Re: Alex Jones: COINTELPRO
Approaching Infinity said:
Jones was caught censoring content of substance. Was your 'deleted' post of any substance? Or was it just "you guys suck for hating Jones!" My guess is that your post lacked any real content (i.e. research).
I never understood and found a way to justify that modos delete posts on forum even if it is not a news site. Not deleting them is a good way to show the real face of trolls and liars. Deleting them is like agreeing with the fact we have something to hide.
---
May I know what "cointelpro" means please?
---
Last year Alex Jones was haranguing a crowd of people to join
occupy wall street and take guns. In July, he was telling exactly what is mainly reported here in the forum: the revolution became a psy-op in his mouth. Now he seems to come back to blood and rage again initiating amounts of people to fall into that trap we know so well, regarding the ancient revolutions on earth...
Come on. Should we explain one more time how those masquerades were conduced?
I guess I stopped believe in Alex Jones last year, though I really appreciated him. When he feigned to cry in one of his video show on pedophiles. It was so obviously crocodile tears. I was just disgusted.
As many people that are taken themselves for prophets when human beings don't need them, he takes most of his sources from others. Thing-in-itself is not a problem. The problem is that he does not quote the names of the people concerned.
Like this Pythagoras, who after having passed around 22 years in Egypt was incapable to convert the theorem to his own greek country. Indeed, the theorem was valuable only if you could find yourself in Egypt... Beside this blunder, he never said he was taking his source from the country of the pyramids. Aristotle remains the only one that recognizes a philosophic occupation through the egyptian priests.
Now, Alex has got followers to serve him and make more
researches. So that he's giving the self-important impression to know everything above all.
See how he is constantly repeating, I told this already in 19.. or 20..
As John Lash, he has to repeat that he was on the stage well before everybody. Really dubious.
How could they know if none talks about those things before them? The world is so full of genuine brains and the web so plenty of resources...
We know that people are paid to surf on the web or enter your computer and give your work to those liars, months or years before it would be visible or known.
When it will, so many neurones would have been already brainwashed in attempting to put serious or dangerous studies through the window.
Curiously, Alex Jones never interviewed John Lash but they listen to each other carefully. They even plagiarize each other! :D
It even appears to be a game between them, while pretending to be the first and the ones to have say this or that.
What is the importance of such conceit? They do it very often. Too much often. It betrays an enormous demand for recognition. And probably other deviances I can't see for now.
The fact is that I know something Alex talks only lightly about. And the way he never goes deep into that subject, each time he is talking about it, is really suspicious. He should have exposed it clearly already. Mainly for that, too, I don't trust him anymore.
For me this kind of men are put in place to make a big farrago in Human's brain. To conduce to "dunno what to think, so better not to". "Dunno what to say, so better stay mute". "Dunno what to do, so better not to move"...