Many thanks to the whole group for another fantastically informative session.
It seems interesting to me to "cross" the following quote
We are you in the future- we are you in the past-we are you in the present- we are you.
Would you say that this is banal or, perhaps, it would be manipulation? There is another quote for this and there is clearly something to think about.
It seems interesting to me to "cross" the following quote
with another famous statement by C's- we are you in the future.(PoB) Is it possible to reincarnate in what we perceive as the past?
A: Yes.
Q: (Joe) Is it possible to reincarnate in what we perceive as the future?
A: Yes
Q: (L) We've already asked: Is it possible to have multiple incarnations simultaneously? And they've said yes. So I mean, kind of like all options are on the table.
(Joe) Well... time and stuff, right?
(L) Time is selective and variable.
(Joe) All the people in the past are all reincarnated, right? Is that true?
(Chu) Or they never reincarnated...
(Joe) ...and they're in 5D.
(PoB) Not necessarily.
(Joe) So people in the past have either reincarnated or are in 5D, so they can't be in the past. There is nobody in the past.
A: Not so simple.
Q: (PoB) But if it's possible that it means that the soul can have experience from the future while living in earlier times?
A: Yes
Q: (PoB) That's huge.
(Chu) So some prophets could be remembering past lives rather than predicting the future?
A: Yes
Q: (L) I think there are so many possibilities, and I think that 4D and all the other rest of it is so strange that we can't even conceive of the strangeness of it. I mean, just think about the distance between us and 2D critters, and then imagine something exponential to that between us and 4D. I mean, Ra said we can't even plumb the depths of 4D mentation and all that sort of thing. So we ain't at the top of the food chain anymore! All right, so that's the last question.
We are you in the future- we are you in the past-we are you in the present- we are you.
Would you say that this is banal or, perhaps, it would be manipulation? There is another quote for this and there is clearly something to think about.
By the way, I would really like to be involved in these "you".A: Not so simple.
Огромная благодарность всей группе за очередную фантастически информативную сессию.
Мне кажется интересным "скрестить" следующую цитату
с другим известным заявлением C's- мы это вы в будущем.
Мы это вы в будущем- мы это вы в прошлом-мы это вы в настоящем- мы это вы.
Скажете, что это банально или, возможно, это было бы манипуляцией? На это есть другая цитата и тут явно есть над чем подумать.
Кстати, я очень хотел бы быть причастным к этим "вы".
Мне кажется интересным "скрестить" следующую цитату
с другим известным заявлением C's- мы это вы в будущем.
Мы это вы в будущем- мы это вы в прошлом-мы это вы в настоящем- мы это вы.
Скажете, что это банально или, возможно, это было бы манипуляцией? На это есть другая цитата и тут явно есть над чем подумать.
Кстати, я очень хотел бы быть причастным к этим "вы".