Session 10 December 2022

Quick question on how people interpret the above. Are they saying that that scientists are mostly taken out "agents of chaos" in the sense of random people who are influenced to do so, and that "others" are taken out be "special operations" in the sense of hit squads/assassins? Or that the agents of chaos are assassins, and "special ops" is high-tech beaming or something? Or does the use of the word "human" before agents imply that that the "special operations" are non-human?
Could be all of above, agent of chaos it’s kinda open, because to create chaos, there must be different type of personal or situations. In other words, agents of chaos could be personal who contribute to general chaos, we pretty much know that chaos can be generated because of false flag attacks, terror attacks, shootings etc. So we got federal agencies. Chaos can be also the result of “pandemics”, in that sense we got the WHO and CDC for example, so there could be agents from different “departments” who mission is contribute, generate or manipulate chaos.
I could be wrong with the interpretation also. But maybe it helps if you can look it that way!
 
Quick question on how people interpret the above. Are they saying that that scientists are mostly taken out "agents of chaos" in the sense of random people who are influenced to do so, and that "others" are taken out be "special operations" in the sense of hit squads/assassins? Or that the agents of chaos are assassins, and "special ops" is high-tech beaming or something? Or does the use of the word "human" before agents imply that that the "special operations" are non-human?
I think the C's added "human" to "agents of chaos" to narrow down the possibilities, because the definition of "agent" (given in Session 11 January 1995) also includes 4D beings cloaking as 3D beings.
Q: (Frank) I don't think I'll repeat that Barry. (L) Did he use the "F" word? (Frank) No, he referred to a part of the anatomy. (Barry) Are Lizards shape shifters?
A: All on 4th level of density have that ability.

Q: (Barry) Do they have the ability to block their true appearance?
A: Yes.

Q: (Barry) Are they walking around amongst us now?
A: Infrequently, they use "agents" to do most of their tasks on 3rd level.

Q: (Barry) Are these agents the "Men in Black" or are they the "Grays?"
A: Both and many others. Men in Black are often Lizards cloaked as human types, and can remain on 3rd density level for limited periods called short wave cycle. Men in Black claim to be government in order to have excuse to have direct contact with selected humans.

Q: (Barry) Have these Men in Black killed humans?
A: No.

Q: (Frank) They just threaten?
A: Yes.

Q: (Barry) Have the Lizards killed humans?
A: Oh yes!!!
So I think "human agents of chaos" are humans who were ordered to assassinate or intimidate people using "standard" 3D techniques. The "special operations" would involve higher tech (memory reprogramming, soul sampling, implants, abductions, etc) used by alien types (possibly in collaboration with highly secretive human types to cover up the operation).
 
Quick question on how people interpret the above. Are they saying that that scientists are mostly taken out "agents of chaos" in the sense of random people who are influenced to do so, and that "others" are taken out be "special operations" in the sense of hit squads/assassins? Or that the agents of chaos are assassins, and "special ops" is high-tech beaming or something? Or does the use of the word "human" before agents imply that that the "special operations" are non-human?

With battlefield harvesting (hlat looks to TDARM) as has been laid out with possible underground reprograming, new 'prime' directives and social reintegration (their agents of chaos who act on a range of skill sets?), while also assuming there is methods to call upon them at will, which seems likely if so, this may fit the 3d 'human' type source and yet non-human from a TDARM harvested and retooled perspective?
 
Quick question on how people interpret the above. Are they saying that that scientists are mostly taken out "agents of chaos" in the sense of random people who are influenced to do so, and that "others" are taken out be "special operations" in the sense of hit squads/assassins? Or that the agents of chaos are assassins, and "special ops" is high-tech beaming or something? Or does the use of the word "human" before agents imply that that the "special operations" are non-human?
I'd tend to see it as the latter, that "human agents of chaos" are those WHO take out peoples in certain cases. The precision of "Mostly" letting the door open to the possibility of non-human intervention as well. "special operations" meaning that here there's a precise purpose to fulfill other than just 'random chaos'.
 

July 3, 1999​

Q: (L) Speaking of magnetic surges, we have been in an apparently very high sunspot cycle. What noticeable effects, other than those commonly known, could these extreme numbers of sunspots be having on the planet or inhabitants?

A: Increased static electricity.

Q: (L) So, increased static can mean more electrical storms?

A: And other.

July 24, 1999​

Q: (L) What’s the deal with all the recent weather activity? These terribly unusual lightning storms?

A: Increased static electricity in atmosphere.

Q: (A) Is it only in our region or all over the planet?

A: Latter.

September 25, 1999​

Q: Now, there is an awful lot of weird stuff going on! There was the earthquake in Turkey; there was an earthquake in Taiwan; there were hurricanes; a fireball in Turkey; strange radar anomalies, as they call them. In fact, one of these circular things showed up on our local radar when the tropical storm was heading our way. Could you tell us what is behind all of these …

A: Well, first of all, it is true that some heavenly bodies transiting the solar system, such as some comets, do indeed interact electrically with the Sun and the planets. This does cause an increase in natural calamities, but this is not new.

Q: There is also a theory of Paul La Violette, that there is a wave that comes from explosions in the galactic core, and that this is what is behind this increased activity.

A: Such waves exist.
(Joe) If our twin sun is relatively soon to be visible, what's it gonna... be called? [laughter]

(L) You're worried about what it's going to be CALLED?! [laughter]

(Joe) No, I mean what are they gonna say about it? What would be the explanation for it? Are they gonna say it's a twin sun, or a comet, or... Maybe that's asking too much.

A: Probably will call it a giant comet or the flaring of same.


Q: (Andromeda) So what's it gonna look like?

A: Won't look like much to anyone but astronomers.

Q: (Pierre) I thought Nemesis was a brown dwarf? If it's a brown dwarf, it's unlike a giant comet... It's way dimmer.

A: Can ignite when connected to the circuit.

Q: (Niall) So there could be flaring. They won't be lying about that part.

(Pierre) And it'll look like a comet. A biggy.

This observation by Griffith Observatory, posted in 2021, doesn't necessarily represent The Big Kahuna but, at best does confirm that "They" are aware, as the session stated..

Giant Comet Bernardinelli Bernstein is Outgassing | All Space Considered | August 2021
Aug 20, 2021, Griffith Observatory


CHANCE OF FLARES: Don't be surprised if there's an X-class solar flare today. Active sunspot AR3947 has a 'beta-gamma-delta' magnetic field that harbors energy for strong explosions. Indeed, it has already produced three X-flares since Jan. 3rd. NOAA estimates a 25% chance of another one today. Solar flare alerts: SMS Text.

 
Back
Top Bottom