Laura said:
I think that pedophiles fall into this category. What kind of person would get turned on by a child? It's beyond imagining
I recall a letter to Dear Abby back in the day, from a mother whose son confided to her that he had these terrible sexual feelings for children and was horrified by them. He was of a loving family and the thought of engaging in such behavior was beyond repugnant but the feelings were of such intensity, he was being tormented by them. He didn't know what to do or who to turn to and neither did his mother. I think Dear Abby recommended counseling. This person may have been the exception to the rule when it comes to pedophilia, but apparently people who do have empathy can be plagued by these inclinations. What a terrible fate although not too different from homosexuals wrestling with their inclinations in a heterosexual dominated world. And, of course, both types of behaviors are out of sync with nature as neither makes sense for normal human reproduction/survival of the species as to creating offspring, although if the raped 'child' is old enough, pregnancy/inbreeding will occur. I'm also now remembering that animals do engage in homosexual behavior and even a Sott article about it - there was some survival advantage involved? But definitely no mating with young on animals' part.
As to animals not raping their young (except as noted caged mice; monkeys), I think we've all seen instances where the mother will run off the male young when they reach adolescence and males never try to mate with the young of females either sired by them or other males, but will kill the young of the ousted dominant male. There are the occasional instances of mounting such as with elephants encountering their own deceased herd member and it is a futile attempt to rouse them back to life. Can we conclude then that animals are not psychopathic and are incapable of being so under normal, natural conditions (habitat infringement or other unnatural issues for monkeys)? Or is it just their natural instinct that it's not in the best interest of the survival of the species to engage in such behavior? Is it strictly a 3D manifestation? Was this part and parcel of the aftermath of the 'fall', the overriding of natural, human instinct not to do these things? And how far back in human history does this behavior go? My impression is that during Roman times, pedophilia was not only rampant, but was business as usual for those who could afford to 'keep a boy'. I've never looked into this subject (can't imagine why), but when were the instances of this terrible practice first recorded? I seem to recall a line in the bible to the effect that it would be better to tie a millstone around one's neck and throw oneself into sea than to hurt one of mine (Jesus referring to children). I don't know if the implication was hurt by sexual attack.
Another thought. If psychopaths are failed organic portals, and their soul imprint is from the same type pool as 2D, wouldn't that inherent animal instinct code against this type of behavior? Maybe it wasn't natural, human instinct that was corrupted by 4DSTS, but the natural, animal instinct seeing that OPs are bridges between 2D and 3D - the primitive, introductory pre-model of a human being. Even though it was the Adamics who gave permission for 4DSTS interference and not the pre-Adamics/OPs, did 4DSTS decide they didn't need permission because the OPs were sublevel, so to speak? Did the burning off of the DNA encompass the preexisting human-type inhabitants as well either by accident or design - in the wrong place at the wrong time sort of situation?
What if there were no failed organic portals, just regular OPs, would the world situation be a lot less extreme, perhaps even platonic? Did the 4DSTS know it would be necessary to have psychopaths to create the required levels of 'emotional loosh' and deliberately inserted these types among us or knew that comets would have this affect, thus, no permission issues? I guess I still don't understand what it is exactly that causes an OP to be 'failed'. But, as a failed OP, a psychopath, they are hard-wired to engage in predatory behavior, pedophilia being merely one variety of such, and that is their (and 4DSTS) sustenance. There is no other way they can be. Perhaps they cannot even live without this particular sustenance. They are just like 4DSTS, only their 'loosh' requirements are not quite as high?
So OPs, even though they don't actually prey on Adamics, are inherently more successful and thus, fill positions of power; and psychopaths, due to their unique characteristics, are in the supreme positions of power leaving the Adamics as the hapless victims, although OPs I think are also victims of the psychopaths. Well, the C's indicate that we are heading in the right direction with our efforts, so that should give some sense of gratification in the light of all these dreadful facts and encourage us to
keep doing what is in us to do! 
