtube, a good portion went after the interviewer for being ja bad interviewer with an obvious agenda and failing and thus demostrating his arguments, but nothing too extreme in general, and the same happened on Twitter.
Then it came to me that perhaps this is diverting the attention away from the interviewer, it reverses the perception and setting a victimisation light. And Peterson's response was adequate, distancing himself from any bashing. Can we expect the next level up of difficulties for Peterson as he becomes more and more famous?
Yes, this is complete upside down. "Vicious misogynistic abuse, nastiness, and threat" - you'd think she was assaulted and raped or something! I can imagine how some of JP's followers might have gone over the top and called her names, but as far as I can see, this is a minority at best. And even so, my gosh, you can't go out there as a "tough interviewer", offending your guest etc., and then whine about the other side offending you in return. How is that even feminism? How about being tough as a woman, as this interviewer clearly is on screen, without crying to the (male!) authorities to protect your feelings!? Strange times!
Not surprising that this is their response, typical "lefty" snowflakiness, calling in a private security firm because of online "abuse" in the form of calling a public person "stupid". When the average person on Twitter or FB gets 'dissed' in the way the interviewer did, they get all self-righteous and angry and scream bloody murder. The big wigs at Channel 4 and this interviewer are no different to the average person.
Glib, superficial and biased analysis is what passes for journalism across the board these days. Subjectivity rulz! Many people freak out at anything resembling an attempt at objectivity or universal truth. 'Leave my subjectivity alone you hateful racist sexist xenophobe!!!' Many people defend it as if their lives depended on it, and maybe it does in a way. Notice that the arguments against things Peterson says are invariably based in strident defense of some form of 'personal identity'. That says it all, subjectivity is god to many people.