http://www.cassiopaea.org/forum/index.php?topic=55 (particularly post 3)dant said:If it is a parasite, I wonder if the "zapper" might work. I don't currently have the
link but is may be somewhere in this index perhaps.
You might be right here when you use the definition of parasite as you have proposed.Deckard said:- Parasites and their developmental stadiums can show affinity towards different organs but the parasite that would cause the sking changes and also in the same time would be present in the intestines is unheard of at least to my knowledge.
Oomycosis is caused by pathogens in the class Oomycetes. These organisms are not true fungi but are aquatic pathogens in the kingdom Stramenopila. They are more closely related to algae than fungi but cause disease that closely resembles zygomycosis ( Zygomycosis). Organisms of significance in veterinary medicine include various species of Saprolegnia and Achyla (eg, S diclina ), which are the common agents of cutaneous disease in fishes; Pythium insidiosum , the cause of a cutaneous and subcutaneous mycosis in horses (bursatti, swamp cancer, leeches), a cutaneous, subcutaneous, and GI disease in dogs, and a cutaneous and paranasal disease of cats; and Lagenidium spp , the cause of cutaneous and systemic lesions and large vessel aneurysms in dogs.
I also have come to a more nuanced idea about "pathogenesis". There are some mechanisms that are partially understood, and I think that we are only seeing the tip of the iceberg. Maybe this is partly due to the fact that medicine, and related sciences, has learned most things from looking at diseased states, and not so much from looking at healthy states wherein many interdependent processes, some of them being incredibly subtle and finely tuned have found a certain equilibrium. It is also much easier of course to find a simple cause and effect relation in a diseased state as to decipher the intricate web of interdependencies in a healthy state.Deckard said:now you have touched on something important - even after all these years of our "advanced" civilization we have very little understanding of mecahnisms that truely take place during the onsent of illness in human or animal body
After so many years of studing conventional or allopathic medicine and few years of studing homeopathy I still have many questions that need to be answered....
How come that certain organisms coexist peacefully with our body without causing any problems and then in almost the same circumstances (or at least due to some factors that are still totally unknown to us) they can cause severe illnes and even death.
Yes I can imagine that there are situations wherein a human body can be that much infested with parasites that the immune system simply can't cope with simple infections any longer or even worse and simply collapses. But these must be very rare OSIT. In our modern world the reverse is actually far closer to the truth. Because of increased hygienic conditions, less infectious diseases, and far less parasites to cope with, our immune systems, being unemployed, start to attack otherwise harmless entities, like certain bacteria, our own tissues, air carried pollen, and dust mites.Ark said:I know next to nothing about these issues, yet let me state my "working hypothesis" here.
I consider it quite plausible that our bodies "know" the physiology and morphology of the attackers. I consider it quite plausible that our bodies may "know" how to deal with them. But whether our bodies do it or not may depend on many factors. Being busy with dealing with parasites our bodies may have no resources left to deal with some other intruders. If so, then I still see a possibility that getting rid of parasites may have consequences that are "not in the books". In other words, I would not dismiss the idea, unless experiments dismiss it.
One more example with more emphasis on hygienic conditions and a general LACK of bacteria in our direct environments as potential cause of all sorts of allergies.Ottesen ought to know--he is head of the Clinical Parasitology Section at the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases in Bethesda, Maryland. But Ottesen is not just a parasitologist; he's also an allergist. And that confluence of disciplines is what makes his involvement with the inhabitants of Mauke downright intriguing. Nineteen years ago, when he was 31 and at the start of his dual career, Ottesen made a visit to Mauke to study the prevalence of filarial worms and to begin treating the islanders for infection. Last summer he returned to the island. But this time he didn't just look for parasites; he found himself on the trail of what he suspects may be the source of allergies as well.
"It's an interesting thing," he says. "When we made our first trip to Mauke to check for filarial worms, we also checked for allergies. But it was hard to find anyone who had allergic complaints. Now, almost two decades later, there's much less parasite infection on the island, but the fascinating thing is"--he leans forward and speaks in an insistent stage whisper--"there's so much more allergy." This observation, and similar disclosures from elsewhere in the world, have persuaded Ottesen to consider a provocative possibility--that there's an inverse relationship between allergies and the presence of parasites.
Ottesen isn't the first to suspect such a link, though his combined expertise in parasitology and allergy may make him the best qualified to do so. It's not as odd an idea as it first seems. Both our allergies and our response to parasites are immune system reactions, and both rely on the same rather unusual immune mechanism. Could allergies result when the body's mechanism for getting rid of worms becomes somehow misdirected? "There must be a reason for having the allergic mechanism," Ottesen says. "It probably evolved first to fight parasite infections. But when there are no parasites around, you're left with a honed immune system looking for something to attack. So people who would have been protected against parasites in the jungle are now stuck in New York or someplace where parasites are scarce, and they're wheezing and coughing because of pollen blowing down the street."
If so, it's news to most allergy sufferers, who number approximately 50 million--that's one in five people--in this country alone. Americans spend at least $5 billion a year in an attempt to cope with the seemingly useless affliction. Allergy, as far as most researchers are concerned, is a pointless marshaling of the body's defenses against usually benign intruders. Allergy-causing substances such as pollen surely pose no great threat to our well-being; neither do cat dander and dust mites. Yet contact with such allergens causes millions of us to swell, wheeze, scratch, and sneeze as though under siege. In extreme cases, in reaction to insect stings and certain foods such as peanuts, an overwhelming allergic response, called anaphylactic shock, can even kill the body our immune system is ostensibly protecting.
...
Compared with 19 years ago, Ottesen found, there was much less filarial infection on Mauke. Only 16 percent of the population harbored the microscopic worms, as opposed to 35 percent on his first visit. The reduction resulted primarily from treating the islanders with the antiparasite drug diethylcarbamazine, which Ottesen had initiated during his earlier visit. And what about allergies? "There's no question that there was a heck of a lot more allergy out there this time," says Ottesen. "Nineteen years ago barely 3 percent of the people had allergies. This time it was at least 15 percent." The complaints ranged from eczema to hay fever and asthma to food allergies. What's more, the dominant problem was one nobody had even heard of 19 years earlier: octopus allergy. "It's the number one offender," says Ottesen. "People are breaking out in rashes, hives, swelling of the throat. Yet octopus is nothing new to them--they were eating it when we were there before. What's different now?" Ottesen answers his own rhetorical question: perhaps the IgE defense mechanism, no longer occupied with attacking worms, is now going after octopus protein and other new targets.
With these things said, maybe it becomes understandable why I simply cannot believe the approach (or credo) a la Hulda Clark. She even educates her "patients" how to disinfect their food with hydrochloric acid before eating it !??The answer to asthma could lie on the carefully wiped tables and scrubbed benches of the ordinary New Zealand home. Paradoxically, many scientists believe the problem is not hidden germs, as most of us would suspect. More likely, they say, it is the lack of them.
The average Western home is a lot cleaner than it was 100 years ago, with thoroughly treated tap water, chemically preserved food and disinfectant cleaners killing germs in kitchens and bathrooms. As a result many children - unlike their great-grandparents - grow up without fighting a constant battle against bacterial diseases. Now a growing number of researchers are exploring the theory that this ruthless suppression of bugs may have contributed to growing rates of asthma, the lung disease suffered by one in six New Zealanders and ranked as our third worst disease (behind depression and anxiety disorders) for its effect on quality of life. The so-called hygiene hypothesis argues that the body's immune system, free of the need to fight bacteria, overreacts to imagined threats from household dust mites and other sources.
I have been Morgellons sufferer for over ten years.
Recently, I discovered, quite by accident, something that is literally making it disappear from my BODY.
As I am sure fellow sufferers can relate to, over the years, I have experimented with various "super baths," filling the tub with hot water and puttibng in things like lemons, baking soda, dish detergent, laundry detergent, alcohol, etc....well, one day about four months ago, I was filling the bath and I was pretty dirty from housecleaning so I put some Sun powdered laundry detergent with colorsafe bleach into the water, just a tad, because it really cleans the skin so good, and once I finish with the bath, I scrub it off with regular soap and a scrubby thing that is regularly disinfected.
anyway, I left the bathroom for a minute or two and heard a crash that sounded like one of my cats getting into something. When I returned to the bathroom, nothing seemed amiss, so I got undressed and slid into the water for a soak.
Everything seemed normal until the bubbles parted, and I got the sight of a morgellons sufferers' lifetime: those black and grey specks MIGRATING OUT OF MY SKIN AS FAST AS THEY COULD IN DROVES BY THE HUNDREDS FROM EVERY SQUARE INCH OF MY BODY!!!!!!!!
And even as I saw that, I also noticed several large oblong things "dissolving" in the bottom of the tub. I picked one up, and it was an alfalfa tablet. Then I noticed the bottle on the counter next to the tub was overturned, and about 25 of them had fallen into the water! They were the cause of the migration of all things morgellon out of my skin in a fantastic migration for about an hour! Brown flecks, black specks, fibers, white patches of fibers drifted off the surface of my skin like No Problema, see ya later, something I had NEVER BEEN ABLE TO ACCOMPLISH WITH ANY TOHER TOPICAL AGENT.
THE MIGHTY ALFALFA HAS SINCE CONQUERED MORGELLONS IN MY BODY.
The scabs are gone, the fibers are history, the patches of fibers are all taped to a piece of wax paper and about to be sent off to a research lab that has requested them.
I am sending you my testimonial in hopes that other sufferers will at least know some relief from the scourge of the skin.
Dandelion the Flame Point Siamese must be credited with this miraculous discovery. He is only three years old, but he's a hero to his long-suffering Mommy!
I've done a little research on the mighty alfalfa, and apparently it creates an alkaline environment in the body in which things like CANCER and other diseases cannot survive. So, taking it internally can only be a good thing, also; but it's the BATHS that made all the difference in the world for me.
I also tried putting St. Johns Wort in the bath along with it, with even better results. And for some reason, using the Sun powdered laundry detergent with colorsafe bleach also helps facilitate the migration of the specks.
If you say "evidence shows", would you be so kind and point out this evidence? Where is it? Who provides this evidence? How reliable this "evidence" is?BrandyTwirl said:Evidence shows that there is a viral nano video camera imbedded in some of the blue fibers growing out of the lesions of victims.
Uhmm, isn't it actually, 'if Rense opens his mouth, he is lying'?GRiM said:Rense will get pissed now :)
I listen to his latest podcast and he said in "03-29-07 - HR1 - Morgellons Special #7 - Dr. Hildegard Staninger, Cliff Mickelson & Jan Smith"
that there are no cures and that if anyone says there is a cure they are lying.
"Jeff Rense Morgellons Special #7
Shocking Research - Nanotech Machines
Running Wild In The Human Body"