Session 11 June 2011
- Thread starter Laura
- Start date
That dang D'Adamo and his "type A = Vegetarian" thing really messed with me for a while.
Interesting session, thanks for posting!
I had a conversation yesterday discussing people who follow strict, adherent guidelines to timeframes without care or concerns for reasonings if one is unable to meet those timeframes. 'If you're supposed to be here at 9:00, you better be here at 9:00, no matter what excuses you have' And we were thinking that this is a case of an authoritarian personality as well. They doggedly follow rules without an ability to adapt to changing circumstances.
No flexibility in their behaviour, just very rigid. These are the rules, and we have to abide by them come hell or high water.
The militant vegans seem exactly the same. 'This is it, and you can't argue or go against it'. Which is kind of odd, because some of them are very into spirituality, meditation, all that stuff, yet there may be a good chance they are OP's. Although they could be approaching it from a superficial standpoint.
I think this is saying Gandhi was an OP, comparing him to human cattle, that he "cares" about. Which is surprising to me!
I had a conversation yesterday discussing people who follow strict, adherent guidelines to timeframes without care or concerns for reasonings if one is unable to meet those timeframes. 'If you're supposed to be here at 9:00, you better be here at 9:00, no matter what excuses you have' And we were thinking that this is a case of an authoritarian personality as well. They doggedly follow rules without an ability to adapt to changing circumstances.
No flexibility in their behaviour, just very rigid. These are the rules, and we have to abide by them come hell or high water.
The militant vegans seem exactly the same. 'This is it, and you can't argue or go against it'. Which is kind of odd, because some of them are very into spirituality, meditation, all that stuff, yet there may be a good chance they are OP's. Although they could be approaching it from a superficial standpoint.
moksha said:
I think this is saying Gandhi was an OP, comparing him to human cattle, that he "cares" about. Which is surprising to me!
OneSoul
Padawan Learner
Holy DCM!
Well, anyway, thank you again, Laura and everyone, for your session and posting this transcript so quickly.
Your conversation about meats and on having them as part of our diet really struck home. Here's something that happened to me a couple of years ago:
I had been back and forth for a while with the whole idea about eating pork, usually having some only occasionally though I'd have other meats, and seafood too. Then one day I read that something like 98% of the genes of pigs is shared with human beings. Oh, that's it I thought, no more pork for me, yuck. I stayed away from pork for some time, then after a bit longer I tried it again when the horror of that thought had faded a little. Guess I'd worked out some measure of that same thought as in your conversation on the weekend but not to the extent your session revealed.
And just as an aside, I always enjoy reading, and re-reading, those sections of the transcripts where the C's answer "Yes, precisely!" like in your excerpt from October, 1995, Laura. Those exchanges greatly help in getting an understanding of the realities and concepts the C's are leading you toward.
Well, anyway, thank you again, Laura and everyone, for your session and posting this transcript so quickly.
Your conversation about meats and on having them as part of our diet really struck home. Here's something that happened to me a couple of years ago:
I had been back and forth for a while with the whole idea about eating pork, usually having some only occasionally though I'd have other meats, and seafood too. Then one day I read that something like 98% of the genes of pigs is shared with human beings. Oh, that's it I thought, no more pork for me, yuck. I stayed away from pork for some time, then after a bit longer I tried it again when the horror of that thought had faded a little. Guess I'd worked out some measure of that same thought as in your conversation on the weekend but not to the extent your session revealed.
And just as an aside, I always enjoy reading, and re-reading, those sections of the transcripts where the C's answer "Yes, precisely!" like in your excerpt from October, 1995, Laura. Those exchanges greatly help in getting an understanding of the realities and concepts the C's are leading you toward.
Laura said:
Thanks for sharing session.
That is curious because I'm too nearly too "vomiting" and was wondering why because detox + diet is On then I have no idea why my organism was vomiting.
felling as "usually" "bad thinks" and fell as a piece of *@#@ with energy.
I must thank you all FOTCM and Laura for that you ARE THERE and showing good way of life.
Because sometimes it is hard to know that "mass" people are just so blind.
Mrs.Tigersoap
The Living Force
Thank you everyone for this session which is, as usual, very very informative!
Nienna Eluch said:
The body is a machine, a very intelligent machine. It just needs some fuel to operate in this reality.
You believe you know how the body works and what it needs. You think you know what is good for the body. It might just be an idea, a concept that the body is not interested in. Your ideas could prevent the body of living here sanely and intelligently in a way it knows best.
Thank you for welcoming me. I read most of the info here. I don't know if it is allowed to disagree with some things. I don't want to be rude or convince you.
StandingOnTheEdge
Padawan Learner
Not only am I deeply grateful for your session, but it is an exquisite example of critical thinking and the path toward truth. Asking such evocative questions and then receiving such sensitive and loving replies by the C's really touched my heart in a deep way. It is an example of teaching that I aspire to, and I hope I can learn to exchange information in a similar manner while in my day to day world.
Thank you!
Thank you!
dant
The Living Force
This session adds another level of understanding, the
checking, testing, and handling of the "dead-dudes"
who hover about, until the channel becomes properly
grooved!
Thank you for this session, as with all of the sessions
given thus far. Every session has been full of meaning,
and may bring about great understandings, especially
for those who do the work!
checking, testing, and handling of the "dead-dudes"
who hover about, until the channel becomes properly
grooved!
Thank you for this session, as with all of the sessions
given thus far. Every session has been full of meaning,
and may bring about great understandings, especially
for those who do the work!
Caveo said:
You are allowed to disagree with anything you like here, just as long as you provide some data to back up your position or at least try to present a fairly rational hypothesis that doesn't fly in the face of the available objective data.
