I picked the very first one on purpose.
I think the terms "time-travel" / time-traveler
versus
timeline-travel / timeline-traveler should be maybe distinguished.
I don't really care about personal questions. In case in the future they become available for me.
What I do care about however is that I remember, what is now missing from the sessions
rectroactively. Someone capable of full reality edits made sure certain C's communications are no more. Convenient excuse: "Mandala effect", poor memory, memory degradation with age. Yeah.. nope.
I made several copies of sessions in the past 20 some years onto my computer.
After I realized with anger and shock that session-parts were
edited out of reality: (and before realizing it as well) I scoured the internet for any available recordings of sessions in any available format in previous decades. Saved them meticulously. To check if the missing parts that I remember, were there. Nope. In any copies on my computer or on the net - including those session sources not published on this forum, all the specific session parts - that I remember were communicated in the old timelines I'm coming from - are now missing from these newer series of realities / current timelines.
1. I already reported that the Israel-line was magically GONE missing from the sessions:
A: Total destruction cannot come fast enough for Israel!!
Note the multiple exclamation marks.
2. In my old timelines I'm coming from the C's never communicated that they were Gang-Inhabiting a human body. Ever. In these timelines they did.
3. Gene Rodenberry was written with a single "d" in my old timeline. I'm not sure. Lots of famous names have been changed - letter garbled - in these newer timelines. The Bruce Lee movie scene at the airport, where he squats on top of the English toilet seat was changed as well.
4. Now, today reading all the newest sessions' posts, I suddenly got the idea to check for
the candy answer. The candy answer is missing as well:
A: Don't you like candy?
Context: Before Laura traveling to (IIRC the Russian clinic?), - or was there an other Southern European destination? - the travel was planned IIRC to be made in a van. Because Laura was in a lot of pain. Therefore the most comfortable travel could be made in a spacey van. Not in a small car.
Through the countries, south of Hungary. I was in email exchanges with Ark that time, about how he called it "philosophy of physics". There was a question, IIRC Ark asked during that session - IIRC before the Laura & Team travel, if the van can make a detour to Hungary. To meet. Loose quote from memory:
- I don't think we can make it..
So it was decided the van won't make a detour to Hungary. To which the C's communicated:
A: Don't you like candy?
I remember that THEN I looked up the word from the C's answer. Just to make sure:
Like sugar, the term “candy” is far more common in the United States than elsewhere. The word can mean something admirable or desirable. It can refer to money or someone seen as “sweet,” with or without sexual overtones.
Then, with one of my previous forum names (forge) - at the time - I made a short post, where I thanked that my question was asked and I remember putting at the end there either the flower smiley
or the shy face smiley:
Then upon my post, Anart got angry with disbelief and laughed and remarked:
- You??! Your question? Never!
How dare I think it was my question I asked from Ark and then he brought it up during the session. My question was regards
Project C. First post's last paragraph. Doesn't matter really, I just provided the
context, which is always important during "memory-excavations".
That above sentence is now also completely missing from the sessions. Any sessions. Including the unofficial, countermanded ones. I don't care about withheld names, nor privacy, since it wasn't the reason: I solely gathered those unofficially sourced sessions to check for the missing C's communications. I remember
reading those missing lines - that the C's have communicated here on the forum
in the old timelines and
these lines were very much present on the site here and in my backups and some lines must have been there even in the old unofficial session transcripts I got from the net.
In these new timelines those old C's communications have been completely CUT OUT. Missing. As if never have been there.
So obviously this creates free-will issues, I can think about the 'Two Hats Phenomenon'. How far the Lizzies can go.
In the old timelines, where I'm coming from, these session lines very much existed on the official server and in the internet archives. I stated multiple times the Israel line was burned into my brain. I was very energized by it during the years that followed its first communication by the C's and I used it couple times in other forums. I was carrying that original Israel line, like a heroic war flag raised high.
5. There were NO NAZI BELL UFOs. There were some simple saucer UFOs (Haunebu class), the "stealth bomber" design the USA MIC copied, the V2 and that's it. In the old timelines.
There were certainly not as many myriad of Nazi UFO designs plus the ridiculous "Nazi Bell UFO" that you can find present in these newer realities / timelines nowadays.
Again, only the missing lines matter here. As an only issue.
I'll ask these, if personal questions become available for me in a future, where I can and do certainly want / aim to pay back with money the precious energy of the channeler team spent on doing, transcribing and publishing the sessions.
If for reasons of personal safety, if the answer would endager the channeling team, I accept the answer as stated directly:
- Cannot comment for safety reasons of present parties involved.
Or something similar, clearly worded.
I'll accept asking it in the section of non-publicized "private questions", meaning NDA, never to mention it publicly as well.
I just need to hear, what the C's say about these missing communications: Obviously I'll want for more than semi", "maybe", "none of your business!" or something similarly dismissive.
I want the reason for these reality edits. Out of the C's mouth with their own wording.
