bjorn said:I mean, let's also consider the possible upcoming economic depression in this picture. I never saw Hillary capable of directing all that anger and hate away from their ivory towers. (Status Quo) And many people will be angry when they lose their jobs, income, pensions, pride etc
Trump with his rallies and inciting violence always seemed like the perfect guy to direct all that anger and hate. Blame the immigrants, blame Muslims. Blame whatever. (We all know who will get the blame if those nukes go off)
No matter how how you look at it, he has proven to be the man capable of carrying and directing all that hate.
I think that full totalitarianism and fascism was always on the agenda for the USA. Maybe it's the right time to usher it in?
Lots of folks are definitely angry on the establishment, the PTB just have to direct that anger away from the Establishment by someone who is supposedly their Anti-Establishment warrior while he blames immigrants and Muslims for everything.
Divide By Zero said:First of all, thanks for the session!
PerfectCircle said:Anybody has idea how could tattoos attract entities?
It's probably the energetic signature of the symbol the tattoo is showing, i.e. what does the image represent, which would then somehow attract corresponding 'critters'.
Divide by Zero said:I was also thinking that tattoos create a psychological feedback loop. Let's say you have a highly visible tattoo. In interacting with people, they might act differently towards you, which makes you act different (as we are social beings). In turn your personality fits how you were treated.
It's just that using the terms entities, etc, seem too hard to verify and might be some sort of C's codeword for subconscious programs.
Turgon said:And it's the first time I've seen something like that in American politics. So it's setting a precedence for something. And is that opening the door to accepted overt fascism in the States. It seems like Trump was allowed to enter the Republican race as a sideshow and that him winning surprised everyone. Was that, at some level by design? He was already a popular figure and the American public worship celebrities. So he would have a distinct advantage over any other candidate simply because of that. As Franklin Roosevelt said "In politics, nothing happens by accident. If it happens, you can bet it was planned that way." Although that might be giving too much credit to the PTB.
bjorn said:<snip>
I mean, the way how the MSM has been treating Trump is just ridiculous. And especially their censorhip on Hillary. In fact, if they really wanted Hillary as president. How come most of what they did seemed counterproductive? They only made Trump more popular through their way of biased reporting. Or so I think.
NSA whistleblower says DNC hack was not done by Russia, but by U.S. intelligence
On Aaron Klein’s Sunday radio program, “Aaron Klein Investigative Radio” (broadcast on New York’s AM 970 The Answer and Philadelphia’s NewsTalk 990 AM), US government whistleblower William Binney threw his hat into the DNC hack ring by stating that the Democratic National Committee’s server was not hacked by Russia but by a disgruntled U.S. intelligence worker.
The motivation of the hacker…concern over Hillary Clinton’s disregard of national security secrets when she used a personal email and consistently lied about it.
Binney was just getting started with revelations we are sure no mainstream media news site will dare to cover. The “Putin did it” fairytale is just too easy for the sheep to follow.
Binney also proclaimed that the NSA has all of Clinton’s deleted emails, and the FBI could gain access to them if they so wished. No need for Trump to ask the Russians for those emails, he can just call on the FBI or NSA to hand them over.
~melissa said:Cipro! I hope you've gotten off it - or that you can, soon. You can youtube pages of dramatic testimonials out there. For one thing, it does something to the liver that makes it amplify the effect of caffiene, I heard by tenfold -and then the half-life gets extended way out there, too.
Also - fluoroquinolone! Another fluoride!
It is black-boxed for attacking joints & tendons
http://medlibrary.org/lib/rx/meds/ciprofloxacin-46
And, apparently a person's joints & tendons are at risk for ~year after you take it. I repeatedly re-injured an MCL that had actually healed up before I went down that dastardly road. I was prescribed a 10-day course but felt terribly off (as those three cups of coffee turned into 30!) and stopped day 2. I just couldn't believe my doctor didn't even mention that to me.
So go with great care...pretty sure that forays into paleo, fasting, mineral supplementation & iodine/boron/selenium have bolstered healing response.
Richard S said:Divide By Zero said:First of all, thanks for the session!
PerfectCircle said:Anybody has idea how could tattoos attract entities?
It's probably the energetic signature of the symbol the tattoo is showing, i.e. what does the image represent, which would then somehow attract corresponding 'critters'.
Divide by Zero said:I was also thinking that tattoos create a psychological feedback loop. Let's say you have a highly visible tattoo. In interacting with people, they might act differently towards you, which makes you act different (as we are social beings). In turn your personality fits how you were treated.
Since there are lots of reasons people get tattoos and also lots of possible interactions with other people because of these tattoos, this idea may be relevant in many cases. It does not answer the question which was asked, which was "how could tattoos attract entities?"
It's just that using the terms entities, etc, seem too hard to verify and might be some sort of C's codeword for subconscious programs.
We have been told that the Spirit World is a Jungle. That it contains dangers that make our Earthly jungles pale in comparison. Why would the C's be using 'codewords' for subconscious programs when they could simply tell us it is that? For sure, it is pretty difficult to 'verify' that there are indeed malignant entities in the Spirit World, and of course, the materialist view is that such things are totally impossible. In the materialist view of the world the C's themselves are impossible. Yet, we get messages from them, and they tell us there are many things we can not usually see or be aware of.
Granted, there is no "proof" of the existence of 'entities', but most of us here are keeping an open mind regarding things like this.
Javi said:Thanks so much for this new session :)
I wish that Laura leg recovers completely.
On the subject of tattoos: I always had an intuitive strong rejection to the idea of accepting a tattoo in my body. It was a feeling of that I exposed to a danger or something that violates my being if I accept that.
After analyzing this intuition in my mind I came to the following conclusion:
firstly, if someone accepts a permanent mark himself he is violating his own freewill in the future. Even if he is applying his present freewill, he are denying his future freedom to remove tattoo and all it represents. Move to be a slave of the subject that represents the tattoo. In second place, a tattoo is the result of not accept and love his own body as is, as the expression more pure possible in the physical world of his own soul. By what means denying himself and accept permanently a brand, and the energy that the brand represents, to invade his own being and submit to it, at least in the specific aspect that represents the tattoo.
While tattoos fashion has been sold as an expression of freedom, I rather see it as a denial of self freedom.
It would can explain why tattoos can anchor attachments.
Yeah. I learned that too late. My legs are now so fragile I have to walk with two canes and extreme care. And yes I am totally engaged in detoxing the stuff. The hamstring injury seems to be healed, but the lower extremities are definitely not in a good state and I have to be super careful to not injure something else or re-injure!
mkrnhr said:The information about the mismatch of energy profiles is intriguing. It has been discussed within the framework of a 2D creature living closely with humans making "progress". I wonder whether it may be extended to people to a certain extent.
Javi said:firstly, if someone accepts a permanent mark himself he is violating his own freewill in the future. Even if he is applying his present freewill, he are denying his future freedom to remove tattoo and all it represents. Move to be a slave of the subject that represents the tattoo. In second place, a tattoo is the result of not accept and love his own body as is, as the expression more pure possible in the physical world of his own soul. By what means denying himself and accept permanently a brand, and the energy that the brand represents, to invade his own being and submit to it, at least in the specific aspect that represents the tattoo.
While tattoos fashion has been sold as an expression of freedom, I rather see it as a denial of self freedom.
It would can explain why tattoos can anchor attachments.