Occupy Wall Street Video Project

Fifth Way said:
Thank you Guardian, for your post and no, I do not mind at all.

However, you got the wrong address. I am living in a forty dwelling rental building in a small one bedroom apartment that also serves as my office and also as the home of my two children when they are with me (approximately a third of a month). I would think that at least a dozen forum members have been at my place so it is easy to verify.

FifthWay, while Guardian's information is obviously off, I think your description of your apartment is less than accurate. You live in a penthouse apartment with a roof top deck on the upper east side of Manhattan. It is a gorgeous and large apartment, by Manhattan standards. I'm not sure why you described it the way you did, but, certainly you're aware of the difference between a usual "small one bedroom apartment" in Manhattan (that can be little more than one room with a bathroom) and your place.

Why obfuscate the truth like that? Or have you recently moved to a smaller place?
 
Laura said:
Guardian said:
I have a couple question if you don't mind Fifth Way? I was poking around a bit (which I always do before I decide whether to support something or not) and I noticed that your business shares the same address with "Rachael Horovitz Productions" in a building owned by her partner, TV executive "Michael Jackson"

It's a 7 million dollar building, with only 4 apartments..which is what I'd definitely call a high rent district. I also found a bunch of other stuff that equates to LOTS of money. So why the appeal for funds?

I'm also wondering how much influence your landlords/neighbors will have on the film considering that Rachael Horovitz, her Father, Israel Horovitz, and her husband Michael Jackson, create pro- Israel productions for the mainstream media?

Excellent questions. And what about your recent association with lovefraud and their guru Liane Leedom?

You know, when you lay down with dogs, you get up with fleas.

Exactly and I am trying to avoid that.

But there is no association.

I got a lot of feedback from the Kickstater campaign. That led to a phone conversation with Donna Anderson of LoveFraud. At that time I did not realize how close she was with Liane Leedom even though I am aware of Leedom's history.

Anderson offered her resources should the documentary project come to live (which is far from certain). Her resources in particular are a large group of victims of psychopaths. She also mentioned Leedom and suggested I look at her research. But it was made clear to her that I was not interested and do not wish to have any contact with her.

Anderson later mentioned my project in her newsletter and this can be read here:
_http://www.lovefraud.com/blog/2012/01/16/another-documentary-to-spread-the-word-about-psychopaths/

Lots of people must be receiving her news letter because as it came out a considerable number of pledges came in. I felt compelled to acknowledge this on the facebook group that I created for this project, unfortunately with an ill-chosen wording that made it appear to some forum members as if I was promoting LoveFraud, which I am not. I regret having done that as it created this association-rumor thus giving me "flees" by second degree association.

I have since taken the facebook post with the reference to LoveFraud down and do certainly not intend to further deal with LoveFraud or Donna Anderson. I have no dealings or any kind of agreements with her at all.

I had never ever any contact or association with Leedom whatsoever and it will stay that way.

The whole point of grassroot funding through a site like Kickstarter is that it keeps the project 100% independed and free of any outside influence or association. It does not get any more independed than that. At the same time the Kickstarter campaign needs maximum level of exposure to become successful and only if that happens the documentary will get made.

I hope I explained the issue sufficiently.

[link deactivated by moderator - please don't leave active links to known disinformation sites]
 
Ailén said:
Fifth Way,

Guardian and Laura just asked you extremely pertinent questions. I hope you have clear answers for them. People who are not as thorough as Guardian would not check for these things. But the least you can do is explain, if you have any respect for this forum. There might be nothing, or there might be something to it. But one should not leave out "details" like these if one is honest about one's work. Remember what Ark always says: the Devil is in the details.

Of course I have respect for the forum. It was 8:30AM on a Saturday morning when I switched my computer on an have immediately answered the questions.
...and Ark is right. :)
 
anart said:
Fifth Way said:
Thank you Guardian, for your post and no, I do not mind at all.

However, you got the wrong address. I am living in a forty dwelling rental building in a small one bedroom apartment that also serves as my office and also as the home of my two children when they are with me (approximately a third of a month). I would think that at least a dozen forum members have been at my place so it is easy to verify.

FifthWay, while Guardian's information is obviously off, I think your description of your apartment is less than accurate. You live in a penthouse apartment with a roof top deck on the upper east side of Manhattan. It is a gorgeous and large apartment, by Manhattan standards. I'm not sure why you described it the way you did, but, certainly you're aware of the difference between a usual "small one bedroom apartment" in Manhattan (that can be little more than one room with a bathroom) and your place.

Why obfuscate the truth like that? Or have you recently moved to a smaller place?

Anart,

A room with a bathroom is called a studio. A room with another room is a one-bedroom. When my children are here, who do not have their own room but just a loft bed in my bedroom that I build myself, it is small. And if someone else is working in the "office" - my living room - such as an editor, it is very small. So small that it makes balancing life and work hard. I haven't measured it but I do not consider it large. It gives the impression of being large because it has high ceilings and a lot of windows and it has hight ceilings because the building is 100 old. Yes, it is technically a "penthouse" as indicated by its address because it is on the top-floor of the building and has a terrace but I find that rather misleading as it makes one think of a much larger place. The reason why it is "gorgeous" is because I build every single thing inside and out by my self and alone and at minimal cost. Lots of blood, sweat and tears instead.

As I write this I am freezing because it is drafty and cold in here because the landlord never repairs anything and the heating system can't cope with the cold place because the outside walls are cracked and the doors don't shut right. There is not proper heating in the bathroom. When I plug in extra electrical radiators when my kids are here and turn them up to much, the fuse blows.

I can hardly afforded it but I have a lease that runs out by the end of this year. The single most important reason why I picked this location in the first place was because I wanted to be close to my children when I was forced out of the family apartment and it had and outside space for them. Being in walking distance of their other home and their school I consider important. At that time I also had an real income from the TV show I was producing.

Anart, you know very well I am not living the high roller lifestyle!

I have to leave the house now but will answer further questions later.
 
Fifth Way said:
Anart,

A room with a bathroom is called a studio. A room with another room is a one-bedroom. When my children are here, who do not have their own room but just a loft bed in my bedroom that I build myself, it is small. And if someone else is working in the "office" - my living room - such as an editor, it is very small. So small that it makes balancing life and work hard. I haven't measured it but I do not consider it large. It gives the impression of being large because it has high ceilings and a lot of windows and it has hight ceilings because the building is 100 old. Yes, it is technically a "penthouse" as indicated by its address because it is on the top-floor of the building and has a terrace but I find that rather misleading as it makes one think of a much larger place. The reason why it is "gorgeous" is because I build every single thing inside and out by my self and alone and at minimal cost. Lots of blood, sweat and tears instead.

Apologies, but having been there, my personal impression is that it is not that small. In fact, having been in many other Manhattan apartments due to other friends and family living there over the years, it's quite nice, it's in a very expensive neighborhood and it's a penthouse, for goodness sake.

fw said:
As I write this I am freezing because it is drafty and cold in here because the landlord never repairs anything and the heating system can't cope with the cold place because the outside walls are cracked and the doors don't shut right. There is not proper heating in the bathroom. When I plug in extra electrical radiators when my kids are here and turn them up to much, the fuse blows.

I can hardly afforded it but I have a lease that runs out by the end of this year. The single most important reason why I picked this location in the first place was because I wanted to be close to my children when I was forced out of the family apartment and it had and outside space for them. Being in walking distance of their other home and their school I consider important. At that time I also had an real income from the TV show I was producing.

Sounds like most older buildings in Manhattan, but apologies for not feeling like you're suffering, considering the location. Seems like you said exactly the same thing last year about the lease running out at the end of the year and you can hardly afford it...

In other words, I'm not really buying it.


fw said:
Anart, you know very well I am not living the high roller lifestyle!

I don't know any such thing, actually. You vacation in Europe with your children for long periods of time each year, yet you are 'out of work' - that's rather 'high roller' to me, but, then again, I live a modest life. Perhaps it comes down to definitions of wealth. You are used to moving in very wealthy circles due to your ex-wife and consider your current lifestyle to be modest, when the vast majority of people in the world would look at your lifestyle now and think it is very wealthy.
 
Fifth Way said:
However, you got the wrong address.

Really? I'm going by the address on your corporate registration, which you're required by NY law to keep current? The address for "John Galt Films Inc." matches the address on the corporate registration for "Rachael Horovitz Productions"

Selected Entity Name: JOHN GALT FILMS, INC.
Selected Entity Status Information Current Entity Name: JOHN GALT FILMS, INC.
Initial DOS Filing Date: JANUARY 10, 1997
County: NEW YORK
Jurisdiction: NEW YORK
Entity Type: DOMESTIC BUSINESS CORPORATION
Current Entity Status: ACTIVE

Selected Entity Address Information DOS Process (Address to which DOS will mail process if accepted on behalf of the entity)
C/O ALEXANDER DAVIDIS
288 W. 4TH STREET
NEW YORK, NEW YORK, 10014
Chairman or Chief Executive Officer
ALEXANDER DAVIDIS
288 WEST 4TH STREET APT 3F
NEW YORK, NEW YORK, 10014
Principal Executive Office
ALEXANDER DAVIDIS
288 WEST 4TH STREET APT 3F
NEW YORK, NEW YORK, 10014
Registered Agent
NONE



Selected Entity Name: RACHAEL HOROVITZ PRODUCTIONS INC.
Selected Entity Status Information Current Entity Name: RACHAEL HOROVITZ PRODUCTIONS INC.
Initial DOS Filing Date: OCTOBER 06, 2010
County: NEW YORK
Jurisdiction: NEW YORK
Entity Type: DOMESTIC BUSINESS CORPORATION
Current Entity Status: ACTIVE

Selected Entity Address Information DOS Process (Address to which DOS will mail process if accepted on behalf of the entity)
RACHAEL HOROVITZ PRODUCTIONS INC.
288 WEST 4TH ST.
NEW YORK, NEW YORK, 10014
Registered Agent
NONE


I also have the tax records for this property, and there are only 4 units in this building.

I am living in a forty dwelling rental building in a small one bedroom apartment that also serves as my office and also as the home of my two children when they are with me (approximately a third of a month). I would think that at least a dozen forum members have been at my place so it is easy to verify.

Yes, I have two other addresses for you, the one on Greenwich and the one on 7th..which is what made me wonder about the address on your corporate registration?

Not sure if you have been to Manhattan but here small multimillion dollar town houses can stand right next to multi-dwelling sky-risers. The house numbers would not be the same but they could be almost the same.

Yes, I have been to NY, and I even saw the highfalutin building (173 Perry) that Mr. Jackson lived in before he bought the building at the address both you and Mrs. Horovitz list on your corporate registration.

I don't know what else you "found". I can tell you that I recently divorced a wealthy woman after a several year long legal battle. Do to the executed settlement agreements I am unfortunately not allowed to discuss the details.

That's ok, I "found" those too, and where she changed her name.

I am in no position to fund this project on my own. If I where it would have already been done. But over the years I have put my own money into this project.

Really? I saw where you also used kickstarter to collect donations for your antique race car show "GT Racer" which was renewed for a second season and is airing both in Europe and the US. Are you saying a TV show that's picked up by networks like the Discovery Channel doesn't pay?

If you have more questions, please fire away.

Just the same questions I already asked that you haven't answered yet.. your relationship with Rachael Horovitz and Michael Jackson? Why is your corporate address the same as Mrs. Horovitz's and what is the nature of your work with her and Mr. Jackson?
 
anart said:
FifthWay, while Guardian's information is obviously off,
Actually, it would be the NY State Corporation Commission's information that would be off...but I don't think so. I think I see a very interesting pattern here, but it's one of those situations where I'm really hoping I'm wrong.
 
Guardian said:
anart said:
FifthWay, while Guardian's information is obviously off,
Actually, it would be the NY State Corporation Commission's information that would be off...but I don't think so. I think I see a very interesting pattern here, but it's one of those situations where I'm really hoping I'm wrong.

Point taken.
 
The apartment at 288 W 4th street seems to have three floors but no penthouse. It is a bit strange that your company address "john Galt films" is the same at the address for Michael Jackson and co...but you say you're office is in your own one bed penthouse elsewhere. I'm sure there's a simple enough explanation...we just haven't heard it yet.
 
I'm very interested in the fact that Horovitz family members are part of the Israel propaganda machine...BIG money.

_http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Seven_Jewish_Children

The Board of Deputies of British Jews, invited to preview the play, accused Churchill of being "Anti-Israel".[27] Jonathan Hoffman, co-vice chairman of the Zionist Federation of Great Britain and Ireland, called the play "a libellous and despicable demonisation of Israeli parents and grandparents" and expressed fear that it would "stoke the fires of antisemitism". He added that the play is a modern blood libel drawing on old anti-Semitic myths.[25]

59 well-known British Jews published a letter published in the Daily Telegraph claiming that Seven Jewish Children reinforces "false stereotypes" and demonizing Israel for depicting Israelis as "inhuman triumphalists" who teach their children "Arabs must be hated", while it is "historically inaccurate" since it "fails to say that the Six Day War was a defensive war" and it doesn't contain Israel's "withdrawal from Gaza in 2005" or "more than 6,000 rockets" launched by Hamas indiscriminately. Signatories included Professor Geoffrey Alderman, the Michael Gross Professor of Modern History at the University of Buckingham; Greville Janner, Baron Janner of Braunstone, the Labour peer and former president of the Board of Deputies; Maureen Lipman, the actress; Ronald Harwood, the Oscar-winning screenwriter; Tracy-Ann Oberman, the actress who starred in EastEnders.[28][29]

Playwright Israel Horovitz, who wrote a play in response to Churchill entitled What Strong Fences Make

Israel Horovitz is Rachael Horovitz's father.

_http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Israel_Horovitz
Horovitz was born in Wakefield, Massachusetts, the son of Hazel Rose (née Solberg) and Julius Charles Horovitz, a lawyer.[6] He has five children: film producer Rachael Horovitz (About Schmidt) (born 1961), television producer-director Matthew Horovitz (NBA network) (born 1964), Adam Horovitz of the Beastie Boys (born 1966) with Doris Keefe, and twins Hannah and Oliver Horovitz (born 1985) with Gillian Adams (born 1955), to whom he is currently married.



It appears there's relatives selling real estate in Israel too:
_http://www.youtube.com/user/horovitz1stclass?feature=watch

What I'd like to know is how a corporation that has a relationship with Israeli apologists can make an unbiased film about psychopathy?
 
anart said:
Fifth Way said:
Anart,

A room with a bathroom is called a studio. A room with another room is a one-bedroom. When my children are here, who do not have their own room but just a loft bed in my bedroom that I build myself, it is small. And if someone else is working in the "office" - my living room - such as an editor, it is very small. So small that it makes balancing life and work hard. I haven't measured it but I do not consider it large. It gives the impression of being large because it has high ceilings and a lot of windows and it has hight ceilings because the building is 100 old. Yes, it is technically a "penthouse" as indicated by its address because it is on the top-floor of the building and has a terrace but I find that rather misleading as it makes one think of a much larger place. The reason why it is "gorgeous" is because I build every single thing inside and out by my self and alone and at minimal cost. Lots of blood, sweat and tears instead.

Apologies, but having been there, my personal impression is that it is not that small. In fact, having been in many other Manhattan apartments due to other friends and family living there over the years, it's quite nice, it's in a very expensive neighborhood and it's a penthouse, for goodness sake.

fw said:
As I write this I am freezing because it is drafty and cold in here because the landlord never repairs anything and the heating system can't cope with the cold place because the outside walls are cracked and the doors don't shut right. There is not proper heating in the bathroom. When I plug in extra electrical radiators when my kids are here and turn them up to much, the fuse blows.

I can hardly afforded it but I have a lease that runs out by the end of this year. The single most important reason why I picked this location in the first place was because I wanted to be close to my children when I was forced out of the family apartment and it had and outside space for them. Being in walking distance of their other home and their school I consider important. At that time I also had an real income from the TV show I was producing.

Sounds like most older buildings in Manhattan, but apologies for not feeling like you're suffering, considering the location. Seems like you said exactly the same thing last year about the lease running out at the end of the year and you can hardly afford it...

In other words, I'm not really buying it.


fw said:
Anart, you know very well I am not living the high roller lifestyle!

I don't know any such thing, actually. You vacation in Europe with your children for long periods of time each year, yet you are 'out of work' - that's rather 'high roller' to me, but, then again, I live a modest life. Perhaps it comes down to definitions of wealth. You are used to moving in very wealthy circles due to your ex-wife and consider your current lifestyle to be modest, when the vast majority of people in the world would look at your lifestyle now and think it is very wealthy.

I measured it so people can draw their own conclusions whether it is big or small, Manhattan or not.
Everything inclusive, living-room, open kitchen, hallway bath room and bedroom it is 497 square feet or 46 square meters.

I renewed my lease for one year (calender year of 2012) last summer after the divorce was settled and I received a payment. I did so in the summer as I had been living without a lease for about a year and a half and my landlord pressured me to sign one or evict me. My landlord had try to evict me previously as I could not pay the rent when the divorce started. But the rental market was down and I could convince him to let me stay for a reduced rent.

Regarding my summer trips to Europe: I am German so when I go I go home so the children can spend time with my mum, the only grandparent they have. Usually my children are already there, departing with my wife right after school finishes, to places like Monaco or Gstaad. Later they then meet me in Germany where we stay at my mother's two bedroom apartment in Hamburg where I sleep on the living room couch. Sometimes we take a short trip to the nearby Baltic see staying in an inexpensive hotel or inn for a few nights. They then spend additional time with my wife. This year on somebody's boat in the Mediterranean.

During that time I pack my calender with business meetings in Germany to drum up work until they return. After they return I go with them to a friend's camping ground in eastern Germany, where we live without power in trailers and tents, like a week or so.

If I have additional time with them here in the States we usually visit friends. Sometimes I rent a car but we also have traveled by greyhound bus several times.
 
Guardian said:
Fifth Way said:
However, you got the wrong address.

Really? I'm going by the address on your corporate registration, which you're required by NY law to keep current? The address for "John Galt Films Inc." matches the address on the corporate registration for "Rachael Horovitz Productions"

Selected Entity Name: JOHN GALT FILMS, INC.
Selected Entity Status Information Current Entity Name: JOHN GALT FILMS, INC.
Initial DOS Filing Date: JANUARY 10, 1997
County: NEW YORK
Jurisdiction: NEW YORK
Entity Type: DOMESTIC BUSINESS CORPORATION
Current Entity Status: ACTIVE

Selected Entity Address Information DOS Process (Address to which DOS will mail process if accepted on behalf of the entity)
C/O ALEXANDER DAVIDIS
288 W. 4TH STREET
NEW YORK, NEW YORK, 10014
Chairman or Chief Executive Officer
ALEXANDER DAVIDIS
288 WEST 4TH STREET APT 3F
NEW YORK, NEW YORK, 10014
Principal Executive Office
ALEXANDER DAVIDIS
288 WEST 4TH STREET APT 3F
NEW YORK, NEW YORK, 10014
Registered Agent
NONE



Selected Entity Name: RACHAEL HOROVITZ PRODUCTIONS INC.
Selected Entity Status Information Current Entity Name: RACHAEL HOROVITZ PRODUCTIONS INC.
Initial DOS Filing Date: OCTOBER 06, 2010
County: NEW YORK
Jurisdiction: NEW YORK
Entity Type: DOMESTIC BUSINESS CORPORATION
Current Entity Status: ACTIVE

Selected Entity Address Information DOS Process (Address to which DOS will mail process if accepted on behalf of the entity)
RACHAEL HOROVITZ PRODUCTIONS INC.
288 WEST 4TH ST.
NEW YORK, NEW YORK, 10014
Registered Agent
NONE


I also have the tax records for this property, and there are only 4 units in this building.

I am living in a forty dwelling rental building in a small one bedroom apartment that also serves as my office and also as the home of my two children when they are with me (approximately a third of a month). I would think that at least a dozen forum members have been at my place so it is easy to verify.

Yes, I have two other addresses for you, the one on Greenwich and the one on 7th..which is what made me wonder about the address on your corporate registration?

Not sure if you have been to Manhattan but here small multimillion dollar town houses can stand right next to multi-dwelling sky-risers. The house numbers would not be the same but they could be almost the same.

Yes, I have been to NY, and I even saw the highfalutin building (173 Perry) that Mr. Jackson lived in before he bought the building at the address both you and Mrs. Horovitz list on your corporate registration.

I don't know what else you "found". I can tell you that I recently divorced a wealthy woman after a several year long legal battle. Do to the executed settlement agreements I am unfortunately not allowed to discuss the details.

That's ok, I "found" those too, and where she changed her name.

I am in no position to fund this project on my own. If I where it would have already been done. But over the years I have put my own money into this project.

Really? I saw where you also used kickstarter to collect donations for your antique race car show "GT Racer" which was renewed for a second season and is airing both in Europe and the US. Are you saying a TV show that's picked up by networks like the Discovery Channel doesn't pay?

If you have more questions, please fire away.

Just the same questions I already asked that you haven't answered yet.. your relationship with Rachael Horovitz and Michael Jackson? Why is your corporate address the same as Mrs. Horovitz's and what is the nature of your work with her and Mr. Jackson?

The 288 West 4th address is where I stopped living about 9 years ago. At the time I rented an approximately 200 square foot studio for $450.-. I incorporated my company there first. The building has been sold on the hight of the real estate bubble and I was forced out at that time. It was then completely gut renovated and is now what it is. A many million $ property with just a few dwellings. With other forum members we walked by there recently and I showed them the window which used to be mine.

Greenwich was my office in a huge artist's community building in Tribeca. I had a small unit. Probably also no more than 200 SQ feet. This was also sold during the real-estate bubble and the new owner agressivly forced and evicted all companies, probably 50 or more in addition to dozen of artist studios.

From there I moved where I am now.

7th... I have no idea what that is.

Again you are misinformed about GT Racer. The season was not renewed. The one-off episode, which' post production was funded by car enthusiast who love my show (The Algarve Special), was not part of the network deal. You can look up what series came out when, on my online store at www.GTRacerTV.com. Look at the DVDs that are out and it becomes clear. Selling those however does not do very well and makes insignificant money. I branded the Algarve film "GT RACER" to better sell it. I own the right to the name, so I can do that.

Rachael Horovitz and Michael Jackson: I don't know these people. When I incorporated my company 15 year ago they where not living there.
 
Fifth Way said:
The 288 West 4th address is where I stopped living about 9 years ago. At the time I rented an approximately 200 square foot studio for $450.-. I incorporated my company there first.

Corporations in New York are required to file Biennial Statements, with a current address.
"The Biennial Statement is made on a form provided by the Secretary of State which is automatically mailed to the most recent principal place of business on record;"

Are you saying that you haven't changed your corporation's address in 9 years? How are you getting your Biennial Statement forms? If they are going to the wrong address, why wouldn't Mrs. Horovitz-Jackson return the mail as undelivered if you were using her address for nine years without her permission?

7th... I have no idea what that is.

Sorry, that was my typo..should have been "75th"
_http://www.johngaltfilms.com/
John Galt Films, Inc.
192 East 75th Street PHA
NY NY 10021 USA

Again you are misinformed about GT Racer. The season was not renewed.

Evidently I'm not the only one who's "misinformed?"

_http://www.hubgarage.com/mygarage/CindyMeitle/blogs/12579

"GT RACER Season Two on Discovery HD Airs Again September 16"
GT RACER Season II premiered on Discovery HD September 4 on Discovery’s HD Theater. It could be viewed on Optimum Digital Cable Channel 765, Comcast Digital Cable and Time Warner Digital Cable Channel 765. The show was fantastic and has received rave reviews from viewers. The show will air again on September 16 so don’t miss it!!!

Historic racing is a worldwide, fast growing phenomenon Historic racing is a worldwide, fast growing phenomenon where colorful characters live out their most sophisticated, car-crazed dreams. GT RACER takes the viewer literally inside the cars and onto the tracks.

GT RACER’s first season airing on UKTV’s channel ‘Dave’ is one of UK’s top rated shows on television. In Season II twelve idiosyncratic race teams give a peek at the most spectacular series of international classic racing, where the most beautiful classic racers ever built battle it out on the world’s most glamorous racing circuits: Bizzarrinis, Ferraris, Jaguars, Morgans, Mustangs and Cobras race at the great circuits of Europe and America."

I guess what I'm questioning here is when you solicit donations for a project, where do the profits go when it's a success?

Rachael Horovitz and Michael Jackson: I don't know these people.

So you've never worked on any TV/film projects they were involved in?
 
Perceval said:
It is a bit strange that your company address "john Galt films" is the same at the address for Michael Jackson and co...but you say you're office is in your own one bed penthouse elsewhere. I'm sure there's a simple enough explanation...we just haven't heard it yet.

I think that's probably the case as well. It sounds at this point like there is an issue with business registration, (as in he hasn't been keeping up with it) that likely caused the confusion, but more input would clarify further. In most states, if you don't file the statement of information with the state on the business, the status of the business becomes inactive, and eventually defunct, which can affect taxes and other things, so if the status of the business is active, that likely means he's been filing the reports with incorrect address info, which wouldn't be wise, but it's not impossible. I can't say from here, though, more data is needed.
 
There could also be some confusion about the 2nd season of GT Racer being back in 2009 not last September so profits could be spent by now.
 

Trending content

Back
Top Bottom