Yes Goyacobol, I didn't find it wisely to respond to their writings, what should I write to them on that? I didn't understood that it is important to respond at every post, as my writings and questions usually get unnoticed and no one ever give any remarks for years, unless someone figure out some "emotinal" "tone" that in them build a needs to be analyzed by the networking ... but this my posts on other places and all that, it is relaly not at all topic for Dyonisius syndrome and this session, so I feel uncomfortable to use space here to disrupt flow of networking on that subject, and I am glad to folow and read others remarks on that subjects .. quite interesting, though! and if my post disrupted that, it wasn't my intention at all, and I am sorry for that ... and good morning to all .... and have a nice weekend ... :)
solarmind,
Thanks for sharing your thoughts in more detail. I guess this illustrates how difficult "networking" can be. This is kind of like texting on steroids I think. Even texting between friends gets misconstrued sometimes and causes problems that are not usually intended. I almost didn't respond to your post here on Dionysius with the music. If it was not for reading the HDT book and seeing some of my own programs developed at an early age I would have just kept my thoughts to myself.
At least now I know you have been thinking about how to respond but are still not sure what that means. Since there are other opinions already expressed I will not try to speak for those posters I mentioned. I find many of your posts interesting and maybe that is partly why I wanted to understand more.