Session 10 December 2022

[irjO]

Quick question on how people interpret the above. Are they saying that that scientists are mostly taken out "agents of chaos" in the sense of random people who are influenced to do so, and that "others" are taken out be "special operations" in the sense of hit squads/assassins? Or that the agents of chaos are assassins, and "special ops" is high-tech beaming or something? Or does the use of the word "human" before agents imply that that the "special operations" are non-human?

Could be all of above, agent of chaos it’s kinda open, because to create chaos, there must be different type of personal or situations. In other words, agents of chaos could be personal who contribute to general chaos, we pretty much know that chaos can be generated because of false flag attacks, terror attacks, shootings etc. So we got federal agencies. Chaos can be also the result of “pandemics”, in that sense we got the WHO and CDC for example, so there could be agents from different “departments” who mission is contribute, generate or manipulate chaos.
I could be wrong with the interpretation also. But maybe it helps if you can look it that way!

 

[Natus Videre]

Quick question on how people interpret the above. Are they saying that that scientists are mostly taken out "agents of chaos" in the sense of random people who are influenced to do so, and that "others" are taken out be "special operations" in the sense of hit squads/assassins? Or that the agents of chaos are assassins, and "special ops" is high-tech beaming or something? Or does the use of the word "human" before agents imply that that the "special operations" are non-human?

I think the C's added "human" to "agents of chaos" to narrow down the possibilities, because the definition of "agent" (given in Session 11 January 1995) also includes 4D beings cloaking as 3D beings.

Q: (Frank) I don't think I'll repeat that Barry. (L) Did he use the "F" word? (Frank) No, he referred to a part of the anatomy. (Barry) Are Lizards shape shifters?
A: All on 4th level of density have that ability.

Q: (Barry) Do they have the ability to block their true appearance?
A: Yes.

Q: (Barry) Are they walking around amongst us now?
A: Infrequently, they use "agents" to do most of their tasks on 3rd level.

Q: (Barry) Are these agents the "Men in Black" or are they the "Grays?"
A: Both and many others. Men in Black are often Lizards cloaked as human types, and can remain on 3rd density level for limited periods called short wave cycle. Men in Black claim to be government in order to have excuse to have direct contact with selected humans.

Q: (Barry) Have these Men in Black killed humans?
A: No.

Q: (Frank) They just threaten?
A: Yes.

Q: (Barry) Have the Lizards killed humans?
A: Oh yes!!!

So I think "human agents of chaos" are humans who were ordered to assassinate or intimidate people using "standard" 3D techniques. The "special operations" would involve higher tech (memory reprogramming, soul sampling, implants, abductions, etc) used by alien types (possibly in collaboration with highly secretive human types to cover up the operation).

 

[daddycat]

Or does the use of the word "human" before agents imply that that the "special operations" are non-human?

I think yes, eg TDARM Missing 411.

 

[Voyageur]

Quick question on how people interpret the above. Are they saying that that scientists are mostly taken out "agents of chaos" in the sense of random people who are influenced to do so, and that "others" are taken out be "special operations" in the sense of hit squads/assassins? Or that the agents of chaos are assassins, and "special ops" is high-tech beaming or something? Or does the use of the word "human" before agents imply that that the "special operations" are non-human?

With battlefield harvesting (hlat looks to TDARM) as has been laid out with possible underground reprograming, new 'prime' directives and social reintegration (their agents of chaos who act on a range of skill sets?), while also assuming there is methods to call upon them at will, which seems likely if so, this may fit the 3d 'human' type source and yet non-human from a TDARM harvested and retooled perspective?

 

[Olivierlejardinier]

Quick question on how people interpret the above. Are they saying that that scientists are mostly taken out "agents of chaos" in the sense of random people who are influenced to do so, and that "others" are taken out be "special operations" in the sense of hit squads/assassins? Or that the agents of chaos are assassins, and "special ops" is high-tech beaming or something? Or does the use of the word "human" before agents imply that that the "special operations" are non-human?

I'd tend to see it as the latter, that "human agents of chaos" are those WHO take out peoples in certain cases. The precision of "Mostly" letting the door open to the possibility of non-human intervention as well. "special operations" meaning that here there's a precise purpose to fulfill other than just 'random chaos'.

 

[Ca.]

Hurricanes, Weather Modification and 4D Battles

July 4, 1998

cassiopaea.substack.com

July 3, 1999​

Q: (L) Speaking of magnetic surges, we have been in an apparently very high sunspot cycle. What noticeable effects, other than those commonly known, could these extreme numbers of sunspots be having on the planet or inhabitants?

A: Increased static electricity.

Q: (L) So, increased static can mean more electrical storms?

A: And other.

July 24, 1999​

Q: (L) What’s the deal with all the recent weather activity? These terribly unusual lightning storms?

A: Increased static electricity in atmosphere.

Q: (A) Is it only in our region or all over the planet?

A: Latter.

September 25, 1999​

Q: Now, there is an awful lot of weird stuff going on! There was the earthquake in Turkey; there was an earthquake in Taiwan; there were hurricanes; a fireball in Turkey; strange radar anomalies, as they call them. In fact, one of these circular things showed up on our local radar when the tropical storm was heading our way. Could you tell us what is behind all of these …

A: Well, first of all, it is true that some heavenly bodies transiting the solar system, such as some comets, do indeed interact electrically with the Sun and the planets. This does cause an increase in natural calamities, but this is not new.

Q: There is also a theory of Paul La Violette, that there is a wave that comes from explosions in the galactic core, and that this is what is behind this increased activity.

A: Such waves exist.

(Joe) If our twin sun is relatively soon to be visible, what's it gonna... be called? [laughter]

(L) You're worried about what it's going to be CALLED?! [laughter]

(Joe) No, I mean what are they gonna say about it? What would be the explanation for it? Are they gonna say it's a twin sun, or a comet, or... Maybe that's asking too much.

A: Probably will call it a giant comet or the flaring of same.

Q: (Andromeda) So what's it gonna look like?

A: Won't look like much to anyone but astronomers.

Q: (Pierre) I thought Nemesis was a brown dwarf? If it's a brown dwarf, it's unlike a giant comet... It's way dimmer.

A: Can ignite when connected to the circuit.

Q: (Niall) So there could be flaring. They won't be lying about that part.

(Pierre) And it'll look like a comet. A biggy.

This observation by Griffith Observatory, posted in 2021, doesn't necessarily represent The Big Kahuna but, at best does confirm that "They" are aware, as the session stated..

Giant Comet Bernardinelli Bernstein is Outgassing | All Space Considered | August 2021

Aug 20, 2021, Griffith Observatory

Region 3947 launches what looks to be an Earth-directed #solarstorm during an M4.8-flare! It is too early to tell without seeing coronagraph images, but the dimming regions around the eruption look promising (see the dark regions developing in the animation below). Stay tuned! pic.twitter.com/X6pAHfzdPq

— Dr. Tamitha Skov (@TamithaSkov) January 6, 2025

SpaceWeather.com -- News and information about meteor showers, solar flares, auroras, and near-Earth asteroids

CHANCE OF FLARES: Don't be surprised if there's an X-class solar flare today. Active sunspot AR3947 has a 'beta-gamma-delta' magnetic field that harbors energy for strong explosions. Indeed, it has already produced three X-flares since Jan. 3rd. NOAA estimates a 25% chance of another one today. Solar flare alerts: SMS Text.

https://www.lmsal.com/solarsoft/archive/sdo/media/ssw/ssw_client/data/ssw_service_250103_144836_41038/www/SSW_cutout_20250103T2227-20250103T2311_AIA_131-193-171_N11E59_ssw_cutout_20250103_222709_aia_171_N11E59_20250103_222709_m.mp4

 

[thorbiorn]

Animal behaviour
It was said in Session 10 January 2015 that when the fish in the example circled they created energy. But then there were the examples of circling birds insects, and animals in the video from this Session 10 December 2022, and the comment: "Same types of wave manipulation that is affecting humans. When such things happen, pay attention." Same types of wave manipulation, might be Very Low Frequency sounds, microwaves and so on, and if the behaviour is seemingly ultimately draining and self-destructive. Do some of the examples show animals that instinctively try to counteract the effect of manipulation, or are some circling examples the intended result of the manipulation and done for the sake of draining energy to 4D STS?

For context here is the excerpt from this session:
Different type of animals around the world walking in circles are appearing online. Why is that happening?
Session 10 December 2022

(irjO) Lately, a lot of videos of different type of animals around the world walking in circles are appearing online. Why is that happening?

A: Same types of wave manipulation that is affecting humans. When such things happen, pay attention.

Why do the fish go there to swim in a circle? - Generating energy.
Session 10 January 2015

(Galatea) On the David Attenborough documentary, he shows some fish swimming along a stream and just going around in circles. They don't do it to mate or to do anything else like feed. There's a mouse crawling up the wall behind that painting!

(Perceval) Spidermouse!

(Pierre) It's a channeling mouse.

(Galatea) So, they just swim in a circle and they have absolutely no idea why they do it. So, I was wondering why do the fish go there to swim in a circle?

A: Generating energy.

Q: (Galatea) Oh, so they generate energy. Interesting. So the fish are like witches.

Why do starlings flock and move in the way they do in apparent instantaneous communication? - Love
Session 23 March 2019

Thread 'Session 23 March 2019'

Mar 24, 2019

Session Date: March 23rd 2019

Laura, Andromeda, and Artemis at the board

Pierre, Joe, Chu, Ark, Gaby, PoB, Scottie, Niall, Princess Leia

Q: (L) Let us tomato! Today is March 23, 2019. [Review of those present] Alright...

A: Good evening children. Cassiopaea calling.

Q: (L) And do we have a name for vibratory frequency this evening?

A: Xyneaea.

Q: (L) I have some questions about shapes. The shapes that I have in mind are folded proteins. I was reading that proteins fold because of the order of the amino acids and how they're attached. These amino acid molecules or bits have little...

• Laura
• Replies: 384
• Forum: Cassiopaean Session Transcripts

• 
• 
• 

Q: (Joe) Why do starlings flock and move in the way they do in apparent instantaneous communication?

A: Love. Flowing and fluid movements are an expression of delight in life.

Q: (L) I would say that that doesn't mean in general, but...

A: Not always, but generally, yes.

There is much that is strange about the 2D world, here is another:

Creatures can act as hosts or receptacles for "spirit entities".
Session 30 August 2014

Q: (Treesparrow) What's the cause or causes behind the recent rise in strange and abnormal animal behavior?

(L) Okay, that's a good one.

(Andromeda) Yeah!

A: EM frequency changes affecting DNA and neurochemistry. Also these factors can affect spiritual factors in the animal kingdom. One additional note is advised: Creatures can act as hosts or receptacles for "spirit entities".

Q: (L) So, if there's a demon out there that has it in for somebody, they can use an animal to attack that person. Is that kind of it?

A: Close.

Q: (Pierre) Castaneda talked about that.

(L) He did?

(Pierre) Yeah, he talked about "special animals" that had special spirits.

(Perceval) Is that particularly strong at this time because of the EM frequency changes affecting DNA?

A: Yes.

Q: (Perceval) So certain spirits can get a certain hold because the DNA is evolving maybe.

(L) Chupacabras, yes!

Is it possible that some of the animals that circle are a bit entity influenced, including a reaction to protext against such?