Vaccines

It has now been more than one annual cycle for school enrollments since the California vaccine law went into effect, and I have helped more than one California child successfully enroll in a California school with medical exemptions to vaccines.

Also, I've checked the case status against Dr. Bob Sears and nothing has happened. I had to go to the Medical Board's new website https://search.dca.ca.gov/ and searched the license number 60936. I am pretty certain that Dr. Sears will keep his medical license if he wants to and the filing of the disciplinary action against him will not go anywhere and it was all just public relations and intimidation against doctors who are easily intimidated.
 
My 23 yo son is traveling to Rwanda in a couple of months for educational purposes. He has been un-vaccinated since birth, a choice that came with a lot of education on how to keep himself healthy and learn natural remedies, something he has embraced, fortunately. He did receive a tetanus shot after losing a battle with a planer/edger last summer. (He's lucky he didn't lose his finger!)

Now that he is traveling abroad, I'm kind of freaking out about all the vaccines that the school is requiring, or at least strongly suggesting that he would need to receive in a very short amount of time. He may choose to waive the vaccines, but Rwanda can apparently use their discretion about allowing him into the country if he doesn't have proof of receiving the yellow fever vaccine, at the very least. It seems that the program coordinator is assuming his childhood vaccines are up to date, when they aren't.

And then there's the issue of him re-entering the US if he remains un-vaxxed, should he happen to pick up something a vaccine is available for.

He has been on the iodine protocol for a few months, and convinced him that a small bottle of Lugol's will go a long way at avoiding some of the nasty pathogens that there are no vaccines for.

Does anyone have any suggestions, experience or at the very least, some reassurance, for this situation?
 
The case of Alfie Evans who died after over a year in an unexplained comatose state and the legal battle that preceded his death were quite a hot topic on social media for some time. SOTT posted articles about it too:

The court decision controversy aside, I found an article that links Alfie's state to potential vaccine poisoning. It was written by a father of a child injured as a result of vaccination, which initially made me suspicious that his fight for a certainly worthy cause may make his research a bit subjective - but the article does make sense to me:

Four Months of Critical Information is Missing from Alfie Evans' Timeline

Baby Alfie Evans’ life recently came to an end when the Alder Hey Trust pushed to suffocate and starve him two weeks before his second birthday. Alfie’s tragic death raises more questions than answers – specifically why was hospital leadership’s so intent on ending Alfie’s life?

The publicly available court document appears to skip approximately four months of critical information, from May 2016 to September 2016. [1] You will see there was an indication Alfie was not right as early as July of 2016. [1]

Only Tom and Kate (Alfie’s parents) or medical records can fill this time period of critical events.

Alfie Evans’ Missing Pediatric Visits
My assumption is Tom and Kate brought Alfie to see a pediatrician for “well-baby checkups”. In the United States, that term is a euphemism for getting your child injected with toxic vaccines. As you can imagine, I noticed pediatric visits and evaluations strangely absent from the documentation.

Timing here is important. Why?

Personal experience has taught me doctors rarely attribute sudden health anomalies with vaccines. They normally classify neurological regression or illness following an injection as a simple coincidence. This fact is important – it could be one justification for not including the information into the court record.

Being a father of a vaccine-injured child has taught me to look a bit deeper.

Let’s first have a look at the metadata in Alfie’s documented timeline. We can then see why the timing of events during this four month period is significant.

Alfie Evans’ Timeline and Reported Sequence of Events (MAY 2016 – DEC 2016)
  1. May 9th – The timeline outlined in the court case for Alfie Evans started with his healthy birth at Liverpool Women’s Hospital on May 9th, 2016. It was reported that, “Alfie was a happy smiling baby who seemed to be perfectly well.” [1]
  2. June – No data.
  3. July [mid?] – The court document describes Alfie developed a “divergent squint” in July.[1]
  4. August – No data.
  5. September [mid?] – Alfie was seen by his general practitioner for his first developmental check. His mother was concerned about his smiles becoming less frequent and sleeping. [1]
  6. November 11th – He was reviewed at the outpatient clinic in Alder Hey Hospital. On examination he was there found to be functioning in a range appropriate to a six week – 2 month old infant. An MRI brain/spine scan was arranged for 30 November 2016. [1]
  7. November 30th – A consulting pediatrician noted “The MRI brain scan done [on November 30th] showed evidence of borderline delayed myelination for his chronological age and unexplained diffusion restriction along sensory motor cortex, the cortical-spinal tracts and fibres leading into the medial temporal lobes.” [1]
  8. December 14th – Alfie was admitted to Alder Hey Accident and Emergency Department. His parents reported seizure-like activity. A microbiology test on a nasopharyngeal aspirate (NPA) showed rhinovirus/enterovirus. Alfie was diagnosed with acute viral bronchiolitis and a possible prolonged febrile convulsion. [1]
  9. December 15th – Dr. “R” reported sudden unprovoked movements compatible with infantile/epileptic spasms. Midazolam which is a benzodiazepine was administered to Alfie. [1]
  10. December 16th – An EEG performed on the 16th December 2016 confirmed hypsarrhythmia (electrical correlate to clinical epileptic or infantile spasms, disorganised EEG). Alfie was commenced on a different anti-convulsant, Vigabatrin. [1]
  11. December 19th – Dr. “R” recommended a plan to transfer Alfie to the High Dependency Unit for non-invasive respiratory support. However, due to a rapid decline in his condition, Alfie was transferred to the Pediatric Intensive Care Unit (PICU). This was due to Alfie suffering from pneumonia. [1]
Vaccine Schedule Overlay on Alfie’s Timeline
Next I decided to overlay the United Kingdom’s vaccine schedule over Alfie’s timeline. I made several reasonable assumptions you need to be aware of. As I mentioned earlier, Alfie’s parents or medical records would confirm the following:

  • Assumption #1: Alfie visited a pediatrician or general practitioner.
  • Assumption #2: Alfie was vaccinated. UK vaccine compliance is around +90%. [2]
  • Assumption #3: Alfie was vaccinated on time in accordance to the UK schedule. [3]
  • Assumption #4: Alfie received all vaccines during his pediatric visits.
What follows is an overlay of the two sets of data.

If Alfie followed the United Kingdom vaccine schedule, he would have received 9 vaccine doses prior to his first developmental check in September 2016. The doctors would have also observed and recorded these facts somewhere in Alfie’s medical records.

Please note this is the appointment where Alfie’s mother reported he was smiling less frequently and that, “…he [Alfie] was sleeping to an extent that had begun to alarm her…

Sleeping and lethargy are common indicators of encephalitis, a medical term used to describe brain swelling (also listed on vaccine inserts as a side effect).

https://vactruth.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/05/alfie-evans-possible-vaccine-sked-1.jpg

The Concerning “Divergent Squint”
As we work through Alfie’s timeline, recall it was reported that Alfie had acquired a “divergent squint” sometime in July [see below]. [1] This condition can go by different terms such as exotropia, strabismus, or oculomotor nerve palsy and can be caused by viral infections (which Alfie had). [1, 4]

It’s well known in the medical literature that,

“Enteroviral encephalitis presents with wide range of symptoms…fever, headache, lethargy, drowsiness, altered sensorium, coma, … myoclonic jerks, oculomotor problems (nystagmus, strabismus, or gaze paresis), and bulbar palsy (dysphagia, dysarthria, dysphonia, and facial weakness).” [5]

As a matter of fact, some of these symptoms – including oculomotor palsies – have been observed with infantile paralysis (also known as “polio”, which is an enterovirus) since 1884. [6]

Another piece of the puzzle falls into on December 14th where a Nasopharyngeal Aspirate (NP) test showed Alfie was infected with a, “…rhinovirus/ enterovirus.” [1]

A day later on December 15th, Dr. “R” reported,

[Alfie] remained profoundly encephalopathic/comatose and remained unresponsive to central noxious stimuli (i.e. painful/ uncomfortable stimulation delivered via rubbing of cranial nerve exit points in the area of his eyebrows). [1]

To summarize what we know from this short analysis, we find that,

  1. Alfie had an obvious oculomotor palsy in his left eye;
  2. Alfie was infected with a rhinovirus/ enterovirus, and that;
  3. Alfie’s brain was swollen (with seizures)
Your Arrogance Blinds You
Here is the million dollar question: What virus type was Alfie infected with?

I regard this as a critical question to be answered. I also would expect responsible experts in their trade would have explored all possible angles, wouldn’t they? After all, Judge Anthony Hayden arrogantly wrote about Alder Hey Children’s Hospital that it is,

“… a recognised centre of excellence in tertiary neurology and neurosurgery. It is a well-equipped, new and extremely impressive hospital. It specialises in investigating and treating children with the most complex neurological disorders. The range of investigation that I have set out above has also to be considered in the context of the available facilities at this particular hospital, which can properly be said to hold world-class facilities.” [1]

A world-class facility would have world-class methods to isolate and identify Alfie’s virus.

The Liverpool Brain Infections Group, funded by pharmaceutical companies like Novartis and Sanofi-Pasteur, would have likely looked at Alfie’s scans. [7]

Yet, Judge Hayden writes,

It is recognised that all the doctors have come to the conclusion that Alfie is suffering from a neurodegenerative disorder. Nobody knows what triggered or caused this devastating erosion of Alfie’s brain…” [1]

I don’t believe his response or the analysis performed by the doctors for one minute.

Conclusion
As I stated in the introduction, Alfie’s situation has raised more questions than answers. What do the records at Alder Hey show? What do the records at Alder Hey really show?

Was Alfie infected with a vaccine-derived virus? July is same month where Alfie would have received his first round of vaccinations. July is temporally significant.

Which came first, the “divergent squint” or the vaccine?

My bet is Alfie received the vaccine first.

The circumstances in which little Alfie’s life ended can be used to help parents get a glimpse into those adamant on protecting a corrupt system.

Godspeed Tom, Kate, and Alfie…

UPDATE:
  • After publication we were notified of two pieces of information. The first piece is a photo of Alfie’s vaccine records made available here.
https://vactruth.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/05/alfie-evans-vaccine-record.jpg

  • A screenshot of Kate’s [Alfie’s mother] Facebook feed shows a General Practitioner visit on September 9th, 2016. Vaccine date timestamp match.

https://vactruth.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/05/kate-james-vaccines.jpg

References:

  1. https://www.judiciary.gov.uk/wp-content/uploads/2018/02/alder-hey-v-evans.pdf
  2. https://files.digital.nhs.uk/pdf/d/3/nhs-immu-stat-eng-2016-17-rep.pdf
  3. https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk…
  4. https://www.merckmanuals.com/professional…
  5. Enteroviral encephalitis in children: clinical features, pathophysiology, and treatment advances
  6. http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/003591571100401446
  7. Brain Infections Group - Institute of Infection and Global Health - University of Liverpool
 
Last edited:
My 23 yo son is traveling to Rwanda in a couple of months for educational purposes. He has been un-vaccinated since birth, a choice that came with a lot of education on how to keep himself healthy and learn natural remedies, something he has embraced, fortunately. He did receive a tetanus shot after losing a battle with a planer/edger last summer. (He's lucky he didn't lose his finger!)

Now that he is traveling abroad, I'm kind of freaking out about all the vaccines that the school is requiring, or at least strongly suggesting that he would need to receive in a very short amount of time. He may choose to waive the vaccines, but Rwanda can apparently use their discretion about allowing him into the country if he doesn't have proof of receiving the yellow fever vaccine, at the very least. It seems that the program coordinator is assuming his childhood vaccines are up to date, when they aren't.

And then there's the issue of him re-entering the US if he remains un-vaxxed, should he happen to pick up something a vaccine is available for.

He has been on the iodine protocol for a few months, and convinced him that a small bottle of Lugol's will go a long way at avoiding some of the nasty pathogens that there are no vaccines for.

Does anyone have any suggestions, experience or at the very least, some reassurance, for this situation?

That is a unfortunate situation. Have you talked to him recently on how he thinks he would like to manage it? Since he is 23 years old, I would imagine that he probably made up his mind about how to handle it already?
 
Two recent developments re vaccines:

The criminalization of science whistleblowers: A mind-blowing interview with Judy Mikovits, PhD
June 8, 2018 by IWB

by Mike Adams

(Natural News) In one of the most shocking science videos you’ll see this year, molecular biologist Judy A. Mikovits, PhD, reveals the disturbing true story of how she was thrown in prison for blowing the whistle on deadly viral contamination of human vaccines.

With a well established history of working for the National Cancer Institute as a cancer research, Dr. Mikovits worked with human retroviruses like HIV. Her work focused on immunotherapy research and involved HIV.

In 2009, she was working on autism and related neurological diseases. She found that many of the study subjects has cancer, motor-neuron disorders and chronic fatigue Syndrome (CFS). She believed a virus may have been responsible for these symptoms, and through her research, she isolated the viruses that turned out to come from mice.

She soon realized that these protein and viral contaminants were being introduced into the human population via contaminated vaccines.

“Twenty-five million Americans are infected with the viruses that came out of the lab… into the humans via contaminated blood and vaccines.”

In response to this discovery, she was fired from her job, indicted, prosecuted, jailed and ordered to retract her research and publicly claim she “made it all up.” She refused to cover up the scientific evidence and was targeted and punished by the “vaccine deep state” establishment. She was actually thrown in prison. “Just dragged out of my house in shackles… I refused to denounce the data… we have the data… they basically said tell everybody you made it all up and you can go home. If you don’t, we’ll destroy you. And they did.”

This is what modern “science” has come to. Watch the full, astonishing video below, and check out Dr. Mikovitz’ book, Plague: One Scientists Intrepid Search for the Truth about Human Retroviruses and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome (ME/CFS), Autism, and Other Diseases.


The criminalization of science whistleblowers: A mind-blowing interview with Judy Mikovits, PhD – Investment Watch Blog
BREAKING NEWS: Two Italian scientists researching vaccines have computers seized by police

On February 23rd, two Italian scientists from Italy had all their research, records and computers confiscated by the Italian “finance” police. Why is this important? Because Dr. Antonietta Gatti and Dr. Stefano Montanari have been studying the potential effects of micro- and nano-particles that have contaminated common childhood vaccines for years and released a groundbreaking study last year calling out pharmaceutical companies on manufacturing practices that could cause vaccine injuries (study link below).

The doctors also had a full conference schedule over the next few months to explain their eye-opening discoveries about the particle contamination. All relevant database seized. Additionally, one of the doctors was scheduled to testify in the coming weeks in a high-profile Italian court case regarding a potential vaccine injury. Coincidence? Or the suppression of scientific findings that cast shadows on the powerful pharmaceutical industry?

Gatti and Montenari published a groundbreaking studying January 2017 in the International Journal of Vaccines and Vaccination, which revealed heavy metal contamination in every vaccine tested: “New Quality-Control Investigations on Vaccines: Micro and Nanocontamination

Study Abstract
Vaccines are under investigation for the possible side effects they can
cause. In order to supply new information, an electron-microscopy investigation
method was applied to the study of vaccines, aimed at verifying the presence of
solid contaminants by means of an Environmental Scanning Electron Microscope
equipped with an X-ray microprobe.


The results of this new investigation show the presence of micro- and nanosized particulate matter composed of inorganic elements in vaccines’ samples which is not declared among the components and whose unduly presence is, for the time being, inexplicable. A considerable part of the particulate contaminants have already been verified in other matrices and reported in literature as non biodegradable and non biocompatible. The evidence collected is suggestive of some hypotheses correlated to diseases that are mentioned and briefly discussed.

If you haven’t been following the situation in Europe, Italy was the first EU country to mandate more than 30 vaccines for children in order for them to start school. Throughout the legislative process, it was clear that pharmaceutical companies had a huge influence over italian lawmakers.

In 2016, vaccine maker GlaxoSmithKline announced its plans to increase its investment in the country by $1 BILLION. Was it an incentive to pressure Italian lawmakers into passing mandatory vaccine laws? Were Italian children sold to the highest bidder? Or just another random coincidence?

Read more here.

BREAKING NEWS: Two Italian scientists researching vaccines have computers seized by police - Learn The Risk

Regarding the second story, I initially read it in a different article and I remember the two scientists saying that all vaccines are contaminated w/ nanoparticles.
 
Also, I've checked the case status against Dr. Bob Sears and nothing has happened. I had to go to the Medical Board's new website https://search.dca.ca.gov/ and searched the license number 60936.

Dr. Sears settled the case instead of going to trial. He will be receiving 35 months of probation supervised by an approved monitor or approved professional enhancement program starting July 27, 2018, and has to attend some classes.

The settlement document link is below. If the link doesn't work, then go to the Medical Board's website https://search.dca.ca.gov/ , search the license number 60936, scroll down "SEARS, ROBERT WILLIAM" and click more detail, Public Documents and click DECISION.
Settlement document
http://www2.mbc.ca.gov/BreezePDL/do...0627\DMRAAAGL14\&did=AAAGL180627201150927.DID
 
They were giving free flu shots at the Golden Globes, can the propaganda get any worse than this? I wonder how much the sponsor paid for this madness? :cuckoo:

Here's a video of the moronic event:



Sandra Oh and Andy Samberg Give Out Free Flu Shots at the 2019 Golden Globes


Sandra Oh and Andy Samberg Give Out Free Flu Shots at the 2019 Golden Globes

With the 2019 Golden Globes finally here, it’s time for celebratory shots … but definitely not the kind you’re thinking of!

During Sunday night’s glamorous event, hosts Sandra Oh and Andy Samberg paused the awards ceremony to give out something else: flu shots.

“So roll up your sleeves, Hollywood, because you’re all getting flu shots,” Oh excitedly announced, as Samberg joined in, before a large group of people wearing white lab coats and holding syringes appeared on stage.

As the line of shot administers entered into the audience, LMFAO’s “Shots” played in the background.

image

NBC


image

Flu shots at the Golden Globes
NBC

“You know you wore a sleeveless gown for a reason!” joked Oh, as stars were approached by the white coats and needles, looking understandably freaked out.

“From the Rite Aid at Echo Park,” added Samberg, before noting, “If you are an anti-vaxxer, just put a napkin on — perhaps over — your head and we will skip you.”

Their flu stint came during a night where the duo already showed off some of their antics together.

When the two first-time Golden Globes hosts took to the stage to deliver the 76th annual award show’s opening monologue, Oh kicked off the night by joking that she and Samberg only got selected for the job because, “We’re the only two people in Hollywood who haven’t gotten in trouble for saying something offensive.”

Samberg went on to quip that his least favorite race of people is “the Hollywood half-marathon.”

They also offered up the Oscars hosting gig in the wake of Kevin Hart stepping down following backlash over old homophobic tweets.

“We are gonna have some fun, give out some awards and one lucky audience will host the Oscars!” Samberg said.
 
From The Truth About Vaccines 2017:
Del Bigtree Discusses Vaccine Safety at The Truth About Cancer LIVE 2017 in Orlando
Vaccine Lies Totally Destroyed!
When my good friend Del Bigtree (one of the producers of the vaccines documentary Vaxxed) spoke last month at The Truth About Cancer Live, the room was on fire and Del requested that we share this video which very well could be the best video ever.

In his powerful presentation, Del discusses the many shocking statistics revolving around vaccines, the drug companies that make them and he also looks at the questions”Are Vaccines dangerous?”


Excellent info!

And then there's this:
Big Pharma Giant GlaxoSmithKline Spends $300 Million For Access To DNA Database Of Genealogy Tracking Company 23AndMe

Since the launch of its DNA testing service in 2007, genomics giant 23andMe has convinced more than 5 million people to fill a plastic tube with half a teaspoon of saliva.

In case it hasn’t dawned on you yet, you are a commodity just like hand cream, dish soap and laundry detergent. In the 21st century, we are all in the process of becoming one of the batteries that provides the fuel for The Matrix that we live in. It is only when we “unplug ourselves” are we able to see this construct for what it really is, and what is that? The coming kingdom of Antichrist.
[...]
Yes, 23AndMe is harvesting your DNA and selling it for obscene amounts of money to Big Pharma. Just like the Mormon Church started Ancestry.com which has become a huge medical research genealogy testing company. Everything is for sale, and privacy is an old-fashioned notion that exists only in the memories of people old enough to remember what life was like before AI took over. Just a little food for thought if you were planning on having your DNA tested.
[...]
FROM WIRED: In return for all that spit (and some cash too), customers get insights into their biological inheritance, from the superficial—do you have dry earwax or wet?—to mutations associated with disease. What 23andMe gets is an ever-expanding supply of valuable behavioral, health, and genetic information from the 80 percent of its customers who consent to having their data used for research.

So last week’s announcement
that one of the world’s biggest drugmakers, GlaxoSmithKline, is gaining exclusive rights to mine 23andMe’s customer data for drug targets should come as no surprise. (Neither should GSK’s $300 million investment in the company). 23andMe has been sharing insights gleaned from consented customer data with GSK and at least six other pharmaceutical and biotechnology firms for the past three and a half years. And offering access to customer information in the service of science has been 23andMe’s business plan all along, as WIRED noted when it first began covering the company more than a decade ago.

But some customers were still surprised and angry, unaware of what they had already signed (and spat) away. GSK will receive the same kind of data pharma partners have generally received—summary level statistics that 23andMe scientists gather from analyses on de-identified, aggregate customer information—though it will have four years of exclusive rights to run analyses to discover new drug targets. Supporting this kind of translational work is why some customers signed up in the first place. But it’s clear the days of blind trust in the optimistic altruism of technology companies are coming to a close.
[...]
23andMe maintains that transparency is a core tenet of the company. “I think a really important distinction to make is that 23andMe operates under an independent ethical review board that oversees all of our research,” says Emily Drabant Conley, 23andMe’s vice president of business development, who oversaw the announcement of the GSK deal. “The guidelines we follow are essentially the same as what other research institutions follow.” So they should apply to any of the analyses GSK might want to run on 23andMe data, like a PheWAS, which connects constellations of symptoms and conditions across many people with a single genetic mutation they all share.

There’s a tension between the way 23andMe portrays itself as a health company, and simultaneously wants to be treated like every other tech company that makes its money from big data, says Allyse. “You can’t have it both ways. That’s why we have HIPAA, it’s why we have all these regulations that say health information is privileged information that can’t be commodified.”

But 23andMe, with its hybrid model, has been commodifying health and genetic data for years as it wades further into the field of drug discovery. In 2015, Forbes reported that the company had inked its first pharmaceutical company deal with Genentech, for $10 million up front, and up to $50 million if its data turned out to be useful for developing Parkinson’s treatments. Pfizer signed a data-sharing agreement of its own shortly after. That was back when 23andMe had data from only 650,000 consented individuals in its proprietary database. Its critics were unsure of the value of that information, self-reported as it was (and still is). But as the database has grown to the millions, differences in how customers interpret survey questions matter less and less to the company’s potential research partners, according to Spector-Bagdady.

“The hypothesis of this company was to circumvent medical records and just self-report,” Wojcicki told a room full researchers at an event on 23andMe’s campus in May. “Anyone can go get genomes. What’s really hard is phenotypic data.”

To get that kind of health and behavioral information, 23andMe is continually pushing surveys out to its customers. A few questions here, a few questions there; it’s kind of like going on a first date every time you log on. And people love talking about themselves. “We specialize in capturing phenotypic data on people longitudinally—on average 300 data points on each customer,” Wojcicki said. “That’s the most valuable by far.”

Read more:
https: //www.wired.com/story/23andme-glaxosmithkline-pharma-deal/
And who's to say this gathered data will not only produce new drugs, but new vaccines - like really really safe ones because data - right?!!
 
Dr. David Brownstein, author of Iodine: Why You Need It, Why You Can't Live Without It, wrote this about vaccines.

NY Times editorial on vaccines is a pseudoscientific mess! -- Sott.net
Dr Brownstein | New York Times Editorial On Vaccines: A Pseudoscience Mess!
New York Times Editorial On Vaccines: A Pseudoscience Mess!
David Brownstein
Jan 20 2019

(Note: My wife vetoed my initial headline: Failing New York Times Op-Ed Full of Fake Vaccine News. She claims that my sense of humor does not translate to all.)

The lead New York Times (NYT) editorial today is titled, “Know The Enemy.” According to the NYT, the “enemy” is anyone who questions the safety and efficacy of any vaccine.

I guess that makes me the enemy. I thought I was a board-certified physician trying to read and decipher the research on vaccines to help guide my patients on how to make their best health care decisions.

The NYT states, “Leading global health threats typically are caused by the plagues and perils of low-income countries — but vaccine hesitancy is as American as can be.” Both parts of that sentence are correct.

In the early 20th Century, infection was the number one killer of Americans and it killed a high percentage of our youth. However, by the 1950’s infection rates for nearly every childhood vaccine- preventable illness (as well as other infectious illnesses like scarlet fever) had drastically declined—BEFORE vaccines were developed and mandated. In fact, for the major vaccine-preventable illnesses such as measles, mumps, diphtheria, and pertussis, the death rate declined well over 90% BEFORE vaccines were mandated. How did that occur? The death rate from infectious diseases declined not by vaccination, but by public health measures. This includes providing clean water to our houses and safely removing waste products.

Did vaccines lower the death rate for their respective illnesses? We don’t know since the rates were already declining dramatically before the mass vaccination program began. To imply that vaccines were responsible for this dramatic decline in pediatric infectious deaths in the 20th Century is nothing more than FAKE NEWS!

One of the best indicators of the health of a country is the infant mortality rate. Researchers correlated the number of vaccines given to infants and the mortality rate for ages five and under. Guess who gave the most vaccines and guess who had the highest infant mortality rate? If you guessed the US, you win.

The NYT states, “On the internet, anti-vaccine propaganda has outpaced pro-vaccine public health information. The anti-vaxxers, as they are colloquially known, have hundreds of websites promoting their message, a roster of tech- and media-savvy influencers and an aggressive political arm that includes at least a dozen political action committees.”

Well, in this case there is just me. And, I am not that tech-savvy.

I don’t write anti-vaccine propaganda. I write about the science behind vaccines. And, if you study the science behind vaccines, it is hard not to question the wisdom of injecting our young with too many toxic-laden vaccines.

“The C.D.C., the nation’s leading public health agency, has a website with accurate information, but no loud public voice,” writes the NYT. The CDC is a cesspool of corruption, according to Robert F. Kennedy Jr. In fact, the CDC has a senior scientist who has assumed whistle-blower status claiming that published studies (by the CDC) looking at whether the MMR vaccine causes autism were fraudulent. The whistle-blower has stated, under oath, that senior CDC managers directed the whistle-blower and others to destroy and alter the data in order to hide the truth. The data, released by the whistle-blower, did show a strong correlation with the MMR vaccine and autism.

Why doesn’t the NYT write a lead op-ed demanding that the CDC whistle-blower testify in front of Congress about his allegations? To date, it has been over four years since the whistle-blower came forward. To date, he has not testified in front of Congress and the CDC has blocked his testimony in other settings. To date, the NYT has failed to write ONE article about this situation. Perhaps the CDC has no loud voice because it is too busy covering up the truth about vaccines. If there is nothing to hide, then why doesn’t the whistle-blower testify? Why has the CDC gagged him from speaking?

Further in the op-ed, the NYT writes, “The consequences of this disparity are substantial: a surge in outbreaks of measles, mumps, pertussis and other diseases; an increase in influenza deaths; and dismal rates of HPV vaccination, which doctors say could effectively wipe out cervical cancer if it were better utilized.”

Would declining vaccine rates increase the susceptibility for some of the vaccinated illnesses? Yes. For example, measles and chickenpox illnesses will increase if we stop vaccinating for these illnesses. But, children rarely die from measles and chickenpox in modern countries. These illnesses are often treated with supportive care and for the vast majority recovery from the illness is uneventful.

Cervical cancer deaths have rapidly fallen not from vaccines, but better medical care such as the Pap smear. The HPV vaccine has never been shown to prevent cancer and probably will not in the future. And, there are too many side effects from the HPV vaccine to recommend its use for a relatively uncommon cancer. Can measles and chickenpox cause serious effects including death? Yes. So can the vaccines.

The NYT mentions the pro-vaccine researchers are having “…to counter pseudoscience with fact” in order to prove vaccines are safe and effective.

Pseudoscience? There is no greater example of pseudoscience than saying it is safe to inject toxic items like mercury, aluminum and formaldehyde into any living being, much less a newborn infant.

Pseudoscience? How about the pseudoscience by not comparing a new vaccine with a placebo to show that it is safe. However, in today’s world, in regards to vaccines, pseudoscience rules. The fact is that childhood vaccines have not been studied against a true placebo (except for one small HPV study which found much higher adverse effects in the HPV group compared to the placebo). Big Pharma studies the vaccines against other vaccines and other toxic agents which hide the true adverse effects of vaccines.

Pseudoscience? Where are the CDC studies comparing vaccinated versus unvaccinated? This simple study could put to rest the idea that vaccines cause too many problems. The CDC refuses to do a vaccinated versus unvaccinated study even though Congress has asked for this.

The NYT mentioned the California Disneyland measles outbreak twice. Here are the facts about the Disneyland measles outbreak. A total of 147 people were sickened with measles. No deaths were reported. Of those sickened with measles, 45% were unvaccinated. Of the remaining subjects, 18% were vaccinated and 38% had unknown vaccination status. Perhaps the NYT editorial board should re-watch the Brady Bunch episode where the Brady children become infected with measles. Marcia Brady stated, “If you have to get sick, sure can’t beat the measles.”

Does the measles vaccine protect against measles infection? Yes. Can measles cause serious health problems? Yes. Are there side effects with the measles vaccine? Yes. These side effects include febrile seizures which occur in 1:640 who receive the vaccine. This is five times more often than seizures from a measles infection. Febrile seizures can increase the risk for epilepsy. Other risks of the MMR vaccine include seizures, coma, lowered consciousness, permanent brain damage and death.

The worst part of the editorial comes next. “Vaccines are not toxic, and they do not cause autism. Full stop.” Full stop is right. We need a full stop on vaccinations until the CDC whistle-blower testifies, the CDC does a vaccinated versus unvaccinated study, and the HHS department (which licenses vaccines) demands all vaccines be tested against a true placebo. Vaccines have been proven to cause autism in the Hannah Poling case. Hannah had been developing normally until at age 19 months she received nine immunizations. Shortly after the vaccinations, Hannah developed a fever, diarrhea, appetite loss, and screaming. This was accompanied by a gradual loss of speech, no longer making eye contact and not sleeping throughout the night. In 2007, the vaccine court said the vaccines she received exacerbated an underlying mitochondrial disorder which lead to a brain disease that appeared as autism. The NYT and the other Powers That Be repeat the same hypothesis over and over: vaccines are safe and do not cause autism. For a hypothesis to be proven true, it has to hold true for all cases. In the case of Hannah Poling, the hypothesis that vaccines are safe and do not cause autism has been disproved. I can assure you that there are many cases like Hannah Poling out there.

The NYT needs to do better research before reporting tired, incorrect, vaccine dogma. Parents need the proper information available to make the best choice whether vaccination is in their child’s interest or not.

[Deleted info for lecture on February 2nd 2019 at Livonia, MI]
 
Back
Top Bottom