Session 29 December 2009
- Thread starter Laura
- Start date
knowledge_of_self
The Living Force
NormaRegula said:
Yes!!!! So true!
shutting down the international travel issue is kind of nerve-racking. But at least it's good that it wont be permanent. And Scottie's quote made me laugh out loud!!!
Marcus-Aurelius
Jedi Master
Deedlet said:[...] And Scottie's quote made me laugh out loud!!!
Yep, same here! But when thinking about it, having a stone megalith should open up so many possibilities if you are able to use it as has been done by the ancients. This has been discussed in the session quoted below:
[quote author=Session 04.15.00]Q: (T) [...]So, by going to the stones, they might have increased their frequencies to transit from 3rd to 4th density. (L) Or they used them as a direct machine or device to do it. Archaeologists say that the people who erected the megaliths were barbarians. They are defined as barbarians because they didn't build cities, they didn't have the wheel, they didn't have organized agriculture, and they left no written records. Those are the defined elements of civilization. Yet, this group of people, whoever they were, did things that we cannot duplicate today, and they did it all over the globe. The groups who came along after them who DID have all the hallmarks of what we call civilization, also could not erect these gargantuan stones. I thought about this for a long time. Archaeologists say they must have erected them as monuments to their gods, or heroes or whatever. Some of them think they were calendars to tell them when to plant the corn. Well, I think that is stretching it a bit. If you can't cross off the days on the wall and look outside and see that it is time to plant the corn, you're in pretty sad shape. You hardly need to haul stones as big as buildings across hills and valleys to set them up in special places to tell you to do that! The psychology of the human being cannot have changed all that much over the many thousands of years from then to now, and it is true that people do not do anything without a powerful motivation; what I call the "payoff." What could be the payoff to haul these things around on greased logs as they are depicted? To create a monument or to bury their kings? To get naked and dance in the moonlight? (A) Like they had a lot of time to do this while struggling to live the barbarian existence, too! (L) Yeah. They are supposed to be howling savages who must constantly hunt to get food, yet they are spending all their time, occupying all their strongest men, to push rocks around! Meanwhile, according to the archaeologists and paleontologists, these folks only live to about 40 years at max! (T) They got a lot of mileage out of those 40 years! (L) Exactly! But, we are supposed to be thinking about the things they didn't have: cities, wheels, agriculture, and writing. (F) Maybe they didn't need it. (L) And why would that be? Because the stones did it all! (T) Maybe they were 4th density STO beings who planted all those stones all over the place. (L) Well, if you think about a group of people who are setting up these massive stones like they were pieces of styrofoam. The stones collect energy and information. They then transduce the energy or amplify it. These people know things about movement, dances or spinning or something, that enables them to behave in concert with the stones so that they all become part of a grand machine that does things! All of the legends talk about stylized dances and the oldest things about Stonehenge say that it was the Temple of Apollo and that Apollo danced there all night at certain periods of time. Every 19 years, I believe. When you think about that, and the other places Apollo appeared, the inversions and redactions of the legends, and we come to these magical stones that produce things. Then we come to the head of Bran the Blessed which supposedly produced endless supplies of bread and fish or whatever else was desired. Bran's head was the giver of all good things. But more than that, it was an oracle. It could speak. And here we have the idea of a similar function for Stonehenge: both an oracle as well as a giver of blessings and bounty. Anything you wanted or needed it provided for you. If you wanted to go somewhere, it transported you as in the legends of the flying carpets. It was magic transportation. All of these things are associated, when you track them back far enough, with a stone. The stones did everything. (JM) And it is funny that stones come up. What I have been doing for the past 10 or 15 years is running around the globe collecting stones. I've been to some of the most ancient places on earth, and I go from one to the other. And from each one, I've collected stones. Plus, Apollo: on Crete, there was an oracle of Apollo on Tara... (L) And there was Tara in Ireland... (JM) I wouldn't be surprised if Tara meant stone too! How is all this connected? (L) Exactly. This is what I have always thought about these megaliths. They DID things. All of the things we think are the "signs" of civilization were done by the stones. Maybe TR is right; these people were at some level of density where they could make this work. At some point, something happened, the ability was lost, and then people had to build cities, engage in agriculture, invent the wheel, and develop writing - because they could no longer do it the "easy" way. (JM) In talking about stones, would the mother of all stones be the navel of the earth; is that the same as Ayers rock? It's the largest stone on earth and they call it the navel of the earth. (L) Does Ayers rock have anything to do with this?
A: No. Stones were once utilized to provide for all needs, as the energies transmitted connected directly with the pituitary gland to connect spiritual realities with the material realms of 3rd and 4th densities. So you see, the "stone" was viewed as Matriarchal indeed!
[/quote]
Edited to arrange quotes.
Arctodus
Jedi
Hello Wanderer-
It is on page two of the e-book. I agree, he has a really rosy view of the future. Though apparently he does nowadays acknowledge the existence of negative beings that feed on us. He was all "love and light" in the past. That was a big sticking point against him, among others (including ragging on Mrs. Knight-Jaczyk and her friend) from the Cass Forum threads I (belatedly) read. From other articles of his, he now advocates "love and compassion and the right to refuse to give anything of yours to negative entities". I think he is getting there, with a long way to go. (Definitely should read up on strategic enclosure and look into giving compassion and understanding of the idea of negativity, not the reality, OSIT.)
I'll give him
at least. I may not share his views, but I'm not going to try to rob him of it. Events as they unfold may do that well enough.
"WHAT ELSE CAN HAARP DO?
Might this variety of super-powered 1000-megawatt HAARP spiral also have the added benefit of creating a missile shield -- thereby explaining why the Russian Bulava test was deemed to be a failure, if it did even happen at all?
Did the Russians deliberately shoot their missile into Project Tequila Sunrise, to see if it would indeed blow up and destroy the projectile?
And if so, isn't it interesting to demonstrate such a technology right before President Obama accepts the Nobel Peace Prize -- proving that they now have a working "Tesla Shield" technology that can defeat any threats that the "New World Order" might try to throw at them -- nuclear or otherwise?"
It is on page two of the e-book. I agree, he has a really rosy view of the future. Though apparently he does nowadays acknowledge the existence of negative beings that feed on us. He was all "love and light" in the past. That was a big sticking point against him, among others (including ragging on Mrs. Knight-Jaczyk and her friend) from the Cass Forum threads I (belatedly) read. From other articles of his, he now advocates "love and compassion and the right to refuse to give anything of yours to negative entities". I think he is getting there, with a long way to go. (Definitely should read up on strategic enclosure and look into giving compassion and understanding of the idea of negativity, not the reality, OSIT.)
I'll give him
at least. I may not share his views, but I'm not going to try to rob him of it. Events as they unfold may do that well enough."WHAT ELSE CAN HAARP DO?
Might this variety of super-powered 1000-megawatt HAARP spiral also have the added benefit of creating a missile shield -- thereby explaining why the Russian Bulava test was deemed to be a failure, if it did even happen at all?
Did the Russians deliberately shoot their missile into Project Tequila Sunrise, to see if it would indeed blow up and destroy the projectile?
And if so, isn't it interesting to demonstrate such a technology right before President Obama accepts the Nobel Peace Prize -- proving that they now have a working "Tesla Shield" technology that can defeat any threats that the "New World Order" might try to throw at them -- nuclear or otherwise?"
anart said:
Shar said:
Very likely indeed, even if "cosmic" may also point to something multidimentional like the wave for example.
In any case things are evolving rapidly!
BTW, thanks Gonzo for your research, amazing!
Smallwood said:
Pete02 said:
Yes, but in the same time, we can manage to be physically safe to continue the Work using the knowledge we have at the moment. I am just thinking while writing, nothing conclusive :/
But at the same time I see this:
and it reminds me of Atlantis. As we see around, the whole world is a part of the global western/american culture/civilisation.dannybananny said:
So maybe the "5D city on a hill" refers not only to the US (even though it could be particularly impacted dur to the STS power concentration) but also to the whole world as a part of the actual civilisation with more or less damages?
The Cassiopaeans say :
I know I am just speculating in the air and the participants know better what it means, but I'm just worried about all these people going to suffer :/
Yes!! Actually we are isn't it! :)Pete02 said:
So we continue to Work and build the STO "future"
drygol said:
I think that if you just do the Eiriu Eolas program and continue to work on your machine along with posting here on the forum, you will find that your skills in writing and helping others on the forum will increase along with your efforts to work on yourself.
Ottershrew
Jedi Master
Laura said:
Thanks Laura and everybody - this transcript is really encouraging.
Thinking about the "city on the hill", I was wondering about the phrase the C's used: "Think big!"
Joe says the US itself is the City on the Hill. If you go back far enough, the background to this is in the Gospel of Matthew, where it crops up in the Sermon on the Mount (5:14). In the Synoptic Gospels this phrase is unique to Matthew, and it doesn't seem to be part of the underlying Q stratum. In a way it is, though, an amplification of something in Q on true enlightenment. And this is where it all got a bit screwy: Q was referring to the true enlightenment of a person:
QS33 (Luke 11:33-36) said:
So Q - or at least a possible secondary stratum of Q (Q2) in the textual transmission - sees the light as referring to something that lights up the whole person. Matthew has given the light another reference: as something which shines from the person or group to other people not yet so enlightened. So even by Matthew's time, the reference had been twisted all out of shape. He says:
Matthew 5:14 said:
The "city" here immediately makes you think of a community, or even a political set-up. For early Christian bishops, this idea is perhaps much more palatable than ideas of a growing light in the body of an esoteric seeker: it gave the Church a reason for expansion, for missionary activity - and even for its blessing on the military expansion of a Christian State.
And this is the sense in which it was understood by the Puritan founding fathers of the United States. Apparently, in 1630, on board the ship Arbella, en route to New England, John Winthrop had preached about the particular aim of these colonists. This sermon (called the City upon a Hill sermon, or A Model of Christian Charity) is often seen in American mythology as setting out the point of the colony - the raison d'etre of the whole American enterprise. As such it's been referenced numerous times, most famously by JFK, and then by Ronald Reagan. It's perhaps a forerunner of the idea of American exceptionalism: the idea that the US occupies a special niche among the nations of the world in terms of its national credo, historical evolution, political and religious institutions (as the world's first modern democracy) and unique origins as a nation of immigrants.
Of course, the idea of American exceptionalism is itself based on a lie: the US sees itself as the shining city set on a hill, a beacon to the other nations of the world to become like itself. The idea is self-serving and jingoistic - it suggests that the US as a governmental system is already perfect, and that other nations have a lot of catching up to do before they become as wonderful as the US. It also suggests that the US is somehow impregnable, as a city set on a hill is easily defensible. The US can just lob a few missiles at anyone with the temerity to approach it - shoot first, ask questions later. It also, of course, suggests a siege-mentality on the part of the US. The city set on a hill has to have enemies at the gate in order to justify its existence as an isolated city-state, in order to keep it together as a political unity. A pretty sad state of affairs all round, and very similar, imo, to the way of thinking found in the Israeli political-military establishment.
John Winthrop had actually argued that there were dangers in being a city on a hill. He said:
John Winthrop said:
It could be said that Winthrop, right at the outset, made a pretty clear prediction of the transition of the city on a hill from 3D to 5D. Which must be of some credit to him - he could probably see from the outset that the whole thing was going to be a failure right from the start, which it has. Since 1630 there have been plenty of prayers "turned into curses" - from native Americans to indentured servants to African slaves, and so on. The whole affair was founded on the idea of treating other sections of the society as not actually part of the city on the hill, but as hewers of wood and drawers of water, who served without freedom or proper recompense - or whose land and resources were taken and fenced off for the exclusive use of its white Christian citizens. Globalization today only extends that model to encompass the whole world, with the US at the centre.
With the city set on a hill, for all to see, the hypocrisy of the model only becomes more glaringly obvious. But this has been going on for a long time - it's not just confined to the United States. And since the C's are asking us to "think big", perhaps we can go further.
Archaeologically speaking, the very first city on a hill was actually deep down in a valley, 200 metres below sea level. At Jericho, in the Pre-Pottery Neolithic A (PPNA) period, round about 8000-7000 BCE, a vast settlement was built unlike anything ever seen in Western Asia before. The town covered about ten acres (about four hectares), and was surrounded with a deep ditch and massive stone wall. The whole affair was spectacular, and so unusual in the light of everything going on around it at that time, that it was actually quite freakish. Bizarre, you might call it. Although it was deep down in the Jordan valley, it formed a hill because of the successive building levels from about 9250 BCE onwards. When a building reached a point of imminent collapse, it was levelled and a new house built on its remains, and so the whole town rose to form a hill - in Arabic, a "tell" or ruin-mound. In Western Asia there are still thousands of these tells which are pretty obvious to anyone standing in open country and looking around. Dating from much later points in history, they just rise up out of the surrounding plain - but Jericho was the first.
At Jericho round about 8000 BCE the building pattern suddenly shifts, from rather flimsy wattle and daub dwellings, to houses made of bricks on stone foundations. Today we just take bricks as fairly obvious things, but at Jericho they were a new invention. As were the defensive structures: a ditch cut into rock, two metres deep and 8.5 metres wide, within which a stone wall was built, 1.6 metres thick, and preserved to a height of four metres, with a brick superstructure of unknown height. Within the wall was a great stone tower, more than eight metres high - and perhaps there were others dotted around the edges of the town. No one knows why this city was built, but it seems likely that agriculture had something to do with it:
James Mellaart said:
Trade too seems to have been crucially important here:
James Mellaart said:
Exclusion of others, resources for trade, and the growing and eating of nice gluten-rich wheat and barley. Probably these Jerichoans really thought they were something special. They lasted a lot, lot longer than the US has done. But they went into 5D all the same. The site was deserted round about 7000 BCE before a new lot of people (PPNB) took over the site, with a completely new stone industry. Of course, something of the same old pattern remained. Wheat- and barley-growing was now the norm - the society was based on grubbing a subsistence from the soil. Other Neolithic systems had no use for cities like this - or the other accoutrements of "civilisation". Probably because they were more sophisticated sociologically and technologically.
So maybe what the C's are suggesting when they say, "Think big!", is a complete break with the past. It's the end of a society dominated by cities, from Jericho (the original city on a tell) to the US (with its governmental system based on repression and exploitation, while pretending to some sort of supernatural glory and destiny - the shining city on a hill). Pretty hopeful, really.
At least, so I'm guessing at the moment.
Congratulation's Anart, it's good to here your on this side of the globe ,i can say that with each knew session just when i have grasp the last and another new one comes back mind blowning. What was appearant in the states and the out come has come to rust. Friends and family are not aware of the t beast that lurks in there midst and it got to the point that the louder I talked the deafer the would become and was moving from sto to sts as to getting them to understand..... a violation of there free will big no no . I could not keep from crying as i feel the scene of loss that they are in harms way and can do nothing to awaken them, totally bummed out and sad that they can't or don't see whats right under their nose...... it feels empty and my dreams have at times of late been informative to the struggles i face if should have to return to the states for what ever.
Anart said:
Great...for some reason I thought you hadn't gotten over there until now.
Anart said:
And it's a Winter Solstice like no other...with lots of creative things going on and in the works!
Deedlet said:
Yeah, Scottie's quote cracked me up. Positive humor is close or spot-on to the truth. Was even thinking of putting that in my sig. Reminds me of Shijing's sig that has the C's quotes about whether the Lizzies have tails. Funny how laughter can give one a dash of courage when a fearful situation is presented in the right light.
As for international travel shutting down, was wondering if it would be because of more blatantly obvious false flag terrorism operations or cometary explosions bringing down a plane or two...or three! Perhaps a bit of both being blamed, of course, on those rascally, out-to-git-us bad guys from AL-CIA-Duh.
What a future!
pete02
The Living Force
mkrnhr said:
Point well taken mkrnhr. I guess the whole session just got my wheels spinning and I tried to put a couple of things together. My intention was really to point out that either physical or non, we could still help win the battle is all.
mkrnhr said:So we continue to Work and build the STO "future"
Most definitely!!
F
forge
Guest
Thank You for transcribing this session and making it available to us. Greatly appreciated! 
JonnyRadar
The Living Force
Any clarification as to whether the "No" is a response to Joe or to Allen?