Session 10 December 2022

Hi Redrock, sorry to hear about the pneumonia, maybe @Gaby has some advice for you. The oxygen therapy is good, but the hyperbaric chamber is better because you're under pressure when breathing the oxygen, and that allows a better absorption of the oxygen into your cells. Have you checked to see if there is any hyperbaric chamber oxygen therapy available in your area?
My guess it was a poly microbial pneumonia. Redrock probably received antibiotics for a possible COPD exacerbation too. Now what's left are scars that could get better with oxygen. If you don't have acces to an HBOT center, you can seek a respiratory physiotherapist or an osteopath who works on visceral organs. An osteopath who knows about the polyvagal theory might work wonders.
 
(L) Yes. You heard him? Alright. He has spoken, and I agree. Okay... I guess we better say goodbye because I'm tired. Is there anything we should have asked that we didn't ask, and if so consider it asked, and please give us an answer because this is our last session probably for this year...?

A: Again we urge all to continuously stay in contact and exert energy on behalf of others in your group so as to refine frequency for receiving. Things are about to get rather "rocky". Help to keep the lighthouse lit at all costs as soon will be vital to all. And finally, be excellent to each other! Goodbye.
From Laura's book From Paul to Mark:
As Mary Ann Tolbert shows, the disciples are examples
of the ‘rocky ground’ in the Parable of the Sower: Because there is a little earth covering the rock, the seed springs up immediately in rocky ground, but since the rock blocks the growth of roots, when the sun comes up the plant quickly withers.” They “accept at first, endure for a time, and then fall away when opposition threatens.”
I expect we will learn lessons as per the quoted route in Laura's book above.

Rather than this way: 'getting high on and right from' destructy-[sic] predictions from all kinds of dodgy-timelines. Awareness, knowledge and free will to avoid these self-destructing, Stupid Paths of Ignorance leading to destruction = I think catastrophe-timelines are directly a result of leading Entropic Lifestyles:
For example, years ago I saw a large asteroid obliterating "The Heart of Germany", without any time stamp. Nathalie saw one hit the Vatican + Paris.
How about participating in a future Timeline of Integrity & Greater Harmony? Where Russia invents [already done] and perfects its Asteroid Protection System, which will debut beautifully and clearly makes multiple Earth-Saving Moves???
 
Last edited:
(Joe) If our twin sun is relatively soon to be visible, what's it gonna... be called? [laughter]
(L) You're worried about what it's going to be CALLED?! [laughter]
(Joe) No, I mean what are they gonna say about it? What would be the explanation for it? Are they gonna say it's a twin sun, or a comet, or... Maybe that's asking too much.
A: Probably will call it a giant comet or the flaring of same.
PTB's grocery list:
  1. Covid lockdowns (caused by anti-vaxxers)
  2. Climate lockdowns (caused by anti-environmentalists)
  3. Galactic lockdowns (caused by anti-vaxxers and anti-environmentalists)
Imagine locking down people again, but this time, because of a "comet."
cm23.png
 
Nice connection of Parable of the Sower with “things about to get rocky.”

I’m thinking that last quote might use a thread of its own:”A: Again we urge all to continuously stay in contact and exert energy on behalf of others in your group so as to refine frequency for receiving. Things are about to get rather "rocky". Help to keep the lighthouse lit at all costs as soon will be vital to all. And finally, be excellent to each other! Goodbye.”

There is so much here. Not all easy.

Mainly - exerting energy on behalf of other group members to refine frequency receivership; And Defining excellence in the current context.

There is something intrinsic in refining frequency receivership: it involves some kind of improvement; an increase in sensitivity; an aspect of doing a better job. And anytime you tell someone “here is how it looks to me you/we could do a better job” then all the ego hooks come into play.

And this is why it takes a real commitment to expend energy on behalf of others: when people won’t listen or push back because their self identity is under threat, it can be draining to be on the receiving end of that self defense. It’s like a Jordan Peterson thing. Any time you say “you can do better/here is what I see” it has the potential to trigger people. “What do you mean I can do better? Who the hell do you think you are to tell me anything?”

Aye, there’s the rub.

It’s not about feel-good agreeableness. OSIT. It’s about a commitment to the truth about what’s objectively discernible. not embedded in our subjective emotional outlook. It’s about reveling in the truth for it’s own sake for it can set us free.

Actually it takes a big commitment and exertion to go against the grain this way. To say: hey, there’s a dead fly in the soup.

Here is a mundane example. There is a thread titled intellectual jokes I think started by Keit that got off to a nice start. But it didn’t take long for it to devolve into just plain jokes of any sort.

So I see a lack of rigor and focused attention. But if I you or anyone says “hey what is intellectual about slapstick?” Then you sound like a prissy, snarky fuddy-duddy.

Again, there’s the rub.

But I do think there is an element of being willing to confront both our own complacency and the complacency of others that is being asked. The Mediocrites Syndrome, if you will:

Meh, Good enough.

Is it?

What really makes a difference? These are the hard questions buried in this simple request from the C’s that is maybe not so simple and certainly challenging.
 
As noted, it's possible that when in humanoid/human-like bodies ("nordic types") they do not have telepathic abilities. Or, maybe they do, but that's still a problem because it's always possible that the human "elite" have someone at the meeting with telepathic abilities, who could in theory listen in on the "aliens" private telepathic communications. The point being, IF the human elite have people with telepathic abilities at these meetings, then the aliens using telepathic communication to discuss nefarious plans with each other is obviously a bad idea. Using spoken language to communicate would seem to be the most secure option, as long as they use a language they know that the humans cannot understand, hence their use of the Atlantean lang. that is an ancestor of Basque. Hence also, the humans attempt to get an AI (i.e. no consciousness) translator to find out what they are saying without the aliens knowing that they are doing it.

I don't think we've really thought enough about the idea of telepathy. The 'hot take' on it is that you can "read everyone's mind" or something, but I'd say it is nowhere near that simple or easy. I think most people tend to think about telepathy from the perspective of being the only person with that ability in a world of non telepathic people. At least, that's how it's most often portrayed in movies (which sadly are a strong reference point for many people). If you're telepathic, but everyone knows you're telepathic, and they are too, then your telepathy isn't really that special. It would essentially be as "special" as being able to speak a language in 3D, where everyone else can too.
Why talk with humans at all, on first place? Do we talk with our catlle? Why they do, with all their might? But, they do, for some reason.
 
Once a friend at a pub was worried about me (I was at the nearby beach, not my scene) and felt a desire to call me, knew their emotional state of concern and was reaching for my phone before it rang.
When another brother crushed his hand in an industrial accident he was alarmed but calm. (Not his first accident). I just knew something was wrong and that it concerned him, so started making calls.
This makes me think of twins that often sense the same feelings or that the other is having a bad experience while they are separated, even over long distances.

The sender just projects withing an emotion that concerns the recipient.
But the recipient feels the thought as if it were their own, so it can be confusing.

When I was a sophomore in high school, two of my girl friends told me they could communicate with each other by thought. I totally scoffed at that and found it completely unbelievable. It just so happened that one of the girls was in my history class - last period of the day and well, history. Not exactly engrossing as I sat in my seat. But then, all of a sudden, I was struck by an overwhelming compulsion to "draw something"! I frantically starting going through my notebook looking for paper to draw something on! It was an irresistible urge despite the fact that my actions might bring a reprimand from the teacher. Much to my surprise, I was slipped a note from my friend saying that she had sent me a "thought" message to "draw something"! My skepticism was absolutely eradicated owing to how that compulsion to draw something came over me. It was like a bolt out of the blue. Sadly, my family moved before the school year was over and I lost contact with those two friends. I really wonder if anything came out of their seeming abilities - psychics perhaps?
 
On the notion of alien telepathy

At some level of understanding, a universal truth is gleaned. And so what is telepathic, is simply universal. In universality, things are simple and open to interpretation - it is faithful. But in a consise scientific context, things are analyzed, broken down, assembled, for use in a material capacity - it is faithful and doubtful. So, what communication hinges on is faith or doubt, as these are avenues toward understandings.
So, I think faith and doubt and reason is the process to gain higher understanding. But simple understandings are often enough, where scientific understandings pursue endlessly.
So, doubt doubts faith, as procedure, because it is seeking higher understandings. Faith is content in its simplicity and moderates doubt by simply being.
So alien telepathy is a notion created in a scientific process to gain a higher understanding of faith, but will always fail due to its methods. Faith is the outcome of failure. Its like a conundrum.
I have to admit that when I first read your thoughts I was a bit confused or not quite sure what you were saying but I kind of agree about how much of what we are trying to learn "Its like a conundrum".

Session 5 August 1995:
Q: (L) Okay. Do any secret libraries containing all the secret wisdom of our history exist anywhere on the planet?

A: No. The secrets that you are alluding to are contained within mental structures in psychic realms, some of which you have little or no conception of. There is no need to record anything in any form that could be placed in any library. It is all done verbally and through mental telepathy.
Session 10 December 2022:
Chu) Wait, what is this alien language like that needs to be translated?

A: Similar to Basque.

Q: (Chu) REALLY?! I KNEW IT! [laughter]

(L) You knew it?

(Chu) Well, they may not have fancy telepathy; they just speak an ancient language, like Basque.
Maybe they choose not to use telepathy or as some suggest in 3D it may be easier to do it "verbally".
 
There was a period where I befriended some people who I thought were reading my mind, because of the things they were saying. 'They must be reading my mind?' I thought.
And they were friendly, but at the same time seemingly intrusive in regard to my thoughts. And I smoked pot at the time, so I would dismiss these coincidences as paranoia - from the pot.
But the tone of the conversations came to a point I felt under attack psychically. So, I began to wish them dead. And it seemed to stop this psychic attack immediately.

I rationalized they were in my thoughts - in my domain, and if they were going to walk in and attack me, I was going to fight back.
And the tone of the discourses went back to being real friendly and a change of subject: 'Let's do something', or go somewhere.

So, I tried to find a rational explanation to alien telepathy before, but it's like I wanted to forget that episode of my life.

If someone says 'they can read minds' I'll believe it. But what can I say? Only the experience I had before.

I came to resent these friends, but I made excuses for them: 'They were drunk'. And some peoples personality changes in a drunken stupor. Maybe in a drunken loss of consciousness a alien mindset arises - like a walk-in, and this leads to addiction, because ones personality is attenuated by such intrusions, leading to a dependency.

Another angle is psychology. It would simply be providing stimulus that evokes thoughts that they can then trick you into believing they know - of course they know, they just suggested it!

So, I tend to think of it as trickery from my experience, as the fear they tried to cast my way, I sent back, and there was no other influence than fear, to my knowledge. Still, you don't really know what this phenomena is, but it didn't impress me because it was negative.
 
A: Again we urge all to continuously stay in contact and exert energy on behalf of others in your group so as to refine frequency for receiving. Things are about to get rather "rocky"

What really makes a difference? These are the hard questions buried in this simple request from the C’s that is maybe not so simple and certainly challenging.

We' re doing exegesis here :-)

The main teaching for me to learn here, might very well be as "simple" as to accept that alone there's no way out of this madness.
Accepting our weaknesses and those of others with a faithfull confidence in the collective superiority, and by a deep personnal choice letting our mind be an open source for others in the group. OSIT
 
My thoughts today were about how we are a team of individuals, not just a network. We are now required to work together towards an aim, the aim being that we all add to the light. We must charge it with knowledge that has been presented to the other team members to be assessed and reviewed before adding it to the light of knowledge.

In addition when we gain more knowledge individually from the network we shine on brighter ourselves. Thus contributing also.
 
Q: (L) Um, can I narrow it down? [laughter] Do I dare? Is it gonna happen, say, like within my lifetime?

A: Yes

Thank you for your great work...

Gosh... I find it disturbing to think that everything that is going to happen, depends on Mrs. Laura's time. Maybe I have misinterpreted, but for a long time now I don't know why I have had this disturbing feeling and with this...

And Jordan Peterson is indeed entering his own spiral of disintegration through his refusal to see objectivity because of his emotional shield to things as they are.... his Achilles heel.
 
Gosh... I find it disturbing to think that everything that is going to happen, depends on Mrs. Laura's time. Maybe I have misinterpreted, but for a long time now I don't know why I have had this disturbing feeling and with this...
Perhaps I have misunderstood what you meant and please do clarify if I have not responded to the issue you began to articulate:
I don’t think it depends on Laura’s time, her lifetime is just a convenient reference point as she is the one asking the question and had asked many previous questions all with very open answers as to when events are likely to occur. I think Laura was simply attempting to get a gauge on whether things will change significantly in our reality within a reasonable human time frame.
ln other words not more than twenty years away.
 
Back
Top Bottom