Jedi Council Member
They will always have something to divide people, people are divisive and are easily divided, the problem being with getting cleansed of Islam is that any kind of opposition could end up cleansed with Islam like it was in Nazi Germany, including all the people here. Either way Europe will get it s share of blood and violence because no matter what measures are applied as restricted controlled migration it is too late to stop it, there are too many radicalised Muslims. It is not so much fault of the religion as it is about politics that is geopolitics.And sure, there'll be a bit of a mess as the civil war breaks out, and sure, everyone will suffer to some extent, but it'll be better in the end when we can all march forth into the glory of a new society cleansed of the scourge of Islam. Things will be so much better, because at least the psychopaths in power won't have anything to use to divide us, right?
Islam is probably more radical not just because of it s ideology but also because most of those countries are poor, there is no critical thinking, and there is no education but those of imam s, and maybe it has something to do with the biological factors of population also. And those countries are poor primarly thanks to West and corrupt puppets they impose , but also the population shares their responsibility but acts like most do without it, living in fear and pursuing selfish goals.
Islam would not be different, only maybe there would not be saudi vahabbism that is main fuel and by that so much seed for terrorism if there was no British interference in Saudi Arabia prior WWI to weaken Turks.So if you look at Muslim culture, beliefs and behavior and you want to blame the West for those, you run into the same problems the leftists run into with their identity politics. How far do you want to go back? Would it be different had America not invaded Iraq? If it hadn't supported Saddam, or the Mujaheddin? If the Brits hadn't created all those nations in the Middle East? If the Crusades hadn't happened? Does any of this justify the more outrageous Sharia practices? Is the West responsible for the moral shortcomings of Saudi citizens? Or of any Muslim individual who's a religious zealot? What level of suffering by the individual justifies moral shortcomings, if any?
Definetly yes there would be less modern terrorism not only in Europe but also in the Middle East because there would be less of recruiting ground, and west is primary responsible for migration and chaos which creates terrorists and enables and supports their activities. Nothing justifies but not all share your view and so called morality. Maybe a good example is to start as being ignorant non educated hillman that has only known about Kuran his all life and get his whole family murdered by bombs so it is easily possible for him to become radicalised by more extreme version, that is he does not has to be at all because he only wants revenge because hate is what fuels him, and revenge is blind. But you do not have to be a Muslim at all to react in that way, it is not definable by religion. Yes Islam is bonus in that way because it teaches violence against that kind of offence by infidels. I can tell you openly if that happened to me I would not spare those coalition troops :) To me it is funny that western population thought that after all their politicians have done, of course ordinary people being not guilty but ignorant, that there would be no reprucussions, and the most severe one from their politicians in their own countries allowing unregulated migration and acts of terrorism.