Session 10 December 2022

Quick question on how people interpret the above. Are they saying that that scientists are mostly taken out "agents of chaos" in the sense of random people who are influenced to do so, and that "others" are taken out be "special operations" in the sense of hit squads/assassins? Or that the agents of chaos are assassins, and "special ops" is high-tech beaming or something? Or does the use of the word "human" before agents imply that that the "special operations" are non-human?
Could be all of above, agent of chaos it’s kinda open, because to create chaos, there must be different type of personal or situations. In other words, agents of chaos could be personal who contribute to general chaos, we pretty much know that chaos can be generated because of false flag attacks, terror attacks, shootings etc. So we got federal agencies. Chaos can be also the result of “pandemics”, in that sense we got the WHO and CDC for example, so there could be agents from different “departments” who mission is contribute, generate or manipulate chaos.
I could be wrong with the interpretation also. But maybe it helps if you can look it that way!
 
Quick question on how people interpret the above. Are they saying that that scientists are mostly taken out "agents of chaos" in the sense of random people who are influenced to do so, and that "others" are taken out be "special operations" in the sense of hit squads/assassins? Or that the agents of chaos are assassins, and "special ops" is high-tech beaming or something? Or does the use of the word "human" before agents imply that that the "special operations" are non-human?
I think the C's added "human" to "agents of chaos" to narrow down the possibilities, because the definition of "agent" (given in Session 11 January 1995) also includes 4D beings cloaking as 3D beings.
Q: (Frank) I don't think I'll repeat that Barry. (L) Did he use the "F" word? (Frank) No, he referred to a part of the anatomy. (Barry) Are Lizards shape shifters?
A: All on 4th level of density have that ability.

Q: (Barry) Do they have the ability to block their true appearance?
A: Yes.

Q: (Barry) Are they walking around amongst us now?
A: Infrequently, they use "agents" to do most of their tasks on 3rd level.

Q: (Barry) Are these agents the "Men in Black" or are they the "Grays?"
A: Both and many others. Men in Black are often Lizards cloaked as human types, and can remain on 3rd density level for limited periods called short wave cycle. Men in Black claim to be government in order to have excuse to have direct contact with selected humans.

Q: (Barry) Have these Men in Black killed humans?
A: No.

Q: (Frank) They just threaten?
A: Yes.

Q: (Barry) Have the Lizards killed humans?
A: Oh yes!!!
So I think "human agents of chaos" are humans who were ordered to assassinate or intimidate people using "standard" 3D techniques. The "special operations" would involve higher tech (memory reprogramming, soul sampling, implants, abductions, etc) used by alien types (possibly in collaboration with highly secretive human types to cover up the operation).
 
Quick question on how people interpret the above. Are they saying that that scientists are mostly taken out "agents of chaos" in the sense of random people who are influenced to do so, and that "others" are taken out be "special operations" in the sense of hit squads/assassins? Or that the agents of chaos are assassins, and "special ops" is high-tech beaming or something? Or does the use of the word "human" before agents imply that that the "special operations" are non-human?

With battlefield harvesting (hlat looks to TDARM) as has been laid out with possible underground reprograming, new 'prime' directives and social reintegration (their agents of chaos who act on a range of skill sets?), while also assuming there is methods to call upon them at will, which seems likely if so, this may fit the 3d 'human' type source and yet non-human from a TDARM harvested and retooled perspective?
 
Quick question on how people interpret the above. Are they saying that that scientists are mostly taken out "agents of chaos" in the sense of random people who are influenced to do so, and that "others" are taken out be "special operations" in the sense of hit squads/assassins? Or that the agents of chaos are assassins, and "special ops" is high-tech beaming or something? Or does the use of the word "human" before agents imply that that the "special operations" are non-human?
I'd tend to see it as the latter, that "human agents of chaos" are those WHO take out peoples in certain cases. The precision of "Mostly" letting the door open to the possibility of non-human intervention as well. "special operations" meaning that here there's a precise purpose to fulfill other than just 'random chaos'.
 
Back
Top Bottom