Re: Is it Les Visible's turn?
Wild Thing but the only questionable line was, "You make my thing sting."
It was a little more than that as I recall, but not much more. I have less sensitivities to that type of humor, so I must not have noticed. Les is a bit of a Ham, but then, that's what karaoke is for. He was a little more "lit" than he lets on, and in my opinion it was a bit more than he should have been from the alcohol he had consumed. I later learned of his tea drinking and had an interesting discussion on the topic with him. I won't go into detail, but afterwards I was pretty sure I never, ever, wanted to drink mushroom tea. By their fruits, and all that jazz.
We drank Armagnac and though pot was smoked at his place, it wasn't by me because I don't care for it.
Fair enough, I wasn't there, I don't know, and to be honest, from what I know of pot smokers (They are usually chill, laid back, introspective) I actually believe what he is saying. He certainly didn't act like someone on pot.
What happened was that Laura just decided she didn't like my saying I liked psychedelics and has just been at it since then. They have got this enemies in the woodwork thing. Meanwhile they have an enormous chateau loaded with amenities and aren't doing bad on the donations end I guess.
He does seem to grind that axe a lot. My OPINION(just opinion) of what he is trying to imply is: They are in a big house, therefore they must be ... Yeah. A big house that is old, falling apart, and needs constant work just to keep it going.
I'm not going to make mention of things that won't serve the interest of higher nature. I do think they should apologize for lying straightaway, lest the results of such behavior come back upon them. It really made me laugh to hear that I was being suggestive to the daughters. Susanne was right by my side through out and if you had seen the daughters you wouldn't need any further reason to doubt what I'm saying. I realize this might be seen as hurtful but it's necessary to give perspective.
Wow, higher nature? Really? What you say here is mean, and untrue.
So let's sum up the admissions of Les Visible:
1. You like taking Ketamine
2. You like taking Mushrooms
3. You conspicuously use a "friends" full name and associate it with your not-so-casual drug use. (After admitting you had a falling out with said friend.)
4. You deny hitting on girls because you say they were too ugly for you (Which, as their brother makes my pimp hand twitch.)
At what point do you not sound like a complete a$$hole?
You admit to taking very strong psychedelic drugs, and animal tranquilizers (Everyone needs a hobby) and then you expect people to believe your version of events vs. a group of, at least SOMEWHAT, more sober people.
The so-called friend who you are indirectly slandering, who you claim will back you up, has actually said the exact opposite, and said he definitely had the distinct impression that you were "high" on something that was in tea form. (I won't say it's absolute, maybe the man just brought his own Lipton? How do I know?)
Look, I don't really care if you use drugs. I am not even particularly mad at you for showing up high. It's a bit rude, and you did act up a bit, but hey, that's part of your character, you are up front about that stuff, I don't particularly want to hang with you because of it, but it doesn't make you a bad human being.
When you talk the way you do about peoples daughters (my sisters), and you were, mildly and playfully, hitting on them (kind of inappropriate, but they can handle themselves, and you were a bit high). That makes you a bad person. You can't come off smelling like a rose from that. Any person with two brain cells to rub together is gonna say: Dude, that's messed up.
All you are saying can basically be summed up with this:
They are lying. Even though I take a lot of drugs, I am more objective about this than them. The reasons I give are: 1) I am getting popular, 2) they live in a big house; therefore they must be a financed COINTELPRO OP trying to sabotage me with libel (slander is spoken).
Look, we talk about YOU. Les Visible. The guy writing, and the pertinent facts about you and your public character, WHICH YOU DON'T CONCEAL. In the end, we are hardly saying anything about you that you don't already say about yourself (We just don't consider them to be as positive as you think they are.). We don't talk about your mom, your wife, or siblings, that's low, and mean, and shows a person's inner self.
We say: You have some issues, you do drugs, hear voices, and act up. In our experience this is how a person gets vectored, misled, and then by accident or later intention will mislead others.
You say: You are talking trash about me. And you can't sing. And your daughters are ugly. And you drink too much. You're liars. And you live in a big house. Huh, yeah ... big house.
Come on man, you're an adult, act like it. If what we are saying isn't true, that's fine to say so. We can agree to disagree, but all of this passive/covert aggressive behavior isn't cool. You aren't looking cool to anyone but yourself, to the rest of humanity, when you act and talk like that, you come off as a total immature dbag. Just saying. Not that you are, it just kind of looks that way.
In the end, the golden rule of communication is: It's not what you say that counts, it's what other people think you say, because in the end, what you look like depends on your audience. You say you're an amateur comedian. If so, then you've prolly read Vorhaus. He says something to the effect that a responsible comedian plays to his audience. You don't go to a women's lib rally and tell misogynistic jokes, you don't go to a Christian comedy night and make fun of Jesus. You have to consider your target audience, and you didn't, you never do. You alienate people and then blame them for not appreciating your genius. I think you really do fear fame, because that my friend, is the best way possible to never have an audience, or at least, not have one for very long.
