The Living Force
This video is certainly food for thought. As far as vaccine safety goes, autism is not the only concern. Cancer can potentially be a side effect because vaccines are contaminated with large amounts of fetal DNA (as well as other DNA).

It certainly is very disturbing, especially if those wanting to study this issue have been prevented from doing so, by some sort of 'catch 22' situation. I.E. You can't get access to the database unless you have grant funding, and you can't get grant funding unless you have access to the database.... catch 22.


Wandering Star

Jedi Council Member
Yes, despite being members of this forum and knowing (actually discernment and Occam's razor) what we know, life sometimes passes over.

All there are lessons, right?

We will do what we will do, right?

At the beginning of Laura's communications with the C's, when they asked for the number 666, they identified it with the "credit cards" that were being used at that time. Laura asked if there was any way to get rid of that "control" and the C's answered something like: only if you want to die of hunger.

On the subject of vaccines I know what to do about myself, but for my son I must have an agreement with my wife and she barely has one foot outside the Matrix.

We live in a world designed to harm our body. Fluor, pesticides, vehicle emissions, etc ... The only way not to enter toxins into the body is to die of starvation.

In my case I have "meditated" on my situation and I will try to do the best with the "letters" that have touched me.

They will never reveal the composition of coca-cola, so each of us will do what we can.

Someone said, "it is the soul that matters, not the body."

A very difficult issue this.


The Living Force
FOTCM Member
We live in a world designed to harm our body. Fluor, pesticides, vehicle emissions, etc ... The only way not to enter toxins into the body is to die of starvation.
For water, you can buy a water distiller or fluoride filter. For food, you can try to buy non-gmo and no pesticides.


FOTCM Member
Just came across this - Physicians for Informed Consent:...
Speaking of which, if not noticed, this came as a nice surprise on SoTT when read today from the The Association of American Physicians and Surgeons:

Their letter:

To: Oversight and Investigations Subcommittee, House Energy and Commerce Committee

Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor and Pensions

Re: Statement federal vaccine mandates

Feb. 26, 2019

The Association of American Physicians and Surgeons (AAPS) strongly opposes federal interference in medical decisions, including mandated vaccines. After being fully informed of the risks and benefits of a medical procedure, patients have the right to reject or accept that procedure. The regulation of medical practice is a state function, not a federal one. Governmental preemption of patients' or parents' decisions about accepting drugs or other medical interventions is a serious intrusion into individual liberty, autonomy, and parental decisions about child-rearing.

A public health threat is the rationale for the policy on mandatory vaccines. But how much of a threat is required to justify forcing people to accept government-imposed risks? Regulators may intervene to protect the public against a one-in-one million risk of a threat such as cancer from an involuntary exposure to a toxin, or-one-in 100,000 risk from a voluntary (e.g. occupational) exposure. What is the risk of death, cancer, or crippling complication from a vaccine? There are no rigorous safety studies of sufficient power to rule out a much lower risk of complications, even one in 10,000, for vaccines. Such studies would require an adequate number of subjects, a long duration (years, not days), an unvaccinated control group ("placebo" must be truly inactive such as saline, not the adjuvant or everything-but-the-intended-antigen), and consideration of all adverse health events (including neurodevelopment disorders).

Vaccines are necessarily risky, as recognized by the U.S. Supreme Court and by Congress. The Vaccine Injury Compensation Program has paid some $4 billion in damages, and high hurdles must be surmounted to collect compensation. The damage may be so devastating that most people would prefer restored function to a multimillion-dollar damage award.

The smallpox vaccine is so dangerous that you can't get it now, despite the weaponization of smallpox. Rabies vaccine is given only after a suspected exposure or to high-risk persons such as veterinarians. The whole-cell pertussis vaccine was withdrawn from the U.S. market, a decade later than from the Japanese market, because of reports of severe permanent brain damage. The acellular vaccine that replaced it is evidently safer, though somewhat less effective.

The risk: benefit ratio varies with the frequency and severity of disease, vaccine safety, and individual patient factors. These must be evaluated by patient and physician, not imposed by a government agency.

Measles is the much-publicized threat used to push for mandates, and is probably the worst threat among the vaccine-preventable illnesses because it is so highly contagious. There are occasional outbreaks, generally starting with an infected individual coming from somewhere outside the U.S. The majority, but by no means all the people who catch the measles have not been vaccinated. Almost all make a full recovery, with robust, life-long immunity. The last measles death in the U.S. occurred in 2015, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention(CDC). Are potential measles complications including death in persons who cannot be vaccinated due to immune deficiency a justification for revoking the rights of all Americans and establishing a precedent for still greater restrictions on our right to give-or withhold-consent to medical interventions? Clearly not.

Many serious complications have followed MMR vaccination, and are listed in the manufacturers' package insert, though a causal relationship may not have been proved. According to a 2012 report by the Cochrane Collaboration, "The design and reporting of safety outcomes in MMR vaccine studies, both pre- and post-marketing, are largely inadequate" (cited by the National Vaccine Information Center).

Mandate advocates often assert a need for a 95% immunization rate to achieve herd immunity. However, Mary Holland and Chase Zachary of NYU School of Law argue, in the Oregon Law Review, that because complete herd immunity and measles eradication are unachievable, the better goal is for herd effect and disease control. The best outcome would result, they argue, from informed consent, more open communication, and market-based approaches.

Even disregarding adverse vaccine effects, the results of near-universal vaccination have not been completely positive. Measles, when it does occur, is four to five times worse than in pre-vaccination times, according to Lancet Infectious Diseases, because of the changed age distribution: more adults, whose vaccine-based immunity waned, and more infants, who no longer receive passive immunity from their naturally immune mother to protect them during their most vulnerable period.

Measles is a vexing problem, and more complete, forced vaccination will likely not solve it. Better public health measures-earlier detection, contact tracing, and isolation; a more effective, safer vaccine; or an effective treatment are all needed. Meanwhile, those who choose not to vaccinate now might do so in an outbreak, or they can be isolated. Immunosuppressed patients might choose isolation in any event because vaccinated people can also possibly transmit measles even if not sick themselves.

Issues that Congress must consider:
  • Manufacturers are virtually immune from product liability, so the incentive to develop safer products is much diminished. Manufacturers may even refuse to make available a product believed to be safer, such as monovalent measles vaccine in preference to MMR (measles-mumps-rubella). Consumer refusal is the only incentive to do better.
  • There are enormous conflicts of interest involving lucrative relationships with vaccine purveyors.
  • Research into possible vaccine adverse effects is being quashed, as is dissent by professionals.
  • There are many theoretical mechanisms for adverse effects from vaccines, especially in children with developing brains and immune systems. Note the devastating effects of Zika or rubella virus on developing humans, even though adults may have mild or asymptomatic infections. Many vaccines contain live viruses intended to cause a mild infection. Children's brains are developing rapidly-any interference with the complex developmental symphony could be ruinous.
  • Vaccines are neither 100% safe nor 100% effective. Nor are they the only available means to control the spread of disease.
AAPS believes that liberty rights are unalienable. Patients and parents have the right to refuse vaccination, although potentially contagious persons can be restricted in their movements (e.g. as with Ebola), as needed to protect others against a clear and present danger. Unvaccinated persons with no exposure to a disease and no evidence of a disease are not a clear or present danger.

AAPS represents thousands of physicians in all specialties nationwide. It was founded in 1943 to protect private medicine and the patient-physician relationship.

Respectfully yours,

Jane M. Orient, M.D., Executive Director

Association of American Physicians and Surgeons


The Living Force
With regard to vaccines, religious exemptions are now under fire, mostly in States where Democrats hold sway, funnily enough.

Apparently the Academy of Pediatrics is listing removal of religious exemptions as it's No. 1 item on 'things to do': Personally I don't think that is going to inspire much public confidence. Especially as the manufacture of vaccines challenge many religious beliefs.



Jedi Master
Nefarious intents me thinks, "We Deliberately Spread AIDS Virus To Wipe Out Blacks In South Africa" Apartheid Era Officer Confess,


The Living Force
FOTCM Member
I have not seen much real data / studies on the vaccine-autism connection but this looks convincing enough:

Real-Life Data Show that the CDC Vaccine Schedule is Causing Harm
The independent consultant identified a total of 3,344 pediatric patients born into the practice over the ten-year period, including 715 unvaccinated children and 2,629 partially vaccinated children. The medical records showed that the latter received about three to six times fewer vaccines (7 to 18 shots) than same-age children vaccinated according to the CDC schedule (25 to 40 shots).
The practice data showed the following:

  • One case of autism in the unvaccinated group—a rate of 1 in 715.
  • Six cases of autism in the partially vaccinated group—a rate of 1 in 438.
  • In comparison, government data from the National Health Interview Survey (NHIS) show a diagnosed autism rate of 1 in 45 children (aged 3-17 years) as of 2014 and, by 2016, a rate of 1 in 36.

In an interview with Del Bigtree on the show HighWire, Dr. Thomas put his practice data in a wider context, noting that if California followed the modified vaccine schedule, it would spare about 9,000 cases of autism annually. At a national level, the slower schedule would prevent about 90,000 cases of autism annually. Dr. Thomas also explained that the consultant’s findings validate his own waiting room observations of an “incredibly healthy” patient population. On the other hand, he speculated that the autism rate in the unvaccinated group might have been even lower—perhaps 1 in 1,000 or less—if his unvaccinated group came from a low-risk patient population. In his clinic, however, many of the children in the unvaccinated group forego vaccination precisely because they are “high risk” for vaccine injury due to a family history of autoimmunity or autism in other family members. The pediatrician also observed that he watches all of his vaccinated patients carefully—if any show signs of immune system trouble, he calls a halt to vaccination to help the child get back into balance.

Dr. Thomas is not the only pediatrician to have achieved a dramatically lower autism rate in their patient population through a modified vaccine schedule and support for a healthy lifestyle.


The Living Force


FOTCM Member
(Natural News) In yet another example of medical tyranny gone insane in the USA, a heavily armed SWAT team operating as part of the Chandler, Arizona Police Department smashed down the door with guns drawn in order to medically kidnap a child who a doctor claimed had a fever.

The child, media reports say, is “unvaccinated,” which of course now justifies all the insane violence and gunplay demonstrated by police. The police also kidnapped another child from the same home and have not yet returned the children to the parents...
I thought, no, really! A vaccine-gestapo spreads fear to all the other parents who might step out of line and even question authorities.:-(

This was posted on SOTT Mar 12 - excellent article that brings up stats and important old truths (it is packed full of background):

"At first it was just a simple clinical observation.
Every Second Child

Click for Amazon link.
I observed that many infants, after they received routine vaccines like tetanus, diphtheria, polio, whooping cough or whatever, became ill. Some became extremely ill, and in fact some died. It was an observation, It was not a theory. So my first reaction was to look at the reasons why this happened. Of course I found it was more likely to happen in infants who were ill at the time of receiving a vaccine, or infants who had been ill recently, or infants who were incubating an infection. Of course in the early stages of incubation there is no way whatsoever that anyone can detect the disease. They turn up later on. Furthermore, some of the reactions to the vaccines were not those that were listed in the standard literature.

They were very strange reactions indeed. A third observation was that with some of these reactions which normally resulted in death I found that I could reverse them by giving large amounts of vitamin C intramuscularly or intravenously. One would have expected, of course, that the authorities would take an interest in these observations that resulted in a dramatic drop in the death rate of infants in the area under my control, a very dramatic drop. But instead of taking an interest their reaction was one of extreme hostility. This forced me to look into the question of vaccination further, and the further I looked into it the more shocked I became. I found that the whole vaccine business was indeed a gigantic hoax. Most doctors are convinced that they are useful, but if you look at the proper statistics and study the instance of these diseases you will realise that this is not so."
Dr Kalokerinos also said something in 1995 that it appears Dr. Aaby's study was able to corroborate in 2017:
"And if you want to see what harm vaccines do, don't come to Australia or New Zealand or any place, go to Africa and you will see it there."


The Living Force
Del Bigtree is being accused of 'antisemitism' because he supports the Hasidic Jews in New York rights to religious freedoms in choosing not to vaccinate their children on religious grounds. He was accused of this when he pinned a Star of David to himself and drew similarities to the Jewish Holocaust as part of a Vaccine Choice demonstration in Texas.

These are troubling times, if you ask me. It gives rise to the idea that vaccination may actually be a faith based religion, rather than a science as bureaucrats are trying to tell us. Unfortunately the 'science' done by the promoters of this religion has done nothing to support it, as shown by his organisation's investigations.



FOTCM Member
These are troubling times, if you ask me. It gives rise to the idea that vaccination may actually be a faith based religion, rather than a science as bureaucrats are trying to tell us. Unfortunately the 'science' done by the promoters of this religion has done nothing to support it, as shown by his organisation's investigations.
Here is how Jon Rappoport put it with an email (no link) received today:

The true goal of immunization
In the recent propaganda campaign, designed to use a measles outbreak as an example of what happens when parents don't vaccinate their children, commentators have stated that, prior to the "epidemic," measles cases in the area had shrunk to zero---as if eliminating the disease were a proper goal of vaccination.

This is bluster and nonsense. At one time, before the obsession to give shots took hold, parents would take their children to the home of a child who had come down with measles, so these kids could catch the illness and be done with it.

Zero reported measles cases is no sign that all is well. Vaccines can and do cause other very serious disease problems, and because the symptoms don't resemble measles, other names are given to these conditions, and no connection is made to the effects of vaccines.

The true goal of immunization has nothing to do with vaccination. It has to do with strengthening a child's immune system so he/she can stage an acute and full inflammatory response when illness occurs, after which the child gains lifelong immunity from measles, mumps, chickenpox, and the like.

A child with a weak immune system will become ill from a number of causes, regardless of vaccinations. One of these major causes is poor nutrition. No vaccine can cure that. Good clean food can.

But these simple facts are ignored as "conspiracy theory" by doctors. If a mainstream doctor gives any credence to the idea of making the immune system stronger, he'll deny this reduces or eliminates the need for vaccination.

Of course, the medical attacks leveled at "anti-vaxxers" are, at the highest level, nothing more than an insistence that chemical drugs and vaccines must continue to sell. These power players are quite aware that a sensible and natural approach to healthcare does, as a matter of course, vastly reduce the interest in their products.

When it comes to fundamental politics, the medical cartel has, for a hundred years---backed by government and huge media operations-been engaged in the process of holding the planet hostage to chemical treatments. This is an example of why the Founders never permitted government to engage in commercial operations.

The result would be enforced monopoly.​


The Living Force
If you come across science that you 'don't like', you can just refuse to fund it, and when people turn to other sources of funding, you can stop them from doing that as well. This is what "Go Fund Me" has recently done to Professor Christopher Exley.

Apparently Aluminium is the latest dangerous toxin that pharma puts into vaccines. We are not allowed to know any risks. Of course, main stream media does not seem to be reporting on this story. This too, seems to have been suppressed in the rush to inject people with as many vaccines as possible.

Medical police state cuts off research funding from scientist who found that vaccines cause autism


FOTCM Member
Here is another recent short emailed article from Jon Rappoport (link):

Toxic aluminum in vaccines
I hope that aluminum, an ingredient in many vaccines, keeps moving up on the chart of key issues in the vaccine wars. The mainstream medical forces believe they can ward off any critiques. They're wrong. But the exposure of the truth has to keep escalating.

At Robert Kennedy, Jr.'s site, the World Mercury Project, there is a science library of studies referring to toxic aluminum in vaccines. I recommend reading all the citations. They're highly informative, and some of them make excellent ammunition. Here are a few examples:

"Aluminium has been shown to be present in brain tissue in sporadic Alzheimer's disease. We have made the first ever measurements of aluminium in brain tissue from 12 donors diagnosed with familial Alzheimer's disease. The concentrations of aluminium were extremely high...Overall, the concentrations were higher than all previous measurements of brain aluminium except cases of known aluminium-induced encephalopathy...The unique quantitative data and the stunning images of aluminium in familial Alzheimer's disease brain tissue raise the spectre of aluminium's role in this devastating disease." ("Aluminium in brain tissue in familial Alzheimer's disease," Ambreen Mirza, Andrew King, Claire Troakes, Christopher Exley. Journal of Trace Elements in Medicine and Biology, November 2016.)

"Vaccine adjuvants and vaccines may induce autoimmune and inflammatory manifestations in susceptible individuals. To date most human vaccine trials utilize aluminum (Al) adjuvants as placebos despite much evidence showing that Al in vaccine-relevant exposures can be toxic to humans and animals...It appears that Gardasil via its Al adjuvant and HPV antigens has the ability to trigger neuroinflammation and autoimmune reactions, further leading to behavioral changes...In light of these findings, this study highlights the necessity of proceeding with caution with respect to further mass-immunization practices with a vaccine of yet unproven long-term clinical benefit in cervical cancer prevention" (Rotem Inbar, Ronen Weiss, Lucija Tomljenovic, Maria-Teresa Arango, Yael Deri, Christopher A Shaw, Joab Chapman, Miri Blank, Yehuda Shoenfeld. Immunol Res, July 2016.)

"Infants and young children throughout the world receive high quantities of aluminum from multiple inoculations. Incremental changes to the vaccination schedule during the past several years significantly increased the quantity of aluminum in childhood shots. Numerous studies provide compelling evidence that injected aluminum can be detrimental to health. Aluminum is capable of remaining in cells long after vaccination and may cause neurologic and autoimmune disorders. During early development, the child's brain is more susceptible to toxins and the kidneys are less able to eliminate them. Thus, children have a greater risk than adults of adverse reactions to aluminum in vaccines. Millions of children every year are injected with vaccines containing mercury and aluminum despite well-established experimental evidence of the potential for additive or synergistic toxicity when an organism is exposed to two or more toxic metals." (Neil Z. Miller. Journal of American Physicians and Surgeons, Winter 2016.)

"In young children, a highly significant correlation exists between the number of pediatric aluminum-adjuvanted vaccines administered and the rate of autism spectrum disorders. Many of the features of aluminum-induced neurotoxicity may arise, in part, from autoimmune reactions, as part of the ASIA syndrome [Autoimmune Syndrome Induced by Adjuvants]. Aluminum is added to vaccines to help the vaccine work more effectively, but unlike dietary aluminum which will usually clear rapidly from the body, aluminum used in vaccines and injected is designed to provide a long-lasting cellular exposure. Thus, the problem with vaccine-derived aluminum is really twofold: It drives the immune response even in the absence of a viral or bacterial threat and it can make its way into the central nervous system. It is not really a matter of much debate that aluminum in various forms can be neurotoxic." (Chris Shaw, L. Tomljenovic. Immunologic Research, (2013) 56:304-316 DOI 10.1007/s12026-013-8403-1.)

Based on these, and many other suggestive citations from studies, what honest researcher wouldn't want to probe the aluminum-vaccine issue to its depths?

A recent paper by several authors, including aluminum expert, Christopher Exley, details a finding of alarmingly high levels of aluminum in the brains of children with autism. The research doesn't implicate vaccines directly, but it certainly points the way to follow-up investigation---and what should be a moratorium on the production of vaccines using aluminum.

Robert Kennedy, Jr.: "Dr. Exley's findings have shocking implications for today's generation of children who receive 5,000 mcg. of aluminum in vaccines by the age of 18 months and up to 5,250 additional mcg. if all recommended boosters, HPV and meningitis vaccines are administered."

Here is a list of U.S. vaccines containing one or more aluminum adjuvants: Dt, Td, DTaP, Hib, Hep A, Hep B, HPV, Meningococcal, Pneumococcal, DTaP-IPV, DTaP-IPV/Hib, Hep A/HepB.


The Living Force
Dr John Bergman (chiropractic doctor) talks about the timeline for government control of your life. It's well worth a look and also he's just so cheerful. I think its time to play these things, before they censor them permanently.... and/or start locking people up. It sure does look scary in America right now. And, by implication, the rest of the world.



The Living Force
FOTCM Member

Maybe I should tell the man that mandatory vaccines are racist and a tool of oppression by the white patriarchy.
Top Bottom