Yeah, I'm starting to think that maybe all of these ancient megaliths can be understood as glorified radios. You dial the right number and you can talk to your buddies on Mars or get some cosmic 'room service' delivered right to your door. There are more sinister options, like calling in a hyperdimensional hit man, or eavesdropping on your enemies. Maybe the structures were also chambers for inducing possession of participants in ritual, or enabling a sort of wire-transfer of negative emotions more directly to 4D STS bank account.
I think that in some cases, human beings were the 'living batteries' required by the radio to function, for good or evil. Other structures may have used natural energetic forces for the same task, more like a hydroelectric dam that captures the flow of a river. On that note, I read this article a while back, and posted about it before, so this is basically a re-post.
Durrington Shafts: Is Britain’s Largest Prehistoric Monument a Sonic Temple?
The recent discovery of an enormous ring of cylinder-like pits, each approximately five meters deep and 10 meters in diameter (16.5 by 33 ft), found to surround the henge enclosure of Durrington Walls in southern Englandwww.ancient-origins.net
The article indicates that Stonehenge isn't a stand-alone structure. The nuclear power plants of today include many outbuildings, and also lines of energy transmission - in other words, a whole organization of outlying infrastructure.
Stonehenge seems to be a smaller adjunct feature of a much, much larger neolithic structure. This structure is still in the process of discovery. So far it looks like an arrangement that consists of Durrington Walls, Durrington Shafts, Woodhenge, and Stonehenge. I don't know if they were all standing at the same time, tho. Who knows what else will be unearthed.
The article details the precise geometric layout of the imperfect 'D' circle, with Stonehenge places just so at 63 degrees. It is alleged that the builders of these monuments were the Grooved Ware culture.
About the shafts themselves:
These shafts may give an indication as to why the Hyperboreans may have been known as the 'Sons of the North Wind'.
The notion of old stones being sonic temples is not new:
The article ends with a discussion of the number 144, and the Schumann resonance.
So 144 is mentioned throughout this article. It's one of those Platonic sacred geometry numbers. Randall Carlson describes sacred geometry as the symbolic language of the universe. Each of the Platonic numbers has a whole collection of phenomena associated with it, expressed in measurements of space, time, the architecture of the solar system, etc. The precise design of many Megaliths are also a similar 'zone of application' of the symbolic language of the cosmos. In other words, the megaliths are symbolic locators that transduce directly from the cosmic information field. Kinda like how reiki symbols work - with the correct symbols, the energy flows. It's one heck of a radio.
There's this from the sessions about 144:
The Biblical 'new song' mentioned in the context of 144 is interesting when considering the claim that Stonehenge was a sonic wind temple. In Comets and the Horns of Moses, there are links between VLF or very low frequencies, DNA changes, shamanic transformation, subliminal emotional states, etc.
In CatHom, there's also some history:
So that sounds like channeling. Also in CatHom, there's a quote from Hecateus about the name of the Hyperboreans:
And finally:
There is also mention of the number 144 in Revelations 21.
So the measure of a man is equated with something angelic so long as the length and breadth of his city are equal. A lot could be read into that, IMO. Angels are known as messengers, and so my best guess is that there is something very real about the proper utilization of the symbolic language of the cosmos via geometric arrangements. Maybe we could say that this 144 thing functions to call in blessings. But then there is also the masquerade of angels, or demons appearing as beings of light. It's all very murky
If the Durrington shafts were designed as Frequency Resonance Generators, as claimed by the article - earthen sonic instruments that were designed to 'sing' as the winds of the area moved over them - then this may indicate the reality behind the name of the Hyperboreans, the Sons of the North Wind.
Did they set up a 'hydroelectric dam' to catch the energy of the wind - and maybe send this energy to Stonehenge for transmission, giving themselves a nice buzz in the process?
That was a very interesting article by Andrew Collins. Thank you for reposting it. Collins has come in for criticism on this Forum for some of his theories and the conclusions he draws from data, but he is a good researcher like Graham Hancock and his research is very useful.
I see the article had input from his friend and former colleague Graham Phillips (they once edited and published a magazine called Strange Phenomena together). I have been reading some of their back catalogue recently and I can tell you they know a lot more about the Megalithic builders of Stonehenge than Collins let's on in this article. I hope to have a lot more to say about their findings in a future article that I am currently working on. The implications are profound. Collins, Phillips and Hugh Newman are due to take part in a conference here in England in November, which I hope to attend and put questions to them.
I think the builders of Stonehenge were the good guys (in comparison to the Pyramid builders at Giza) and probably were Laura's Hyperboreans (the 'sons of the north wind'). However, the builder race seem to have died out more or less, although, according to Collins and Phillips, a group of them appear to have migrated to south-eastern Europe and eventually reached Egypt. As to the builders of Stonehenge, the C's told us that it was the Druids who built the monument, using sound wave focusing:
Session dated 23 October 1994:I see the article had input from his friend and former colleague Graham Phillips (they once edited and published a magazine called Strange Phenomena together). I have been reading some of their back catalogue recently and I can tell you they know a lot more about the Megalithic builders of Stonehenge than Collins let's on in this article. I hope to have a lot more to say about their findings in a future article that I am currently working on. The implications are profound. Collins, Phillips and Hugh Newman are due to take part in a conference here in England in November, which I hope to attend and put questions to them.
I think the builders of Stonehenge were the good guys (in comparison to the Pyramid builders at Giza) and probably were Laura's Hyperboreans (the 'sons of the north wind'). However, the builder race seem to have died out more or less, although, according to Collins and Phillips, a group of them appear to have migrated to south-eastern Europe and eventually reached Egypt. As to the builders of Stonehenge, the C's told us that it was the Druids who built the monument, using sound wave focusing:
Q: (L) Who built Stonehenge?
A: Druids.
Q: (L) Who were the Druids?
A: Early Aryan group.
Q: (L) How did they move the stones and set them up?
A: Sound wave focusing; try it yourself; Coral Castle.
Q: (L) Who taught the Druids to use the sound waves?
A: They knew; handed down Q: (L) When was Stonehenge built?
A: 6000 approx. B.C. [MJF: The C's later changed this to 8,000 BC]
Q: (L) What was Stonehenge built to do or be used for?
A: Energy director.
Q: (L) What was this energy to be directed to do?
A: All things.
Q: (L) Was the energy to be directed outward or inward to the centre?
A: Both.
As you point out, the Stonehenge complex may be considered as part of a much larger grouping of megalithic/neolithic structures in the local area, which includes the nearby Silbury Hill (at 39.3 metres or 129 ft high, it is the tallest prehistoric man-made mound in Europe), the immense stone Ring of Avebury and the West Kennet Long Barrow – a very large neolithic tomb. Together, they all form part of a UNESCO World Heritage Site.
As to the Cs saying that the Druids built Stonehenge, Compton's Encyclopedia states that “No, neither the druids nor the Celts built Stonehenge. Stonehenge was built long before the Celts arrived in Britain. Even more fanciful was an earlier notion that Stonehenge was connected with the Druids, a caste of Celtic priests.”
Clearly the C’s disagree with this statement. However, the C’s tell us that the Druids were an early Aryan group and did not say they were Celts specifically, since the term ‘Celt’ was just a recent moniker or designation for a sub-group of the Aryans or Kantekkians who migrated into Western Europe during the Bronze Age. This is an important point to bear in mind since the C’s had this to say about the Celts:
As to the Cs saying that the Druids built Stonehenge, Compton's Encyclopedia states that “No, neither the druids nor the Celts built Stonehenge. Stonehenge was built long before the Celts arrived in Britain. Even more fanciful was an earlier notion that Stonehenge was connected with the Druids, a caste of Celtic priests.”
Clearly the C’s disagree with this statement. However, the C’s tell us that the Druids were an early Aryan group and did not say they were Celts specifically, since the term ‘Celt’ was just a recent moniker or designation for a sub-group of the Aryans or Kantekkians who migrated into Western Europe during the Bronze Age. This is an important point to bear in mind since the C’s had this to say about the Celts:
Q: Were the Celts the tall blonds known as the 'Sons of Anak' who ruled over the Sumerians as described by Sitchen? [MJF: The Sons of Anak may equate with the Mesopotamian Anunnaki and the Anakim giants of the Bible]
A: "Celts" are what remains of the original prototype.
Q: Okay. Kantekkians. When did...
A: Gravity differences account for the height difference.
Q: When did the Kantekkians, or Celts or whatever arrive on the Canary Islands?
A: 12,000 years ago.
Q: When did the Celts or Kantekkians first take up residence in the British Isles?
A: Same. 12,000 years ago.
Q: Were the Picts also Celts?
A: No, Atlantean. Remember, "Celt" is latter day moniker.
Q: Were the Picts Kantekkians?
A: Originally.
So, the people who built Stonehenge would appear to have been Kantekkian survivors of the Deluge and were probably giants. If you are not aware, the building of Stonehenge has always been associated in local folklore with giants and the monument was even known as the ‘Giants Circle’. Although historians and archaeologists tend to link the Druids with the Celts, who for them were Bronze Age migrants who had moved westwards from the Eurasian Steppe into central and western Europe, the C's are suggesting here that the Druids have a much older pedigree than this. Indeed, could they have migrated from Britain and northern Europe eastwards to the Balkans, Anatolia and the Middle East to avoid a cataclysm, only to move back westwards again centuries later, when the British Isles and northern Europe had become habitable again?
Let us recall that the C's have supported Iman Wilkens' hypothesis in his book Where Troy Once Stood that the Trojan War had been fought in England. If this is correct, then this may have implications for Stonehenge and the people who lived there. An alternative name for Stonehenge is the Cloisters of Ambrius and this cloister has traditionally been linked with a massacre that took place there. The C's confirmed the link between Stonehenge and the Cloisters of Ambrius in the following extract:
Q: Was Stonehenge once known as the Cloister of Ambrius?
A: Yes.
Q: Who was Ambrius?
A: Druid tradition/cloak.
Q: What was it a cloak for? Who was Ambrius?
A: Not who. What.
Q: What was Ambrius?
A: They would label as a god. You might say otherwise. [MJF: An alien, most probably Phoebus Apollo]
Whether or not the massacre at Stonehenge was linked with the Trojan War, Homer's account certainly speaks of raids by the Greeks on Trojan temples. Homer's account also speaks of a plague being present in the Achaean/Greek camp. It may come as something as a surprise to learn that until recently there has never been any evidence for plague in Britain save for a 1,500 year old skeleton interred at an Anglo-Saxon burial site near Cambridge (N.B. the time of the Justinian Plague). However, evidence has recently emerged in the form of Yersinia pestis, the bacteria that causes plague, which was found in the dental pulp of three people who had died about 4,000 years ago (2000 BC). Two bodies were found in Somerset, the county next door to Wiltshire where Stonehenge is located, and the other in Cumbria in northern England. This discovery has pushed back the earliest evidence for plague in England by several millennia. Scientists had previously identified plague in human remains across Europe and Asia dating to between 5,000 and 2.500 years ago but this is the first proof that it had reached the British Isles. Evidence demonstrating that plague was present in England 2000 years ago would therefore seem to tally with the description of plague in the Greek camp at the end of the Trojan War. It would appear then that plague, war and climate change (cometary influenced?) may have wiped out most of the Trojan population of England leaving the survivors to scatter across Europe via Brittany, Spain, Italy, the Balkans and into Anatolia. Indeed, there is little trace of this earlier British population in the DNA record in the Stonehenge area and their place seems to have been taken by nomadic pastoralists who came in from France, Belgium and the Netherlands.
I note your comments on the 144 link. 144 is equal to 2 x 72 and 72 seems to have been a very important number to the ancients, as it is embedded in many myths. You also make a good link with the 144,000 'just' who are ransomed from the Earth in the Apocalypse account. I note that the article you posted made reference to the theories of English writer and mythologist John Michell who also made a link between Stonehenge and the Heavenly Jerusalem. I wrote the following about his theories in the Alton Towers thread:
As I mentioned above, in Hinduism, a basic mandala (yantra) takes the form of a square with four gates containing a circle with a centre point. Each gate is in the general shape of a “T”. Do we see any examples of this concept in the Christian Bible? Well, yes, we do, and it can be found in of all places St. John’s Apocalypse or the Book of Revelation.
For one author and researcher John Michell, within the measurements of Stonehenge, the foundation plan of Glastonbury, Plato's ideal city (Atlantis) and the Heavenly City of the New Jerusalem, as set out in the vision of Saint John, lay the science and cosmology on which the ancient world order was founded. The central revelation of his book, The Dimensions of Paradise: Sacred Geometry, Ancient Science, and the Heavenly Order on Earth, is a structure of geometry and number representing the essential order of the heavens, one which functions as a map of paradise.
For one author and researcher John Michell, within the measurements of Stonehenge, the foundation plan of Glastonbury, Plato's ideal city (Atlantis) and the Heavenly City of the New Jerusalem, as set out in the vision of Saint John, lay the science and cosmology on which the ancient world order was founded. The central revelation of his book, The Dimensions of Paradise: Sacred Geometry, Ancient Science, and the Heavenly Order on Earth, is a structure of geometry and number representing the essential order of the heavens, one which functions as a map of paradise.
Michell's "New Jerusalem" sacred geometry diagram
However, as you can immediately see, this is the same hexagon/Star of David symbol we have encountered on the plains of Nasca and in the Mandalas of Eastern spirituality.
Quoting from Wikipedia (See: John Michell (writer) - Wikipedia):
From my viewpoint, there certainly seems to be a definite correspondence between Michell’s the "New Jerusalem" sacred geometry diagram above and the ground plan of Stonehenge, as shown below:
Stonehenge Double Hexagon Structure
I also added the comments of another writer on the mathematics of the New Jerusalem in that same post - see Alton Towers, Sir Francis Bacon and the Rosicrucians
One particular interpreter has though provided an interpretation of the New Jerusalem that St John was describing in the Apocalypse as set out below (see: The New Jerusalem (heraldmag.org):
The name of the city of my God [is] new Jerusalem — Revelation 3:12
“And I saw a new heaven and a new earth: for the first heaven and the first earth were passed away; … And I John saw the holy city, new Jerusalem, coming down from God out of heaven, prepared as a bride adorned for her husband” (Revelation 21:1,2).
Revelation 21:16 tells us that the New Jerusalem is a perfect cube with length, width, and height of 12,000 furlongs (fifteen hundred miles).
The Twelve Gates
Revelation 21:12,13 tells us the city had a great and high wall with twelve gates, three on each side facing the four points of the compass. Verses 14 and 17 tell us the wall of the city had twelve foundations, and in each the names of the twelve apostles of the lamb, and the wall was 144 cubits. [MJF: The gates also represent the 12 Tribes of Israel since verse 12 provides - "On the gates were written the names of the twelve tribes of Israel”,]
Why would an architect put twelve foundations under a wall that goes around the city? And what does the wall being 144 cubits mean?
We believe the 144-cubit wall refers to the thickness of the walls, not its height. The wall completely surrounds New Jerusalem. Not only is there a wall on four sides, there is a wall on the top and bottom as well.
Twelve Foundations = Twelve Apostles
Because the wall completely surrounds New Jerusalem, including the top and bottom, we can understand why the wall has twelve foundations. There are twelve edges to a cube, edges that surround and hold the cube together. This beautifully shows how the twelve apostles are the foundations upon which the walls (a picture of the Church) are built and held together.
Because there are twelve edges to a cube, picturing the twelve foundations, and each edge is 12,000 furlongs long, we have a beautiful picture of the entire Church because twelve foundations or edges multiplied by 12,000 furlongs in length equals 144,000. Thus, the Church class of 144,000 will completely surround the city and be a wall of protection to those inside.
The area of one wall of New Jerusalem is 12,000 ´ 12,000 furlongs or 144 million square furlongs. 144,000 multiplied by 1,000 years is 144 million, a picture of how the Church of 144,000 will be a wall of protection for the thousand years of the Millennial kingdom.
The area of one wall of the cube is 144 million square cubits. The area of all six sides is 864 million square furlongs. Consider these words from Jesus: “Then shall the righteous shine forth as the sun in the kingdom of their Father” (Matthew 13:43). The diameter of the sun is 864,000 miles. Thus, New Jerusalem’s walls, with an area of 864 million square furlongs, is the same as the sun’s diameter of 864,000 miles multiplied by a thousand years. This illustrates how the Church (the walls of this city) will shine as the sun to enlighten and protect all within the city for the thousand-year duration of the kingdom.
But is it correct to compare units of measure such as furlongs with feet and miles? Yes, it is! First, we believe feet and miles are divinely appointed units of measure because they are based on the divisions of twelve: twelve inches to one foot, 12 x 440 feet to a mile, etc. Twelve is a divine basic building block: twelve sons of Jacob, twelve tribes of Israel, 2 x 12 = 24 divisions of the priesthood, twelve hours in a day, twelve hours in a night, 12 x 12 = 144 [thousand] members of the Church, etc. [MJF: It is also part of the Sexagesimal, or base 60 (sexagenary) numeral system]. Second, when we convert the dimensions of New Jerusalem to units of measure based on twelve (i.e., feet and miles), it produces beautiful, harmonious lessons. It correlates with the dimensions of our sun, moon, and earth because the same great architect brought them into existence using this same divine measuring rod based on units of twelve.
New Jerusalem’s measurements also correlate with the size of the earth. New Jerusalem is a cube 12,000 furlongs on an edge. Smith’s Bible Dictionary says one furlong is 220 yards (660 feet). Thus 12,000 furlongs ´ 660 feet = 7,920,000 feet. The New American Standard translates 12,000 furlongs directly into 1,500 miles (1,500 miles ´ 5,280 feet to a mile = 7,920,000 feet). The diameter of earth is 7,920 miles and New Jerusalem is 7,920,000 feet on each side.
The Twelve Gates
Revelation 21:12,13 tells us the city had a great and high wall with twelve gates, three on each side facing the four points of the compass. Verses 14 and 17 tell us the wall of the city had twelve foundations, and in each the names of the twelve apostles of the lamb, and the wall was 144 cubits. [MJF: The gates also represent the 12 Tribes of Israel since verse 12 provides - "On the gates were written the names of the twelve tribes of Israel”,]
Why would an architect put twelve foundations under a wall that goes around the city? And what does the wall being 144 cubits mean?
We believe the 144-cubit wall refers to the thickness of the walls, not its height. The wall completely surrounds New Jerusalem. Not only is there a wall on four sides, there is a wall on the top and bottom as well.
Twelve Foundations = Twelve Apostles
Because the wall completely surrounds New Jerusalem, including the top and bottom, we can understand why the wall has twelve foundations. There are twelve edges to a cube, edges that surround and hold the cube together. This beautifully shows how the twelve apostles are the foundations upon which the walls (a picture of the Church) are built and held together.
Because there are twelve edges to a cube, picturing the twelve foundations, and each edge is 12,000 furlongs long, we have a beautiful picture of the entire Church because twelve foundations or edges multiplied by 12,000 furlongs in length equals 144,000. Thus, the Church class of 144,000 will completely surround the city and be a wall of protection to those inside.
The area of one wall of New Jerusalem is 12,000 ´ 12,000 furlongs or 144 million square furlongs. 144,000 multiplied by 1,000 years is 144 million, a picture of how the Church of 144,000 will be a wall of protection for the thousand years of the Millennial kingdom.
The area of one wall of the cube is 144 million square cubits. The area of all six sides is 864 million square furlongs. Consider these words from Jesus: “Then shall the righteous shine forth as the sun in the kingdom of their Father” (Matthew 13:43). The diameter of the sun is 864,000 miles. Thus, New Jerusalem’s walls, with an area of 864 million square furlongs, is the same as the sun’s diameter of 864,000 miles multiplied by a thousand years. This illustrates how the Church (the walls of this city) will shine as the sun to enlighten and protect all within the city for the thousand-year duration of the kingdom.
But is it correct to compare units of measure such as furlongs with feet and miles? Yes, it is! First, we believe feet and miles are divinely appointed units of measure because they are based on the divisions of twelve: twelve inches to one foot, 12 x 440 feet to a mile, etc. Twelve is a divine basic building block: twelve sons of Jacob, twelve tribes of Israel, 2 x 12 = 24 divisions of the priesthood, twelve hours in a day, twelve hours in a night, 12 x 12 = 144 [thousand] members of the Church, etc. [MJF: It is also part of the Sexagesimal, or base 60 (sexagenary) numeral system]. Second, when we convert the dimensions of New Jerusalem to units of measure based on twelve (i.e., feet and miles), it produces beautiful, harmonious lessons. It correlates with the dimensions of our sun, moon, and earth because the same great architect brought them into existence using this same divine measuring rod based on units of twelve.
New Jerusalem’s measurements also correlate with the size of the earth. New Jerusalem is a cube 12,000 furlongs on an edge. Smith’s Bible Dictionary says one furlong is 220 yards (660 feet). Thus 12,000 furlongs ´ 660 feet = 7,920,000 feet. The New American Standard translates 12,000 furlongs directly into 1,500 miles (1,500 miles ´ 5,280 feet to a mile = 7,920,000 feet). The diameter of earth is 7,920 miles and New Jerusalem is 7,920,000 feet on each side.
Now the reference to the 144,000 is, of course, meant to represent the number of members of the Twelve Tribes of Israel who will be saved and become citizens of the New Jerusalem or Heaven/Paradise. I seem to recall the C’s saying that these 144,000 people described in the Apocalypse were in fact those persons who would have supreme knowledge.
The word "paradise" entered English from the Frecnh paradis, inherited from the Latin paradisus, from Greek parádeisos (παράδεισος), from an Old Iranian form, from Proto- Iranian*parādaiĵah- "walled enclosure", whence Old Peersian p-r-d-y-d-a-m /paridaidam/, Avestan pairi-daêza. The literal meaning of this Eastern Old Iranian language word is "walled (enclosure)". Hence, it is curious that in the above description, the number 144 is prominent, since 144 is, of course, equal to 2 x 72 [MJF: there’s that special number again!].
However, this reference to the number 144 brings us back to the Platonic solids and the geometry of the universe again since the five perfect solids (see below) create a total of 14,400 as regards their angular measure and, as I have mentioned before, the number 144 was highly revered in antiquity and often occurred in many myths and allegorical stories.
The word "paradise" entered English from the Frecnh paradis, inherited from the Latin paradisus, from Greek parádeisos (παράδεισος), from an Old Iranian form, from Proto- Iranian*parādaiĵah- "walled enclosure", whence Old Peersian p-r-d-y-d-a-m /paridaidam/, Avestan pairi-daêza. The literal meaning of this Eastern Old Iranian language word is "walled (enclosure)". Hence, it is curious that in the above description, the number 144 is prominent, since 144 is, of course, equal to 2 x 72 [MJF: there’s that special number again!].
However, this reference to the number 144 brings us back to the Platonic solids and the geometry of the universe again since the five perfect solids (see below) create a total of 14,400 as regards their angular measure and, as I have mentioned before, the number 144 was highly revered in antiquity and often occurred in many myths and allegorical stories.
For more on this, see: The Platonic and Pythagorean Solids - √ø∑Dubs (joedubs.com)
N.B. Credit should go to JGeropoulas who originally posted this link.
