Yes it'a a microcontroller, clocked at 32KHz so there's no EMF much above that. Other than that, careful layout...Very cool, is it a microcontroller and if so, what strategies did you use to reduce the EMF from the clock signal?
Yes it'a a microcontroller, clocked at 32KHz so there's no EMF much above that. Other than that, careful layout...Very cool, is it a microcontroller and if so, what strategies did you use to reduce the EMF from the clock signal?
if you don't have any metals poisoning your body, and you don't have any critters colonizing your body, then the frequency beaming of the PTB can't get to you.
Sorry ReasonBear, Keyhole and Nienna didn't point that.... Perhaps it would be more responsible to say ?
Keyhole and Nienna have a point - many so-called EMF remedies have not been studied medically - and iodine is among them! Sorry, but what are we doing here? While I might take risks with my personal life, I believe it's a crime of sorts to cause injury to another.
After extensive research motivated by personal symptoms, the only 'remedy' I can advocate with good conscience is architectural shielding. Its been used for decades to protect sensitive equipment. It negates the 'health' angle altogether by removing the body from the contaminated environment. It's a bona-fide science complete with standards and measures and best practices, but it's not limited to these. You'll still find videos online which do more harm than good by advocating improper applications - like the paint-can-over-smart-meter-shield.
While that video's producer might believe they're trying to help people, they're actually teaching people to install directed-energy weapons on the wall of their own homes. That so-called 'shield' redirects an outward-facing beam inward (towards sleeping children). It also concentrates the force of the transmission into the home. This video is so irresponsible, it made me reflect upon an old Tibetian (Chinese ruled) billboard in a new light. The billboard reads: It's a crime to disseminate unhealthy things and ideas'.
When is a shield a weapon? When it doesn't work. Thanks Andrew for inspiring such an important subject!
Now if these devices are just priming us to do something that we never needed them for, then maybe we should call a spade a spade and take a more direct approach.
I wonder if most of the time, we could "just do it" - if we could get over what we think we know. Since we usually can't, but we love our "devices", then the device is simply enabling that part of us that is restricted.
IOW, we believe something is not possible until we also believe more strongly that something else makes it possible, so then POOF! It's possible.
I think that idea is far more likely than the idea that some of these gizmos work due to crazy unknown physics.
And that's why I usually say: In the end, if it works, run with it!
Mind you I was using a fairly broad brush. We are talking about low-level energies, ie no "nukes" in any form. Low enough to make them highly susceptible to modulations or interferences by other forms of energy, in turn making their efficacy subjective.That may be, but what about all the snares and lies that come along with these devices? They are expensive, their promotion is full of lies and misinformation, you can't have a clear idea of what they can or can't do.
Maybe, but "understanding your own abilities" is a potentially lifelong full-time job! What´s more, in the end you may realize that "I know that I know nothing".Wouldn't it be better to understand your own abilities so you don't have a false reliance on dubious sources which come with the devices as an energy drain?
Interestingly, many of the biological effects of EMF can be mitigated via calcium channel blockers, which strongly implicates VGCC activation being one of the primary mechanisms of cellular stress. The CMO supposedly alters the threshold for VGCC acitivation, which is almost acting like a calcium-channel blocker but which is specific for external EMF.
5. How do EMF exposures lead to non-thermal health impacts?
The author found the answer to this question in the already published scientific literature (Pall, 2013). That study showed that in 24 different studies [there are now a total of 26 Pall (2015b)], effects of low-intensity EMFs, including microwave frequency and also extremely low frequency EMFs, static electrical fields and static magnetic fields could be blocked by calcium channel blockers, drugs that are specific for blocking voltage-gated calcium channels (VGCCs). There were 5 different types of calcium channel blockers used in these studies, each thought to be highly specific, each structurally distinct and each binding to a different site on the VGCCs. In studies where multiple effects were studied, all studied effects were blocked or greatly lowered by calcium channel blockers. These studies show that EMFs produce diverse non-thermal effects via VGCC activation Pall, 2013, Pall, 2014, Pall, 2015a, Pall, 2015b, Pall, 2016a, Pall, 2016b) in many human and animal cells. In plant cells, EMFs activate somewhat similar calcium channels and produce somewhat similar effects on oxidative stress, cellular DNA damage and calcium signaling (Pall, 2016a). Furthermore, many different effects shown to be produced in repeated studies by EMF exposures, including the effects discussed above, can be produced by downstream effects of VGCC activation, via increased [Ca2+]i, as discussed in detail below.
...
8. Two other models for producing non-thermal effects
With the possible exception of the electrosoliton model, the author does not find any of the models discussed by Dr. Belyaev (2015) to have substantial evidence for roles in producing EMF effects. There are two other models which may be more compelling, each of which either produces increased [Ca2+]i.
Six studies have supported the view that calcium cyclotron resonance, has a role in producing biological effects produced by certain specific frequencies which can interact with Ca2+ ions to produce a cyclotron-like resonance (Foletti et al., 2010; Gaetani et al., 2009; De Carlo et al., 2012; Lisi et al., 2008; Pazur and Rassadina, 2009; Pazur et al., 2006). In each case, the effects involved a very specific frequency which produces the calcium cyclotron resonance and in three studies, these frequencies were shown to produce increases in [Ca2+]i levels. In the De Carlo et al. (2012) study, the calcium channel blocker nifedipine was shown to greatly lower the apparent calcium cyclotron resonance effect. This finding strongly suggests that the calcium cyclotron resonance can feed Ca2+ ions into the VGCCs, thus increasing the flow of Ca2+ ions through the VGCCs into the cell following EMF exposure. The frequencies studied here for cyclotron resonance, one was close to 7 Hz and the other was close to 50 Hz, are both in the extremely low frequency range and consequently are not relevant to microwave frequency effects. The finding that only very specific calcium cyclotron resonance frequencies produce these effects is the main evidence for this mechanism.
Calcium channel blockers (CCB), calcium channel antagonists or calcium antagonists[2] are a group of medications that disrupt the movement of calcium (Ca2+) through calcium channels.[3] Calcium channel blockers are used as antihypertensive drugs, i.e., as medications to decrease blood pressure in patients with hypertension. CCBs are particularly effective against large vessel stiffness, one of the common causes of elevated systolic blood pressure in elderly patients.[4] Calcium channel blockers are also frequently used to alter heart rate (especially from atrial fibrillation), to prevent peripheral and cerebral vasospasm, and to reduce chest pain caused by angina pectoris.
Side effects of these drugs may include but are not limited to:
- Constipation
- Dizziness, headache, redness in the face
- Fluid buildup in the legs and ankle edema
- Gingival overgrowth
- Rapid heart rate
- Slow heart rate
Magnesium is a natural calcium channel blocker, blocks sodium attachment to vascular smooth muscle cells, increases vasodilating PGE, binds potassium in a cooperative manner, increases nitric oxide, improves endothelial dysfunction, causes vasodilation, and reduces BP.
Scientists have demonstrated that cats produce the purr through intermittent signaling of the laryngeal and diaphragmatic muscles. Cats purr during both inhalation and exhalation with a consistent pattern and frequency between 25 and 150 Hertz. Various investigators have shown that sound frequencies in this range can improve bone density and promote healing.
This association between the frequencies of cats' purrs and improved healing of bones and muscles may provide help for some humans. Bone density loss and muscle atrophy is a serious concern for astronauts during extended periods at zero gravity. Their musculo-skeletal systems do not experience the normal stresses of physical activity, including routine standing or sitting, which requires strength for posture control.
Because cats have adapted to conserve energy via long periods of rest and sleep, it is possible that purring is a low energy mechanism that stimulates muscles and bones without a lot of energy. The durability of the cat has facilitated the notion that cats have "nine lives" and a common veterinary legend holds that cats are able to reassemble their bones when placed in the same room with all their parts.
[...]
Although it is tempting to state that cats purr because they are happy, it is more plausible that cat purring is a means of communication and a potential source of self-healing.