Re: Final Events-Demonic UFO's, Alien Abductions, the Government, and the Afterlife
The Collins Elite was only ever first mentioned in Redfern's book, and Laura's books were written years before Redfern's. As for whether such a group existed, who knows? It could be disinfo. But then again, it looks like there WAS something similar going on, from other evidence. In his articles, John Keel observed that even though the Air Force wasn't doing a real UFO investigation, someone or some gov. org. WAS intensely interested in contactees/abductees, from at least 1950 on, which matches the so-called Collins Elite narrative. Seeing as how so much of their conclusions, as presented in Redfern's book, match up with the work of John Keel, and Laura, for example, it looks like if it is disinfo, the purpose is the religious angle. If they exist as presented, they are victims themselves of the thing they're trying to fight against, thus playing into its hands. If they don't exist, it looks like a campaign to sandwich pretty good conclusions (aliens as para-physical, evil, paranormal, etc.) with a ludicrous theology and 'solution' to the problem.
(note: merged this topic with existing thread on Redern's book)
Chaitanya Krishna das said:So far in Laura's writings, as well as in my extensive past research, I haven't encountered any mention of this "Collins Elite". Is this book, in you guys opinions, just another disinformation piece mixing lies with truth? Or is there something to these stories?
The Collins Elite was only ever first mentioned in Redfern's book, and Laura's books were written years before Redfern's. As for whether such a group existed, who knows? It could be disinfo. But then again, it looks like there WAS something similar going on, from other evidence. In his articles, John Keel observed that even though the Air Force wasn't doing a real UFO investigation, someone or some gov. org. WAS intensely interested in contactees/abductees, from at least 1950 on, which matches the so-called Collins Elite narrative. Seeing as how so much of their conclusions, as presented in Redfern's book, match up with the work of John Keel, and Laura, for example, it looks like if it is disinfo, the purpose is the religious angle. If they exist as presented, they are victims themselves of the thing they're trying to fight against, thus playing into its hands. If they don't exist, it looks like a campaign to sandwich pretty good conclusions (aliens as para-physical, evil, paranormal, etc.) with a ludicrous theology and 'solution' to the problem.
(note: merged this topic with existing thread on Redern's book)