Keyhole said:Ok, I understand the point - that things may have been completely different even in our recent history, but things are rapidly changing now so it is difficult to make any assumptions about what level of exposure (etc) or type of light is best.Laura said:The conditions we are in right now don't really matter if they are not what we evolved to encounter.
You might benefit a lot from reading "The Idea of History" as posted on another thread, and using the methods he describes to begin to try to get in touch with your inner paleolithic ancestor.
Thanks for the book recommendation, I will add it to the list
And not just light levels and types, but just about everything. That's why we are having such a devil of a time sorting out what works and what doesn't and for who. Obviously, with epigenetics entering the picture, there is going to be a lot of variation. But, there is also a baseline that is linked to our evolutionary substratum. Finding and adjusting for that is tricky as we have ALL witnessed!!!
So, basically, those theorists of whatever kind who use history to form their ideas really need to take onboard the fact that uniformitarianism just doesn't give an accurate picture and we really need to consider drastic changes in our RECENT history (i.e. last 20K years forward AT LEAST), which are too recent to have contributed much to the basic human evolutionary process which appears to have reached its culmination 75 to 50 K years ago. Everything since then appears to be mainly epigenetics and bottlenecks.