Trevrizent said:
Thor, it was from TAASOLCL that my confusion started, in fact on rereading it yesterday evening it was then that I found that 1.5-2.5g/kg body weight referred to Protein Food, and not to protein amount. Protein content of 78g refers to my body weight, waist dimensions and other factors given by the Eades' in Protein Power.
Apart from the water loss at the start of reducing to 20g carbs, my weight has remained constant at 67kg, so no muscle loss. I have not read sufficiently far in PBPM yet to get to the figure that Laura has given - 0.95g/kg body weight - that's even lower and would equate to 63.65g of protein content per day. The amount of protein that I was eating for lunch is now reduced by a half! I'll need to do some more calcs to see what this further reduction equates to. :)
Well, this is why it is important to do the reading. But then, we've all been doing the reading and adjusting as we learn new stuff and when our experiments suggest that one thing or another is a better answer. I certainly couldn't understand why I wasn't going into ketosis after weeks and weeks. Well, obviously, I was eating too much protein.
But maybe, at the beginning, eating more protein is not such a bad idea because then you are still getting some carbs (converted from the extra protein) and that can help ease you into the lower protein amounts.
Trevrizent said:
So, it looks like the shopping bag gets even lighter and cheaper, as the food amounts are much, much lower than on a high carb diet, even taking into account the cost of 'good' meat, and it will last longer too. :)
Keep in mind that fats are still pretty much unlimited except for your own limits which you will discover by experimenting. And carbs should stay pretty low.