Howdy all,
The Am-EU group finishes
Chapter 8 and
Chapter 9 of Dr. Andrew's Łobaczewski's
Logocracy: A Concept of the State System (translation by Harrison). The synopsis follows:
Logocracy - Chapter 8: The Principle of Public Sovereignty
While democracy in the past has in part passed the test of time and experience, its doctrines, in addition to not adequately aligning with the laws of nature, are idealistically naive in that they don't account for the previously mentioned psychological realities. Giving the universal right to vote without the appropriate knowledge makes it too easy for democracy to turn into a semi-secret rule of organized minorities.
In all societies, there exists a minority of individuals with mental deficiencies/deviations and moral failings that limit them from fully performing their duties as stated in democratic principles. Ponerogenic activity can stem from this and it's important to limit its flow if not alright stop it.
"We must recognize as a natural law the sovereignty of a rational society which is capable of exercising sound judgment and prudence". This principle will need to be refined naturally in a logocratic society using objective knowledge on the nature of societies. It may come to fruition with the help of increased knowledge flow in a society, and via a politically neutral organization (logocratic/civic association).
A logocratic society, in its aim of better utilizing the talents of all, will recognize the failings of democracy's party system, where there is a tendency to place into power those who are unfit to take on tremendous responsibility. The new system would have this neutral logocratic organization that would attract a wide range of folks with moderate views, as they tend to have a more critical mind, and would vote based on the personal qualities of candidates instead of falling back on a party or "tribe" mentality.
Logocracy - Chapter 9: The Principle of Competence
The principle of competence in modern societies can be seen in many jobs that require specialized training, knowledge, and/or psychological predisposition in order to perform them. Surgeons make a great examples as they not only do they need to be a doctor, but also require additional training to perform their responsibilities to society. Without proper measures in place to limit those who would not excel in such positions, society would suffer its consequences stemming from the resulting incompetence.
There is a lack of competence criteria in the political sphere, where this naivety severely misaligns it from the laws of nature. Logocracy would ameliorate this by seeing the principle of competence as a natural law, stemming from the laws of nature, and permeating this idea to all social functions. Naturally, it would be the logocratic/civic association that would oversee this principle come to fruition in political activity.
Civil Rights
To vote, one would need to take the appropriate exam and civic pledge. In engaging with this learning process, it may cultivate inspiration towards advancing their skills in these fields. The study material is as follows (up to 100 pages for each), that would be published by the aforementioned logocratic/civic association:
- Economic geography of the country
- Political history of the last ninety years
- Elements of economics and management
- Psychological and social issues
- Constitutional law
This practice would remove approximately 12% of the population from political activity. The upsides are, ironically, a higher voter turnout, increased quality of voting due to higher political awareness, and limiting those susceptible to demagogy. This process would also be available to foreigners as well, provided they complete the necessary work for the right of citizenship.
The civic pledge consists of:
- An obligation in line with logocracy—to be guided by one's own discernment of affairs
- An appeal to conscience and justice
- May include a short religious invocation of moral significance that drives one to positively influence responsible behavior.
It would not consist of:
- Commitments such as defense of borders or political orientations
- Parts that would not go well with the morally sensitive and national minorities
By completing this, it would give citizens the right to vote for all representative bodies, and perhaps the president if it's decided by the popular vote. They would also gain a civil right (not the same as a citizen right) to lower elective positions in one's community such as village leaders and aldermen, and be able to take part in local councils.
Parliamentary Members’ Rights
Would-be members of parliament should undergo academic preparation, which is scoped by parliamentary honoraria. With the help of the council of the wise, this will be refined by appropriate resolutions of parliament. Logocracy would not bar anyone who has potential talent in this sphere, and allow those to prepare for any number of years according to their current life situation.
Parliamentary study would include the five aforementioned disciplines (see Civil Rights above). Additional aspects to study are:
- Social sciences with emphasis on psychology, psychopathology, and ponerology
- Parliamentary activity and issues facing legislative work
- Principles in line with logocracy—religious cognition
Where democracy fails, these methods would create the necessary rigor and better align with the principle of competence which is sorely needed in the political sphere. This would improve adaptation of critical minds and talented people, increase resistance to demagogic activity, and create a more mature and efficient parliament.
General Offices
The chief executive offices, in its great responsibilities, will be tasked by those generally who are younger and who are fully normal and mentally fit. While some older folks have the necessary merit and talent, it is important also to consider psychologically how their age affects their performance. Is there a decline in mental activity? Do they tend to live in the past? Have they let egotism creep into their psyche over the years?
A logocratic system would be more resistant to psychopaths taking leadership positions. To bolster this resistance, it would be up to the council of the wise to remind society of how these positions of power attract those predisposed to ponerology. If they do achieve their dreams of power, history shows that large-scale devastations would follow.
The council of the wise will have a direct hand in assessing the health and mental state of candidates for these high-responsibility offices and would have the ability to veto a would-be candidate and one who is already in office if they prove to be unfit for the role. If there's pushback, an open-dialogue will be needed and the council would disclose its reasons for such a decision for the good of the public as a whole.
In closing, the principle of competence is one of the pillars of logocracy, and would be written in the first part of the constitution. It would be permeated throughout all aspects of society, while at the same time not be used as a source of privilege for the wealthy or become a self-gratifying tool for organized groups.
For Next Meeting - October 22nd, 2023
We will start
Logocracy - Chapter 10: Ownership of Property for the next time. See y'alls!