Killary Clinton, The Donald, or Jill Stein: The US Election

Zero Hedge had a video piecing together snippets of a recent speech by Trump in response to the sexual misconduct allegations (below). I found the full speech (below) with transcript on NPR and have to say I was being swayed by what he said the first read through. Read it again and it is obvious that he doesn't nearly have the whole picture of the power structure (or gets some points wrong) with so many examples of the US blossoming into the evil empire well before Obama etc, yet he seems to be getting closer to the reality of things, such as a cabal running the show, as the pressure is being put on him. After the videos I've included the parts of the speech that I found most compelling and could see people getting behind.


http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-10-14/donald-trump-uncensored-americas-moment-reckoning


http://www.npr.org/2016/10/13/497857068/transcript-donald-trumps-speech-responding-to-assault-accusations

Our movement is about replacing a failed and corrupt — now, when I say "corrupt," I'm talking about totally corrupt — political establishment, with a new government controlled by you, the American people.

There is nothing the political establishment will not do — no lie that they won't tell, to hold their prestige and power at your expense. And that's what's been happening.

The Washington establishment and the financial and media corporations that fund it exist for only one reason: to protect and enrich itself.

The establishment has trillions of dollars at stake in this election. As an example, just one single trade deal they'd like to pass involves trillions of dollars, controlled by many countries, corporations and lobbyists.

For those who control the levers of power in Washington, and for the global special interests, they partner with these people that don't have your good in mind. Our campaign represents a true existential threat like they haven't seen before.

This is not simply another four-year election. This is a crossroads in the history of our civilization that will determine whether or not we the people reclaim control over our government.

The political establishment that is trying to stop us is the same group responsible for our disastrous trade deals, massive illegal immigration and economic and foreign policies that have bled our country dry.

The political establishment has brought about the destruction of our factories, and our jobs, as they flee to Mexico, China and other countries all around the world. Our just-announced job numbers are anemic. Our gross domestic product, or GDP, is barely above 1 percent. And going down. Workers in the United States are making less than they were almost 20 years ago, and yet they are working harder.

But so am I working harder, that I can tell you.

It's a global power structure that is responsible for the economic decisions that have robbed our working class, stripped our country of its wealth and put that money into the pockets of a handful of large corporations and political entities.

Just look at what this corrupt establishment has done to our cities like Detroit; Flint, Michigan; and rural towns in Pennsylvania, Ohio, North Carolina and all across our country. Take a look at what's going on. They stripped away these town bare. And raided the wealth for themselves and taken our jobs away out of our country never to return unless I'm elected president.

The Clinton machine is at the center of this power structure. We've seen this first hand in the WikiLeaks documents, in which Hillary Clinton meets in secret with international banks to plot the destruction of U.S. sovereignty in order to enrich these global financial powers, her special interest friends and her donors.

So true.

Honestly, she should be locked up. Should be locked up.

And likewise the e-mails show that the Clinton machine is so closely and irrevocably tied to the media organizations that she, that she — listen to this — is given the questions and answers in advance of her debate performance with Bernie Sanders.

Hillary Clinton is also given approval and veto power over quotes written about her in the New York Times.

They definitely do not do that to me, that I can tell you.

And the e-mails show the reporters collaborate and conspire directly with the Clinton campaign on helping her win the election all over.

With their control over our government at stake, with trillions of dollars on the line, the Clinton machine is determined to achieve the destruction of our campaign, not gonna to happen.

Which has now become a great, great movement, the likes of which our country has never seen before, never ever.

They've never seen a movement like this in our country before. Yesterday in Florida, massive crowds, people lined up outside of big arenas, not able to get in. Never happened before. It's one of the phenomenas — it's one of the great political phenomenas. The most powerful weapon deployed by the Clintons is the corporate media, the press.

Let's be clear on one thing, the corporate media in our country is no longer involved in journalism. They're a political special interest no different than any lobbyist or other financial entity with a total political agenda, and the agenda is not for you, it's for themselves.

And their agenda is to elect crooked Hillary Clinton at any cost, at any price, no matter how many lives they destroy.

For them it's a war, and for them nothing at all is out of bounds. This is a struggle for the survival of our nation, believe me. And this will be our last chance to save it on Nov. 8, remember that.

This election will determine whether we are a free nation or whether we have only the illusion of democracy, but are in fact controlled by a small handful of global special interests rigging the system, and our system is rigged. This is reality, you know it, they know it, I know it, and pretty much the whole world knows it. The establishment and their media enablers will control over this nation through means that are very well known. Anyone who challenges their control is deemed a sexist, a racist, a xenophobe, and morally deformed.

They will attack you, they will slander you, they will seek to destroy your career and your family, they will seek to destroy everything about you, including your reputation. They will lie, lie, lie, and then again they will do worse than that, they will do whatever is necessary. The Clintons are criminals, remember that. They're criminals.

This is well documented, and the establishment that protects them has engaged in a massive cover-up of widespread criminal activity at the State Department and the Clinton Foundation in order to keep the Clintons in power.

Never in history have we seen such a cover-up as this, one that includes the total destruction of 33,000 e-mails, 13 iPhones – some by hammer – laptops, missing boxes of evidence, and many, many other things.

People who are capable of such crimes against our nation are capable of anything. And so now we address the slander and libels that was just last night thrown at me by the Clinton machine and the New York Times and other media outlets, as part of a concerted, coordinated and vicious attack.

It's not coincidence that these attacks come at the exact same moment, and all together at the same time as WikiLeaks releases documents exposing the massive international corruption of the Clinton machine, including 2,000 more e-mails just this morning.

[…]

Our great civilization, here in America and across the civilized world has come upon a moment of reckoning. We've seen it in the United Kingdom, where they voted to liberate themselves from global government and global trade deal, and global immigration deals that have destroyed their sovereignty and have destroyed many of those nations. But, the central base of world political power is right here in America, and it is our corrupt political establishment that is the greatest power behind the efforts at radical globalization and the disenfranchisement of working people. Their financial resources are virtually unlimited, their political resources are unlimited, their media resources are unmatched, and most importantly, the depths of their immorality is absolutely unlimited.

[…]

This is our moment of reckoning as a society and as a civilization itself. I didn't need to do this, folks, believe me — believe me. I built a great company and I had a wonderful life. I could have enjoyed the fruits and benefits of years of successful business deals and businesses for myself and my family. Instead of going through this absolute horror show of lies, deceptions, malicious attacks — who would have thought? I'm doing it because this country has given me so much, and I feel so strongly that it's my turn to give back to the country that I love.

Many of my friends and many political experts warned me that this campaign would be a journey to hell – said that. But they're wrong. It will be a journey to heaven, because we will help so many people that are so desperately in need of help.

In my former life, I was an insider as much as anybody else. And I knew what it's like, and I still know what it's like to be an insider. It's not bad. It's not bad. Now I'm being punished for leaving the special club and revealing to you the terrible things that are going on having to do with our country. Because I used to be part of the club, I'm the only one that can fix it.
I'm doing this for the people and for the movement, and we will take back this country for you and we will make America great again.

[…]

We will vote for the special interests and say lots of luck, but you're being voted out of power. They've betrayed our workers, they've betrayed our borders and, most of all, they've betrayed our freedoms. We will save our sovereign rights as a nation. We will end the politics of profit. We will end the rule of special interests. We will end the raiding of our jobs by other countries. We will end the total disenfranchisement of the American voter and the American worker. Our Independence Day is at hand, and it arrives finally on Nov. 8.
 
Maybe it's just me but there's something about the part where Donald says:

Vote for Donald Trump. You're going to see something and you'll be so happy. You'll be so thrilled.

That kind of scares me a bit. :cry:
 
luc said:
So yes, if that's all they got for their democracy show, it might be a sign that the end is near. Even if she is elected, they probably need to go openly fascist (which they are kind of doing already), pull the plug, or face a crazy revolution they cannot co-opt... Plus the in-fighting between the psychos that is probably in full swing, the rage-fits at their precious 'reality' being busted, which might make even the smart ones among them behave out of control... Not to mention a looming financial crisis etc. Looks pretty bleak.

I had similar sentiments as well. It's like they want to pull the plug soon, so why even bother putting on the con job? The whole thing is such a complete farce. On the other hand, this could be a result of what happens when the ponerogenesis is so pervasive, so complete that even at the highest levels the mask cannot be kept on anymore. Which is good in a way in that more and more people can see it for what it is, but unfortunately a little too late for anything to be done about it this point, osit.
 
WikiLeaks released on Saturday a fresh portion of emails written to or by John Podesta, the campaign chairman of the US Democratic party presidential nominee Hillary Clinton.

WikiLeaks Releases 8th Batch of Clinton Campaign Chairman's Emails
https://sputniknews.com/us/201610151046372305-wikiLeaks-clinton-campaign/

The new release brings the total number of Podesta's emails leaked so far by the whistleblowing website to over 10,000.

The previously published emails gave insight into the early stages of mapping out Clinton's presidential campaign strategy. The letters revealed, for example, that Clinton reversed her position on free trade agreements from enthusiastic support to strong opposition, as trade deals appeared to be a hot-button issue for many voters and one of the main talking points for Clinton's Democratic Party rival Senator Bernie Sanders and Republican candidate Donald Trump. In July, WikiLeaks published nearly 20,000 hacked emails that apparently showed the Democratic National Committee (DNC) members discussing ways to undercut Bernie Sanders in the race for the Democratic nomination.
 
‘She’s getting pumped up’: Trump calls for drug tests before next debate (VIDEO)
https://www.rt.com/usa/362908-trump-drug-tests-debate/

Donald Trump has suggested that he and Hillary Clinton should undergo drug testing before their next election debate, appearing to accuse his Democratic rival of using performance enhancing drugs.


The Republican nominee compared presidential candidates to athletes and said they should be subject to similar drug screenings. "I think we should take a drug test prior to the debate," he said during a rally at a car dealership in New Hampshire on Saturday.

"Because I don't know what's going on with her, but at the beginning of her last debate, she was all pumped up at the beginning, and at the end it was like, huh, take me down. She could barely reach her car. I think we should take a drug test. Anyway, I'm willing to do it."

"A lot of things are going on, folks. A lot of things. I think she's actually getting pumped, you want to know the truth? She's getting pumped up," the businessman said.

Trump has repeatedly raised concerns about Clinton’s health and fitness to be president throughout the campaign, particularly after she fell ill with pneumonia in September. His campaign released an attack ad last week saying Clinton doesn’t have the “fortitude, strength or stamina to lead in our world.”

The candidates will face off in their third and final presidential debate in Las Vegas on Wednesday.
 
Re: Presidential debates 2016 between Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump

Apparently, VP Joe Biden will be in Pennsylvania to campaign for Clinton. Considering the developments in Syria, Iraq, Ukraine and else where, I would think he would be spending some serious time in Washington?

Biden to Campaign for Hillary Clinton in Luzerne County
_https://www.hillaryclinton.com/events/view/ES7FBVMJHVTCJ3VN/

At a public event in Luzerne County, Vice President Biden will lay out the high stakes of November's election for Pennsylvania families and highlight Hillary Clinton's vision for an America that is stronger together, with an economy that works for everyone, not just those at the top.

More details to be released soon.

This from a local news station:

Vice President Joe Biden is scheduled to campaign for Hillary Clinton in Luzerne County, the Clinton campaign announced.

According to the campaign website, Biden will speak at a public event on Friday, October 21. The venue has not yet been announced.

The campaign said it would release additional details for the event in the coming days.
 
Trump isn't letting up. Here he is working a crowd in Florida and explicitly calling the Clintons criminals: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mxjLuvR0338 .
 
Re: Presidential debates 2016 between Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump

Pashalis said:
Here is the full thing:


There is one statement from Killary that stood out for me especially and nobody seemed to have noticed. Which is kind of strange in itself. It starts at 02:03:05 in the video above.

She says:


http://www.nytimes.com/2016/10/10/us/politics/transcript-second-debate.html?_r=0 said:
So I believe that this election has become in part so — so conflict-oriented, so intense because there’s a lot at stake. This is not an ordinary time, and this is not an ordinary election. We are going to be choosing a president who will set policy for not just four or eight years, but because of some of the important decisions we have to make here at home and around the world, from the Supreme Court to energy and so much else, and so there is a lot at stake. It’s one of the most consequential elections that we’ve had.

And that’s why I’ve tried to put forth specific policies and plans, trying to get it off of the personal and put it on to what it is I want to do as president. And that’s why I hope people will check on that for themselves so that they can see that, yes, I’ve spent 30 years, actually maybe a little more, working to help kids and families. And I want to take all that experience to the White House and do that every single day.

What did she just say there, at the end of the debate? She says that this time is different and that the new president will set the policy not just for 4 or 8 years!? What? What does she mean by that and what does she know from her PTB handlers, that would let her make such a statement?
What do they plan, or know, to make something like that happen?

Did she just blurb something out nobody is supposed to know at this stage? The agenda of the PTB?

Normal procedure is that after 4 years of presidency, there is another (s)election, in which the new president is voted for. The normal term of a president is 4 years, after that it can be expanded by another (s)election for another 4 years. So what does she know that makes her say/know that this president will already set the policy for the next 8 years and beyond? What is up with that?

Sounds to me that she said something there, that she wasn't supposed to blurb out. Or the PTB wanted her to blurb that out, to see what the reaction (if any) from the public is, about such a announcement. Sort of a tes: "Will they just swallow it? Will anybody even question it?".

It is beyond me that no political analyst has even questioned this most peculiar and strange statement as of yet.

There is another possibility that came to my mind just now, for why she said what she said above.

Maybe she is already certain that she will be the next president and that she will do everything in her power to stay at that position, come what may. Grandiosity and clinging to power as much and for as long as she can. Maybe that was her personal psychopathic vision that she revealed there, to be the ruler of the empire forever, even after the official max of 8 years?
 
The new release of emails of US Democratic party presidential candidate Hillary Clinton’s campaign chairman John Podesta appeared on the WikiLeaks website.

WikiLeaks Releases 9th Batch of Clinton Campaign Chairman's Emails
https://sputniknews.com/us/201610161046389304-wikileaks-podesta-emails/

WikiLeaks uploaded on Sunday a fresh batch of emails of US Democratic party presidential candidate Hillary Clinton’s campaign chairman John Podesta on its website.

The new release brings the total number of Podesta's emails leaked so far by the whistleblowing site to over 12,000.


Presidential candidate Donald Trump has called for both himself and Hillary Clinton to undergo a drug test before the third presidential debate.

Donald Trump Calls for Candidate Drug Testing Ahead of Next Presidential Debate
https://sputniknews.com/us/201610161046378110-trump-drug-test-debate/

Athletes, they make them take a drug test, right. I think we should take a drug test prior to the debate," Trump said during a campaign rally in New Hampshire Saturday.

"Why don't we do that? We should take a drug test, prior, because I don't know what's going on with her, but at the beginning of her last debate, she was all pumped up at the beginning, and at the end it was like, 'Oh, take me down,' " Trump said, imitating Clinton. He also noted Hillary could "barely reach her car."

Concerns about Hillary Clinton's health have been one of Trump's campaign points. The Republican nominee repeatedly questioned whether Clinton is physically fit to serve as a president, giving food for various conspiracy theories.

These concerns are based on various displays of physical inability by the Democratic nominee, such as coughing fits that could last for several minutes, or Hillary fainting mere steps away from her van after the 9/11 ceremony. Donald Trump said he also agrees to undergo the drug test before the upcoming debates.
 
Re: Presidential debates 2016 between Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump

Pashalis said:
Pashalis said:
Here is the full thing:


There is one statement from Killary that stood out for me especially and nobody seemed to have noticed. Which is kind of strange in itself. It starts at 02:03:05 in the video above.

She says:


http://www.nytimes.com/2016/10/10/us/politics/transcript-second-debate.html?_r=0 said:
So I believe that this election has become in part so — so conflict-oriented, so intense because there’s a lot at stake. This is not an ordinary time, and this is not an ordinary election. We are going to be choosing a president who will set policy for not just four or eight years, but because of some of the important decisions we have to make here at home and around the world, from the Supreme Court to energy and so much else, and so there is a lot at stake. It’s one of the most consequential elections that we’ve had.

And that’s why I’ve tried to put forth specific policies and plans, trying to get it off of the personal and put it on to what it is I want to do as president. And that’s why I hope people will check on that for themselves so that they can see that, yes, I’ve spent 30 years, actually maybe a little more, working to help kids and families. And I want to take all that experience to the White House and do that every single day.

What did she just say there, at the end of the debate? She says that this time is different and that the new president will set the policy not just for 4 or 8 years!? What? What does she mean by that and what does she know from her PTB handlers, that would let her make such a statement?
What do they plan, or know, to make something like that happen?

Did she just blurb something out nobody is supposed to know at this stage? The agenda of the PTB?

Normal procedure is that after 4 years of presidency, there is another (s)election, in which the new president is voted for. The normal term of a president is 4 years, after that it can be expanded by another (s)election for another 4 years. So what does she know that makes her say/know that this president will already set the policy for the next 8 years and beyond? What is up with that?

Sounds to me that she said something there, that she wasn't supposed to blurb out. Or the PTB wanted her to blurb that out, to see what the reaction (if any) from the public is, about such a announcement. Sort of a tes: "Will they just swallow it? Will anybody even question it?".

It is beyond me that no political analyst has even questioned this most peculiar and strange statement as of yet.

There is another possibility that came to my mind just now, for why she said what she said above.

Maybe she is already certain that she will be the next president and that she will do everything in her power to stay at that position, come what may. Grandiosity and clinging to power as much and for as long as she can. Maybe that was her personal psychopathic vision that she revealed there, to be the ruler of the empire forever, even after the official max of 8 years?
Those are interesting lines of Clinton's to speculate about. After all, most political decisions made at that level of power are going to have ramifications that reach far into the future -- so what makes THIS particular election so entirely different? It does sound grandiose, especially since she doesn't follow it up with any especially significant examples illustrating her statements.

angelburst29 said:
No offense taken, on my part - Heather. No worries - no problem. We're all entitled to our own opinions and rightly so. Actually, sometimes, something that might seem out of place, might actually shed light on another aspect of the main topic. Shakespeare is an excellent example, in this case. His production of plays and their content in the very beginning, reflected a creativity for growth and social environment and culture. To better understand Shakespeare and his plays, especially his poetry, it's best to study the culture and the influences during that same time period. The Elizabethan era in clothing, jewelry and furniture design, not to mention - the hand painted porcelain and glass pieces that are highly prized antiques by all the major collectors and auction houses. When King James took over, Shakespeare's work changed to include the dark aspects of life, in turn, the cultural environment took a hit, including it's manufacturing of goods and trade. There's more "to Shakespeare" than meets the eye.

Edit=Quote

I've been busy the last few days, but wanted to respond to this. First, thank you for your kind words, angelburst29. It really did help (!)

As to your comments on Shakespeare during the Elizabethan Era versus the Jacobean era under James I, it's an interesting transition to look into and speculate about.

Just briefly.. (and then I guess this conversation needs to find another thread).. but I looked up a list of the plays and ratio wise -- comedy to tragedy -- you actually see a similar trend in both periods, although Shakespeare wrote far fewer plays under James and so the actual number of comedies is less in that period.

Another issue that comes up is that Shakespeare tended to blur the lines between tragedy, comedy and history, which is why the term tragicomedy is employed for certain of the plays. So, that complicates the situation as well.

It also seems significant to point out that Shakespeare wrote Hamlet (the play I'm most versed in) under Elizabeth's reign. This tragedy is considered by many to be his most important play, and so one feels to give it more weight in light of that fact.

.. as to its dark, subversive content, Hamlet was set in Denmark so as to fictionalize its implicit, even explicit indictment of Elizabethan England. In one scene Prince Hamlet even calls the world a prison with Denmark (Elizabethan England) being the worst prison of all (!)

Meanwhile, under James, it makes sense that the play King Lear (a tragedy involving an aging monarch and his three daughters) would have been written during the latter period merely by virtue of the author's advancing age.

(FYI, I recently saw Ian McKellen's Lear, and it was astounding.)

On the other hand, Macbeth is written during the Jacobean period, which is no doubt the bloodiest play -- although Hamlet becomes something of a killing machine in the latter part of that play as well.

(Another recommendation I have is Roman Polanski's Macbeth, which I believe to be among the best uses of cinema for Shakespeare.)

Anyway, these are just my first observations. Obviously, the more one studies and understands the historical/political/economic dynamics of each period, the more one is in a position to comment on how this is specifically reflected in the plays.

I've not looked into the Sonnets yet relative to this idea, so maybe that should be for another time.. (and thread).

Anyway, thanks, angelburst29, for bringing this up -- even just this short survey has been interesting!

And so I return thee now to the tragicomedy of our time, as evidenced in the bawdy antics of Sir Donald and... did someone already say Lady Macbeth?

 
Re: Presidential debates 2016 between Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump

Cross posting this from the recent session thread:

Well, if you think about it, the Killary gang are making a rather large mistake, or so it seems to me, by focusing too much of anti-Russian propaganda and 'regime change in Syria' in their campaign.

It seems to me that the ordinary people of America are generally disinterested in foreign policy UNLESS it is personal for them. That was the case after 9/11 and Bush capitalized on it in 2004 to win "get the evil terrorists over there who attacked us on 9/11", because 9/11 was still a sore point and personal to Americans and getting the 'bad guys' who did it could be leveraged for a Presidential campaign. But 9/11 is no longer a useful tool to stir up the masses for foreign wars and to get them interested in foreign policy in general, and certainly Russia, Syria, Iran or whoever are not a high priority for most Americans because those countries have never done anything to hurt Americans (we notice however, the attempt to make people feel that way with the DNC "hacks" blamed on Russia).

The problem, then, with Killary and co focusing on bashing Russia as part of her campaign to gain votes is that people are not interested in her personal vendetta and love for war and destruction, and in fact her focus on that rather than on domestic issues that ARE important to Americans just makes her look like she does not really care enough about the little people at home. Trump, on the other hand, is not taking the bait on the Russia bashing (quite the contrary) and why would he, since any suggestion that the leaked emails material he is using to bash Killary would be discredited if he were to associate it with Russia, as Killary's camp is doing. In addition, Trump is pandering to ordinary American's problems and needs in his speeches. You could even say that, at a mass psychology level, his talk of "building a wall on the Mexican border" actually makes a lot of Americans feel safe and that he cares for them.

So overall, the Killary camp and the establish that supports her are engaging in lots of wishful thinking here and I reckon they'll be getting a big shock on election night.
 
Re: Presidential debates 2016 between Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump

In an act one official has called "political terrorism," the offices of the Republican Party in Orange County, North Carolina have come under attack, according to the Charlotte Observer.

North Carolina Republican Party Headquarters Reportedly Firebombed
https://sputniknews.com/news/201610161046395336-Firebomb-Republican-North-Carolina-Headquarters/

Police say the words "Nazi Republicans get out of town, or else!" were also spray-painted on a nearby building.

The office itself is a total loss,” Dallas Woodhouse, executive director of state GOP, told the Charlotte Observer.

“The only thing important to us is that nobody was killed, and they very well could have been."

The incident, which took place when flammable liquid was thrown through the front window of the office, is under investigation.

In a statement, Hillsborough Mayor Tom Stevens called the act "highly disturbing."

"[This] act goes far beyond vandalizing property; it willfully threatens our community’s safety via fire, and its hateful message undermines decency, respect and integrity in civic participation," Stevens said.


US Democratic presidential nominee Hillary Clinton condemned an attack on a headquarters of the Republican Party in North Carolina calling it unacceptable.

Clinton Condemns Attack on Republican Headquarters in North Carolina
https://sputniknews.com/us/201610171046396716-clinton-republican-attack/

According to Fox News, on Saturday night a bottle of flammable liquid was thrown through the window of the Republican headquarters in Hillsborough, Orange County.

The office was severely damaged while an adjacent building was vandalized. Nobody was injured during the incident.


US Republican presidential nominee Donald Trump accused Democratic candidate Hillary Clinton’s followers of an attack on a headquarters of the Republican Party in North Carolina, calling them “animals.”

Trump Accuses Democrats of Attack on Republican HQ in North Carolina
https://sputniknews.com/politics/201610171046397700-trump-republican-attack-carolina/

According to media reports, on Saturday night a bottle of flammable liquid was thrown through the window of the Republican headquarters in Hillsborough, Orange County. The office was severely damaged while an adjacent building was vandalized. Nobody was injured during the incident.


Donald J. Trump
✔ ‎@realDonaldTrump

Animals representing Hillary Clinton and Dems in North Carolina just firebombed our office in Orange County because we are winning @NCGOP

6:29 PM - 16 Oct 2016

Clinton condemned the attack calling it unacceptable.


Republican headquarters in North Carolina firebombed — ‘Nazi Republicans leave town or else’
_http://www.nydailynews.com/news/national/republican-headquarters-north-carolina-firebombed-article-1.2832967 (Video )


Local GOP office in North Carolina firebombed (Video)
_http://www.cnn.com/2016/10/16/politics/north-carolina-gop-office-vandalized/


Local North Carolina GOP Office Firebombed And Vandalized With Nazi Graffiti (Photos)
_http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/local-north-carolina-gop-office-firebombed_us_5803d61ee4b06e0475957b82


North Carolina GOP headquarters firebombed (Video)
_http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2016/10/16/north-carolina-gop-headquarters-firebombed.html


BREAKING NEWS: Republican party headquarters is firebombed and a local business is daubed with Nazi graffiti in North Carolina (Photos)
_http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3841896/Republican-party-headquarters-firebombed-daubed-Nazi-graffiti-North-Carolina.html
 
Re: Presidential debates 2016 between Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump

Police say the words "Nazi Republicans get out of town, or else!" were also spray-painted on a nearby building.
Such ridiculous hypocrisy, likely the work of ignorant stooges. The arsonists are the ones acting like fascists!
 
An interesting video of Hillary carefully inching down some steps sideways--until surprised by a reporter--when she immediately begins descending the steps in a normal fashion.

_https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J01saVnHfrI
 
More Hillary hypocrisy. Only a brazen psychopath, with so many skeletons in her own closet, would dare to make an issue of the appropriateness and morality of Trump's behavior. For the record, for those who may not know:

(Another) secret that could DESTROY Hillary Clinton’s Presidential campaign.

Another skeleton in Hillary’s closet is coming back to haunt her… It appears Chelsea Clinton’s real father is Webster Hubbell, the former Mayor of Little Rock, Arkansas. Hubbell was a law partner at Rose Law Firm with Hillary, and became one of the most important Clinton-insiders.

Then-Governor Clinton appointed Hubbell as Chief Justice of the Arkansas State Supreme Court, but 10 years later he resigned before pleading guilty to federal mail fraud and tax evasion for overbilling clients. Hubbell served 15 months in prison.

The New Yorker reported on rumors that Hillary Clinton’s affair was first noticed in 1984 at the Governor’s Mansion during Bill’s second term, but had started long before.

Very convincing photo comparisons here (after the article text):
_http://www.thepoliticalinsider.com/huge-scandal-chelsea-isnt-bill-clintons-daughter/
 
Back
Top Bottom