That was a fascinating session, thank you for sharing it and getting it up so quickly!
So in the year ahead it seems we shall have: famine, plague, and a real intensification of the Nazi Experiment, Run Two. While at the same time experiencing an increasing frequency of catastrophic events (earthquakes, meteor showers), and Fortean phenomena. Well ... they've been warning us about this for years, haven't they? :P
When the C's made reference to a 'Shining 5th Density City Upon the Hill' ... 5th density (if I understand correctly) is essentially the afterlife, or perhaps better the interlife, the point of review and contemplation upon the previous life, in light of all previous lives, and the selection of the subsequent life. But basically it's where you go when you die. The City upon the hill typically refers to America.
What happens if America destroys itself? If the state and corporate apparatus, and the psychopathic elite that have created them, in the end go to such extremes in their pursuit of power that they end up wiping out most of the American populace, by in essence turning the populace upon itself? The sheer, towering terror of this memory would make the Nazi holocaust pale in comparison as a thin prelude to something almost infinitely worse. It would stand as an example to the rest of human history of what happens when an ideology of pure self-interest is made the core guiding philosophy of a civilization: inevitable self-destruction as the incidence of psychopathy in the population increases beyond tolerable levels.
That's just from a cultural standpoint ... from an esoteric standpoint, that is a lot of souls heading back to 5th density that will have gone through some extraordinarily traumatic events during their lives. Perhaps this would serve as a profound lesson to them, in a positive sense, one they would take with them into the next incarnation? Or maybe that's just wishful thinking and the only effect of the trauma would be to warp them further....
Q: (Perceval) They said electrical charge... (L) Then you can't tell that a charge is different from anything... (Perceval) What we heard in the office was coming from the computer amp, but... (Mr. Scott) Well, but it's like if you measure the voltage between something and the earth, if the charge of both is increased, the voltage will be the same but the total charge on both can be much higher. But you can't tell because you're using a device that can only measure the difference between two points. (L) Belibaste, what's your question about the companion star grounding that you mentioned earlier? (Belibaste) In a previous session, it was said that the companion star coming closer induced a grounding of the sun. I simply wanted to know more precisely how this grounding occurs. For example, is there some kind of electric connection between the sun and the companion star, and if so, which kind of current transits between those two celestial bodies?
A: Indeed, but that occurs "outside" the system.
Q: (Belibaste) That's what you said, Ark. That it's a kind of wormhole...
A: Wormhole is good!
Q: (Belibaste) At the level of the sun, can we say that the reason for this grounding is the reduced positive overall charge?
A: Yes.
Q: (Belibaste) Okay, this reduced positive charge induces a reduced field that increases gravity?
A: Yes.
Q: (Belibaste) And this increase in gravity explains why there are less solar winds expelled from the sun although there is increased cometary activity?
A: Yes.
I'm particularly glad you asked about this topic. This concept of a connection between electric charge and gravity is a fascinating one ... now why should a reduced positive charge increase gravity? And is this something that could be measured? BTW, I believe Clif High has been talking a bit about the planet expanding/growing and gravity increasing as a result, although he is likely IMO to be exaggerating the magnitude of the effect (something he seems to do a lot, perhaps because - as he admits - he tunes the web bots to be biased towards language with high 'emotional sums') ... something along those lines is turning up in the web bot data too, I suspect. So this is very interesting.
Back to the electrical Sun and its companion ... what is this about a wormhole? Ark, could you expand on that idea? Are we talking like an actual, relativistic wormhole connecting the two bodies? Where would it be located? In their cores, or elsewhere?
When the C's answered, "Indeed, but that occurs "outside" the system.", my first reaction was to envision the solar current system as a component of the Galactic system. There is the solar current sheet, which connects the planets, but there are also (according to e.g. Donald Scott) polar currents (which we astronomers call 'jets' when they can be detected), which form a more direct connection between a star and the external electrical environment. Positive charge flows out along the current sheet, and in through the poles: we might suppose that in general this process is in equilibrium, such that the Sun (more or less) maintains its mass.
Now, the planets within the system are connected only to the solar current system: their connection to the Galaxy is through the Sun. Nemesis however, being (for most of its orbit at least) extremely distant from the Sun, and very likely outside the heliosphere, may well for that reason have an independent connection of its own to the Galaxy, it's own equatorial/polar current sheet/column system. Perhaps the close approach of this competing star drains away some charge from the Galactic current(s) upon which the Sun feeds, hence causing a depletion of positive charge within the Sun and the heliosphere. Somehow, from this effect, we must obtain an increase in gravity.