Starshine said:
The fact that it was rigged was blatantly sure but 29% for Asselineau ?
I do not know if this is correct (regarding results) but there is no 100% accurate channeling. And the goal is not to leave our minds, to throw our brains and as children to depend on the Cassiopaeans. The goal is to grow, develop.
So, regard to things that are not clear, I advise to wait until they become clear.
If Ra and Cassiopaean material have a high percentage of accuracy, this is still not 100%. And even if it is, it is impossible to explain the full truth. We need to use it as a stimulus for research and the idea.
"...since the Ra material is considered to be a kind of primer to the Cassiopaean material, could you give us a percentage on the accuracy of this material?
A: 63 "
https://cassiopaea.org/forum/index.php/topic,34941.msg496949.html#msg496949
Q: (L) What is the percentage of accuracy of the information given in the Vedas? Overall?
A: Accurate at what level?
Q: (L) Third Density.
A: Accurate to what extent and in what way?
Q: (L) Well, in a general sense, as a way of living one's life and perceiving the universe.
A: That's an extremely difficult question to answer as accuracy in determining such things as perceiving the universe and living one's life is entirely open to interpretation as anyone can resolve accuracy by relating to the parallel universe which is appropriate for the information given. And, as we have stated in the past, it is possible to create parallel universes through thought energy, and once they are created naturally, they correspond naturally to the interpretation given for them.
https://cassiopaea.org/forum/index.php/topic,34875.msg495806.html#msg495806
Q: (L) I would like to address the issue of accuracy. How can we increase or determine or work on accuracy?
A: Accuracy is 3rd level concept.
Q: (L) Well, you do understand that at this level we determine whether information is correct or good by whether it happens or comes true, particularly in terms of prognostications.
A: Yes.
Q: (L) And if a source misses on a prognostication, very often people lose faith in that source. Is that an unrealistic expectation?
A: Yes.
Q: (L) Is that because accuracy is an impossible task because of variability of reality?
A: If it were possible there would be no existence. The universe is nothing more than a learning laboratory.
https://cassiopaea.org/forum/index.php/topic,28382.msg353162.html#msg353162
As for the hope that the world will change this way or the other, it is childish. We will soon die. We will not be here for long. It is in essence irrelevant what will be with Earth. It will be what it should be. And we'll go further. We are what we are. The sun shines and throws light at all: from flower to feces. So, whatever will be, we should be what we want to be. There is no happy ending. But the journey continues.