Laura said:Following on to my previous post: I've come to realize that things that may seem more or less not so spectacular can have really serious implications so when you notice the beginning of something, if you have some idea about what is waiting for us in the future, you can see if that thing/event might contribute to getting us there.
For example, the Ukraine business. I KNEW that this was a big deal. And it sure turned out that way. A lot bigger than anybody thought at the time of the beginnings. But I was primed by two things: the Cs had mentioned Ukraine and an "explosion" and they had also mentioned that we were heading into year zero or something like that.
Looking at Ukraine NOW, it sure is easy to see that it was a manipulated event, planned, and a whole lot of things were piggy-backed on it, including the plans to create a new Cold War if it was not possible to take over Russian and institute a NWO. But Putin kinda messed up their plans, I think. Still, the events of Maidan were way more important for the WHOLE planet than anyone would have suspected at the time. Interestingly, I think that it was just a few months before that when there was a bunch of volcanoes going off at once and I saw that as a precursor to something. I even started a thread about it. And I was right.
Now, as to the Greek business, this also looks like something that was planned though we do not yet have the full picture because it has not totally played out.
Yes, of course, there can be BIG events, but even if you think about 9-11, which changed the reality of the whole planet so drastically, at the time, I doubt that many people realized what it actually meant and would precipitate. I knew because the Cs had prepared me. I had no idea HOW things that they said would happen could possibly be put into play, but when it happened, I recognized it.
And that's the key, to be looking at things with the general idea of what is in store in mind, and try to see how an event might further that scenario, or play into it. It's a process of connecting dots and reading signs and you can only do it if you have a pretty full field of awareness and historical data. In this case, I merely mean historical as in the past 15-16 years or so since all this mess got kicked off. But good knowledge of historical history is also useful.
There was an article up on SOTT a few weeks ago, US stealth coup in Armenia foiled by Russia, that relates to this, I think. By arming the Armenian people with the knowledge of what NGO's and particular 'movers and shakers' were doing, they were primed to see how a coup could play out and were better prepared when it did.
Here's an excerpt from the article:
Russia's emerging media influence on the world stage played an essential role in unmasking and disrupting America's efforts to destabilize and overthrow the government in Armenia. The ability to be one step ahead of the Western-narrative and expose the players before they even take to the stage, meant that people already knew what to look for.
When the protesters hit the streets, and as the protests dragged on, US NGOs and Western media reports supporting the protests confirmed initial Russian warnings. When clumsy, overt assets like Pashinyan began getting involved, there was little doubt that electrical prices, while a real point of contention, were being used as a means to create a larger, more disruptive, and ultimately dangerous attempt at foreign-backed regime change.
In the future, the government of Armenia should be careful about giving such points of contention for foreign interests to use in the first place - meaning that dedication to economic and social progress cannot be ignored, even if one is confident they can tamp down potential protests.
Other nations around the world have a lot to learn from how Russia disrupted this latest attempt by America to project power beyond its shores and disrupt the lives of a sovereign people thousands of miles away. By simply informing people of what is really going on, following the money, and exposing the players involved, people in Armenia were able to assess for themselves whether or not to support the mobs - they chose wisely not to. Were Armenia to adopt similar laws as Russia's regarding NGOs - mandating that they declare openly and often their foreign funding - people can better assess whether or not mobs these NGOs are supporting are truly marching for their interests, or Wall Street and Washington's.