Q: (L) In terms of these Earth Changes, Edgar Cayce is one of 
  the most famous prognosticators of recent note, a large 
  number of the prophecies he made seemingly were erroneous 
  in terms of their fulfillment.  For example, he prophesied 
  that Atlantis would rise in 1969, but it did not though 
  certain structures were discovered off the coast of Bimini 
  which are thought by many to be remnants of Atlantis. 
  These did, apparently, emerge from the sand at that time. 
A: Example of one form of symbolism. 
Q: (L) Well, in terms of this symbolism, could this be 
  applied to the remarks you made about the two little boys 
  who were missing in South Carolina. 
A: Yes. 
Q: (L) And the symbolism was that you were reading the event 
  from 3rd density into sixth density terms and then 
  transmitting it back into 3rd, and while the ideation was 
  correct, the exact specifics, in 3rd density terms, were 
  slightly askew.  Is that what we are dealing with here? 
A: 99.9 per cent would not understand that concept.  Most are 
  always looking for literal translations of data.  Analogy 
  is novice who attends art gallery, looks at abstract 
  painting and says "I don't get it." 
Q: (L) Well, let's not denigrate literal translations or at 
  least attempts to get things into literal terms.  I like 
  realistic art work. I am a realist in my art preferences. 
  I want trees to look like trees and people to have only 
  two arms and legs.  Therefore, I also like some 
  literalness in my prognostications. 
A: Some is okay, but, beware or else "California falls into 
  the ocean" will always be interpreted as California 
  falling into the ocean. 
Q: [General uproar]  (F) Wait a minute, what was the 
  question? (L) I just said I liked literalness in my 
  prophecies.  (F) Oh, I know what they are saying.  People 
  believe that California is just going to go splat and that 
  Phoenix is going to be on the seacoast, never mind that 
  it's at 1800 feet elevation, it's just going to drop down 
  to sea level, or the sea level is going to rise, but it's 
  not going to affect Virginia Beach even though that's at 
  sea level.  I mean... somehow Phoenix is just going to 
  drop down and none of the buildings are going to be 
  damaged, even though its going to fall 1800 feet...  (T) 
  Slowly.  It's going to settle.  (F) Slowly?  It would have 
  to be so slowly it's unbelievable how slowly it would have 
  to be. (T)  It's been settling for the last five million 
  years, we've got a ways to go in the next year and a half! 
  (F) Right!  That's my point.  (T) In other words, when 
  people like Scallion and Sun Bear and others say 
  California is going to fall into the ocean, they are not 
  saying that the whole state, right along the border is 
  going to fall into the ocean, they are using the term 
  California to indicate that the ocean ledge along the 
  fault line has a probability of breaking off and sinking 
  on the water side, because it is a major fracture.  We 
  understand that that is not literal.  Are you telling us 
  that there is more involved here as far as the way we are 
  hearing what these predictions say? 
A: Yes. 
Q: (T) Are we understanding what you are saying? 
A: Some. 
Q: (T) So, when we talk about California falling into the 
  ocean, we are not talking about the whole state literally 
  falling into the ocean? 
A: In any case, even if it does, how long will it take to do 
  this? 
Q: (LM) It could take three minutes or three hundred years. 
  (T) Yes.  That is "open" as you would say. 
A: Yes. But most of your prophets think it is not open.